Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 4s

Telefone de gama alta por um preço de baixa. O Mi 4s dá um bom motivo para gastar $300 USD em um novo smartphone, em vez de $600 ou $700 por um modelo topo de linha. Descubra como o Xiaomi se compara com concorrentes tanto da gama alta como da baixa.
Xiaomi Mi 4s (Mi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Placa gráfica
Memória
2.7 GB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Leitor de digitais, acelerômetro, gyro, proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 A2DP, Bandas 2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2, CDMA 800 / 1900, Bandas 3G: HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 TD-SCDMA, Bandas 4G: LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 139.3 x 70.8
Bateria
3210 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, autofoco de detecção facial, flash dual-LED (dual tone)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0, 1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Monaural, Carregador de parede, cabo USB Type-C, Guia de início rápido
peso
133 g
Preço
350 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g147 mm 72.6 mm 8 mm 136 g144 mm 71.5 mm 10.5 mm 140 g146 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 143 g143.5 mm 70 mm 7.9 mm 140 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g139.3 mm 70.8 mm 7.8 mm 133 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g131 mm 67 mm 10 mm 141 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Left: Micro-SIM + Nano-SIM/MicroSD slots
Left: Micro-SIM + Nano-SIM/MicroSD slots
Bottom: USB Type-C port
Bottom: USB Type-C port
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Right: Power button, Volume rocker
Top: IR blaster, 3.5 mm audio
Top: IR blaster, 3.5 mm audio
440.2
cd/m²
488.3
cd/m²
471.6
cd/m²
445.2
cd/m²
488.2
cd/m²
482.7
cd/m²
431.5
cd/m²
498.7
cd/m²
490.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 498.7 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 470.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.763 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 869:1 (Preto: 0.562 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.06 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4
Xiaomi Mi 4s
5", 1920x1080
Google Nexus 5X
5.2", 1920x1080
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
5", 1280x720
HTC One A9
5", 1920x1080
OnePlus X
5", 1920x1080
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36.4 ?(12.8, 23.6)
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 ?(6, 15.6)
PWM Frequency
237 ?(25)
Screen
25%
25%
8%
-63%
Brightness middle
488.2
503
3%
467
-4%
346
-29%
312
-36%
Brightness
471
498
6%
460
-2%
349
-26%
314
-33%
Brightness Distribution
87
97
11%
95
9%
93
7%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.562
0.38
32%
0.3
47%
Contrast
869
1324
52%
1557
79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.48
2.09
40%
3.28
6%
1.55
55%
6.28
-80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.01
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.06
2.12
31%
1.89
38%
2.05
33%
8.24
-169%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.15 102%
2.12 104%
CCT
6627 98%
6621 98%
6734 97%
6267 104%
8145 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
25% / 25%
25% / 25%
8% / 8%
-63% / -63%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
839 MFLOPS +51%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
819 MFLOPS +47%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
275 MFLOPS -51%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
264.4 MFLOPS -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
207.7 MFLOPS -63%
Single Thread
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
630 MFLOPS +49%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
626 MFLOPS +48%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
423.5 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
134 MFLOPS -68%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
117.1 MFLOPS -72%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
114.2 MFLOPS -73%
PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1756 Points
Storage score
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3900 Points
Work 2.0 performance score
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3293 Points
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5050 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4735 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4282 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3701 Points -22%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3589 Points -24%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3494 Points -26%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65936 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
63166 Points
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
36800 Points -42%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4843 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4154 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1563 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1329 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1066 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
528 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5619 Points +76%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4804 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3185 Points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2824 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2558 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1561 Points -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1503 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1253 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1140 Points -9%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
717 Points -43%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
623 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
526 Points -58%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10540 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9334 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7700 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7650 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3917 Points -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3125 Points -59%
Browsermark - 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2731 points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2368 points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2111 points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1471 points -38%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1233 points -48%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1203 points -49%
Sunspider
1.0 Total Score
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1573 ms * -144%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1518 ms * -135%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1235 ms * -91%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
740 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
645 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
347.1 ms * +46%
0.9.1 Total Score
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1396 ms * -128%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
613 ms *
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.19 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.39 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.29 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
24.51 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
20.83 Points -53%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.13 Points -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13679 ms * -197%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
11843 ms * -157%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11694 ms * -154%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585 ms * -43%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4609 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4037 ms * +12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8650 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8143 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3764 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3296 Points -60%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3040 Points -63%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points -18%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
58 Points -40%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52 Points -46%
Vellamo 3.x
Metal
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2583 Points +16%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2526 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2224 Points
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1291 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
1219 Points -45%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1128 Points -49%
Multicore Beta
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3425 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2287 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2272 Points -1%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1519 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1025 Points -55%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
966 Points -58%
Browser
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5463 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4665 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4526 Points -3%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2753 Points -41%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2043 (1641min) Points -56%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1849 Points -60%
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - ---
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
36419 points +72%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31148 points +47%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21167 points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20276 points -4%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
17712 points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15455 points -27%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
15455 points -27%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4498 points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4399 points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4325 points -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3234 points -26%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2948 points -33%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2523 points -43%
Productivity Index
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13558 points +183%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10472 points +118%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
4962 points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4793 points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4194 points -12%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3820 points -20%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2345 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1935 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1534 Points -21%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1128 Points -42%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1069 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
811 Points -58%
2D Graphics Tests
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5395 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5274 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4601 Points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2835 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2745 Points -40%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1818 Points -60%
Memory Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6924 Points +18%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6632 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5859 Points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4838 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
3154 Points -46%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2457 Points -58%
Disk Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
68872 Points +69%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44133 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40846 Points
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35176 Points -14%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23839 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
7518 Points -82%
CPU Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
176225 Points +91%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
126720 Points +38%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
120120 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
92136 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
13288 Points -86%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10592 Points -89%
System
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8438 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6958 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6462 Points -7%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4454 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3050 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2966 Points -57%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20.95 MB/s +37%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15.27 MB/s
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14.22 MB/s -7%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.21 MB/s -20%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.48 MB/s -44%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.61 MB/s -76%
Random Read 4KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
89.9 MB/s +178%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.3 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.8 MB/s -23%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20.68 MB/s -36%
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16.31 MB/s -50%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10 MB/s -69%
Sequential Write 256KB
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
159.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151.1 MB/s -5%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.6 MB/s -38%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
90 MB/s -44%
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.31 MB/s -69%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.61 MB/s -75%
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
383 MB/s +55%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246.8 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
245.2 MB/s -1%
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
235.5 MB/s -5%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
187.6 MB/s -24%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
144.5 MB/s -41%
3DMark
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9723 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
9544 Points -2%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8761 Points -10%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6137 Points -37%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10381 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4969 Points -52%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3783 Points -64%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2135 Points -79%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10227 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5498 Points -46%
Bluboo Xtouch
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4136 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
2580 Points -75%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.52 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
11.18 fps +75%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.39 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
0.74 fps -88%
Carga Máxima
 43.2 °C37.2 °C42.4 °C 
 42.4 °C37.2 °C43.6 °C 
 38.8 °C36.4 °C38.8 °C 
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 40 °C
32.2 °C35.2 °C42.6 °C
32.6 °C35.2 °C43 °C
32.2 °C35.2 °C36.8 °C
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
28%
57%
38%
56%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
0.55
61%
0.5
64%
0.9
36%
0.6
57%
Idle Average *
2.15
1.44
33%
0.9
58%
1.2
44%
0.91
58%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
1.9
18%
1.1
53%
1.4
40%
1.12
52%
Load Average *
6.41
3.36
48%
2.4
63%
3.8
41%
3.04
53%
Load Maximum *
8.11
9.76
-20%
4.3
47%
5.9
27%
3.2
61%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 4s
3260 mAh
Google Nexus 5X
2700 mAh
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
2070 mAh
HTC One A9
2150 mAh
OnePlus X
2525 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-27%
-8%
35%
Reader / Idle
1499
1775
18%
1154
-23%
968
-35%
WiFi v1.3
367
412
12%
267
-27%
368
0%
549
50%
Load
179
245
37%
176
-2%
339
89%
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 59min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 59min

