Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 10: Mais Megapixels

Name: Xiaomi Mi 10
Brand: Xiaomi

Chinês de gama alta.

Os fabricantes gostam de anunciar seus dispositivos com grandes números, e a Xiaomi não é exceção aqui. Assim, somente com mencionar um sensor de 108 MP, é garantido que a câmera chamará a atenção. Em nosso teste, ele finalmente tem que provar se mais megapixels realmente fazem uma imagem melhor.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 10 (Mi 10 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 386 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, e-compass, barômetro, USB-C, IR blaster

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/40), 5G Sub6G (n1/n3/n7/n28/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.96 x 162.6 x 74.8

Bateria

4780 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix 108 MP (f/1.7, 1/1.33", 0.8µm) + 13 MP (ultra wide-angle, f/2.4, 12mm) + 2 MP (depth, f/2.4) + 2MP (macro, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 1/3", 0.9µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, fones, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, capa protetora, MIUI 11.0.24, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.69 W/kg, SAR value (body): 0.99 W/kg, fanless

peso

208 g, Suprimento de energia: 121 g

Preço

799 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Oppo Find X2 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	202 g	512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	3168x1440
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	199 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.78"	3168x1440
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	163 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.20"	3200x1440
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	175 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1296 (1095^min - 1376^max) MBit/s +49%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	882 (847^min - 902^max) MBit/s +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (767^min - 904^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	509 (264^min - 571^max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P40 Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1368 (1104^min - 1442^max) MBit/s +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 8 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	831 (745^min - 872^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	827 (791^min - 846^max) MBit/s -8%
Oppo Find X2 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	754 (346^min - 881^max) MBit/s -17%

Xiaomi Mi 10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (881-916)

Xiaomi Mi 10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø853 (440-907)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 10 (Hauptkamera)

Canon EOS 70 D

LG G8s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 10 (Ultraweit)

Canon EOS 70 D

LG G8s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 10 (5-fach Zoom)

Canon EOS 70 D

LG G8s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi 10 (LowLight)

Canon EOS 70 D

LG G8s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10: 9.65 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 20.57 ∆E


775 cd/m²	784 cd/m²	810 cd/m²
777 cd/m²	786 cd/m²	810 cd/m²
782 cd/m²	786 cd/m²	811 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 811 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 791.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 786 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Oppo Find X2 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7"	OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S20 AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2"	Huawei P40 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Screen		-134%	17%	-45%	-64%
Brightness middle	786	778 -1%	796 1%	745 -5%	583 -26%
Brightness	791	775 -2%	779 -2%	740 -6%	593 -25%
Brightness Distribution	96	99 3%	94 -2%	97 1%	94 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	4.4 -300%	0.68 38%	2.67 -143%	3.03 -175%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.2	8.7 -295%	1.55 30%	4.52 -105%	5.33 -142%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	5.6 -211%	1.1 39%	2 -11%	2 -11%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.26 ^97%	2.237 ^98%	2.092 ^105%	2.301 ^96%
CCT	6315 ^103%	7250 ^90%	6310 ^103%	6240 ^104%	6621 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

362.3 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 362.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 362.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	911 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	903 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	755 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	906 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +9%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3360 Points +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3318 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2731 Points -17%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	2988 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3338 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points 0%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2829 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2960 Points +5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3027 Points +7%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3606 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2932 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points +164%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2549 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2641 Points +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2659 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3670 Points +44%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	2693 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2519 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points +212%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13360 Points +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13471 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14708 Points +24%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	11268 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	13142 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11387 Points +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11153 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10431 Points -2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8736 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10952 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points +6%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8581 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8866 Points +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8811 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5646 Points -34%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3973 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9123 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12234 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11458 Points -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11371 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6388 Points -48%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3894 Points -68%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12394 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4196 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5054 Points +20%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4928 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4015 Points -4%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4279 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4729 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8499 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9616 Points +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9807 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7981 Points -6%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4432 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8823 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 11492, n=22)	9645 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12601 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12573 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12665 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11301 Points -10%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4293 Points -66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12694 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 16809, n=22)	12921 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3973 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5209 Points +31%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5480 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3935 Points -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4998 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4283 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=22)	5138 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7190 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7012 Points -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7117 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6732 Points -6%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5651 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7157 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8371 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8045 Points -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8106 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8411 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6244 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8299 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4813 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4582 Points -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4987 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3963 Points -18%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4242 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4895 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7957 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7982 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8111 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6638 Points -17%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6140 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7986 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8947, n=23)	8073 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9389 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9345 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9379 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8106 Points -14%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6606 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9356 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 11999, n=22)	9501 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5187 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5187 Points 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5506 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4063 Points -22%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4924 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5277 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4733 - 5780, n=22)	5319 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6182 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6444 Points +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6618 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5139 Points -17%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5456 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6578 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 6961, n=20)	6202 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8175 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8076 Points -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8279 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6315 Points -23%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6326 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8173 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7618 - 9104, n=19)	8249 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3336 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3843 Points +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3888 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3112 Points -7%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3684 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3830 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1786 - 4061, n=19)	3414 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -33%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps -33%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	202 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	151 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	203 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +39%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	58 fps -34%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps -32%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46 fps -48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps -14%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	123 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	108 fps -12%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	100 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	122 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +34%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps -40%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps -21%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	57 fps -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	77 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps -12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps -1%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33 fps -62%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +36%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	26 fps -38%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	43 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +14%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +41%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28 fps -39%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps +9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	42 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	54 fps +2%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	54 (20^min) fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +51%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	18 fps -38%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps -24%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	27 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +29%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	20 fps 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29 fps +45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +60%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	599843 Points +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	585231 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	504192 Points -11%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	450373 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	595466 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5540 Points -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5993 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4764 Points -17%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5105 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6072 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +9%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9555 Points -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10058 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8843 Points -10%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8992 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10002 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +4%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6350 Points -15%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7240 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4271 Points -43%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6942 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7945 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11496 Points -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11842 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10703 Points -9%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	8634 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11567 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +44%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points
Oppo Find X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1351 Points +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1496 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1274 Points 0%
Huawei P40 HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1260 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1514 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +23%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +137%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	65 Points +28%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	64.6 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points +25%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	63.4 Points +25%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	55.6 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	53.9 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	115.4 Points +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	114.8 Points +5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	114.7 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)	113.1 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	109.2 Points
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	103.2 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	93.5 Points -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +142%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	71 runs/min +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	68.6 runs/min +22%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)	67.7 runs/min +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min +14%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	63 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)	50.8 runs/min -10%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points -10%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	104 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	101 Points -14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	100 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	97 Points -18%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	95 Points -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +69%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	23678 Points +8%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	22976 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	22834 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	21348 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	18162 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)	2511 ms * -19%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)	2287 ms * -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms *
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)	2044 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)	2021 ms * +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)	1945 ms * +8%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +25%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 10	Oppo Find X2 Pro	OnePlus 8 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S20	Huawei P40	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	2%	2%	-20%	19%	-7%	53%
Sequential Read 256KB	1498	1606 7%	1627 9%	1542 3%	1592 6%	1739 16%	1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13) 1%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 23%
Sequential Write 256KB	680	729 7%	730 7%	670 -1%	212.9 -69%	750 10%	546 ?(213 - 740, n=13) -20%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 110%
Random Read 4KB	207	202.6 -2%	208.3 1%	205.3 -1%	189.4 -9%	264.9 28%	206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13) 0%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 34%
Random Write 4KB	215.9	205 -5%	197.7 -8%	228.1 6%	197 -9%	258.5 20%	193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13) -10%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 43%

