Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: Campeão de desempenho de 300 euros

Name: Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

5G para todos!

O Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite permite a entrada no mundo 5G por menos de 300 Euros (~$ 355). Além disso, o acessível smartphone Xiaomi oferece alguns equipamentos muito poderosos combinados com um painel AMOLED. Descubra em nossa análise do smartphone Xiaomi se o Mi 10 Lite também tem alguns pontos fracos.

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/07/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Mi 10 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.57 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 392 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de aceleração, bússola eletrônica, giroscópio, OTG, Miracast, emissor IV

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM：2/3/5/8; WCDMA: 1/2/4/5/8; LTE FDD：1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28, LTE TDD：38/40/41; 5G：n1/n3/n7/n28/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 163.7 x 74.8

Bateria

4160 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2 in sensor, 0.8 μm, f/1.79 aperture, 6P lens) + 8 MP (120° ultra wide-angle, f/2.2 aperture) + 2 MP (1.75μm, ƒ/2.4) + 2 MP (1.75μm, ƒ/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: onscreen, carregador, capa protetora, cabo USB Type-C, ferramenta SIM, manual do usuário, cartão de garantia, MiUI, 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, SAR: 0.79 W/kg (head), 1.18 W/kg (body) , fanless

peso

192 g, Suprimento de energia: 78 g

Preço

350 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	192 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.57"	2340x1080
82.1 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618	179 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618	204 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620	184 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.44"	2440x1080

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Realme 6 Pro Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Samsung Galaxy A71 Huawei P40 Lite 5G Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 (618^min - 677^max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	563 (275^min - 666^max) MBit/s -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	324 (310^min - 330^max) MBit/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	317 (151^min - 367^max) MBit/s -53%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (137^min - 336^max) MBit/s -57%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	255 (234^min - 277^max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (563^min - 668^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (545^min - 662^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	341 (334^min - 349^max) MBit/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy A71 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	338 (295^min - 356^max) MBit/s -46%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	333 (319^min - 345^max) MBit/s -47%
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 (145^min - 352^max) MBit/s -54%

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø627 (545-662)

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø668 (618-677)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera LowLight Ultraweitwinkel Hauptkamera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


574 cd/m²	574 cd/m²	579 cd/m²
579 cd/m²	584 cd/m²	585 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	588 cd/m²	594 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 594 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 583.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 584 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231

	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"	OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-49%	-18%	-159%	16%	-42%	-32%
Brightness middle	584	629 8%	610 4%	442 -24%	605 4%	466 -20%	529 -9%
Brightness	583	646 11%	579 -1%	419 -28%	608 4%	457 -22%	531 -9%
Brightness Distribution	97	95 -2%	92 -5%	90 -7%	95 -2%	91 -6%	94 -3%
Black Level *			0.37	0.37		0.61
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.17	2.7 -131%	1.8 -54%	6.1 -421%	0.84 28%	2.2 -88%	2.53 -116%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.95	6 -103%	3 -2%	9.7 -229%	1.8 39%	4.6 -56%	4.52 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	3 -76%	2.5 -47%	5.9 -247%	1.3 24%	2.7 -59%	1.7 -0%
Gamma	2.231 ^99%	2.1 ^105%	2.31 ^95%	2.35 ^94%	2.211 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.249 ^98%
CCT	6341 ^103%	6340 ^103%	6864 ^95%	7631 ^85%	6310 ^103%	6633 ^98%	6462 ^101%
Contrast			1649	1195		764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

