Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A1
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 1359:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
| Xiaomi Mi A1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -36% | -45% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 503 | 417 -17% | 458 -9% | 434 -14% |
| Brightness | 478 | 421 -12% | 473 -1% | 404 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 88 0% | 81 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.61 -65% | 0.51 -38% | |
| Contrast | 1359 | 684 -50% | 898 -34% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 6.1 -56% | 7.1 -81% | 4.4 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.86 | 11.2 -42% | 14.5 -84% | 8.6 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.1 -45% | 10.5 -114% | 4.2 14% |
| Gamma | 2.223 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7884 82% | 8362 78% | 8951 73% | 7343 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | Nokia 6 2018 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | -6% | 78% | 51% | 1422% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 277.4 | 272.6 -2% | 270.5 -2% | 245.6 -11% | 274 ? -1% | 1887 ? 580% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 202.4 | 118.3 -42% | 139.6 -31% | 137.5 -32% | 176.6 ? -13% | 1471 ? 627% |
| Random Read 4KB | 78.1 | 38.78 -50% | 37.97 -51% | 38.2 -51% | 59.4 ? -24% | 278 ? 256% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.19 | 15.3 113% | 12.07 68% | 47.9 566% | 32.2 ? 348% | 311 ? 4225% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.6 | 83.4 ? 0% | 78.7 ? -6% | 79.7 ? -5% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.9 | 61.3 ? 6% | 49.77 ? -14% | 58.7 ? 1% | 58.3 ? 1% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   1.52 / 1.9 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.2 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt |
| Carga |
6.2 / 7.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 49% | 40% | 69% | 37% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 0.67 70% | 0.67 70% | 0.45 80% | 0.981 ? 55% | 0.88 ? 60% |
| Idle Average * | 2.8 | 1.76 37% | 1.7 39% | 0.78 72% | 1.985 ? 29% | 1.444 ? 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.4 | 1.78 48% | 1.78 48% | 0.84 75% | 2.27 ? 33% | 1.6 ? 53% |
| Load Average * | 6.2 | 2.82 55% | 4.42 29% | 1.69 73% | 3.51 ? 43% | 6.57 ? -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 4.56 37% | 6.3 12% | 3.79 47% | 5.38 ? 25% | 9.91 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 15% | 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 633 | 942 49% | 730 15% | 749 18% |
| Reader / Idle | 1833 | 1840 | 1589 | |
| H.264 | 675 | 644 | 946 | |
| Load | 362 | 254 | 477 |
Pro
Contra
O Mi A1 é o primeiro smartphone da Xiaomi que não é entregue com o sistema operacional MIUI da empresa; ele vem com Android puro. Como o Mi A1 faz parte do projeto Android One, você tem a garantia de atualizações de segurança rápidas e uma garantia de atualização de dois anos. Como o smartphone foi desenvolvido de maneira direcionada para o mercado europeu, a banda LTE, muitas vezes necessária, também está a bordo. Em termos de hardware, o Xiaomi Mi A1 é um excelente smartphone de gama média.
Uma das vantagens dos smartphones Xiaomi é sua câmera, que, para sua faixa de preços, tira fotos excelentes com o efeito Bokeh (desfocagem de profundidade). Além disso, o dispositivo oferece uma tela nítida e brilhante, um processador e memória de trabalho que são suficientemente dimensionados para aplicativos padrão, USB-C e um leitor de digitais que funciona de maneira muito confiável, embora não seja o mais rápido do mercado. Qualquer pessoa que use o Mi A1 para navegação também pode ter certeza de ter feito uma boa escolha.
Dispositivos alternativos para o Xiaomi Mi A1 são, por exemplo, o Nokia 6 (2018), o BQ Aquaris x Pro, e o Motorola Z2 Play. Todos esses dispositivos vêm com o Android e oferecem desempenho similar. Em termos de preço, o Mi A1 atualmente está significativamente abaixo dos dispositivos alternativos.
Xiaomi Mi A1
- 06/14/2018 v6 (old)
Christian Irion
Price comparison
