Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - Poderoso smartphone para jogos com uma desvantagem

Máquina para jogos 5G.

Dado que o telefone da Xiaomi oferece uma ampla gama de recursos por cerca de 670 Euros (~$760), o Black Shark 3 Pro não é somente interessante para gamers: Vem com um painel OLED com 90 Hz e 1440p, uma taxa de sampling de toque de 270Hz, carregamento rápido de 65W , Wi-Fi 6, alto-falantes estéreo, uma câmera de 64MP, 5G e um Snapdragon 865. Que mais se pode pedir? Continue lendo para saber como o Shark 3 Pro se sai na nossa análise.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Black Shark Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
12 GB 
Pantalha
7.10 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 484 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C, OTG, Miracast, P2i-rating
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 5G NR NSA (N41, N78, N79); FDD LTE ( B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28); TDD LTE (B34, B38, B39, B40, B41); WCDMA(B1, B2, B4, B5, B6, B8, B9, B19); GSM (B2, B3 B5, B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.1 x 177.8 x 83.3
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm) + 13 MP (f/2.25) + 5 MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,2, 1/3", 0,9 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB Type-C, Ferramenta SIM, capa protetora, protetor de tela, guia de início rápido, JoyUI, 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L3 (China), A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS, LTE Cat 24, fanless
peso
253 g, Suprimento de energia: 189 g
Preço
730 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.3 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
253 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.10"3120x1440
84.2 %
v7 (old)
06/2022
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
88.4 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.8 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
84.1 %
v7 (old)
01/2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.2 %
v7 (old)
08/2019
Asus ROG Phone 2
SD 855+, Adreno 640
240 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.59"2340x1080

Size Comparison

177.8 mm 83.3 mm 10.1 mm 253 g170.99 mm 77.6 mm 9.48 mm 240 g168.6 mm 78 mm 9.8 mm 218 g165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (463min - 960max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (785min - 909max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s -1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
642 (549min - 664max) MBit/s -27%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
530 (410min - 606max) MBit/s -39%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (280min - 399max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (911min - 960max) MBit/s +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s +11%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
817 (785min - 843max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (345min - 697max) MBit/s -16%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
623 (611min - 633max) MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (520min - 657max) MBit/s -26%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø817 (785-843)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (785-909)
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Black Shark 3 Pro
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
64MP cam
64MP cam
Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
5x zoom
5x zoom

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: 10.49 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 18.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
55 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
57.1 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
61 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: 40.48 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 62.81 ∆E
569
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 630 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 588.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.205
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1"
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Asus ROG Phone 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-37%
49%
48%
4%
25%
-5%
Brightness middle
570
593
4%
778
36%
786
38%
774
36%
658
15%
580
2%
Brightness
589
601
2%
783
33%
791
34%
778
32%
643
9%
599
2%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
95
6%
96
7%
95
6%
93
3%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.65
8.1
-74%
0.9
81%
1.1
76%
5.28
-14%
1.8
61%
4.9
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.61
16.2
-113%
2.2
71%
2.2
71%
8.55
-12%
4.4
42%
9.1
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
7.1
-45%
1.7
65%
1.8
63%
6.2
-27%
3.8
22%
5.4
-10%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.292 96%
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
CCT
7500 87%
7566 86%
6481 100%
6315 103%
7319 89%
6255 104%
7487 87%
Contrast
1343