241.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 241.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 241.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	673 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	542 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points -15%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	547 Points -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	642 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	611 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (554 - 673, n=17)	603 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +48%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1908 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1647 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points -11%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	2434 Points +28%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1966 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1520 - 1966, n=17)	1781 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +74%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	861 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1163 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1201 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1178 - 1266, n=5)	1223 Points
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)	7481 Points
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	982 Points
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1063 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	903 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	2137 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1004 - 1192, n=5)	1082 Points
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)	7952 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1183 Points
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1169 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (168 - 1278, n=12)	1060 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points +472%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1293 Points
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1242 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1231 - 1302, n=10)	1265 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points +447%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2863 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	3113 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2689 - 2882, n=3)	2811 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +92%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7765 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	9860 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (6213 - 7765, n=3)	7214 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +94%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8968 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	9324 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8591 - 9965, n=3)	9175 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +34%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8730 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	8885 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points +4%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points +58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8941 Points +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	13099 Points +50%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	10876 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16)	9734 Points +12%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7786 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7773 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points +1%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7628 Points -2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	9527 Points +22%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9427 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17)	8308 Points +7%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	45304 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	40105 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points -15%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39491 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	52715 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	45872 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (38137 - 48201, n=17)	44398 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	69506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	52600 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53194 Points -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	57067 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69285 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (56690 - 70216, n=17)	67538 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20429 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	21898 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points -2%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	20767 Points +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	41610 Points +104%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21016 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (14891 - 28331, n=17)	20632 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4693 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2950 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5516 Points +18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4665 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2972 - 4693, n=17)	4318 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5832 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2999 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points -38%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3610 Points -38%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6158 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5171 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2844 - 5832, n=17)	4882 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3452 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2792 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points -5%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3294 Points -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4042 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3476 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1689 - 3529, n=17)	3237 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4893 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3002 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points -26%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5853 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4815 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3678 - 4893, n=17)	4562 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5335 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3101 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points -29%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3751 Points -30%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6327 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5357 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4036 - 5437, n=17)	5181 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3492 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2702 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points -8%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3134 Points -10%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4637 Points +33%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3555 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1790 - 3651, n=17)	3275 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3346 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2451 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2459 Points -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4608 Points +38%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3330 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2261 - 3346, n=17)	3162 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3321 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2296 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points -29%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2298 Points -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4804 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3284 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2048 - 3342, n=17)	3137 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3425 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3210 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3257 Points -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4031 Points +18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3503 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2964 - 3556, n=17)	3331 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2214 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points -26%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2577 Points -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4845 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3553 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2934 - 3605, n=17)	3413 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3589 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2085 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points -29%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2466 Points -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4906 Points +37%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3556 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2814 - 3592, n=17)	3467 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3495 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3058 Points -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4642 Points +33%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3544 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1898 - 3765, n=17)	3288 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3130 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1851 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2244 Points -28%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4204 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3108 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2287 - 3130, n=17)	2966 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3198 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1731 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points -30%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2143 Points -33%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4544 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3185 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 3198, n=17)	3053 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2893 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2445 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points -6%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2686 Points -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	3331 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2867 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 2979, n=17)	2742 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -7%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	60 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15)	62.5 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	95 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps -11%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	83 fps -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	112 fps +18%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	97 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15)	88.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +195%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	37 fps -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps -29%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	55 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15)	46.5 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	49 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -16%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -16%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	69 fps +41%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	55 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15)	51.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +237%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps -12%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps -12%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	40 fps +21%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15)	31.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +99%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	38 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -21%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	47 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15)	35.3 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +208%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -6%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	23 fps +28%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (11 - 21, n=15)	17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +166%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -14%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	27 fps +29%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 21, n=15)	19.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +236%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	26 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (13 - 23, n=17)	20.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +136%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	24 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -25%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -25%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	31 fps +29%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 24, n=17)	21.6 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +233%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps -15%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps -15%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	17 fps +31%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8.8 - 15, n=17)	12.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +188%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps -19%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	12 fps +41%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5.3 - 13, n=17)	8.38 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +276%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	318669 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	247507 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points -15%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	273255 Points -14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	369207 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	332074 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14)	312767 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4094 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2972 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points -16%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3342 Points -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4371 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4054 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3237 - 4094, n=14)	3813 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +54%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6069 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6426 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points +13%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6305 Points +4%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	8619 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6801 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5411 - 6936, n=14)	6506 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +67%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5683 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3466 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points -22%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3752 Points -34%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4609 Points -19%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5296 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4556 - 5683, n=14)	5099 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5201 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3175 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points -28%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3864 Points -26%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6754 Points +30%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5203 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2525 - 5247, n=14)	4732 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +225%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1462 Points
Samsung Galaxy A71 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1103 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points -16%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1365 Points -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	1361 Points -7%
OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1441 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1139 - 1462, n=14)	1372 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +7%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +140%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	54.8 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.2 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.9 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)	47.7 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	46.15 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	36.58 Points -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	96.3 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	93.6 Points
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.6 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.8 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	82.3 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)	81.1 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	65.3 Points -30%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +169%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	50.7 runs/min
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	49.5 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)	46.1 runs/min -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	40.4 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	32.8 runs/min -35%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +96%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	115 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	76 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)	71.5 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	70 Points -8%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	60 Points -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	19727 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	18556 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points -7%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)	16671 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	16197 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	12771 Points -31%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)	3721 ms * -43%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)	3436 ms * -32%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033 ms * -17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	2941 ms * -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)	2602 ms *
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	2254 ms * +13%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G	Samsung Galaxy A71	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Realme 6 Pro	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite	Huawei P40 Lite 5G	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-40%	-38%	-23%	-32%	1%	-17%	122%
Sequential Read 256KB	980	493 -50%	498.1 -49%	513 -48%	501 -49%	905 -8%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -22%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 88%
Sequential Write 256KB	476.9	192.4 -60%	171.1 -64%	203.3 -57%	213.2 -55%	188 -61%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) -38%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 199%
Random Read 4KB	156.4	112.3 -28%	122.6 -22%	158.7 1%	134.6 -14%	146.1 -7%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) -2%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 77%
Random Write 4KB	138.5	109.6 -21%	112.9 -18%	154 11%	125.8 -9%	249.7 80%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -5%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 123%

