Breve Análise do Smartphone Vivo X50 Pro - A câmera gimbal "revolucionária" faz alguma diferença?

Name: Vivo X50 Pro
Brand: Vivo

Para mãos trêmulas.

O destaque e ponto de venda exclusivo do Vivo X50 Pro é o seu sistema de câmera gimbal, que supostamente estabiliza as gravações de vídeo muito melhor do que um OIS tradicional. Descubra se a câmera tipo gimbal no mais recente smartphone da Vivo oferece um benefício real ou se não é nada além de marketing, em nossa análise.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/07/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Vivo X50 Pro (X Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 620

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.56 polegadas 19.8:9, 2376 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 228 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor geomagnético, sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola, OTG, Miracast

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G: GSM850/900/1800/1900; 3G: WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8; 4G: FDD_LTEB1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20, TDD_LTEB38/B40/B41; 5G: NSA n41/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.04 x 158.46 x 72.8

Bateria

4315 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.6) + 8 MP (f/3.4, 1/4.0") + 13MP (2x f/2.5, 1/2.8", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 120˚, 16 mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Capa protetora, fones, fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, Funtouch OS 10.5, 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L3, fanless

peso

181.5 g, Suprimento de energia: 93 g

Preço

600 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Vivo X50 Pro SD 765G, Adreno 620	181.5 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.56"	2376x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	208 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2340x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.44"	2400x1080
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	180 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Oppo Find X2 Neo SD 765G, Adreno 620	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
85 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	LG Velvet SD 765G, Adreno 620	180 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.80"	2460x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	937 (466^min - 960^max) MBit/s +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	867 (440^min - 907^max) MBit/s +35%
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	849 (414^min - 930^max) MBit/s +32%
Vivo X50 Pro Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	642 (627^min - 656^max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X2 Neo Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	628 (294^min - 639^max) MBit/s -2%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	618 (310^min - 644^max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AX12
Realme X50 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	914 (888^min - 928^max) MBit/s +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 (881^min - 916^max) MBit/s +34%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	894 (864^min - 925^max) MBit/s +32%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	683 (656^min - 691^max) MBit/s +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (664^min - 686^max) MBit/s 0%
Vivo X50 Pro Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	676 (631^min - 695^max) MBit/s

Vivo X50 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø665 (631-695)

Vivo X50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (627-656)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Weitwinkel Low Light Ultraweitwinkel Weitwinkel 5-facher-Zoom

click to load images

Vivo X50 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Vivo X50 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Vivo X50 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Vivo X50 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Vivo X50 Pro

Huawei P40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Vivo X50 Pro: 8.71 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 15.77 ∆E


782 cd/m²	771 cd/m²	784 cd/m²
769 cd/m²	784 cd/m²	784 cd/m²
779 cd/m²	776 cd/m²	791 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 791 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 780 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 784 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.99

	Vivo X50 Pro AMOLED, 2376x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Realme X50 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Oppo Find X2 Neo OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	LG Velvet P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.8"
Screen		29%	-8%	30%	-35%	-1%
Brightness middle	784	786 0%	679 -13%	778 -1%	797 2%	586 -25%
Brightness	780	791 1%	690 -12%	783 0%	807 3%	587 -25%
Brightness Distribution	97	96 -1%	97 0%	95 -2%	95 -2%	97 0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	1.1 69%	3.2 9%	0.9 74%	5.4 -54%	2.8 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.4	2.2 66%	6.2 3%	2.2 66%	9.2 -44%	6.3 2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	1.8 40%	4.1 -37%	1.7 43%	6.4 -113%	2.3 23%
Gamma	1.99 ^111%	2.26 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.01 ^109%
CCT	6666 ^98%	6315 ^103%	6604 ^98%	6481 ^100%	7245 ^90%	6827 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

