Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition

After 6 comes 8.

O último ataque à elite dos smartphones pela Xiaomi é chamado de Mi 8 Explorer Edition. No papel, o carro-chefe acessível é o pacote total a um preço razoável. Nesta análise, avaliaremos os numerosos pontos fortes do Mi 8 Explorer Edition e também os pontos fracos que refletem seu baixo preço.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Mi 8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
6.20 polegadas 18.7:9, 2248 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Infravermelho, Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Barômetro, Bússola, USB Type-C, USB On-The-Go (OTG), Miracast, Status LED, Face Unlock, VoLTE
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: B2, B3, B5, B8. CDMA: 1x EVDO BC0. WCDMA: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. TD-SCDMA: B34, B39. TD-LTE: B34, B38, B39, B40, B41; 120 MHz. FDD-LTE: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B20. LTE: B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 154.9 x 74.8
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual camera: 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55”, 1.4 μm, 4-axis, dual-pixel. 12 MP f/2.4, 1/3.4”, 1.0 μm, 2x optical zoom
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9 μm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono speaker, Teclado: Teclado virtual, 1 x OVP, 1 x USB Type-A to Type-C cable, 1x Chinese charger and EU adapter, 1 x USB Type-C to 3.5 mm adapter, 1 x Silicon case, MIUI 10, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR value: Head - 0.7 W/kg, Body – 1.66 W/kg, fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 58 g
Preço
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8

Size Comparison

161.6 mm 75.4 mm 9.3 mm 190 g156.6 mm 73.9 mm 9.7 mm 188 g155.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.75 mm 177 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g150.9 mm 74.9 mm 8.1 mm 189 g149.1 mm 70.8 mm 7.65 mm 165 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g145.2 mm 70.5 mm 7.5 mm 168 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s 0%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s -19%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
397 MBit/s -35%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s -81%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s +6%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
637 MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s -1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
574 MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s -81%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Wooded area
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Wooded area
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Wooded area
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Wooded area
Normal mode
Normal mode
HDR Mode
HDR Mode
HDR mode with AI
HDR mode with AI
2x optical zoom
2x optical zoom
Bokeh effect
Bokeh effect

