Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A3 – O rei do preço-desempenho novamente!

Name: Xiaomi Mi A3
Brand: Xiaomi

Reduzido ou melhorado?

O Xiaomi Mi A3 novamente pretende oferecer muitos recursos de gama média por pouco dinheiro. No entanto, na verdade, não estamos vendo apenas melhorias em comparação com o antecessor. Descubra em nosso teste se o modelo 2019 ainda vale a pena.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/11/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi A3 (Mi A Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.09 polegadas 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 53 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256GB, compartilhada, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 153.5 x 71.9

Bateria

4030 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge 3.0, carga rápida de 18 W

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.79, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos at 2160p/30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 1.6μm, f/2.0, videos at 1080p/30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, capa de silicone, SIM tool, Android One, Mi Community, Mi Store, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 12/Cat 13: 600 Mbps (download), 150 Mbps (upload); SAR value: 0.301 W/kg (head), 1.097 W/kg (body); FM radio; notification LED; A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, fanless

peso

173.8 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g

Preço

200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 6X Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	333 MBit/s +94%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	221 (157^min - 243^max) MBit/s +28%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (2^min - 282^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (107^min - 117^max) MBit/s -35%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 (47^min - 58^max) MBit/s -69%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (24^min - 40^max) MBit/s -80%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 6X Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	246 MBit/s +56%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	167 (108^min - 214^max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (18^min - 227^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash	112 (94^min - 118^max) MBit/s -29%
Honor 20 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53.6 (44^min - 57^max) MBit/s -66%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (35^min - 52^max) MBit/s -67%

Xiaomi Mi A3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø158 (18-227)

Xiaomi Mi A3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø171.9 (2-282)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


349 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	376 cd/m²
343 cd/m²	348 cd/m²	357 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	366 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 376 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 354.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232

	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1"	Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Xiaomi Mi 6X LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7"
Screen		15%	14%	34%	-3%	-1%
Brightness middle	348	455 31%	471 35%	427 23%	459 32%	445 28%
Brightness	355	456 28%	453 28%	415 17%	441 24%	424 19%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	94 3%	84 -8%	91 0%	91 0%
Black Level *		0.58	0.5	0.2	0.47	0.26
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.86	4.43 24%	5.5 6%	1.95 67%	5.8 1%	5.9 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.6	6.81 56%	7.95 49%	4.47 71%	10.7 31%	9.3 40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	5.4 -50%	5 -39%	2.3 36%	7.3 -103%	6.8 -89%
Gamma	2.232 ^99%	2.248 ^98%	2.326 ^95%	2.07 ^106%	2.28 ^96%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7051 ^92%	7336 ^89%	7654 ^85%	6414 ^101%	7984 ^81%	8443 ^77%
Contrast		784	942	2135	977	1712

