Breve Análise do Smartphone UMIDIGI S2 Lite

Name: Umidigi S2 Lite
Brand: Umidigi

Smartphone de metal. O UMIDIGI S2 Lite é um phablet acessível com uma enorme bateria, uma tela de 6.0 polegadas com um formato de 2:1 e câmeras duplas traseiras. Descubra nesta análise se o S2 Lite é bom o suficiente para o uso diário.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone Phablet

Test device courtesy of Umidigi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Umidigi S2 Lite (S Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.00 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 24 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Bússola, USB Type-C, USB OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 158.1 x 74.6

Bateria

22.4 Wh, 5100 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge

Sistema Operativo

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP Omnivision OV 16880 sensor, f/2.0 aperture, Phase detection autofocus (AF), Dual LED flash, videos can be recorded in up to 2160p; 5 MP secondary camera, depth of field (DOF)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Quick charger, USB cable, SIM tool, protective cover, LTE Bandwidth: 300 Mbps Download, 50 Mbps Upload; FM radio; SAR value: 0.511 W/kg (Head), 1.021 W/kg (Body), fanless

peso

186 g, Suprimento de energia: 63 g

Preço

149 Euro

Links

Umidigi página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s +77%
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.6 MBit/s
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.9 MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s -3%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s +96%
Umidigi S2 Lite Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 MBit/s
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55 MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -5%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s -19%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