373.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.2 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	634 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	910 Points +44%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	915 Points +44%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	919 Points +45%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	620 Points -2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	554 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (554 - 673, n=17)	603 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +57%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1876 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3309 Points +76%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3087 Points +65%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3427 Points +83%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1854 Points -1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1797 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1520 - 1966, n=17)	1781 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +77%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1265 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1187 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (168 - 1278, n=12)	1060 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)	6763 Points +435%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1302 Points
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1242 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1231 - 1302, n=10)	1265 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)	7074 Points +443%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2882 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4304 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2689 - 2882, n=3)	2811 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +90%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	7665 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13589 Points +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (6213 - 7765, n=3)	7214 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +97%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	9965 Points
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9576 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8591 - 9965, n=3)	9175 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +20%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	9675 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11850 Points +22%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	19711 Points +104%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13079 Points +35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	9955 Points +3%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	9154 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16)	9734 Points +1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8065 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10613 Points +32%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13202 Points +64%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10800 Points +34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8456 Points +5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	7808 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17)	8308 Points +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	44918 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	83917 Points +87%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72524 Points +61%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	44531 Points -1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	43325 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (38137 - 48201, n=17)	44398 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	68808 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	145603 Points +112%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	144611 Points +110%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	69645 Points +1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	68764 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (56690 - 70216, n=17)	67538 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	20631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	33793 Points +64%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27026 Points +31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19658 Points -5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18769 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (14891 - 28331, n=17)	20632 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4652 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8581 Points +84%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8947 Points +92%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8810 Points +89%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4561 Points -2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3576 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2972 - 4693, n=17)	4318 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5176 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12234 Points +136%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11533 Points +123%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11540 Points +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5148 Points -1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5005 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2844 - 5832, n=17)	4882 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3432 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4196 Points +22%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5034 Points +47%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4819 Points +40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points -5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1689 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1689 - 3529, n=17)	3237 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4819 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8499 Points +76%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9910 Points +106%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9850 Points +104%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4621 Points -4%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3678 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3678 - 4893, n=17)	4562 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	5265 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12601 Points +139%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12895 Points +145%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12873 Points +145%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5356 Points +2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5437 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4036 - 5437, n=17)	5181 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +274%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3651 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3973 Points +9%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5478 Points +50%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5406 Points +48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3099 Points -15%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1790 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1790 - 3651, n=17)	3275 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3329 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7190 Points +116%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7293 Points +119%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7174 Points +116%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points -1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3278 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2261 - 3346, n=17)	3162 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3342 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8371 Points +150%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8345 Points +150%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8288 Points +148%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3259 Points -2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3289 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2048 - 3342, n=17)	3137 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3462 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4813 Points +39%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5068 Points +46%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4879 Points +41%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3395 Points -2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3312 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2964 - 3556, n=17)	3331 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3597 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7957 Points +121%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points +128%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8153 Points +127%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3501 Points -3%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2934 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2934 - 3605, n=17)	3413 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3556 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9389 Points +164%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9567 Points +169%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9542 Points +168%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3569 Points 0%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3547 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2814 - 3592, n=17)	3467 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3765 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5187 Points +38%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5523 Points +47%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5401 Points +43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3301 Points -12%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1898 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1898 - 3765, n=17)	3288 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6182 Points +100%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6644 Points +115%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6543 Points +112%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3065 Points -1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2877 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2287 - 3130, n=17)	2966 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3149 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8175 Points +160%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8263 Points +162%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8294 Points +163%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3147 Points 0%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3193 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 3198, n=17)	3053 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	2893 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3336 Points +15%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3947 Points +36%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3763 Points +30%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	2756 Points -5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	2145 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2145 - 2979, n=17)	2742 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -7%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	81 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	90 fps +11%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -26%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	61 fps -25%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	60 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15)	62.5 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	93 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	202 fps +117%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	204 fps +119%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	207 fps +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	94 fps +1%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	96 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15)	88.7 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +201%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	46 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps +91%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +30%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +30%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	50 fps +9%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	47 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15)	46.