Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED

Jogos acessíveis?

O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 mais uma vez oferece uma experiência de jogo barata e um exterior incomum. Embora falte alguns recursos em comparação com o modelo Pro, é mais barato e mais compacto em troca. Vamos ver se a Xiaomi conseguiu criar algo que será capaz de satisfazer a comunidade de gamers.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Black Shark Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 128 GB UFS, 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.4 x 168.7 x 77.3
Bateria
4720 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ até 65 watts
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​60FPS (câmera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.25, lente grande ângular (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbridos), Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS; LED de notificações (back/multi-colored); , fanless
peso
222 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
85.3 %
v7 (old)
07/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
SD 865, Adreno 650
222 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.3 %
v6 (old)
04/2019
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
SD 855, Adreno 640
205 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
85.3 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
253 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.10"3120x1440
88.4 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
84.2 %
v7 (old)
06/2022
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3200x1440
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Size Comparison

177.8 mm 83.3 mm 10.1 mm 253 g168.7 mm 77.3 mm 10.4 mm 222 g168.56 mm 78 mm 9.75 mm 218 g163.61 mm 75.01 mm 8.77 mm 205 g161.9 mm 73.7 mm 7.8 mm 188 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (463min - 960max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
923 (783min - 956max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (785min - 909max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (759min - 898max) MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (410min - 577max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (911min - 960max) MBit/s +39%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (808min - 847max) MBit/s +23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
817 (785min - 843max) MBit/s +20%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (601min - 733max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
586 (267min - 693max) MBit/s -14%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (601-733)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (783-956)
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - roundabout
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - roundabout
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - bridge
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - bridge
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - overview
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - overview
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - roundabout
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - roundabout
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - bridge
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
16.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3: 10.16 ∆E min: 2 - max: 16.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.7 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
31 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3: 26.71 ∆E min: 12.23 - max: 38.84 ∆E
583
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 650 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 615.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 619 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1"
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-49%
-37%
35%
-91%
22%
Brightness middle
619
409
-34%
570
-8%
778
26%
593
-4%
740
20%
Brightness
616
412
-33%
589
-4%
783
27%
601
-2%
747
21%
Brightness Distribution
90
95
6%
90
0%
95
6%
92
2%
94
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.74
5.2
-39%
4.65
-24%
0.9
76%
8.1
-117%
2.6
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.94
8.9
-12%
7.61
4%
2.2
72%
16.2
-104%
4.57
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
4.8
-182%
4.9
-188%
1.7
-0%
7.1
-318%
1.5
12%
Gamma
2.188 101%
2.21 100%
2.205 100%
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.269 97%
CCT
6662 98%
7430 87%
7500 87%
6481 100%
7566 86%
6284 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
924 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
903 Points -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +8%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3449 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3361 Points -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -4%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3382 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2634 - 4737, n=15)
3203 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)
6763 Points +100%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3310 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2896 - 4464, n=15)
3239 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)
7074 Points +114%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12612 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10330 Points -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11839 Points -6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points +8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9822 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8342 Points -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10945 Points +11%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points +10%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points +14%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
112989 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
83518 Points -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
110468 Points -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points -36%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
154375 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
110432 Points -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149468 Points -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
58293 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
45072 Points -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
57583 Points -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points -54%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9138 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7673 Points -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
Points -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9492 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11557 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9983 Points -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12494 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5274 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4240 Points -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points -9%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5049 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10090 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7980 Points -21%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9877 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 11492, n=22)
9645 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12843 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10300 Points -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12750 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 16809, n=22)
12921 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5765 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 Points -23%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=22)
5138 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7323 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5734 Points -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
Points -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7305 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8284 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6362 Points -23%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8432 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5209 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4262 Points -18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8105 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8154 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8947, n=23)
8073 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9157 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7108 Points -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9467 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 11999, n=22)
9501 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5780 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4535 Points -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points -7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4733 - 5780, n=22)
5319 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps +50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
206 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
203 fps -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +36%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
68 fps +13%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +26%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
120 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
102 fps -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
122 fps +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=23)
123.6 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +38%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43 fps -28%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +10%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
71 fps -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps +5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +43%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
41 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
25 fps -39%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +17%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps +4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +44%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +10%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps -48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +53%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps -10%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +25%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +60%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
574589 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
572807 Points 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5264 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3847 Points -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5302 Points +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +20%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8421 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5993 Points -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8622 Points +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points +19%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +21%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5564 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3560 Points -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5688 Points +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points +24%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11747 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8125 Points -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11445 Points -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +44%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1395 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1264 Points -9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1429 Points +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +12%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +82%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
66.3 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.5 Points -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
53.1 Points -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.3 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.6 Points -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
45.54 Points -31%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
117.4 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)
113.1 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
103.4 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.3 Points -24%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.1 Points -33%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +92%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83)
70.9 runs/min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.7 runs/min -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min -11%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
59.6 runs/min -16%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
46.7 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
106.7 Points +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
104 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
101 Points -3%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
94 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +134%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points +42%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
20976 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
17011 Points +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
15901 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2529 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
2411 ms *
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
2061 ms * +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * +16%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Black Shark 3Xiaomi Black Shark 2Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProOnePlus 8Nubia RedMagic 5GSamsung Galaxy S20+Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-63%
-3%
-2%
-19%
-5%
-15%
43%
Sequential Read 256KB
1692
793
-53%
1398
-17%
1707
1%
1654
-2%
1603
-5%
1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
680
195.6
-71%
658
-3%
748
10%
388.4
-43%
694
2%
546 ?(213 - 740, n=13)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
238.3
145.2
-39%
218.2
-8%
215
-10%
201.6
-15%
199.6
-16%
Random Write 4KB
227.8
25
-89%
261.5
15%
203.9
-10%
193.6
-15%
229.8
1%
193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13)
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø59.9 (59-61)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø60 (59-61)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29.5 (24-31)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø29.1 (25-31)
Carga Máxima
 39.5 °C40.6 °C40.9 °C 
 39.8 °C41.8 °C41.6 °C 
 39.7 °C40.2 °C41.1 °C 
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
37.2 °C39.7 °C37.4 °C
37.4 °C40.6 °C37.4 °C
39.1 °C41.2 °C38.7 °C
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.840.62539.940.53131.935.64038.938.75043.740.36329.8348025.924.710026.325.712524.92716021.634.92001940.925018.94631518.152.640016.660.250016.263.563014.967.68001568.6100015.668.4125014.968.9160014.970.9200015.669.4250014.668.3315014.273.2400014.170.3500014.467.3630014.659.7800014.961.31000015.261.91250015.462.71600015.754SPL68.76666.36470.627.580.8N22.418.319.715.825.3146.9median 15.6median 62.7median 43median 39.9median 48median 14.2median 63.8Delta411.323.324.122.613.316.932.536.629.424.822.826.425.32730.23323.326.121.923.21921.419.625.21944.516.148.518.954.316.657.214.358.51560.715.262.914.364.314.366.814.269.714.871.914.874.514.475.114.374.314.674.114.770.114.968.414.965.714.666.714.863.515.447.726.883.40.953.4median 14.8median 64.30.78.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 3Nubia RedMagic 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 6.3 / 10.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
41%
-18%
19%
19%
8%
6%
19%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.73
39%
1.5
-25%
0.9
25%
1.1
8%
1
17%
Idle Average *
2.1
1.01
52%
2.3
-10%
2.3
-10%
1.5
29%
1.7
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.13
55%
3.1
-24%
2.33
7%
1.71
32%
2.3
8%
Load Average *
6.3
3.64
42%
7.4
-17%
3.5
44%
4.84
23%
5.8
8%
5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22)
17%
Load Maximum *
10.7
8.86
17%
12.3
-15%
7.68
28%
10.42
3%
11.8
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 26min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
11%
11%
-21%
16%
Reader / Idle
1487
952
-36%
1589
7%
1374
-8%
2041
37%
H.264
899
666
-26%
972
8%
1096
22%
978
9%
WiFi v1.3
703
774
10%
767
9%
1045
49%
614
-13%
794
13%
Load
206
295
43%
247
20%
168
-18%
149
-28%
218
6%