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 362 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 362 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 362 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
903 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points +1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
595 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +10%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3361 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points -8%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points -2%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1676 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -1%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3080 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2954 Points -4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1178 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=48, last 2 years)
7481 Points +143%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3008 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2487 Points -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points -15%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1004 Points -67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=54, last 2 years)
7952 Points +164%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11839 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9454 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
15193 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10945 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points -3%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7896 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
11690 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
110468 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points -34%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43778 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
81679 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149468 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
66655 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points -54%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
113347 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
57583 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points -55%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points -53%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19888 Points -65%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
41296 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
61 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps -4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
203 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps -53%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps +39%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
68 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +29%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps -29%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
61 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +11%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
122 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps +3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
100 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=23)
123.6 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps +37%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps +19%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps -23%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
58 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +53%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps -57%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps +38%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
25 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps +68%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps +84%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps +68%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps -24%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
38 fps +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps +92%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps -59%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
43 fps -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps +40%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps -13%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps -60%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
41 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)
50.5 fps -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps +96%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps -15%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
47 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
80.3 fps +197%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps +4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps +7%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps -67%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
27 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.6 fps +39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps 0%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps -35%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
18 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
32.3 fps +62%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
572807 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points +6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points -48%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
501784 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5302 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points +16%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points -25%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
5335 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +19%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8622 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points +13%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points -20%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8693 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +18%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5688 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points +48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points -7%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6077 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11445 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points -56%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10467 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +50%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1429 Points
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points +5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points -4%
Asus ROG Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
1465 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +10%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +127%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
67.3 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points +20%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.5 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.1 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
53.1 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.3 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.9 Points -4%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +101%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.7 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
59.6 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min -19%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min -25%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
39.1 runs/min -42%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points +17%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
111 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
106.7 Points +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
101 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +77%
Asus ROG Phone 2
24571 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
20976 Points
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points -10%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * -35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538 ms * -23%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401 ms * -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2104 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
2061 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * +1%
Asus ROG Phone 2 (Chrome 78)
2007 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProNubia RedMagic 5GOnePlus 8Xiaomi Mi 10Oppo Reno3 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi K30 5GAsus ROG Phone 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
3%
-3%
-33%
-51%
-24%
-9%
49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1398
1654
18%
1707
22%
1498
7%
961
-31%
890
-36%
1487
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
658
388.4
-41%
748
14%
680
3%
476.3
-28%
312.8
-52%
386.4
-41%
575 ?(387 - 915, n=22)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
218.2
201.6
-8%
215
-1%
207
-5%
159.1
-27%
96.8
-56%
165.9
-24%
Random Write 4KB
261.5
193.6
-26%
203.9
-22%
215.9
-17%
145
-45%
101
-61%
165.3
-37%
188.5 ?(24.8 - 272, n=22)
-28%
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Asphalt 9 Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Dead Trigger 2
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro: Ø60.1 (60-61)
Carga Máxima
 38 °C39.6 °C39.5 °C 
 38.3 °C40.1 °C40.2 °C 
 38.3 °C39.6 °C39.4 °C 
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C
35.4 °C38.8 °C36.1 °C
36 °C39.9 °C35.7 °C
36.4 °C39.3 °C36.1 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.435.12539.736.9312828.44027.4315029.834.36325.826.58022.22610023.424.112521.222.716019.230.920018.940.22501949.531517.252.84001657.950016.764.863018.865.580014.770.1100015.673.512501474.9160013.975.6200014.474.7250014.773.6315014.372.840001571.9500015.773.2630015.860.4800015.763.41000016.260.61250015.7581600015.948.9SPL71.86327.684.3N26.315155.8median 15.9median 63median 14.3median 70Delta3.313.913.314.332.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.61.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 3 ProXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.3 / 3.1 Watt
Carga midlight 7.4 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 2
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
31%
46%
24%
49%
31%
20%
31%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.9
40%
0.53
65%
0.66
56%
0.68
55%
1.1
27%
1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22)
24%
Idle Average *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.46
37%
2.37
-3%
1.05
54%
1.5
35%
Idle Maximum *
3.1
2.33
25%
1.52
51%
2.42
22%
1.07
65%
1.71
45%
Load Average *
7.4
3.5
53%
3.83
48%
6.8
8%
4.14
44%
4.84
35%
5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22)
29%
Load Maximum *
12.3
7.68
38%
8.89
28%
7.5
39%
9.05
26%
10.42
15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
26h 29min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 07min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 2
6000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
1%
2%
14%
3%
11%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1589
1374
-14%
1789
13%
2083
31%
H.264
972
1096
13%
1126
16%
734
-24%
WiFi v1.3
767
1045
36%
662
-14%
876
14%
802
5%
851
11%
614
-20%
Load
247
168
-32%
226
-9%
243
-2%
149
-40%

Pro

+ Bons recursos para jogo
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Painel AMOLED de 90-Hz
+ Muito desempenho
+ Suporte para 5G
+ Carga rápida de 65 W
+ Muitos acessórios
+ SIM dual + conector para fones de 3,5 mm
+ Veloz armazenamento UFS 3.0
+ Alto-falantes estéreo...

Contra

- ... Com fraquezas
- Sem armazenamento expansível
- Sem certificação IP
- Tela escura com sensor de luz ambiente desativada
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- USB 2.0

Veredicto - Grande, maior, Black Shark 3 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro in review: Test device courtesy of
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro in review: Test device courtesy of

O Black Shark 3 Pro oferece um excelente hardware de jogo para os entusiastas de jogos móveis. O enorme painel OLED apresenta tanto uma alta taxa de atualização como uma alta taxa de amostragem. Apesar da resolução de 1440p, o desempenho do smartphone para jogos é excelente, os tempos de duração são decentes e o desenvolvimento de calor mal afeta o desempenho disponível - mesmo sem o acessório opcional "FunCooler Pro". Os botões dedicados e alto-falantes estéreo contribuem para a experiência de jogo em geral, embora os alto-falantes não sejam de alta qualidade quando comparados com os do Xiaomi Mi 10.

Além de reclamações menores, que se relacionam com a tela escura no modo manual sem o sensor de luz ambiente, botões do Master Trigger um pouco soltos, bem como a falta de opções de expansão de armazenamento, um problema é particularmente irritante em um smartphone destinado para jogos: As restrições de software do fabricante chinês. Eles limitam o painel OLED para abaixo da taxa de atualização total de 90 Hz em nossos jogos de teste, embora PUBG móvel e Dead Trigger 2 ambos teoricamente suportam 120 FPS - aqui, o Black Shark parece ter implementado um limite de 60-FPS. O fato de que o Redmi K30 5G atinge os 120 FPS completos no nosso teste, exacerba esta frustração. Esperamos que o Black Shark resolva isso o mais rápido possível.  

O Black Shark 3 Pro é uma delícia para os jogadores.

Para aqueles que consideram a tela de 7,1 polegadas grande demais, o Black Shark 3 "normal”, já disponível na Europa com 8 GB de RAM e 128 GB de armazenamento, é uma alternativa interessante.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 73%
Peso
88%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
71%
Médio
80%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro - Poderoso smartphone para jogos com uma desvantagem
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-06- 9 (Update: 2020-06-16)