Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - Poderoso smartphone para jogos com uma desvantagem

Name: Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

Máquina para jogos 5G.

Dado que o telefone da Xiaomi oferece uma ampla gama de recursos por cerca de 670 Euros (~$760), o Black Shark 3 Pro não é somente interessante para gamers: Vem com um painel OLED com 90 Hz e 1440p, uma taxa de sampling de toque de 270Hz, carregamento rápido de 65W , Wi-Fi 6, alto-falantes estéreo, uma câmera de 64MP, 5G e um Snapdragon 865. Que mais se pode pedir? Continue lendo para saber como o Shark 3 Pro se sai na nossa análise.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/09/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Black Shark Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

12 GB

Pantalha

7.10 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 484 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 219 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C, OTG, Miracast, P2i-rating

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 5G NR NSA (N41, N78, N79); FDD LTE ( B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28); TDD LTE (B34, B38, B39, B40, B41); WCDMA（B1, B2, B4, B5, B6, B8, B9, B19); GSM (B2, B3 B5, B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.1 x 177.8 x 83.3

Bateria

5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm) + 13 MP (f/2.25) + 5 MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,2, 1/3", 0,9 µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB Type-C, Ferramenta SIM, capa protetora, protetor de tela, guia de início rápido, JoyUI, 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L3 (China), A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS, LTE Cat 24, fanless

peso

253 g, Suprimento de energia: 189 g

Preço

730 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.3 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	253 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7.10"	3120x1440
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	06/2022	Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650	218 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.65"	2340x1080
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	180 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
84.1 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	171 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
82 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Asus ROG Phone 2 SD 855+, Adreno 640	240 g	512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.59"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	937 (466^min - 960^max) MBit/s +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	926 (463^min - 960^max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (785^min - 909^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s -1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	642 (549^min - 664^max) MBit/s -27%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	530 (410^min - 606^max) MBit/s -39%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	341 (280^min - 399^max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	946 (911^min - 960^max) MBit/s +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s +11%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	894 (864^min - 925^max) MBit/s +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	817 (785^min - 843^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	687 (345^min - 697^max) MBit/s -16%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	623 (611^min - 633^max) MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	605 (520^min - 657^max) MBit/s -26%

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø817 (785-843)

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (785-909)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Olympus E-M 10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Olympus E-M 10 II

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

OnePlus 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

Olympus E-M 10 II

ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: 10.49 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 18.76 ∆E


569 cd/m²	566 cd/m²	583 cd/m²
567 cd/m²	570 cd/m²	570 cd/m²
619 cd/m²	624 cd/m²	630 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 630 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 588.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.205

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1"	Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Asus ROG Phone 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen		-37%	49%	48%	4%	25%	-5%
Brightness middle	570	593 4%	778 36%	786 38%	774 36%	658 15%	580 2%
Brightness	589	601 2%	783 33%	791 34%	778 32%	643 9%	599 2%
Brightness Distribution	90	92 2%	95 6%	96 7%	95 6%	93 3%	91 1%
Black Level *						0.49
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.65	8.1 -74%	0.9 81%	1.1 76%	5.28 -14%	1.8 61%	4.9 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.61	16.2 -113%	2.2 71%	2.2 71%	8.55 -12%	4.4 42%	9.1 -20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	7.1 -45%	1.7 65%	1.8 63%	6.2 -27%	3.8 22%	5.4 -10%
Gamma	2.205 ^100%	2.28 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2.292 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	7500 ^87%	7566 ^86%	6481 ^100%	6315 ^103%	7319 ^89%	6255 ^104%	7487 ^87%
Contrast						1343