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

219 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 219 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 219 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1536 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1537 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1256 Points -18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1539 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1620 Points +5%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=3)	1509 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)	5507 Points +259%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5663 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5335 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4765 Points -16%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5426 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5843 Points +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5134 - 5663, n=3)	5388 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)	15246 Points +169%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5144 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2631 Points -49%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4006 Points -22%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	3133 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5486 Points +7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5122 - 5144, n=2)	5133 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 24524, n=59, last 2 years)	12211 Points +137%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7388 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	7187 Points -10%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7004 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6723 Points -16%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10)	8163 Points +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5829 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6038 Points -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5855 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5995 Points -6%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12)	6985 Points +9%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14907 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	26731 Points +13%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22445 - 25046, n=11)	23846 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	14475 Points -43%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	28984 Points +15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15403 - 25351, n=11)	24085 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	16647 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21016 Points +7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (17865 - 24652, n=11)	20749 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	795 Points -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	913 Points -49%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	876 Points -51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2023 Points +14%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1675 - 1795, n=12)	1751 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +136%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	667 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	780 Points -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	744 Points -55%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1891 Points +15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1564 - 1663, n=12)	1623 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2441 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2273 Points -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2307 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2680 Points +8%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2282 - 2596, n=12)	2427 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1360 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	941 Points -47%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1179 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2121 Points +19%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1754 - 1810, n=12)	1787 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +522%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1233 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	809 Points -52%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1065 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1981 Points +18%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1650 - 1692, n=12)	1669 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1077%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2124 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2201 Points -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1887 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2815 Points +20%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2199 - 2503, n=12)	2369 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	841 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	512 Points -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	818 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1335 Points +23%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1076 - 1152, n=12)	1119 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)	3088 Points +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	710 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	419 Points -55%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	692 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1164 Points +25%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (927 - 999, n=12)	970 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)	3272 Points +251%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2378 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2251 Points -9%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2246 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2757 Points +11%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2212 - 2580, n=12)	2418 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)	3285 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	958 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	566 Points -50%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	892 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1417 Points +25%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1097 - 1151, n=11)	1135 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)	7911 Points +597%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	829 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	467 Points -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	770 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1244 Points +26%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (980 - 999, n=11)	988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)	11758 Points +1091%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2109 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2206 Points -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2006 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2764 Points +16%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2154 - 2541, n=11)	2377 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)	4659 Points +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1365 Points +30%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1263 Points +20%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1035 - 1140, n=12)	1074 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=71, last 2 years)	2850 Points +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1220 Points +34%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1121 Points +23%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (897 - 995, n=12)	933 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=71, last 2 years)	3103 Points +242%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2336 Points +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2272 Points -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2185 - 2444, n=12)	2281 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=71, last 2 years)	2702 Points +17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	36 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	23 fps -56%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	32 fps -38%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	48 fps -8%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10)	35.4 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +67%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	39 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	24 fps -33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	34 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps +39%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10)	35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	286 fps +694%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19 fps -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	9.9 fps -71%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	17 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps -38%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10)	20.7 fps -39%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +124%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	10 fps -50%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps +15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10)	19.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	169.3 fps +747%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	13 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.5 fps -75%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	12 fps -54%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps -46%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10)	14.6 fps -44%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.4 fps +155%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	14 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	6.9 fps -47%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps +15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10)	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120 fps +823%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.8 fps -48%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps -72%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.8 fps -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps -34%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	7.69 fps -41%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.5 fps +273%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.7 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps -45%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7.7 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9 fps +27%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)	7.07 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.1 fps +915%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.6 fps -76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.9 fps -54%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12)	9.14 fps -39%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.4 fps +243%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	3.9 fps -54%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.4 fps -24%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)	8.13 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	81.6 fps +871%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	2 fps -78%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	4.1 fps -55%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)	5.53 fps -39%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.3 fps +321%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1.2 fps -57%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2.6 fps -7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +1075%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.16 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 ()	7.44 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	10.74 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.96 fps -17%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.62 fps -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2)	8.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11.99 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	10.11 fps -16%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4.41 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2)	10.1 fps -16%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	140633 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	131614 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	108408 Points -23%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	124870 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140714 Points 0%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	77652 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 ()	140633 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1092 Score
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	999 Score -9%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	552 Score -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2)	1113 Score +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +433%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2220 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1747 Points -32%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2140 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2343 Points -8%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2001 - 2556, n=9)	2271 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +149%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5238 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	4378 Points -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	4826 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4797 Points -6%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4391 - 5089, n=9)	4825 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +100%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3096 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1963 Points -38%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2823 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2470 Points -22%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1804 - 3174, n=9)	2681 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +116%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1462 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1075 Points -43%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1465 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2295 Points +22%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1881 - 1932, n=9)	1906 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +820%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points
Honor 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096	1008 Points -28%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1051 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1108 Points -21%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (926 - 1400, n=9)	1101 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +12%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +297%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	30.69 Points
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)	30.18 Points -2%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	30.01 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)	29.2 Points -5%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.92 Points -48%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +373%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	33 runs/min +12%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chome 74)	31.16 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)	29.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)	28.9 runs/min -2%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	18.23 runs/min -38%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +156%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)	63 Points +9%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	62 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	61 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	58 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)	50.9 Points -12%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +307%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	9995 Points +8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)	9695 Points +5%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	9591 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)	8901 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	8351 Points -10%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points -48%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768 ms * -113%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)	4900 ms * -7%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)	4853 ms * -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)	4783 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	4769 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4584 ms *
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)	4251 ms * +7%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi A3	Honor 20 Lite	Motorola Moto G7	Huawei P Smart Plus 2019	Xiaomi Mi 6X	Nokia 4.2	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-7%	-19%	-43%	-45%	8%	310%
Sequential Read 256KB	502	288.1 -43%	297 -41%	295.4 -41%	272 -46%	220.4 -56%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) 39%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 271%
Sequential Write 256KB	184	200.9 9%	216 17%	152.8 -17%	203.7 11%	18.17 -90%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) 22%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 686%
Random Read 4KB	126.9	38.7 -70%	69.3 -45%	40.3 -68%	73 -42%	17.51 -86%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) 8%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) 119%
Random Write 4KB	117.4	73.1 -38%	75.6 -36%	77.3 -34%	6.89 -94%	4.31 -96%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) -28%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 163%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	75.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 28%	76.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%		86.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 28%	68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33) 1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 34%	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 33%	66.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 33%		65.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 32%	52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33) 4%

