Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 492 cd/m²
Contraste: 834:1 (Preto: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.25
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 37% | 37% | 22% | 36% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 492 | 600 22% | 569 16% | 565 15% | 630 28% | 472 -4% |
| Brightness | 463 | 606 31% | 578 25% | 571 23% | 632 37% | 430 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 95 6% | 96 7% | 96 7% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.59 | 0.44 25% | 0.27 54% | |||
| Contrast | 834 | 1432 72% | 1748 110% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.2 50% | 1.3 46% | 2.3 4% | 1.5 37% | 3.5 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 3 52% | 2.1 66% | 4.8 23% | 4.3 31% | 5.9 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 1.6 64% | 1.6 64% | 1.9 58% | 2.1 53% | 4 11% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6395 102% | 6707 97% | 6401 102% | 6332 103% | 6513 100% | 7048 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1168 Hz | ≤ 36 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1168 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 36 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1168 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | Huawei P20 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 9% | -20% | -23% | -21% | 15% | 251% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 756 | 832 10% | 819 8% | 679 -10% | 704 -7% | 760 ? 1% | 1887 ? 150% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 208.1 | 196.7 -5% | 204.9 -2% | 198.7 -5% | 208.6 0% | 297 ? 43% | 1471 ? 607% |
| Random Read 4KB | 135.1 | 144.3 7% | 129.7 -4% | 149.4 11% | 148.5 10% | 152.9 ? 13% | 278 ? 106% |
| Random Write 4KB | 128.4 | 160.5 25% | 22.74 -82% | 17 -87% | 15.75 -88% | 131.6 ? 2% | 311 ? 142% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.18 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.75 / 2.25 / 2.26 Watt |
| Carga |
4.89 / 9.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 35% | 34% | 3% | 14% | 4% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.75 | 1.03 -37% | 0.84 -12% | 0.68 9% | 0.72 4% | 0.69 8% | 0.862 ? -15% | 0.88 ? -17% |
| Idle Average * | 2.25 | 2.4 -7% | 1.54 32% | 0.95 58% | 2.21 2% | 2.03 10% | 1.728 ? 23% | 1.444 ? 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.26 | 2.6 -15% | 1.57 31% | 1.09 52% | 2.22 2% | 2.1 7% | 2.07 ? 8% | 1.6 ? 29% |
| Load Average * | 4.89 | 2.96 39% | 2.47 49% | 4.58 6% | 4.6 6% | 3.18 35% | 4.87 ? -0% | 6.57 ? -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.6 | 6.6 31% | 2.49 74% | 5.16 46% | 9.34 3% | 8.73 9% | 9.27 ? 3% | 9.91 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | 15% | -14% | -13% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1678 | 1292 -23% | 1727 3% | 1343 -20% | 1402 -16% | |
| H.264 | 718 | 634 -12% | 784 9% | 674 -6% | 722 1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 716 | 564 -21% | 744 4% | 521 -27% | 679 -5% | 600 -16% |
| Load | 239 | 180 -25% | 345 44% | 237 -1% | 159 -33% |
Pro
Contra
Assim como o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S não apresenta fraquezas que valham a pena mencionar. O acabamento do smartphone Android de 5,99 polegadas é de primeira classe, a tela mostra uma imagem nítida do conteúdo, a configuração de câmera dupla pertence às melhores câmeras de smartphone atualmente, e os módulos de comunicação quase não deixam nada a desejar. Além disso, com o Snapdragon 845 vem um SoC extremamente veloz, tornando a operação do Mi Mix 2S incrivelmente fluente. Enquanto o Android 8.0, que foi modificado via MIUI 9.5, é ligeiramente diferente ao layout de um Android stock, ele pode ser navegado de forma intuitiva e, além disso, oferece alguns extras práticos.
Existem apenas alguns pontos negativos com o atual carro chefe da Xiaomi: A porta USB-C só pode lidar com velocidades USB-2.0 e não há slot microSD. Você pode substituir a porta de fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm usando o adaptador USB incluído. Em contraste com muitos dos rivais de gama alta, o Mi Mix 2S não possui certificação IP, portanto não é protegido contra poeira nem água. Aqueles que receberem o Xiaomi como importação da China, como fizemos, precisam instalar o Google Play, o que não é uma desvantagem, pois pode ser feito rapidamente.
Um feito de sucesso: Com seu poderoso desempenho geral, o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S se recomenda como uma boa alternativa para smartphones de gama alta, como o Apple iPhone X, Huawei P20 Pro ou Samsung Galaxy S9+.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
- 05/22/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
