Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

O smartphone Mi(drange) compacto?

O Mi 9 SE sucede o Mi 8 SE e é o irmão de gama média do Mi 9. O SE é mais fino e compacto do que o seu homônimo carro-chefe, mas ainda assim conseguiu nos surpreender positivamente. Continue lendo para descobrir o que nos impressionou e se o Mi 9 SE tem deficiências.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Mi 9 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 360
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
5.97 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva multitouch, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C, OTG, Miracast, transmissor infravermelho
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G: B1, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40. 3G: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.45 x 147.5 x 70.5
Bateria
3070 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8 μm. 13 MPix ultra-wide, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. 8 MPix telephoto lens, f/2.4, 1.12 μm. Camera2 API Level: Full.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0, 0.9 μm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Cabo USB, carregador, adaptador de USB Type-C para conector de 3,5 mm, capa de silicone, MIUI 10, 12 Meses Garantia, DRM Widevine: L1 (EU), L3 (China), fanless
peso
155 g, Suprimento de energia: 42 g
Preço
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (598min - 665max) MBit/s +132%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (430min - 578max) MBit/s +91%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s +15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (138min - 294max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (229min - 303max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (250min - 285max) MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (128min - 283max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (549min - 725max) MBit/s +118%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (630min - 704max) MBit/s +117%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 341max) MBit/s +7%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (314min - 341max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (214min - 346max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (278min - 302max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s -10%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (214-346)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø279 (229-303)
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - Loop
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken with the 48 MP sensor
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Photo taken at 2x zoom
Wide-angle photo
Wide-angle photo
Default camera app filters
Default camera app filters
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app viewfinder
Default camera app settings
Default camera app settings
Default camera app modes
Default camera app modes
Video mode
Video mode
Video settings
Video settings
Manual mode
Manual mode
Video modes
Video modes

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
581
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 586 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 577.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 583 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6"
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6"
Xiaomi Poco F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen
10%
-77%
-53%
-30%
-109%
23%
Brightness middle
583
570
-2%
547
-6%
489
-16%
644
10%
537
-8%
593
2%
Brightness
577
565
-2%
525
-9%
486
-16%
628
9%
525
-9%
587
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
85
-12%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.34
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
4.6
-188%
3.8
-138%
2.64
-65%
6.41
-301%
0.9
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
3.6
8%
12.1
-210%
7.1
-82%
9.23
-137%
10.86
-178%
2
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
1.2
56%
3.9
-44%
4.4
-63%
2.5
7%
6.7
-148%
1.5
44%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.024 109%
2.099 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6267 104%
6504 100%
7158 91%
7213 90%
6649 98%
8310 78%
6548 99%
Contrast
1519
1438
926