717 cd/m²	673 cd/m²	703 cd/m²
739 cd/m²	701 cd/m²	737 cd/m²
737 cd/m²	699 cd/m²	778 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 778 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 720.4 cd/m² Minimum: 26.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344 cd/m²
Contraste: 1402:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Umidigi S2 Lite IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Oukitel U18 LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.9"	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		-22%	-7%	-28%	0%
Brightness middle	701	392 -44%	393 -44%	565 -19%	620 -12%
Brightness	720	403 -44%	365 -49%	535 -26%	612 -15%
Brightness Distribution	87	85 -2%	85 -2%	83 -5%	96 10%
Black Level *	0.5	0.61 -22%	0.29 42%	0.55 -10%	0.57 -14%
Contrast	1402	643 -54%	1355 -3%	1027 -27%	1088 -22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.97	5.4 -9%	5.28 -6%	7.1 -43%	3.46 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.31	9.7 27%	9 32%	13.7 -3%	7.88 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	4.2 -27%	4.2 -27%	6.2 -88%	3.9 -18%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.59 ^85%	2.6 ^85%	2.85 ^77%	2.073 ^106%
CCT	8056 ^81%	6734 ^97%	7086 ^92%	7153 ^91%	7230 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	43125 Points
Honor 7C	54731 Points +27%
Huawei Y7 2018	45687 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	60490 Points +40%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17)	41781 Points -3%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	56639 Points
Honor 7C	71167 Points +26%
Huawei Y7 2018	59421 Points +5%
Oukitel U18	54989 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	76178 Points +34%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)	54391 Points -4%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	4371 Points
Honor 7C	5656 Points +29%
Huawei Y7 2018	4918 Points +13%
Oukitel U18	4532 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	5801 Points +33%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3667 - 4532, n=13)	4271 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	3348 Points
Honor 7C	4736 Points +41%
Huawei Y7 2018	3874 Points +16%
Oukitel U18	3358 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4905 Points +47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2782 - 3394, n=17)	3221 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	886 Points
Honor 7C	442 Points -50%
Huawei Y7 2018	1020 Points +15%
Oukitel U18	899 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1229 Points +39%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (253 - 965, n=19)	663 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +611%
System (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	1870 Points
Honor 7C	2665 Points +43%
Huawei Y7 2018	1906 Points +2%
Oukitel U18	1838 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3236 Points +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1077 - 2003, n=19)	1776 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +443%
Memory (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	840 Points
Honor 7C	1522 Points +81%
Huawei Y7 2018	1144 Points +36%
Oukitel U18	798 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	961 Points +14%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (609 - 1288, n=19)	833 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +706%
Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	645 Points
Honor 7C	955 Points +48%
Huawei Y7 2018	739 Points +15%
Oukitel U18	640 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1017 Points +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=19)	585 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +2521%
Web (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	607 Points
Honor 7C	10 Points -98%
Huawei Y7 2018	673 Points +11%
Oukitel U18	698 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	722 Points +19%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=19)	446 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +158%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	624 Points
Honor 7C	758 Points +21%
Huawei Y7 2018	676 Points +8%
Oukitel U18	608 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	870 Points +39%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=18)	618 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +779%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	2671 Points
Honor 7C	3913 Points +46%
Huawei Y7 2018	2889 Points +8%
Oukitel U18	2617 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4292 Points +61%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=18)	2520 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +464%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	1762 Points
Honor 7C	2800 Points +59%
Huawei Y7 2018	2133 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3316 Points +88%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=16)	1705 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +581%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	9774 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	9583 Points -2%
Oukitel U18	10117 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13682 Points +40%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5606 - 10269, n=18)	9018 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	9716 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	9713 Points 0%
Oukitel U18	10100 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13219 Points +36%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5884 - 10361, n=18)	9007 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	9984 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	9153 Points -8%
Oukitel U18	10143 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	15593 Points +56%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (4811 - 10553, n=18)	9040 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	547 Points
Honor 7C	824 Points +51%
Huawei Y7 2018	603 Points +10%
Oukitel U18	559 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	854 Points +56%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=18)	471 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +669%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	477 Points
Honor 7C	713 Points +49%
Huawei Y7 2018	524 Points +10%
Oukitel U18	484 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	732 Points +53%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=18)	411 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +894%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	1127 Points
Honor 7C	1809 Points +61%
Huawei Y7 2018	1280 Points +14%
Oukitel U18	1219 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2058 Points +83%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (694 - 1219, n=18)	1059 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	378 Points
Honor 7C	445 Points +18%
Huawei Y7 2018	310 Points -18%
Oukitel U18	393 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	463 Points +22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (105 - 393, n=19)	324 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +716%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	317 Points
Honor 7C	366 Points +15%
Huawei Y7 2018	255 Points -20%
Oukitel U18	329 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	379 Points +20%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (83 - 329, n=19)	272 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +929%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	1170 Points
Honor 7C	1817 Points +55%
Huawei Y7 2018	1258 Points +8%
Oukitel U18	1195 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2038 Points +74%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (702 - 1233, n=19)	1086 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +181%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	25 fps
Honor 7C	34 fps +36%
Huawei Y7 2018	27 fps +8%
Oukitel U18	25 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	17 fps -32%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16)	20.6 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +245%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	17 fps
Honor 7C	21 fps +24%
Huawei Y7 2018	16 fps -6%
Oukitel U18	17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	23 fps +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16)	15.1 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +1547%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	13 fps
Honor 7C	18 fps +38%
Huawei Y7 2018	14 fps +8%
Oukitel U18	13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.4 fps -28%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17)	10 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +481%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	6.9 fps
Honor 7C	9.2 fps +33%
Huawei Y7 2018	7.1 fps +3%
Oukitel U18	6.8 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.9 fps +43%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17)	6.26 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +2296%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	9.9 fps
Honor 7C	13 fps +31%
Huawei Y7 2018	10 fps +1%
Oukitel U18	10 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.2 fps -37%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17)	7.46 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +564%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.6 fps
Honor 7C	6 fps +30%
Huawei Y7 2018	4.6 fps 0%
Oukitel U18	4.6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.5 fps +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17)	4.18 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +2448%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	4.8 fps
Honor 7C	7 fps +46%
Huawei Y7 2018	5.4 fps +13%
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.4 fps -29%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=18)	3.57 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +896%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi S2 Lite	2.4 fps
Honor 7C	3.3 fps +38%
Huawei Y7 2018	2.6 fps +8%
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.5 fps +46%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=18)	2.24 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +2842%

Legend

Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 7C Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6750

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	23.1 Points +20%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	22.35 Points +17%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	19.18 Points
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	18.33 Points -4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19)	18.2 Points -5%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points -7%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +960%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	4424 Points +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	3506 Points
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	3470 Points -1%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	3377 Points -4%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	3363 Points -4%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19)	3095 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	14566 ms * -11%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19)	14563 ms * -11%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	13541 ms * -3%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)	13114 ms *
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	11370 ms * +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	10895 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +88%

