Breve Análise do Smartphone UMIDIGI S2 Lite
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 7C | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 7C | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344 cd/m²
Contraste: 1402:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Oukitel U18 LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.9" | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -22% | -7% | -28% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 701 | 392 -44% | 393 -44% | 565 -19% | 620 -12% |
| Brightness | 720 | 403 -44% | 365 -49% | 535 -26% | 612 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 85 -2% | 83 -5% | 96 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.61 -22% | 0.29 42% | 0.55 -10% | 0.57 -14% |
| Contrast | 1402 | 643 -54% | 1355 -3% | 1027 -27% | 1088 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.97 | 5.4 -9% | 5.28 -6% | 7.1 -43% | 3.46 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.31 | 9.7 27% | 9 32% | 13.7 -3% | 7.88 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 4.2 -27% | 4.2 -27% | 6.2 -88% | 3.9 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.59 85% | 2.6 85% | 2.85 77% | 2.073 106% |
| CCT | 8056 81% | 6734 97% | 7086 92% | 7153 91% | 7230 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3667 - 4532, n=13) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (2782 - 3394, n=17) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Umidigi S2 Lite | Honor 7C | Huawei Y7 2018 | Oukitel U18 | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -1% | 2% | 42% | 20% | 1426% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 271 | 297 10% | 256 -6% | 273.1 1% | 270 0% | 242 ? -11% | 1887 ? 596% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 75 | 115 53% | 71.5 -5% | 109.2 46% | 194.5 159% | 100.5 ? 34% | 1471 ? 1861% |
| Random Read 4KB | 36.4 | 30 -18% | 38.8 7% | 28.7 -21% | 79.5 118% | 43.2 ? 19% | 278 ? 664% |
| Random Write 4KB | 11.6 | 10 -14% | 9.5 -18% | 12.96 12% | 7.1 -39% | 22.4 ? 93% | 311 ? 2581% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.5 | 83.9 ? 8% | 85 10% | 71.5 ? -8% | 84.4 9% | 71.8 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 56.5 | 62.6 ? 11% | 61.5 9% | 47.02 ? -17% | 59.5 5% | 52.9 ? -6% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.8 / 1.6 / 3.5 Watt |
| Carga |
4.6 / 6.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Oukitel U18 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 2% | -56% | -12% | -10% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.6 25% | 0.9 -13% | 1.12 -40% | 0.7 12% | 1.13 ? -41% | 0.88 ? -10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.16 -35% | 1.9 -19% | 2.27 -42% | 2.8 -75% | 2.02 ? -26% | 1.444 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.5 | 2.24 36% | 2.3 34% | 2.49 29% | 3.4 3% | 2.42 ? 31% | 1.6 ? 54% |
| Load Average * | 4.6 | 2.59 44% | 4.7 -2% | 10.75 -134% | 4.2 9% | 5.21 ? -13% | 6.57 ? -43% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.5 | 4.11 37% | 5.7 12% | 12.39 -91% | 7.2 -11% | 6.56 ? -1% | 9.91 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
| Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Oukitel U18 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 7% | -3% | -1% | -23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 645 | 693 7% | 624 -3% | 639 -1% | 497 -23% |
| Reader / Idle | 1305 | ||||
| H.264 | 687 | ||||
| Load | 245 |
Pro
Contra
A maior decepção com o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é que ele não faz jus às suas imagens de marketing. Os marcos laterais são muito mais grossos do que a tela de borda a borda do que a UMIDIGI sugere em seu site e em seu material de marketing.
Essas imagens de marketing enganosas são uma pena, já que o S2 Lite é um bom smartphone. A carcaça de metal é estável e elegante, enquanto a duração da bateria é boa, embora o S2 Lite não consiga fazer o melhor uso de sua enorme bateria de 5.100 mAh. A tela é espetacularmente brilhante e eclipsa dispositivos muito mais caros. O S2 Lite pode até competir com smartphones projetados para serem usados em exteriores como o CAT S31. A combinação do brilho impressionante da tela, uma alta relação de contraste e boa reprodução de cores também não é muito comum em smartphones a esse preço.
O UMIDIGI S2 Lite tem uma tela extremamente brilhante que ofusca as desvantagens do dispositivo, como suas altas temperaturas de superfície sob uso intenso, seus patches de segurança desatualizados e suas imagens de marketing enganosas. No geral, o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é um dispositivo com excelente desempenho a um preço acessível.
A câmera está abaixo da média, enquanto o nível de patch de segurança do Android precisa ser atualizado com urgência. A prometida atualização para o Android Oreo 8.1 também está atrasada, mas nunca recomendaríamos confiar nas promessas do fabricante sobre as atualizações de software. Recomendamos a compra do dispositivo de um fornecedor europeu, embora para a cobertura de garantia. No geral, o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é um ótimo smartphone de gama média baixa.
Umidigi S2 Lite
- 06/27/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