Xiaomi Mi A3; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø58.7 (49-60)

Xiaomi Mi A3; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.9 (55-60)

Xiaomi Mi A3; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø25.4 (16-31)

Xiaomi Mi A3; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø17.3 (7-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


43 °C	37.9 °C	35.5 °C
42.7 °C	38.2 °C	35.7 °C
42 °C	38.5 °C	35.5 °C

Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C


34.8 °C	37.6 °C	41.8 °C
34.9 °C	38.3 °C	42.6 °C
35 °C	38.2 °C	41.1 °C

Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 34.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (126% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 2 / 3.3 Watt
Carga	4.1 / 7.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	1%	13%	14%	23%	6%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.9 -13%	1.1 -38%	0.8 -0%	0.65 19%	0.74 7%	1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11) -27%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Average *	2	1.6 20%	1.8 10%	1.2 40%	1.94 3%	1.9 5%	1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11) 5%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Maximum *	3.3	2.2 33%	2.6 21%	2.3 30%	1.97 40%	2.21 33%	2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11) 28%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 51%
Load Average *	4.1	6 -46%	4.2 -2%	4.5 -10%	4.65 -13%	3.04 26%	3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11) 8%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -60%
Load Maximum *	7.7	9.1 -18%	6.8 12%	7.3 5%	5.93 23%	4.15 46%	6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11) 14%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 44min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 57min

	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh	Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-30%	-19%	-33%	-41%	-29%
Reader / Idle	1724		1548 -10%	1346 -22%	1046 -39%
H.264	1023		819 -20%	536 -48%	608 -41%
WiFi v1.3	985	685 -30%	798 -19%	523 -47%	495 -50%	696 -29%
Load	297		219 -26%	249 -16%	192 -35%

Pro

+ Tela AMOLED com boa reprodução de cores

+ Bom equipamento de câmera

+ Muito desempenho e recursos pelo dinheiro

+ Emissor de infravermelhos

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Bom alto-falantes

+ Android puro e atual

+ Carcaça robusta e moderna

Contra

- Conexões WLAN irregulares

- Quase nenhum aumento de desempenho em comparação com o Mi A2

- Alto consumo de energia em partes

- Qualidade de voz ligeiramente oca

- Tela escura de baixa resolução

Veredicto – Principalmente mais, mas, às vezes, menos

In review: Xiaomi Mi A3. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

A pergunta que fizemos no início de nosso teste não é tão fácil de responder: Comparado ao seu antecessor, o Mi A3 foi reduzido ou melhorado? Há sinais de ambos. Existem fatores como a menor resolução da tela, o desempenho 3D ligeiramente reduzido e o maior consumo de energia. Por outro lado, está o design mais moderno, a vida duração da bateria significativamente maior, o melhor equipamento da câmera e um alto-falante que foi novamente aprimorado.

O Mi A3 também sofre de uma WLAN intermitente, que a Xiaomi deve corrigir rapidamente com uma atualização, pois caso contrário, o smartphone é quase inutilizável na WLAN para aplicativos de comunicação como o Skype.

Em algumas áreas, o Xiaomi Mi A3 é melhor que o seu antecessor. Mas a Xiaomi deve corrigir rapidamente a WLAN intermitente com uma atualização.

Os concorrentes precisam fazer um esforço contínuo, já que por 200 Euros (~ US $ 221; ~ US $ 185 nos EUA), atualmente quase ninguém mais oferece tanto poder de computação, um monitor OLED, duração da bateria que dura uma eternidade e até um design moderno. Portanto, no final, os aspectos positivos contam mais para nós, mesmo que o Mi A2 ainda ofereça a melhor relação preço-desempenho em comparação com seu sucessor por 50 Euros a menos (~$55).

Nota: O Xiaomi Mi A3 é um dos primeiros smartphones que avaliamos usando o novo Versão 7 do nosso sistema de avaliação. Como alguns critérios se tornaram mais rigorosos aqui e alguns limites de valor foram alterados para que dispositivos futuros não atinjam a escala, a classificação de acordo com a Versão 7 é mais baixa que a dos testes anteriores. Nas próximas semanas, vamos trazer os dispositivos mais importantes para a nova versão do nosso sistema de classificação, para que você possa continuar a compará-los facilmente.

Xiaomi Mi A3 - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

77%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

40 / 70 → 57%

Peso

90%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

13 / 64 → 20%

Desempenho da aplicação

59 / 86 → 68%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

62%

Médio

72%

78%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A3 – O rei do preço-desempenho novamente!

Florian Schmitt, 2019-09-11 (Update: 2019-09-16)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Principalmente mais, mas, às vezes, menos

More articles related to this device

Price comparison