Breve Análise do Smartphone UMIDIGI A1 Pro

Name: Umidigi A1 Pro
Brand: Umidigi

Um concorrente acessível. O UMIDIGI A1 Pro parece ser uma verdadeira barganha. O dispositivo é projetado com inteligência, possui câmeras duplas e suporta redes Wi-Fi de 5 GHz, o qual não esperaríamos de um dispositivo de 120 euros (~$138). Descubra em nossa análise se o UMIDIGI A1 Pro atende às expectativas e até que ponto o dispositivo é adequado para o uso diário.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone ARM Android

Test device courtesy of Umidigi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Umidigi A1 Pro (A Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6739 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8100

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.50 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 293 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.7 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Bússola, Sensor de luz ambiente, Leitor de digitais, USB-C, USB-OTG

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B19/B20/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 145.1 x 69.1

Bateria

11.8 Wh, 3150 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP, f/2.0, Contract Autofocus (AF), dual LED flash, videos de até 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5 MP, f/2.4, depth of field (DOF)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação Quick Charge, cabo USB, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

173 g, Suprimento de energia: 66 g

Preço

119 Euro

Links

Umidigi página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi A1 Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s +325%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.6 MBit/s +59%
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.9 MBit/s +4%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi A1 Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s +325%
Sony Xperia L1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.2 MBit/s +66%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s
Honor 6X Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.6 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	42.1 MBit/s -24%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