* ... smaller is better

	Umidigi S2 Lite	Honor 7C	Huawei Y7 2018	Oukitel U18	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		8%	-1%	2%	42%	20%	1401%
Sequential Read 256KB	271	297 10%	256 -6%	273.1 1%	270 0%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -11%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 579%
Sequential Write 256KB	75	115 53%	71.5 -5%	109.2 46%	194.5 159%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) 34%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1800%
Random Read 4KB	36.4	30 -18%	38.8 7%	28.7 -21%	79.5 118%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) 19%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 661%
Random Write 4KB	11.6	10 -14%	9.5 -18%	12.96 12%	7.1 -39%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 93%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 2564%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	77.5	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	85 10%	71.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -8%	84.4 9%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	56.5	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	61.5 9%	47.02 ?(Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401) -17%	59.5 5%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -6%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


44.2 °C	40.1 °C	43.4 °C
43.3 °C	40.5 °C	42.8 °C
41.9 °C	39.9 °C	43.3 °C

Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 42.2 °C


38.4 °C	39.5 °C	41.3 °C
38.5 °C	39.9 °C	40.5 °C
39.2 °C	40 °C	40.9 °C

Máximo: 41.3 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.6 / 3.5 Watt
Carga	4.6 / 6.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6750	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	2%	-56%	-12%	-10%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.6 25%	0.9 -13%	1.12 -40%	0.7 12%	1.13 ?(0.57 - 2.3, n=19) -41%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.6	2.16 -35%	1.9 -19%	2.27 -42%	2.8 -75%	2.02 ?(1.42 - 3.5, n=19) -26%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	3.5	2.24 36%	2.3 34%	2.49 29%	3.4 3%	2.42 ?(1.47 - 5.9, n=19) 31%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 54%
Load Average *	4.6	2.59 44%	4.7 -2%	10.75 -134%	4.2 9%	5.21 ?(3.24 - 10.8, n=19) -13%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -40%
Load Maximum *	6.5	4.11 37%	5.7 12%	12.39 -91%	7.2 -11%	6.56 ?(3.3 - 12.4, n=19) -1%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -51%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		10h 45min

	Umidigi S2 Lite 5100 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	-3%	-1%	-23%
WiFi v1.3	645	693 7%	624 -3%	639 -1%	497 -23%
Reader / Idle			1305
H.264			687
Load			245

Pro

+ Carcaça de metal estável

+ Tela extremamente brilhante

+ Tela de alto contraste

+ Versão pura do Android

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Vídeos 4K respeitáveis

+ WiFi de 5 GHz

Contra

- Marcos da tela são evidentemente mais amplos do que implicam as imagens de marketing

- Sem conector de 3,5 mm

- Nível de patch de segurança desatualizado do Android

- Altas temperaturas da superfície sob uso intenso

- Consumo de energia relativamente alto

- O sensor de brilho adaptável, reduz o brilho máximo

A maior decepção com o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é que ele não faz jus às suas imagens de marketing. Os marcos laterais são muito mais grossos do que a tela de borda a borda do que a UMIDIGI sugere em seu site e em seu material de marketing.

Essas imagens de marketing enganosas são uma pena, já que o S2 Lite é um bom smartphone. A carcaça de metal é estável e elegante, enquanto a duração da bateria é boa, embora o S2 Lite não consiga fazer o melhor uso de sua enorme bateria de 5.100 mAh. A tela é espetacularmente brilhante e eclipsa dispositivos muito mais caros. O S2 Lite pode até competir com smartphones projetados para serem usados em exteriores como o CAT S31. A combinação do brilho impressionante da tela, uma alta relação de contraste e boa reprodução de cores também não é muito comum em smartphones a esse preço.

O UMIDIGI S2 Lite tem uma tela extremamente brilhante que ofusca as desvantagens do dispositivo, como suas altas temperaturas de superfície sob uso intenso, seus patches de segurança desatualizados e suas imagens de marketing enganosas. No geral, o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é um dispositivo com excelente desempenho a um preço acessível.

A câmera está abaixo da média, enquanto o nível de patch de segurança do Android precisa ser atualizado com urgência. A prometida atualização para o Android Oreo 8.1 também está atrasada, mas nunca recomendaríamos confiar nas promessas do fabricante sobre as atualizações de software. Recomendamos a compra do dispositivo de um fornecedor europeu, embora para a cobertura de garantia. No geral, o UMIDIGI S2 Lite é um ótimo smartphone de gama média baixa.

Umidigi S2 Lite - 06/27/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

0 / 60 → 0%

Peso

89%

Bateria