Pro

+ Tela de alta qualidade; cores precisas e escala de cinzas
+ Rápido desempenho do armazenamento
+ USB Tipo-C (velocidades 2.0)
+ Perfil fino e design elegante
+ Bateria de alta capacidade
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Retro iluminação brilhante
+ Boa câmera
+ Leve
+ Controle remoto de IV
+ Dual SIM

Contra

- Slot MicroSD compartilhado com o slot de SIM secundário
- Leve afogamento sob estresse extremo
- A resposta táctil poderia ser mais forte
- A retro iluminação poderia ser mais uniforme
- Bateria não removível
- Bastante morno sob uso intenso
- Duração média da bateria
- Sem NFC ou MHL
- Escorregadio
In review: Xiaomi Mi 4s. Test model provided by iBuyGou.com
In review: Xiaomi Mi 4s. Test model provided by iBuyGou.com

É difícil encontrar falhas maiores no Mi 4s. O desempenho está no escalão superior de um smartphone convencional e seu design dá uma impressão de que é mais caro do que o seu preço de venda sugere. A qualidade da tela é excelente e com uma luz de fundo forte, enquanto que o leitor de digitais, capacidade para dois SIMs, leitor de MicroSD, e o peso muito leve só adicionam à lista de vantagens. O Mi 4s se sente muito balanceado sem características que fiquem abaixo das expectativas.

Em vez disso, o Mi 4s possui um número sensato de desvantagens que o separam de telefones de quase o dobro do seu preço. A luz de fundo de sua tela é um pouco irregular e o nosso modelo de teste mostrou uma brecha notável entre as bordas do chassi. Recursos auxiliares como NFC e carregamento sem fio estão faltando e sua porta USB Type-C é limitada a especificações do USB 2.0. A duração da bateria e as temperaturas da superfície não são horríveis, mas têm muito espaço para melhorar.

O preço de venda de $300 a $350, no entanto, joga o Mi 4s diretamente em contra do Nexus 5X. A tela ligeiramente maior e mais brilhante do Nexus, vida mais longa da bateria, temperaturas mais baixas, NFC, e a experiência do Android puro, são todas razões válidas para escolher o telefone da Google sobre o Xiaomi. Se o design, dual SIM, e capacidades MicroSD do telefone Xiaomi são mais atraentes, então o 4s Mi tem a ligeira vantagem.

Smartphone projetado de forma atraente com estatísticas acima da média de baixo para cima. Alguns aspectos são menos do que estelares, onde outros smartphones tradicionais com preços similares são capazes de superar o Xiaomi.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Xiaomi Mi 4s - 04/21/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
84 / 75 → 100%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
33 / 60 → 55%
Peso
94%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
25 / 63 → 40%
Desempenho da aplicação
48 / 70 → 68%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Camera
56%
Médio
70%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 4s
Allen Ngo, 2016-03-27 (Update: 2017-05-23)