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Photo of our test chart
Photo of our test chart
Test chart in detail
425
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 460 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 431.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 429 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Huawei P20
LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.8"
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3"
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6"
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"
Screen
-15%
-37%
-0%
54%
12%
24%
32%
Brightness middle
429
620
45%
549
28%
492
15%
753
76%
430
0%
395
-8%
529
23%
Brightness
432
586
36%
541
25%
463
7%
748
73%
437
1%
402
-7%
527
22%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
95
8%
90
2%
96
9%
87
-1%
90
2%
96
9%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
0.59
0.37
0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.39
4.8
-42%
6.08
-79%
2.4
29%
1.3
62%
2.3
32%
1.6
53%
1.4
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.25
8.8
-68%
10.69
-104%
6.2
-18%
2.3
56%
4.6
12%
3.4
35%
4
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
5.3
-61%
6.6
-100%
4.5
-36%
1.7
48%
2.4
27%
1.1
67%
1.6
52%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.25 98%
2.305 95%
2.25 98%
2.18 101%
2.28 96%
2.14 103%
2.16 102%
CCT
7135 91%
7473 87%
8399 77%
6395 102%
66.76 9736%
6160 106%
6536 99%
6358 102%
Contrast
2214
1307
834
2035
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
162183 Points -30%
Huawei P20
179393 Points -23%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points -1%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points -3%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
266601 Points -7%
Huawei P20
200756 Points -30%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points -7%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points -4%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
9179 Points +2%
Huawei P20
8700 Points -3%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points +7%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points +13%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points -9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8078 Points +10%
Huawei P20
7002 Points -5%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points +13%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)
8368 Points +14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3614 Points -8%
Huawei P20
3288 Points -16%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points +10%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +59%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5792 Points -12%
Huawei P20
5797 Points -12%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points +26%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +55%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points +15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3012 Points -14%
Huawei P20
4154 Points +18%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points +8%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +91%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
7918 Points -1%
Huawei P20
3697 Points -54%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +110%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
1234 Points -4%
Huawei P20
1313 Points +2%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points +8%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +21%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2456 Points +1%
Huawei P20
1886 Points -23%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5422 Points +122%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8937 Points +5%
Huawei P20
6557 Points -23%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
14892 Points +74%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points -5%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)
11924 Points -17%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
56913 Points -1%
Huawei P20
30845 Points -47%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points +8%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
76078 Points -1%
Huawei P20
34146 Points -56%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points +6%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points -34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
30245 Points -2%
Huawei P20
23046 Points -25%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points +11%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points +10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4540 Points 0%
Huawei P20
3354 Points -26%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points +39%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
6630 Points +1%
Huawei P20
3550 Points -46%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points +26%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points +58%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2159 Points -1%
Huawei P20
2811 Points +29%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points +59%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points +18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4248 Points +33%
Huawei P20
2982 Points -7%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points +46%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5181 Points +38%
Huawei P20
3040 Points -19%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points +39%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points +42%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points +61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2606 Points +23%
Huawei P20
2795 Points +32%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points +62%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points +55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps +3%
Huawei P20
59 fps +2%
OnePlus 6
60 fps +3%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
85.7 fps +48%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
150 fps +47%
Huawei P20
125 fps +23%
OnePlus 6
150 fps +47%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)
142.5 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
279 fps +174%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps +10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps +16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
59 fps +16%
Huawei P20
56 fps +10%
OnePlus 6
58 fps +14%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75 fps +47%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps +52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
74 fps +37%
Huawei P20
59 fps +9%
OnePlus 6
66 fps +22%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps +35%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
164.1 fps +204%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps +45%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps +83%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
55 fps +90%
Huawei P20
39 fps +34%
OnePlus 6
54 fps +86%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps +56%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +125%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps +88%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps +88%
Huawei P20
39 fps +22%
OnePlus 6
56 fps +75%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps +68%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
116.5 fps +264%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps +29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
34 fps +42%
Huawei P20
23 fps -4%
OnePlus 6
32 fps +33%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.5 fps +98%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
35 fps +40%
Huawei P20
23 fps -8%
OnePlus 6
35 fps +40%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps +34%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
70.3 fps +181%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.7 Points +8%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.9 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)
80.3 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.5 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.8 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.7 Points -16%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
56.2 Points -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +151%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points +16%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points -19%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
11468 Points -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
3979 ms * -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2668 ms * -15%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * -6%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2410 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2317 ms *
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2078 ms * +10%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +32%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points +2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)
246 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points -9%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
182 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points -35%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionXiaomi Mi 6Xiaomi Black SharkXiaomi Mi Mix 2SHuawei P20OnePlus 6HTC U12 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
101%
119%
159%
0%
86%
5%
137%
534%
Sequential Read 256KB
692
728
5%
742
7%
756
9%
827
20%
726
5%
709
2%
815
18%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.2
196.7
-4%
199.6
-3%
208.1
1%
193.6
-6%
201.4
-2%
195.8
-5%
206.9
1%
Random Read 4KB
135.2
143.5
6%
127.2
-6%
135.1
0%
147
9%
137
1%
118.1
-13%
131
-3%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
13%
Random Write 4KB
22.65
25.19
11%
114.1
404%
128.4
467%
161.5
613%
21.8
-4%
104.2
360%
23.07
2%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
481%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 43.7 °C40.3 °C38.8 °C 
 44.1 °C40.3 °C39.5 °C 
 43.3 °C40.3 °C39 °C 
Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 41 °C
37.8 °C39.5 °C40.7 °C
36.6 °C38.6 °C42.8 °C
36.9 °C38.9 °C41.8 °C
Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.727.92533.935.63147.6504031.234.6503837.56327.128.38027.129.410024.627.312520.634.316018.840.920018.546.425017.749.73151752.240016.55950016.961.163014.463.78001468.3100013.567.5125013.765.9160013.967.3200012.767.8250012.770.1315012.769.4400012.566.6500011.963630011.461.6800011.564.41000011.664.11250011.552.81600011.442.5SPL70.167.725.778.7N25.721.20.743median 13.9median 63median 13.2median 60.8Delta4.310.312.517.922.924.324.224.125.12522.230.227.739.917.420.717.517.214.918.61419.514.732.112.243.413.649.513.153.910.857.29.754.29.357.19.6628.2668.168.1869.97.771.37.875.17.874.47.869.47.864.47.857.48.159.78.157.98.147.98.129.257.920.681.69.90.343.5median 8.2median 57.2median 62.63.91519hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionOnePlus 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (108.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.9 / 3.5 Watt
Carga midlight 4.8 / 11.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
30%
25%
26%
44%
20%
53%
30%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
0.45
75%
0.8
56%
0.75
58%
0.67
63%
0.6
67%
0.77
57%
0.65
64%
0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
52%
Idle Average *
2.9
1.67
42%
1.5
48%
2.25
22%
2.05
29%
1
66%
2.18
25%
0.81
72%
1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
40%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
1.69
52%
2.3
34%
2.26
35%
2.11
40%
1.6
54%
2.21
37%
0.92
74%
Load Average *
4.8
4.07
15%
4.8
-0%
4.89
-2%
6.15
-28%
4.3
10%
6.25
-30%
4.76
1%
Load Maximum *
11.2
8.54
24%
10.1
10%
9.6
14%
8.09
28%
8.6
23%
10.16
9%
5.16
54%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 21min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 11min
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
10%
7%
24%
14%
-13%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1401
1753
25%
1678
20%
1888
35%
1806
29%
1452
4%
1182
-16%
H.264
921
747
-19%
718
-22%
810
-12%
791
-14%
464
-50%
609
-34%
WiFi v1.3
694
739
6%
711
2%
716
3%
818
18%
762
10%
507
-27%
474
-32%
Load
191
253
32%
239
25%
295
54%
246
29%
230
20%
164
-14%