581 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	542 cd/m²
590 cd/m²	594 cd/m²	544 cd/m²
602 cd/m²	575 cd/m²	518 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 602 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 570.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 598 cd/m²
Contraste: 2700:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Xiaomi Mi A1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"
Screen		-16%	-17%	-2%	-6%
Brightness middle	594	479 -19%	547 -8%	503 -15%	425 -28%
Brightness	570	478 -16%	540 -5%	478 -16%	425 -25%
Brightness Distribution	86	94 9%	94 9%	88 2%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.22	0.58 -164%	0.57 -159%	0.37 -68%	0.37 -68%
Contrast	2700	826 -69%	960 -64%	1359 -50%	1149 -57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.63	4.5 32%	5.1 23%	3.92 41%	4.7 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.99	7.5 46%	9.1 35%	7.86 44%	8.3 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.2	4.1 55%	6.2 33%	4.9 47%	4.6 50%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.09 ^105%	2.223 ^99%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	8663 ^75%	7139 ^91%	6546 ^99%	7884 ^82%	7445 ^87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	36073 Points
Sony Xperia L1	37495 Points +4%
Honor 6X	56764 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mi A1	63101 Points +75%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	30619 Points -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13)	33655 Points -7%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	45868 Points
Xiaomi Mi A1	77161 Points +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46951, n=13)	41995 Points -8%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	4330 Points
Sony Xperia L1	4285 Points -1%
Honor 6X	4383 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1	5721 Points +32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3624 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11)	4323 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	3159 Points
Sony Xperia L1	3237 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4895 Points +55%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	2768 Points -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16)	3206 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	208 Points
Sony Xperia L1	744 Points +258%
Honor 6X	1300 Points +525%
Xiaomi Mi A1	1263 Points +507%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	536 Points +158%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=15)	291 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +3025%
System (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	1318 Points
Sony Xperia L1	1338 Points +2%
Honor 6X	2721 Points +106%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3187 Points +142%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1086 Points -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1103 - 1526, n=15)	1294 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +685%
Memory (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	802 Points
Sony Xperia L1	798 Points 0%
Honor 6X	1779 Points +122%
Xiaomi Mi A1	881 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	591 Points -26%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (420 - 1039, n=15)	768 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +780%
Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	184 Points
Sony Xperia L1	386 Points +110%
Honor 6X	819 Points +345%
Xiaomi Mi A1	1012 Points +450%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	208 Points +13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 190, n=15)	160.5 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +9682%
Web (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	10 Points
Sony Xperia L1	743 Points +7330%
Honor 6X	720 Points +7100%
Xiaomi Mi A1	895 Points +8850%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	620 Points +6100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 624, n=15)	165.4 Points +1554%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +15680%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	665 Points
Sony Xperia L1	674 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1	881 Points +32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	556 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14)	632 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +743%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	1852 Points
Sony Xperia L1	1875 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4396 Points +137%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1562 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14)	1733 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +751%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	1450 Points
Sony Xperia L1	1241 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3678 Points +154%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	952 Points -34%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1460, n=12)	1328 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +766%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	6669 Points
Honor 6X	11775 Points
Honor 6X	11775 Points
Xiaomi Mi A1	13799 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3692 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3692 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3392 - 4339, n=17)	3912 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	6015 Points
Honor 6X	11353 Points
Honor 6X	11353 Points
Xiaomi Mi A1	13314 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3183 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3183 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=17)	3398 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1	10767 Points
Honor 6X	13535 Points
Honor 6X	13535 Points
Xiaomi Mi A1	15816 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	8390 Points
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	8390 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10981, n=17)	9367 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	168 Points
Sony Xperia L1	285 Points +70%
Honor 6X	550 Points +227%
Xiaomi Mi A1	476 Points +183%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	163 Points -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 211, n=17)	157.5 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +2402%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	140 Points
Sony Xperia L1	238 Points +70%
Honor 6X	468 Points +234%
Xiaomi Mi A1	390 Points +179%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	133 Points -5%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 185, n=17)	131.6 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +3286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	537 Points
Sony Xperia L1	939 Points +75%
Honor 6X	1433 Points +167%
Xiaomi Mi A1	2079 Points +287%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	753 Points +40%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +515%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	108 Points
Sony Xperia L1	184 Points +70%
Honor 6X	385 Points +256%
Xiaomi Mi A1	473 Points +338%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	99 Points -8%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (80 - 221, n=17)	104.9 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +2683%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	88 Points
Sony Xperia L1	149 Points +69%
Honor 6X	318 Points +261%
Xiaomi Mi A1	388 Points +341%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	79 Points -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (65 - 185, n=17)	85.4 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +3498%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	531 Points
Sony Xperia L1	968 Points +82%
Honor 6X	1440 Points +171%
Xiaomi Mi A1	2070 Points +290%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	783 Points +47%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (486 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +514%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	9.7 fps
Sony Xperia L1	19 fps +96%
Honor 6X	19 fps +96%
Xiaomi Mi A1	22 fps +127%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	11 fps +13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17)	10.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +793%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	6 fps
Sony Xperia L1	11 fps +83%
Honor 6X	18 fps +200%
Xiaomi Mi A1	23 fps +283%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	6 fps 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17)	5.64 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +4833%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	5.4 fps
Sony Xperia L1	8.8 fps +63%
Honor 6X	8.5 fps +57%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9.5 fps +76%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	4.8 fps -11%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16)	5.61 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +1309%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	2.7 fps
Sony Xperia L1	4.1 fps +52%
Honor 6X	4.6 fps +70%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9.8 fps +263%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	2.2 fps -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)	2.56 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +6381%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	3.3 fps
Sony Xperia L1	6.3 fps +91%
Honor 6X	4.9 fps +48%
Xiaomi Mi A1	6.3 fps +91%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	3.4 fps +3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)	3.51 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +1921%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.6 fps
Sony Xperia L1	2.6 fps +63%
Honor 6X	2.5 fps +56%
Xiaomi Mi A1	6.4 fps +300%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	1.4 fps -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)	1.494 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +7669%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.4 fps
Honor 6X	3 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3.5 fps +150%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)	1.553 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +3436%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro	0.9 fps
Honor 6X	2.8 fps +211%
Xiaomi Mi A1	3.6 fps +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)	0.826 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +8211%

Legend

Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi A1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6739

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	26.46 Points +48%
Xiaomi Mi A1	26.08 Points +46%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	17.37 Points -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14)	16.7 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	14.55 Points -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1108%
Xiaomi Mi A1	4756 Points +49%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	4199 Points +32%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	3191 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)	2945 Points -8%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	2684 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	2273 Points -29%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)	17405 ms * -11%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)	16427 ms * -5%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	15718 ms *
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)	12507 ms * +20%
Xiaomi Mi A1	9868 ms * +37%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	9373 ms * +40%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +90%