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +64%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	50 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	123 fps +146%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	124 fps +148%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	125 fps +150%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	56 fps +12%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	55 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15)	51.1 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +231%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	31 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	75 fps +142%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +94%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps +94%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	34 fps +10%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	32 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15)	31.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +112%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	35 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	86 fps +146%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps +146%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps +151%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	38 fps +9%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	37 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15)	35.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +235%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	18 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	42 fps +133%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps +144%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps +156%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	19 fps +6%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	18 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (11 - 21, n=15)	17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +166%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps +150%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps +155%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	52 fps +160%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps +5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	21 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 21, n=15)	19.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +253%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	21 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps +119%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps +119%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps +129%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	21 fps 0%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	20 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (13 - 23, n=17)	20.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +136%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	23 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps +130%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps +130%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps +135%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	24 fps +4%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	23 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (12 - 24, n=17)	21.6 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +247%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	13 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	29 fps +123%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	30 fps +131%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps +138%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	13 fps 0%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	12 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8.8 - 15, n=17)	12.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +188%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	8.3 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps +141%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps +141%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps +141%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	8.5 fps +2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	8.5 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5.3 - 13, n=17)	8.38 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +286%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	327208 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	566256 Points +73%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	593933 Points +82%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	563466 Points +72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	326795 Points 0%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	308878 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14)	312767 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	3857 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5752 Points +49%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6205 Points +61%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5897 Points +53%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	3931 Points +2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	3674 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3237 - 4094, n=14)	3813 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +63%
System (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	6936 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9810 Points +41%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10147 Points +46%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10021 Points +44%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	6685 Points -4%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	6430 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5411 - 6936, n=14)	6506 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +47%
Memory (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4637 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7450 Points +61%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8204 Points +77%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6912 Points +49%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	4856 Points +5%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	4556 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (4556 - 5683, n=14)	5099 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	4639 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11730 Points +153%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11688 Points +152%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11654 Points +151%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	5216 Points +12%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	5153 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2525 - 5247, n=14)	4732 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +264%
Web (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192	1442 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1276 Points -12%
Realme X50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1576 Points +9%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1498 Points +4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288	1412 Points -2%
LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144	1226 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1139 - 1462, n=14)	1372 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +8%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +660%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	69.5 Points +339%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	51.3 Points +224%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	51 Points +222%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	50.9 Points +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)	47.7 Points +201%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	39.33 Points +148%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	15.84 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	116.7 Points +984%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	109.2 Points +914%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)	81.1 Points +653%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	79.1 Points +634%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	10.77 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +1413%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.3 runs/min +648%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	56.2 runs/min +524%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	50.8 runs/min +464%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	49.8 runs/min +453%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)	46.1 runs/min +412%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	9 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +644%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	118 Points +490%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	102 Points +410%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	99 Points +395%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	76 Points +280%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	74 Points +270%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)	71.5 Points +258%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	20 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +935%
Realme X50 Pro	23768 Points +562%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	22016 Points +513%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	18546 Points +416%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)	16671 Points +364%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	16523 Points +360%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	15745 Points +338%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	3592 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)	15230 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)	3721 ms * +76%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)	2689 ms * +82%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)	2666 ms * +82%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	2538 ms * +83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)	2104 ms * +86%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)	2000 ms * +87%
Realme X50 Pro	0 ms * +100%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +90%

