Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 222 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.3 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 205 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.39" | 2340x1080 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 253 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 7.10" | 3120x1440 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 06/2022 | Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650 | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.65" | 2340x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3200x1440 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 619 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1" | OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -49% | -37% | 35% | -91% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 619 | 409 -34% | 570 -8% | 778 26% | 593 -4% | 740 20% |
| Brightness | 616 | 412 -33% | 589 -4% | 783 27% | 601 -2% | 747 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 95 6% | 92 2% | 94 4% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.74 | 5.2 -39% | 4.65 -24% | 0.9 76% | 8.1 -117% | 2.6 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.94 | 8.9 -12% | 7.61 4% | 2.2 72% | 16.2 -104% | 4.57 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.8 -182% | 4.9 -188% | 1.7 -0% | 7.1 -318% | 1.5 12% |
| Gamma | 2.188 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.205 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.269 97% |
| CCT | 6662 98% | 7430 87% | 7500 87% | 6481 100% | 7566 86% | 6284 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 227.3 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | OnePlus 8 | Nubia RedMagic 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20+ | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -63% | -3% | -2% | -19% | -5% | -15% | 46% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1692 | 793 -53% | 1398 -17% | 1707 1% | 1654 -2% | 1603 -5% | 1520 ? -10% | 1887 ? 12% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 680 | 195.6 -71% | 658 -3% | 748 10% | 388.4 -43% | 694 2% | 546 ? -20% | 1471 ? 116% |
| Random Read 4KB | 238.3 | 145.2 -39% | 218.2 -8% | 215 -10% | 201.6 -15% | 199.6 -16% | 206 ? -14% | 278 ? 17% |
| Random Write 4KB | 227.8 | 25 -89% | 261.5 15% | 203.9 -10% | 193.6 -15% | 229.8 1% | 193.9 ? -15% | 311 ? 37% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 66.8 ? | 67.3 ? | ||||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.6 ? | 55.7 ? |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.2 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt |
| Carga |
6.3 / 10.7 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 41% | -18% | 19% | 19% | 8% | 6% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 0.73 39% | 1.5 -25% | 0.9 25% | 1.1 8% | 1 17% | 1.133 ? 6% | 0.883 ? 26% |
| Idle Average * | 2.1 | 1.01 52% | 2.3 -10% | 2.3 -10% | 1.5 29% | 1.7 19% | 2.23 ? -6% | 1.467 ? 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.5 | 1.13 55% | 3.1 -24% | 2.33 7% | 1.71 32% | 2.3 8% | 2.45 ? 2% | 1.621 ? 35% |
| Load Average * | 6.3 | 3.64 42% | 7.4 -17% | 3.5 44% | 4.84 23% | 5.8 8% | 5.26 ? 17% | 6.55 ? -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.7 | 8.86 17% | 12.3 -15% | 7.68 28% | 10.42 3% | 11.8 -10% | 9.68 ? 10% | 9.9 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | 11% | 11% | -21% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1487 | 952 -36% | 1589 7% | 1374 -8% | 2041 37% | |
| H.264 | 899 | 666 -26% | 972 8% | 1096 22% | 978 9% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 703 | 774 10% | 767 9% | 1045 49% | 614 -13% | 794 13% |
| Load | 206 | 295 43% | 247 20% | 168 -18% | 149 -28% | 218 6% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Muito desempenho...mas não por muito
O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 tem muitos recursos que os jogadores esperam: Um design extraordinário, porém bem pensado, desempenho extremamente rápido, armazenamento interno rápido, uma solução de refrigeração confiável e uma boa tela.
No entanto, o dispositivo não está livre de falhas e a duração da bateria poderia ter sido maior em sessões de jogos mais longas, o alto índice de atualização da tela nos jogos não é tão abrangente quanto gostaríamos e os alto-falantes têm espaço para melhorias também. Dito isto, alguns compromissos são inevitáveis, uma vez que o Black Shark 3 dá aos usuários acesso ao mundo dos jogos por apenas 599 Euros (~ US$ 685). Isso também inclui a falta de certificação IP, carregamento sem fio e NFC. O último é particularmente surpreendente, uma vez que os pagamentos móveis estão se tornando cada vez mais importantes.
Comparado ao modelo Pro, não há botões nas esquinas dedicados, no entanto, existem muitos acessórios para jogos, alguns dos quais são incrivelmente convenientes.
O Black Shark 3 está muito rápido, mas sua duração da bateria é apenas média.
Em suma, o Black Shark 3 é uma alternativa barata para todos aqueles que procuram principalmente alto desempenho nos jogos. Para quem não gosta de design, ainda é um smartphone relativamente acessível, porém poderoso, com uma tela de 90 Hz. De qualquer forma, a duração da bateria não deve ser uma prioridade.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