* ... smaller is better

	Umidigi A1 Pro	Sony Xperia L1	Honor 6X	Xiaomi Mi A1	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-41%	62%	82%	14%	-25%	1901%
Sequential Read 256KB	269.2	181.9 -32%	283.4 5%	277.4 3%	194.4 -28%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -39%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 601%
Sequential Write 256KB	44.4	40.2 -9%	73.8 66%	202.4 356%	42 -5%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -3%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 3213%
Random Read 4KB	29.6	13.6 -54%	39.55 34%	78.1 164%	19.15 -35%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -27%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 839%
Random Write 4KB	10.2	5.9 -42%	45.05 342%	7.19 -30%	29.4 188%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -21%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 2949%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	37.81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -53%	52 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -36%	83.6 3%	66.3 -18%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -27%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	26.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -55%	34.53 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -41%	57.9 -2%	46.6 -21%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -32%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.7 °C	34.7 °C	33 °C
38.9 °C	34.5 °C	33.6 °C
37.9 °C	34.1 °C	33.5 °C

Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C


31.2 °C	34.5 °C	39.6 °C
31.6 °C	34.5 °C	39.1 °C
32.2 °C	33.9 °C	36.2 °C

Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 50.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Umidigi A1 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia L1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 1.6 Watt
Ocioso	1.8 / 2.3 / 3.2 Watt
Carga	4.7 / 6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6739	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	30%	-20%	35%	6%	7%
Idle Minimum *	1.8	0.89 51%	0.82 54%	2.2 -22%	0.89 51%	1.522 ?(0.87 - 2.8, n=16) 15%	0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Average *	2.3	2.05 11%	2 13%	2.8 -22%	1.87 19%	2.17 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=16) 6%	1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Maximum *	3.2	2.18 32%	2.03 37%	3.4 -6%	1.98 38%	2.86 ?(1.68 - 6.3, n=16) 11%	1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years) 50%
Load Average *	4.7	6.02 -28%	3.34 29%	6.2 -32%	3.04 35%	4.73 ?(2.8 - 7, n=16) -1%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -40%
Load Maximum *	6	6.94 -16%	4.92 18%	7.2 -20%	4.01 33%	5.99 ?(3.5 - 11.9, n=16) -0%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) -65%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		10h 08min

	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh	Honor 6X 3340 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh	Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	57%	4%	30%
WiFi v1.3	608	567 -7%	957 57%	633 4%	788 30%
Reader / Idle		1398	2250
H.264		656	885
Load		223	375

Pro

+ Carcaça elegante e estável

+ Wi-Fi de 5 GHz

+ Muitas frequências LTE

+ Carga rápida

+ Versão atual do Android

+ GPS preciso

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas

+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado

+ Dual SIM

+ Tela brilhante com boa relação de contraste

Contra

- Consumo de energia relativamente alto

- Forte tonalidade azul na tela

- Câmera pobre

- O sensor de brilho ocasionalmente define o brilho da tela muito baixo

O UMIDIGI A1 Pro é um smartphone com muitas surpresas. Além da carcaça de aparência inteligente e robusta, o A1 Pro possui uma tela brilhante, Quick Charge, e suporta bandas Wi-Fi de 5 GHz e 14 LTE. Esses recursos são complementados por um moderno formato 2:1, qualidade de chamada decente e duração da bateria aceitável. Não esperávamos tudo isso em um smartphone de 120 euros (~$138).

O UMIDIGI A1 Pro é um smartphone potente com um preço acessível. Enquanto o desempenho e a câmera estão apenas no nível da classe, o A1 Pro vai muito além das expectativas com seu carregamento rápido e tela brilhante.

O A1 Pro é uma verdadeira barganha. Há comprometimentos sobre a qualidade da câmera e a precisão das cores da tela, mas você terá dificuldades para encontrar um smartphone melhor que o UMIDIGI A1 Pro, que oferece tanto por tão pouco.

Umidigi A1 Pro - 06/22/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

88%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

41 / 60 → 69%

Peso

90%

Bateria