Pro

+ Bom valor
+ Tela fluente de 90-Hz
+ Desempenho veloz
+ Efeitos de iluminação extravagantes na à parte traseira
+ Sem afogamento no uso intenso prolongado
+ Ampla variedade de acessórios disponível
+ A câmera capturas boas fotos
+ Navegação confiável
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Sem NFC
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Sem certificação IP
- 90 Hz não disponível em muitos jogos
- Duração de bateria bastante curta

Veredicto – Muito desempenho...mas não por muito

In review: Xiaomi Black Shark 3
In review: Xiaomi Black Shark 3

O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 tem muitos recursos que os jogadores esperam: Um design extraordinário, porém bem pensado, desempenho extremamente rápido, armazenamento interno rápido, uma solução de refrigeração confiável e uma boa tela.

No entanto, o dispositivo não está livre de falhas e a duração da bateria poderia ter sido maior em sessões de jogos mais longas, o alto índice de atualização da tela nos jogos não é tão abrangente quanto gostaríamos e os alto-falantes têm espaço para melhorias também. Dito isto, alguns compromissos são inevitáveis, uma vez que o Black Shark 3 dá aos usuários acesso ao mundo dos jogos por apenas 599 Euros (~ US$ 685). Isso também inclui a falta de certificação IP, carregamento sem fio e NFC. O último é particularmente surpreendente, uma vez que os pagamentos móveis estão se tornando cada vez mais importantes.

Comparado ao modelo Pro, não há botões nas esquinas dedicados, no entanto, existem muitos acessórios para jogos, alguns dos quais são incrivelmente convenientes.

O Black Shark 3 está muito rápido, mas sua duração da bateria é apenas média.

Em suma, o Black Shark 3 é uma alternativa barata para todos aqueles que procuram principalmente alto desempenho nos jogos. Para quem não gosta de design, ainda é um smartphone relativamente acessível, porém poderoso, com uma tela de 90 Hz. De qualquer forma, a duração da bateria não deve ser uma prioridade.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
50 / 70 → 71%
Peso
88%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
62 / 64 → 97%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
71%
Médio
79%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-24 (Update: 2020-07-27)