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 255 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 255 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 255 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
1875 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)
5554 Points +196%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
5975 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)
15612 Points +161%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points -48%
Xiaomi Poco F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
  ()
7282 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)
12424 Points +71%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
125.1 Points +236%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.2 Points +54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.21 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 ()
37.2 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.25 Points -56%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9 SESamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Sony Xperia 10Xiaomi Poco F1Samsung Galaxy A50Motorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-27%
-2%
-7%
42%
206%
99%
606%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.5
295.8
-40%
273.8
-44%
705
43%
507
3%
283.6
-42%
666
35%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.1
104.9
-45%
232.9
23%
155.6
-18%
192.1
1%
208.7
10%
388.3
104%
Random Read 4KB
115.8
84
-27%
53.1
-54%
101
-13%
98.9
-15%
76.6
-34%
149.4
29%
130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37)
13%
Random Write 4KB
21.86
15.45
-29%
14.39
-34%
17.81
-19%
18.2
-17%
73.1
234%
165.3
656%
101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37)
363%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
PUBG Compare
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø29.8 (25-31)
Asphalt Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø29.3 (27-31)
Dead Trigger 2
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE: Ø59.8 (54-61)
Carga Máxima
 35.1 °C33.6 °C32 °C 
 35.6 °C34.8 °C31.8 °C 
 34.3 °C31.6 °C31.2 °C 
Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
30.9 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
30 °C32.1 °C34.2 °C
30.2 °C32.1 °C33.9 °C
Máximo: 34.2 °C
Médio: 32 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.5392531.931.53122.324.84021.721.95029.228.46326.724.98020.324.410020.526.51252325.316015.64520017.849.125016.359.131515.461.540015.963.550015.864.263013.367.980014.165.9100014.171.412501469.7160013.567.8200013.469250013.972.3315014.271.7400013.967.1500014.672.9630014.267.7800014.766.3100001568.21250014.955.41600015.338SPL26.481.5N0.852.7median 14.7median 66.3Delta0.9839.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.78.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 SEXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.53 / 1.18 / 1.2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.04 / 4.83 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-44%
-57%
-57%
-72%
-31%
-4%
-70%
Idle Minimum *
0.53
0.71
-34%
0.72
-36%
0.65
-23%
0.8
-51%
1.1
-108%
0.67
-26%
Idle Average *
1.18
1.36
-15%
2.16
-83%
1.97
-67%
1.5
-27%
1.7
-44%
1.26
-7%
1.285 ?(1.18 - 1.39, n=2)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.47
-23%
2.17
-81%
2.01
-68%
1.7
-42%
2.1
-75%
1.29
-8%
1.32 ?(1.2 - 1.44, n=2)
-10%
Load Average *
3.04
5.13
-69%
3.32
-9%
4.29
-41%
5.9
-94%
5.1
-68%
3.71
-22%
Load Maximum *
4.83
7.89
-63%
5.34
-11%
9.05
-87%
8.3
-72%
7.9
-64%
9.3
-93%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 54min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 38min
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
-10%
30%
20%
8%
9%
Reader / Idle
1374
1467
7%
1006
-27%
2088
52%
1587
16%
1650
20%
H.264
853
836
-2%
620
-27%
936
10%
869
2%
809
-5%
1008
18%
WiFi v1.3
510
605
19%
541
6%
808
58%
701
37%
715
40%
546
7%
Load
218
273
25%
233
7%
220
1%
275
26%
196
-10%
194
-11%

Pro

+ Design moderno
+ Bem construído
+ Boas câmeras
+ Alto-falante mono decente
+ Desempenho sólido do sistema
+ Belo painel OLED

Contra

- Sem certificação IP
- Sem carregamento sem fio Qi
- Somente Widevine L3 para a versão chinesa
- Memória não expansível
- Pouco suporte para LTE; sem banda 20 LTE na versão chinesa
- Sem OIS
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE smartphone review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

Com o Mi 9 SE, a Xiaomi conseguiu criar um atraente smartphone de gama média com um design compacto. O SE assume alguns dos principais recursos de seu irmão maior, mantendo os custos baixos. A Xiaomi equipou o dispositivo com um painel OLED de alto contraste, belas câmeras e um alto-falante mono decente, além de uma carcaça de excelente aparência.

A maioria de nossas críticas se torna obsoleta com a compra da edição global do Mi 9 SE. No entanto, a capacidade da bateria e a cobertura LTE são surpreendentemente baixas, independentemente do modelo que você comprar. Além disso, a falta de um slot para cartões microSD, certificação IP, um LED de notificação ou um conector para fone de ouvido parecem oportunidades perdidas de criar um smartphone de gama média ainda maior do que o Mi 9 SE já é.

Se você está procurando um polivalente que não vai quebrar o banco, então o Xiaomi Mi 9 SE poderia ser o dispositivo para você.

O Mi 9 SE é vendido por pouco mais de 300 Euros (~$336) no momento da escrita, o que o torna um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. No entanto, já o vimos quase 10% mais barato online, o que torna uma barganha ainda mais atraente. O Mi 9 SE é um fantástico smartphone de gama média nesta faixa de preço.

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE - 05/06/2019 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
43 / 60 → 72%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 63 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
67 / 70 → 95%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
77%
Médio
79%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05- 6 (Update: 2019-05- 6)