* ... smaller is better

	Vivo X50 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 10	Realme X50 Pro	OnePlus 8	Oppo Find X2 Neo	LG Velvet	Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		88%	113%	101%	27%	19%	13%	211%
Sequential Read 256KB	925	1498 62%	1756 90%	1707 85%	943 2%	925 0%	826 ?(496 - 984, n=22) -11%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 99%
Sequential Write 256KB	209.1	680 225%	756 262%	748 258%	454.4 117%	409.2 96%	358 ?(198.5 - 914, n=22) 71%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 581%
Random Read 4KB	165.2	207 25%	229.4 39%	215 30%	160.5 -3%	154.3 -7%	166.6 ?(108.4 - 265, n=22) 1%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 68%
Random Write 4KB	156.8	215.9 38%	252 61%	203.9 30%	143.8 -8%	135.9 -13%	141.5 ?(22.1 - 280, n=22) -10%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 97%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


31.5 °C	31.7 °C	30.2 °C
32 °C	32.8 °C	30.9 °C
32.4 °C	32 °C	30.7 °C

Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


30 °C	30.2 °C	30.2 °C
30 °C	30.5 °C	30.7 °C
28.9 °C	30.2 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 24 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Vivo X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.03 / 0.39 Watt
Ocioso	1.18 / 2.45 / 2.51 Watt
Carga	3.61 / 5.36 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Vivo X50 Pro 4315 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh	LG Velvet 4300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		12%	-4%	-1%	13%	25%	7%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	1.18	0.53 55%	1 15%	0.9 24%	0.8 32%	0.66 44%	0.965 ?(0.66 - 1.8, n=15) 18%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Average *	2.45	1.46 40%	1.77 28%	2.3 6%	2.21 10%	1.58 36%	1.899 ?(0.82 - 2.55, n=15) 22%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	2.51	1.52 39%	1.86 26%	2.33 7%	2.23 11%	1.6 36%	2.07 ?(0.85 - 2.9, n=15) 18%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 36%
Load Average *	3.61	3.83 -6%	4.23 -17%	3.5 3%	3.14 13%	3.3 9%	3.98 ?(2.73 - 6.8, n=15) -10%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -79%
Load Maximum *	5.36	8.89 -66%	9.13 -70%	7.68 -43%	5.44 -1%	5.46 -2%	6.19 ?(4.4 - 10.3, n=15) -15%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -83%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 29min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 36min

	Vivo X50 Pro 4315 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh	Realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh	LG Velvet 4300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-8%	-4%	-7%	-3%
Reader / Idle	1529	1789 17%	1507 -1%	1374 -10%
H.264	1352	1126 -17%	1029 -24%	1096 -19%
WiFi v1.3	763	662 -13%	775 2%	1045 37%	712 -7%	741 -3%
Load	216	226 5%	194 -10%	168 -22%

Pro

+ Painel OLED brilhante de 90 HZ

+ Quase nenhuma emissão de calor

+ Tecnologia gimbal

+ Boa câmera principal

+ Bom alto-falante...

Contra

- ...mas apenas mono

- Sem certificação IP, sem carregamento sem fio

- SO FunTouch

- Leitor de digitais

- Widevine L3

Veredicto do Vivo X50 Pro: Design elegante com câmera Gimbal

In review: Vivo X50 Pro. Review unit provided by TradingShenzhen.

O Vivo X50 Pro combina hardware de gama média com uma excelente qualidade de construção, uma sensação de alta qualidade e um design moderno. Ele possui um painel AMOLED brilhante, bem como uma câmera gimbal capaz de tirar fotos muito boas. Apesar de o Vivo X50 Pro ser apenas um dispositivo de gama média superior, seu nível de estabilização de imagem é excelente quando comparado diretamente com smartphones topo de linha com OIS tradicional.

O Vivo X50 Pro é um smartphone de gama média de boa aparência. No entanto, seu sistema operacional FunTouch precisa urgentemente de alguma “europeização”.

Os preços oficiais europeus ainda não foram anunciados. Se acabar custando quase o mesmo que o LG Velvet entes “exótico” contendor de gama média certamente se tornará uma opção interessante. Dita competição neste segmento é dura e numerosa, e uma vez que o X50 Pro esteja oficialmente disponível na Europa, esperamos que dispositivos como o Xiaomi Mi 10 ou OnePlus 8 compitam quase na mesma faixa de preço.

Dado que o fabricante chinês já estabeleceu a sua presença na Alemanha com, entre outros, uma conta oficial do Instagram, esperamos que estes dispositivos estejam oficialmente disponíveis o mais tardar no final deste ano. Com o lançamento da versão global deste dispositivo, esperamos ver recursos de software ajustados em comparação com nossa unidade de análise chinesa, uma certificação DRM e suporte para bandas LTE adicionais, como a banda 28 bastante comum.

Vivo X50 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento

88%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

93%

Conectividade

52 / 70 → 74%

Peso

90%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

36 / 64 → 56%

Desempenho da aplicação

66 / 86 → 76%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

72%

Médio

78%

84%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Vivo X50 Pro - A câmera gimbal "revolucionária" faz alguma diferença?

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10- 7 (Update: 2020-10-12)

Vergleichsgeräte

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Vivo X50 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto do Vivo X50 Pro: Design elegante com câmera Gimbal

More articles related to this device

Price comparison