Xiaomi Mi 10; Arena of Valor; min: Ø61.4 (55-62)

Xiaomi Mi 10; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø61.1 (50-62)

Xiaomi Mi 10; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (50-60)

Xiaomi Mi 10; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.8 (57-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36.8 °C	38.2 °C	38.7 °C
36.1 °C	37.4 °C	39.3 °C
36.5 °C	37.9 °C	38.9 °C

Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C


35.2 °C	35.7 °C	36.2 °C
35 °C	36.2 °C	35.3 °C
34.8 °C	35.6 °C	35.6 °C

Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Ocioso	0.53 / 1.46 / 1.52 Watt
Carga	3.83 / 8.89 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-105%	-126%	-32%	-29%	-55%	-31%
Idle Minimum *	0.53	1.47 -177%	2.2 -315%	0.9 -70%	1 -89%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) -114%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Average *	1.46	3.43 -135%	3.3 -126%	1.5 -3%	1.9 -30%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) -53%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Maximum *	1.52	3.52 -132%	3.7 -143%	2 -32%	2.4 -58%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) -61%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -6%
Load Average *	3.83	6.2 -62%	5.9 -54%	4.8 -25%	3.5 9%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) -37%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -68%
Load Maximum *	8.89	10.63 -20%	8.3 7%	11.5 -29%	6.9 22%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) -9%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 46min

	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh	OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20 4000 mAh	Huawei P40 3800 mAh
Battery Runtime		-1%	20%	6%	9%
Reader / Idle	1789		2103 18%	2105 18%	2063 15%
H.264	1126		1023 -9%	809 -28%	1052 -7%
WiFi v1.3	662	654 -1%	923 39%	726 10%	806 22%
Load	226		296 31%	279 23%	236 4%

Pro

+ Acabamento de alta qualidade

+ Tela brilhante

+ Bom desempenho WLAN

+ 5G e dual SIM

+ Sensor infravermelho

Contra

- Desempenho da câmera um pouco decepcionante

- Sem leitor de cartões de armazenamento

- Sem certificação IP

Veredicto - O alto preço faz com que suas falhas pareçam piores

In review: Xiaomi Mi 10. Test unit provided by TradingShenzen.

O Xiaomi Mi 10 nos deixa com sentimentos confusos. Por um lado, oferece excelente desempenho na operação diária, se sente ótimo e mostra uma alta qualidade de acabamento em qualquer lugar. Por outro lado, a câmera de 108 MP oferece gravações um pouco decepcionantes no final. Aqui, a influência de um bom software na qualidade da imagem é mostrada novamente. Outros fabricantes podem obter muito mais de suas câmeras com significativamente menos megapixels - por isso, gostaríamos de obter exatamente isso também do dispositivo Xiaomi.

O Xiaomi Mi 10 convence com bom acabamento e desempenho fluente na operação diária. Só esperávamos mais da câmera.

Além do desempenho da câmera, há apenas pequenas reclamações, como a falta de um leitor de cartão de armazenamento no Xiaomi, por exemplo. Também é possível viver sem uma conexão de áudio de 3,5 mm, e a maioria dos usuários deve se contentar com a duração média da bateria. Mas no final, o Xiaomi Mi 10 é bastante caro, fazendo com que a pressão dos concorrentes, alguns dos quais são significativamente mais poderosos, fique muito mais alta.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Xiaomi Mi 10 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

88%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

54 / 70 → 77%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

93%

Desempenho do jogos

62 / 64 → 97%

Desempenho da aplicação

82 / 86 → 95%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

73%

Médio

82%

88%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 10: Mais Megapixels

Mike Wobker, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 3)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

Oppo Find X2 Pro audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - O alto preço faz com que suas falhas pareçam piores

More articles related to this device

Price comparison