PUBG mobile

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; Smooth: Ø39.9 (34-41)

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; Balanced: Ø39.9 (39-41)

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)

Asphalt 9 Legends

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; High Quality: Ø29.7 (14-32)

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G; Standard / low: Ø30 (28-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.7 °C	38.6 °C	35.2 °C
40.5 °C	39.1 °C	35.5 °C
40.7 °C	38.5 °C	35.6 °C

Máximo: 40.7 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C


33.5 °C	37.3 °C	37.5 °C
33.2 °C	37.9 °C	38.8 °C
33.9 °C	37.6 °C	38.2 °C

Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Carga	4.4 / 7.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		27%	20%	13%	33%	20%	11%	21%	7%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	0.63 58%	0.75 50%	0.92 39%	0.8 47%	0.65 57%	1.8 -20%	0.965 ?(0.66 - 1.8, n=15) 36%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.2	1.49 32%	2.19 -0%	1.79 19%	1.1 50%	2.25 -2%	2.1 5%	1.899 ?(0.82 - 2.55, n=15) 14%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	1.51 48%	2.24 23%	1.88 35%	1.8 38%	2.29 21%	2.3 21%	2.07 ?(0.85 - 2.9, n=15) 29%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	4.4	4.62 -5%	3.88 12%	5.41 -23%	3.7 16%	3.7 16%	3.4 23%	3.98 ?(2.73 - 6.8, n=15) 10%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -47%
Load Maximum *	7.2	7.11 1%	5.97 17%	7.59 -5%	6.1 15%	6.46 10%	5.2 28%	6.19 ?(4.4 - 10.3, n=15) 14%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		23h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)		7h 28min

	Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh
Battery Runtime		-11%	5%	17%	8%	18%	-12%
Reader / Idle	1683	2164 29%	2336 39%		2249 34%		2003 19%
H.264	1403	1164 -17%	1096 -22%		1370 -2%		1064 -24%
WiFi v1.3	884	815 -8%	1175 33%	1031 17%	1095 24%	1047 18%	869 -2%
Load	448	242 -46%	303 -32%		337 -25%		261 -42%

Pro

+ Belo painel OLED

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Bom acabamento

+ WLAN veloz

+ Bom desempenho (considerando o preço)

+ Alto-falante mono decente

+ Boa câmera principal sob a luz do dia...

Contra

- ...mas não tão bom à noite

- Sem classificação IP

- Poucas frequências LTE

- Sem suporte para cartões SD

- Sem lente teleobjetiva

- Apenas 60 Hz

Veredicto sobre o Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - A Xiaomi oferece um pacote geral potente

In review: Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de.

Considerando a infinidade de modelos que a fabricante chinesa já lançou no mercado este ano, é difícil estar ao tanto. Felizmente, a Xiaomi não parece criar seus smartphones seguindo o lema "massa, não classe", já que o Mi 10 Lite acabou sendo um smartphone de gama média muito bom.

Considerando sua faixa de preço, o modelo Lite da série Mi-10 dificilmente tem qualquer fraqueza digna de menção. A duração da bateria é excelente, o MiUI 12 funcionou bem, o acabamento e a escolha de materiais são de bom nível e a WLAN é rápida. Além disso, o smartphone de gama média oferece equipamentos muito bons, como suporte 5G e um poderoso SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, bem como um atraente painel OLED. Também ficamos positivamente surpresos com a câmera principal no teste, independentemente de ser devido ao próprio sensor OmniVision ou ao bom software da câmera - embora a Xiaomi não tenha tido muito sucesso com seus algoritmos de câmera até agora. Os resultados da câmera de 48 MP são de boa qualidade.

Aqueles que se contentam com 60 Hz terão um ótimo smartphone de gama média com o Mi 10 Lite.

No entanto, o Mi 10 Lite ainda é um dispositivo de gama média. As qualidades de pouca luz são suficientes, na melhor das hipóteses, você já tem que diminuir sua visão com a câmera ultra grande angular à luz do dia, e recursos premium como carregamento sem fio ou Wi-Fi 6 não estão lá. O Mi 10 Lite também não oferece certificação IP ou suporte para cartão SD. Também gostaríamos de uma taxa de quadros nativa além de 60 Hz para a próxima geração Mi-Lite, já que os concorrentes não dormem.

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 71%

Peso

89%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

92%

Desempenho do jogos

37 / 64 → 57%

Desempenho da aplicação

73 / 86 → 85%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

72%

Médio

78%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: Campeão de desempenho de 300 euros

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08- 7 (Update: 2020-08-10)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto sobre o Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - A Xiaomi oferece um pacote geral potente

More articles related to this device

Price comparison