Pro

+ Muita memória - 128 GB de ROM, 8 GB de RAM
+ Acabamento e sensação premium
+ design marcante (Explorer Edition)
+ Painel OLED
+ LTE banda 20
+ Bom desempenho
+ Opções de desbloqueio biométrico rápido (Mi 8)

Contra

- O MIUI e o GPS precisam de uma otimização do software
- Alto-falante
- Altas temperaturas da superfície
- A Explorer Edition tem uma duração de bateria abaixo da média sob uso intenso contínuo
- USB 2.0
The Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.com
The Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition review. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.com

A Xiaomi criou um dos smartphones com melhor relação custo-benefício deste ano, algo que não esperávamos, dados os dispositivos Mi anteriores. Inclusive recomendamos a atualização do Mi 6 para o Mi 8 pelas ótimas melhorias e refinamentos

Se você se deparar com a pergunta sobre qual versão do Mi 8 deve escolher, então nossa resposta é clara: Escolha o Mi 8 regular, particularmente agora que está 200 Euros (~$231) mais barato. Ignorando a diferença de preço, o Mi 8 regular é o melhor smartphone com sua duração de bateria superior e seu sensor de digitais mais confiável. O Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition vai atrair olhares com sua parte traseira marcante, seus 2 GB adicionais de RAM e tecnologias biométricas inovadoras. Este último não é mais rápido do que os mais convencionais que o Mi8 regular usa.

Você não irá errar com o Xiaomi Mi 8, mas não é o melhor smartphone do ano.

Independentemente do Explorer Edition, o Mi 8 é um impressionante smartphone premium. No entanto, o dispositivo está longe de ser um smartphone top do 2018. As câmeras, o alto-falante, o software, o GPS e a falta de certificação IP e carregamento sem fio distinguem o Mi 8 Explorer Edition dos carros-chefe mais caros. Isso é aceitável, dado o preço da Explorer Edition, especialmente considerando que a Xiaomi fez muitas coisas bem com o dispositivo.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - 09/24/2018 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
90%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
80%
Médio
80%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)