Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8

Name: Xiaomi Mi 8
Brand: Xiaomi

Mimimi?

O smartphone topo de gama Xiaomi Mi 8 de 2018 está mais do que ultrapassado, e ainda tem muito para oferecer a um preço muito baixo. Hora de descobrir como ele se compara aos atuais smartphones premium.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/14/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 8 (Mi 8 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.21 polegadas 18.75:9, 2248 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, HDR10, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 115 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro, Detecção facial (infravermelho), USB-C (OTG)

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1,800/1,900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B34/B39), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 154.9 x 74.8

Bateria

12.9 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, phase detection autofocus (dual pixel), OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 12.0 MP, f/2.4, depth of field, tele lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Videos @1080p/30fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, protetor de silicone, adaptador USB-C para 3.5 mm, MIUI, Cleanup, Mi Drop, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/E5a), QZSS (L1/L5); SAR: 0.701W/kg (head), 1.662W/kg (body);notification LED; LTE-Cat 16 (1,015 Mbit/s Download, 100 Mbit/s Upload), fanless

peso

175 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g

Preço

419 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 MBit/s +43%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s +21%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	484 (382^min - 499^max) MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	429 (256^min - 448^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s +33%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s +28%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	624 (593^min - 636^max) MBit/s +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 MBit/s +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (444^min - 499^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Mi 8; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (444-499)

Xiaomi Mi 8; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø429 (256-448)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker colors; reference color in the bottom half of each square.


432 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	449 cd/m²
422 cd/m²	430 cd/m²	447 cd/m²
424 cd/m²	426 cd/m²	443 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 449 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 434.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.08 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 430 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.257

	Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Screen		24%	10%	37%	-10%
Brightness middle	430	437 2%	429 0%	529 23%	543 26%
Brightness	434	442 2%	432 0%	527 21%	542 25%
Brightness Distribution	94	95 1%	88 -6%	96 2%	92 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.09	2.21 57%	3.39 33%	1.4 72%	6.6 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.05	4.27 47%	5.25 35%	4 50%	11 -37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	2.1 36%	3.3 -0%	1.6 52%	4.7 -42%
Gamma	2.257 ^97%	2.307 ^95%	2.238 ^98%	2.16 ^102%	1.835 ^120%
CCT	7026 ^93%	6353 ^102%	7135 ^91%	6358 ^102%	6817 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

238 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2430 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2441 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3688 Points +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2272 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)	2416 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +126%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8907 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8548 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	8786 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7934 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)	8705 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +69%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13371 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14299 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6219 Points -53%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	13194 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)	13578 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points -10%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9689 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8967 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5736 Points -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11474 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)	10123 Points +4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7983 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7360 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	5291 Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)	8368 Points +5%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55397 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	57711 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	41093 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	65330 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)	61139 Points +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77203 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77003 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	48433 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83927 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)	80548 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	27858 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30765 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	26851 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	36794 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)	33322 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4363 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points +45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4529 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3911 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6300 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)	5811 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6243 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6554 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4569 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8014 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)	7763 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2124 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2176 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2600 Points +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3603 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)	3115 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4034 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points +56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4232 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4091 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6517 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)	5761 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5328 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points +58%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5922 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	4843 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8369 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)	7671 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +270%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2181 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points +55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2145 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2650 Points +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3672 Points +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)	3094 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3356 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3197 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3244 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4700 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)	4388 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4010 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3742 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3553 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5092 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)	4919 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2137 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2118 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2486 Points +16%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3703 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)	3217 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3646 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3512 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3376 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5184 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)	4607 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4471 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4209 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3697 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5810 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)	5439 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +158%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2215 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2227 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2590 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3764 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)	3088 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +108%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)	62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	120 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	102 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	144 fps +20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	152 fps +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)	142.5 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +133%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	51 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	45 fps -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	50 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)	54.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +35%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	67 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	73 fps +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	83 fps +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)	73.1 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +147%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	45 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	24 fps -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	31 fps -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)	45.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +46%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	47 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	46 fps -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	57 fps +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)	53.9 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +149%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	28 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	24 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	14 fps -50%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	19 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)	27.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +71%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	25 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	28 fps +8%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	35 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)	33.4 fps +28%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +172%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	21 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)	29.1 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +41%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)	35.2 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +135%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)	18.6 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +70%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)	15.6 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +129%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	288062 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	243861 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	292268 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)	277434 Points

