Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - Poderoso smartphone para jogos com uma desvantagem
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 253 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 7.10" | 3120x1440 | |
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 06/2022 | Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650 | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.65" | 2340x1080 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2340x1080 | |
| 84.1 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 171 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Asus ROG Phone 2 SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 240 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.205
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1" | Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Asus ROG Phone 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -37% | 49% | 48% | 4% | 25% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 570 | 593 4% | 778 36% | 786 38% | 774 36% | 658 15% | 580 2% |
| Brightness | 589 | 601 2% | 783 33% | 791 34% | 778 32% | 643 9% | 599 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 95 6% | 96 7% | 95 6% | 93 3% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.65 | 8.1 -74% | 0.9 81% | 1.1 76% | 5.28 -14% | 1.8 61% | 4.9 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.61 | 16.2 -113% | 2.2 71% | 2.2 71% | 8.55 -12% | 4.4 42% | 9.1 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.1 -45% | 1.7 65% | 1.8 63% | 6.2 -27% | 3.8 22% | 5.4 -10% |
| Gamma | 2.205 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.292 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7500 87% | 7566 86% | 6481 100% | 6315 103% | 7319 89% | 6255 104% | 7487 87% |
| Contrast | 1343 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 362 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 362 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 362 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | Nubia RedMagic 5G | OnePlus 8 | Xiaomi Mi 10 | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | Asus ROG Phone 2 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | 3% | -3% | -33% | -51% | -24% | -9% | 51% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1398 | 1654 18% | 1707 22% | 1498 7% | 961 -31% | 890 -36% | 1487 6% | 1547 ? 11% | 1894 ? 35% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 658 | 388.4 -41% | 748 14% | 680 3% | 476.3 -28% | 312.8 -52% | 386.4 -41% | 575 ? -13% | 1476 ? 124% |
| Random Read 4KB | 218.2 | 201.6 -8% | 215 -1% | 207 -5% | 159.1 -27% | 96.8 -56% | 165.9 -24% | 210 ? -4% | 278 ? 27% |
| Random Write 4KB | 261.5 | 193.6 -26% | 203.9 -22% | 215.9 -17% | 145 -45% | 101 -61% | 165.3 -37% | 188.5 ? -28% | 312 ? 19% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Dead Trigger 2
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.5 / 2.3 / 3.1 Watt |
| Carga |
7.4 / 12.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 2 6000 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 46% | 24% | 49% | 31% | 20% | 31% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 1.5 | 0.9 40% | 0.53 65% | 0.66 56% | 0.68 55% | 1.1 27% | 1.133 ? 24% | 0.883 ? 41% | |
| Idle Average * | 2.3 | 2.3 -0% | 1.46 37% | 2.37 -3% | 1.05 54% | 1.5 35% | 2.23 ? 3% | 1.467 ? 36% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.1 | 2.33 25% | 1.52 51% | 2.42 22% | 1.07 65% | 1.71 45% | 2.45 ? 21% | 1.621 ? 48% | |
| Load Average * | 7.4 | 3.5 53% | 3.83 48% | 6.8 8% | 4.14 44% | 4.84 35% | 5.26 ? 29% | 6.58 ? 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 12.3 | 7.68 38% | 8.89 28% | 7.5 39% | 9.05 26% | 10.42 15% | 9.68 ? 21% | 9.91 ? 19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Asus ROG Phone 2 6000 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | 2% | 14% | 3% | 11% | -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1589 | 1374 -14% | 1789 13% | 2083 31% | |||
| H.264 | 972 | 1096 13% | 1126 16% | 734 -24% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 1045 36% | 662 -14% | 876 14% | 802 5% | 851 11% | 614 -20% |
| Load | 247 | 168 -32% | 226 -9% | 243 -2% | 149 -40% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Grande, maior, Black Shark 3 Pro
O Black Shark 3 Pro oferece um excelente hardware de jogo para os entusiastas de jogos móveis. O enorme painel OLED apresenta tanto uma alta taxa de atualização como uma alta taxa de amostragem. Apesar da resolução de 1440p, o desempenho do smartphone para jogos é excelente, os tempos de duração são decentes e o desenvolvimento de calor mal afeta o desempenho disponível - mesmo sem o acessório opcional "FunCooler Pro". Os botões dedicados e alto-falantes estéreo contribuem para a experiência de jogo em geral, embora os alto-falantes não sejam de alta qualidade quando comparados com os do Xiaomi Mi 10.
Além de reclamações menores, que se relacionam com a tela escura no modo manual sem o sensor de luz ambiente, botões do Master Trigger um pouco soltos, bem como a falta de opções de expansão de armazenamento, um problema é particularmente irritante em um smartphone destinado para jogos: As restrições de software do fabricante chinês. Eles limitam o painel OLED para abaixo da taxa de atualização total de 90 Hz em nossos jogos de teste, embora PUBG móvel e Dead Trigger 2 ambos teoricamente suportam 120 FPS - aqui, o Black Shark parece ter implementado um limite de 60-FPS. O fato de que o Redmi K30 5G atinge os 120 FPS completos no nosso teste, exacerba esta frustração. Esperamos que o Black Shark resolva isso o mais rápido possível.
O Black Shark 3 Pro é uma delícia para os jogadores.
Para aqueles que consideram a tela de 7,1 polegadas grande demais, o Black Shark 3 "normal”, já disponível na Europa com 8 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento, é uma alternativa interessante.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
