Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 459 cd/m²
Contraste: 977:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Xiaomi Mi 6X LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | TP-Link Neffos N1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris VS Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XA1 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto X4 LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 23% | 12% | -3% | 34% | 18% | 9% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 459 | 580 26% | 634 38% | 522 14% | 458 0% | 545 19% | 469 2% | 395 -14% |
| Brightness | 441 | 560 27% | 635 44% | 499 13% | 463 5% | 526 19% | 479 9% | 402 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 96 5% | 92 1% | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 86 -5% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.3 36% | 0.49 -4% | 0.74 -57% | 0.22 53% | 0.42 11% | 0.37 21% | 0.37 21% |
| Contrast | 977 | 1933 98% | 1294 32% | 705 -28% | 2082 113% | 1298 33% | 1268 30% | 1068 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5.6 3% | 5.9 -2% | 4.2 28% | 4 31% | 4.9 16% | 5.5 5% | 1.6 72% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 11.2 -5% | 11.6 -8% | 11.5 -7% | 7.4 31% | 8.5 21% | 10.7 -0% | 3.4 68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 7.4 -1% | 7.8 -7% | 6.4 12% | 4.7 36% | 5.4 26% | 6.7 8% | 1.1 85% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7984 81% | 8584 76% | 8464 77% | 7044 92% | 7425 88% | 7610 85% | 8064 81% | 6536 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1174 Hz | ≤ 21 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1174 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1174 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=11) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6426, n=13) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 59, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 40, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 30, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.2 - 15, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 18, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Motorola Moto X4 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8 - 9.1, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
| TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | TP-Link Neffos N1 | BQ Aquaris VS Plus | Sony Xperia XA1 | Nokia 7 Plus | HTC U11 Life | Motorola Moto X4 | HTC U12 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 132% | -10% | 9% | 42% | 135% | 157% | 408% | 83% | 1460% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 272 | 262.1 -4% | 274.3 1% | 248.5 -9% | 283.1 4% | 268 -1% | 281.6 4% | 709 161% | 274 ? 1% | 1839 ? 576% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 203.7 | 184.6 -9% | 205.1 1% | 127.8 -37% | 211.6 4% | 120 -41% | 120.5 -41% | 195.8 -4% | 176.2 ? -14% | 1425 ? 600% |
| Random Read 4KB | 73 | 57.4 -21% | 48.3 -34% | 66.2 -9% | 54.7 -25% | 39.3 -46% | 45.4 -38% | 118.1 62% | 59.4 ? -19% | 277 ? 279% |
| Random Write 4KB | 6.89 | 45.48 560% | 6.4 -7% | 13.2 92% | 19.62 185% | 50.2 629% | 55.3 703% | 104.2 1412% | 32 ? 364% | 309 ? 4385% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.9 ? | 84.5 ? | 78.4 ? | 82.2 | 82.8 ? | 83.9 ? | 84.3 ? | 77.4 ? | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.4 ? | 60.6 ? | 68 ? | 62.3 | 59.8 ? | 60 ? | 63.6 ? | 58.3 ? |
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 60 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 28 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U11 Life audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.65 / 1.94 / 1.97 Watt |
| Carga |
4.65 / 5.93 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh | TP-Link Neffos N1 3260 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -8% | 43% | -6% | 7% | 13% | -29% | -41% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.65 | 0.69 -6% | 0.79 -22% | 0.64 2% | 0.65 -0% | 0.63 3% | 0.65 -0% | 0.77 -18% | 1.052 ? -62% | 0.894 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 1.94 | 1.64 15% | 2.29 -18% | 0.81 58% | 1.76 9% | 2.1 -8% | 1.51 22% | 2.18 -12% | 2.62 ? -35% | 1.456 ? 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.97 | 1.67 15% | 2.3 -17% | 0.86 56% | 1.78 10% | 2.15 -9% | 1.57 20% | 2.21 -12% | 2.88 ? -46% | 1.616 ? 18% |
| Load Average * | 4.65 | 2.59 44% | 3.84 17% | 2.09 55% | 4.47 4% | 3.34 28% | 3.88 17% | 6.25 -34% | 5.1 ? -10% | 6.45 ? -39% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.93 | 4.36 26% | 5.95 -0% | 3.31 44% | 9.13 -54% | 4.83 19% | 5.47 8% | 10.16 -71% | 9.08 ? -53% | 9.8 ? -65% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh | TP-Link Neffos N1 3260 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 57% | 30% | 33% | 24% | 52% | 39% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1046 | 1433 37% | 1703 63% | 1820 74% | 1652 58% | 1452 39% | ||
| H.264 | 608 | 751 24% | 706 16% | 798 31% | 688 13% | 464 -24% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 495 | 776 57% | 644 30% | 675 36% | 672 36% | 725 46% | 659 33% | 507 2% |
| Load | 192 | 256 33% | 158 -18% | 303 58% | 289 51% | 230 20% |
Pro
Contra
O Xiaomi Mi 6X é um poderoso smartphone de gama média, que custa menos que outros smartphones equipados de forma similar que estão disponíveis na Europa. O desempenho e as opções de conectividade são impressionantes para um smartphone nesta faixa de preços. A qualidade de construção e a carcaça de alumínio também estão em outro nível.
A Xiaomi fez alguns recortes quando se trata do alto-falante, o slot para cartão SD faltante e a capacidade relativamente baixa da bateria. O reconhecimento facial também funciona de forma muito pobre e o módulo de câmera dupla sofre sob condições de baixa iluminação.
A disponibilidade limitada, o software chinês e cobertura LTE insuficiente fazem com que seja difícil de recomendar o Mi 6X para usuários alemães. Tudo isto mudará quando o Mi A2 venha para a Europa.
O Xiaomi Mi 6X se tornará interessante assim quando seu modelo irmão Mi A2 venha para o mercado europeu, o que deve ocorrer em início de agosto. O Mi A2 contará com Android One e suportará a banda LTE 20. O Mi 6X é um smartphone bem completo que oferece hardware poderoso e faz apenas algumas concessões quando comparado com outros aparelhos nesta faixa de preço.
Xiaomi Mi 6X
- 07/02/2018 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