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	234421 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	232931 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	217950 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	226853 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)	225534 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3852 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3923 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	3285 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3804 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)	4111 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +63%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6620 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6556 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6234 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8135 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)	7644 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +54%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3261 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3521 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	2669 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2317 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)	3649 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +108%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7895 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7965 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	6373 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7989 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)	7797 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +114%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1292 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1288 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096	1099 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1390 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)	1344 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +21%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	87.9 Points +16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	86.1 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	80.9 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)	80.3 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	75.5 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	67.7 Points -10%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +146%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	16982 Points +13%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	15233 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)	15153 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	15086 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	14617 Points -3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)	2905 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	2818 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	2317 ms * +18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	2295 ms * +19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2282 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2078 ms * +26%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +44%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +79%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	98 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)	90.2 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	83 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9	63 Points -24%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)	251 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)	246 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	245 Points
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)	238 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	163 Points -33%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 8	OnePlus 6T	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition	Samsung Galaxy S9	Sony Xperia XZ3	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		3%	2%	6%	-1%	148%	556%
Sequential Read 256KB	693	735 6%	692 0%	815 18%	681 -2%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 10%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 165%
Sequential Write 256KB	207.8	204.4 -2%	205.2 -1%	206.9 0%	196.1 -6%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 43%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 586%
Random Read 4KB	136.3	138.5 2%	135.2 -1%	131 -4%	135.7 0%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 12%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 103%
Random Write 4KB	21	22 5%	22.65 8%	23.07 10%	22.22 6%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 527%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 1371%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard				79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	34.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard				67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	30.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43)

Arena of Valor

Xiaomi Mi 8; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (56-60)

Xiaomi Mi 8; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)

Asphalt 9

Xiaomi Mi 8; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø29.5 (28-30)

Xiaomi Mi 8; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø29.3 (27-30)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.7 °C	38.4 °C	36.7 °C
42.5 °C	38.9 °C	37.4 °C
41.6 °C	38.4 °C	36.7 °C

Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C


32.6 °C	36 °C	38.9 °C
33.5 °C	37.4 °C	39.7 °C
34.1 °C	37.7 °C	39.3 °C

Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.5 / 2.2 / 2.6 Watt
Carga	6.1 / 10.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		35%	-14%	52%	40%	24%	23%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	0.7 53%	1.8 -20%	0.65 57%	0.8 47%	0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26) 43%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.2	1.1 50%	2.9 -32%	0.81 63%	1.2 45%	1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26) 21%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	2.1 19%	3.5 -35%	0.92 65%	1.5 42%	2.07 ?(0.87 - 3.5, n=26) 20%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 38%
Load Average *	6.1	4.2 31%	4.8 21%	4.76 22%	4.8 21%	4.87 ?(3.56 - 7.41, n=26) 20%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	10.9	8.3 24%	11.2 -3%	5.16 53%	6.2 43%	9.27 ?(6.2 - 12.3, n=26) 15%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) 10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		27h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 35min

	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		15%	-7%	-30%	-31%
Reader / Idle	1634	1936 18%	1401 -14%	1182 -28%	1270 -22%
H.264	897	903 1%	921 3%	609 -32%	420 -53%
WiFi v1.3	736	865 18%	694 -6%	474 -36%	419 -43%
Load	215	261 21%	191 -11%	164 -24%	202 -6%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e bonita

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Muito desempenho

+ Preço baixo

+ Câmeras de alta qualidade

+ Tela HDR

Contra

- Muitos aplicativos não podem ser desinstalados

- GPS inexato

- Situação da garantia questionável

- Consumo comparativamente alto de energia

In Review: Xiaomi Mi 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Quando analisamos o Mi 8 Explorer Edition, julgamos ser o padrão ouro da faixa de menos de $ 400, e isso também é verdade para o Mi 8. Não é tão excepcional, apresenta menos brilho (como a tampa traseira translúcida ou o leitor de digitais na tela), mas ainda oferece componentes tradicionais bem estabelecidos a um preço justo. Mesmo muitos meses após o lançamento oficial do smartphone nos países ocidentais, ele continua sendo muito mais barato do que muitos de seus concorrentes, incluindo o autoproclamado assassino de carros chefe, o OnePlus 6T.

Pode não atender aos mais altos padrões e expectativas - seu GPS não é suficientemente preciso, seu modem Wi-Fi é muito lento e seu consumo de energia é muito alto. No entanto, no dia-a-dia, se sente como um smartphone premium com um carcaça robusta, um poderoso SoC, uma tela AMOLED com capacidade HDR e dispositivos de entrada decentes.

Graças à sua excelente relação preço-desempenho, o Xiaomi Mi 8 se mantém fiel à sua palavra.

Existem apenas duas desvantagens. Em primeiro lugar, a garantia do fabricante (ou melhor, falta dela) e o fato de que os clientes estão limitados a apenas uma potencial garantia de revendedor. E segundo, o fato de que enquanto o sistema operacional e o software foram traduzidos muito bem desta vez, a quantidade de bloatware que não pode ser desinstalada ainda é exagerada. Além disso, quando você se aprofunda nas opções e nas configurações, elas ficam muito mais… digamos, exclusiva.

No geral, o Xiaomi Mi 8 ainda merece nosso endosso total, e não apenas por causa de seu alto valor pelo dinheiro. Mal podemos esperar pelo Xiaomi Mi 9, que é esperado para aparecer na nossa porta em apenas algumas semanas.

Xiaomi Mi 8 - 03/11/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

49 / 60 → 81%

Peso

90%

Bateria