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

362 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 362 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 362 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	903 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points +1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	919 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points +1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	595 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	569 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=23)	903 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)	989 Points +10%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3361 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3076 Points -8%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3427 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points -2%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1676 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1520 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=23)	3268 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)	3298 Points -2%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3080 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2954 Points -4%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3001 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2829 Points -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1178 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1212 Points -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2829 - 3080, n=8)	2981 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=47, last 2 years)	7244 Points +135%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3008 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2487 Points -17%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	2663 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	2549 Points -15%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1004 Points -67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1035 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2487 - 3259, n=8)	2723 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=53, last 2 years)	7760 Points +158%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11839 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13954 Points +18%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13079 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	9454 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	10689 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	15193 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=22)	13584 Points +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10945 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12879 Points +18%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10800 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points -3%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	7896 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	9989 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	11690 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=23)	11246 Points +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	110468 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	73143 Points -34%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72524 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	43778 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	47824 Points -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	81679 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=20)	84555 Points -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	149468 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	150654 Points +1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	144611 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	66655 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	68634 Points -54%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	113347 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 180392, n=20)	147707 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	57583 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	26182 Points -55%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27026 Points -53%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	19888 Points -65%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	23203 Points -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	41296 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=20)	35224 Points -39%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	90 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	90 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	86 fps -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	61 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=23)	75.4 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps -5%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	203 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps +1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	207 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	95 fps -53%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 266, n=23)	206 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +37%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	68 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +29%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	48 fps -29%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	61 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=23)	71.7 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	122 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps +3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	125 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	54 fps -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	100 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 151, n=23)	123.6 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +35%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	43 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +19%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	33 fps -23%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	58 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=24)	60.1 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +52%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	74 fps -14%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	37 fps -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 103, n=24)	86 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +35%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	25 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	42 fps +68%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps +84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps +68%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	19 fps -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	38 fps +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 54, n=24)	40.5 fps +62%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +90%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	52 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps -59%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	43 fps -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 62, n=24)	51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +38%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps -17%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps -13%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	20 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	41 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 57, n=25)	43.2 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps -7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps +100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps +96%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	24 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	23 fps -15%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	47 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 67, n=25)	52.7 fps +95%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +194%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28 fps +4%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps +7%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8.9 fps -67%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	27 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 40, n=25)	27.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +37%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8.6 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps -35%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	18 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 27, n=25)	20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +58%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	572807 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	607937 Points +6%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	563466 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	298925 Points -48%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	501784 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24)	579049 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5302 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6149 Points +16%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5897 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3990 Points -25%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	5335 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=23)	5871 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +18%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8622 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9723 Points +13%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10021 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	6870 Points -20%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	8693 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8412 - 10147, n=23)	9660 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +18%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5688 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8398 Points +48%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6912 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5278 Points -7%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	6077 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=23)	7073 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11445 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11648 Points +2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11654 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5087 Points -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	10467 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11366 - 13833, n=23)	11779 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +46%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1429 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1505 Points +5%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1498 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1378 Points -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288	1465 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=23)	1497 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +9%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +125%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)	67.3 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)	63.6 Points +20%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	61.5 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)	53.1 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	53.1 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	51.3 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points -4%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +97%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.7 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)	63.9 runs/min -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	59.6 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)	54.9 runs/min -19%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	50.8 runs/min -25%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)	39.1 runs/min -42%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points +17%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)	111 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)	106.7 Points +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	101 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	99 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	99 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)	80 Points -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +75%
Asus ROG Phone 2	24571 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)	22518 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	21048 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	20976 Points
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)	18809 Points -10%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	15745 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)	2787 ms * -35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	2538 ms * -23%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	2401 ms * -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	2061 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)	2031 ms * +1%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)	2007 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro	Nubia RedMagic 5G	OnePlus 8	Xiaomi Mi 10	Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G	Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G	Asus ROG Phone 2	Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	3%	-3%	-33%	-51%	-24%	-9%	49%
Sequential Read 256KB	1398	1654 18%	1707 22%	1498 7%	961 -31%	890 -36%	1487 6%	1547 ?(983 - 1789, n=22) 11%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 31%
Sequential Write 256KB	658	388.4 -41%	748 14%	680 3%	476.3 -28%	312.8 -52%	386.4 -41%	575 ?(387 - 915, n=22) -13%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 117%
Random Read 4KB	218.2	201.6 -8%	215 -1%	207 -5%	159.1 -27%	96.8 -56%	165.9 -24%	210 ?(168.5 - 265, n=22) -4%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 27%
Random Write 4KB	261.5	193.6 -26%	203.9 -22%	215.9 -17%	145 -45%	101 -61%	165.3 -37%	188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22) -28%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 19%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38 °C	39.6 °C	39.5 °C
38.3 °C	40.1 °C	40.2 °C
38.3 °C	39.6 °C	39.4 °C

Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C


35.4 °C	38.8 °C	36.1 °C
36 °C	39.9 °C	35.7 °C
36.4 °C	39.3 °C	36.1 °C

Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.5 / 2.3 / 3.1 Watt
Carga	7.4 / 12.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 2 6000 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		31%	46%	24%	49%	31%	20%	32%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	0.9 40%	0.53 65%	0.66 56%	0.68 55%	1.1 27%	1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22) 24%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.3	2.3 -0%	1.46 37%	2.37 -3%	1.05 54%	1.5 35%	2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22) 3%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Maximum *	3.1	2.33 25%	1.52 51%	2.42 22%	1.07 65%	1.71 45%	2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22) 21%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 48%
Load Average *	7.4	3.5 53%	3.83 48%	6.8 8%	4.14 44%	4.84 35%	5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22) 29%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) 13%
Load Maximum *	12.3	7.68 38%	8.89 28%	7.5 39%	9.05 26%	10.42 15%	9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22) 21%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) 22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		26h 29min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 07min

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 4025 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 2 6000 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	2%	14%	3%	11%	-30%
Reader / Idle	1589	1374 -14%	1789 13%		2083 31%
H.264	972	1096 13%	1126 16%		734 -24%
WiFi v1.3	767	1045 36%	662 -14%	876 14%	802 5%	851 11%	614 -20%
Load	247	168 -32%	226 -9%		243 -2%		149 -40%

Pro

+ Bons recursos para jogo

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Painel AMOLED de 90-Hz

+ Muito desempenho

+ Suporte para 5G

+ Carga rápida de 65 W

+ Muitos acessórios

+ SIM dual + conector para fones de 3,5 mm

+ Veloz armazenamento UFS 3.0

+ Alto-falantes estéreo...

Contra

- ... Com fraquezas

- Sem armazenamento expansível

- Sem certificação IP

- Tela escura com sensor de luz ambiente desativada

- Sem carregamento sem fio

- USB 2.0

Veredicto - Grande, maior, Black Shark 3 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro in review: Test device courtesy of

O Black Shark 3 Pro oferece um excelente hardware de jogo para os entusiastas de jogos móveis. O enorme painel OLED apresenta tanto uma alta taxa de atualização como uma alta taxa de amostragem. Apesar da resolução de 1440p, o desempenho do smartphone para jogos é excelente, os tempos de duração são decentes e o desenvolvimento de calor mal afeta o desempenho disponível - mesmo sem o acessório opcional "FunCooler Pro". Os botões dedicados e alto-falantes estéreo contribuem para a experiência de jogo em geral, embora os alto-falantes não sejam de alta qualidade quando comparados com os do Xiaomi Mi 10.

Além de reclamações menores, que se relacionam com a tela escura no modo manual sem o sensor de luz ambiente, botões do Master Trigger um pouco soltos, bem como a falta de opções de expansão de armazenamento, um problema é particularmente irritante em um smartphone destinado para jogos: As restrições de software do fabricante chinês. Eles limitam o painel OLED para abaixo da taxa de atualização total de 90 Hz em nossos jogos de teste, embora PUBG móvel e Dead Trigger 2 ambos teoricamente suportam 120 FPS - aqui, o Black Shark parece ter implementado um limite de 60-FPS. O fato de que o Redmi K30 5G atinge os 120 FPS completos no nosso teste, exacerba esta frustração. Esperamos que o Black Shark resolva isso o mais rápido possível.

O Black Shark 3 Pro é uma delícia para os jogadores.

Para aqueles que consideram a tela de 7,1 polegadas grande demais, o Black Shark 3 "normal”, já disponível na Europa com 8 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento, é uma alternativa interessante.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

71 / 75 → 95%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

51 / 70 → 73%

Peso

88%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

59 / 64 → 92%

Desempenho da aplicação

83 / 86 → 97%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

69 / 90 → 77%

Camera

71%

Médio

80%

85%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - Poderoso smartphone para jogos com uma desvantagem

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-06- 9 (Update: 2020-06-16)

Competing Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Asphalt 9 Legends

Dead Trigger 2

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Grande, maior, Black Shark 3 Pro

More articles related to this device

Price comparison