Breve Análise do Smartphone TP-Link Neffos C9

Name: TP-Link Neffos C9
Brand: TP-Link

A large, budget smartphone

A TP-Link expandiu sua série C com o Neffos C9, um dispositivo com tela de 5,99 polegadas e um SoC MediaTek. Não espere um desempenho milagroso ou capacidades de câmera para o C9, já que ele é voltado para aqueles que querem um smartphone grande e sem frescuras. Leia mais para descobrir como o Neffos C9 se desempenha em nossos testes e se ele pode encarar seus contemporâneos.

Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/24/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Cyberport

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

TP-Link Neffos C9 (Neffos Serie)

Processador

Mediatek MT6739 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8100

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.99 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB. Suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT e FAT32, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G/GSM: Bands, 2, 3, 5, 84G. 3G UMTS/WCDMA: Bands 1, 5, 8. LTE/FDD: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.45 x 158.7 x 76.6

Bateria

3840 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador USB, cabo micro USB, NFUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 0.864 W/kg, Head - 0.169 W/kg

peso

170 g, Suprimento de energia: 60 g

Preço

140 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	99.6 MBit/s +88%
Wiko View 2 Go Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53 (36^min - 58^max) MBit/s 0%
TP-Link Neffos C9 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53 (48^min - 57^max) MBit/s
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.6 (2^min - 36^max) MBit/s -78%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigaset GS100 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash	97.9 MBit/s +55%
TP-Link Neffos C9 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	63 (51^min - 61^max) MBit/s
Wiko View 2 Go Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 (53^min - 57^max) MBit/s -13%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s -23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34.8 (27^min - 44^max) MBit/s -45%

TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.9 (51-61)

Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø34.8 (27-44)

Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.6 (53-57)

Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.2 (29-54)

TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.9 (48-57)

Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø11.9 (2-36)

Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (36-58)

Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.7 (27-58)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

TP-Link Neffos C9

Olympus O-MD E-M10 Mark II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone XS Max

click to load images

TP-Link Neffos C9

Olympus O-MD E-M10 Mark II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone XS Max

click to load images

TP-Link Neffos C9

Olympus O-MD E-M10 Mark II

OnePlus 6T

Apple iPhone XS Max


451 cd/m²	426 cd/m²	407 cd/m²
463 cd/m²	447 cd/m²	416 cd/m²
472 cd/m²	448 cd/m²	449 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 442.1 cd/m² Minimum: 9.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 447 cd/m²
Contraste: 745:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229

	TP-Link Neffos C9 IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7"	Wiko View 2 Go IPS, 1512x720, 5.9"	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Gigaset GS100 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		2%	13%	-8%	-34%
Brightness middle	447	479 7%	465 4%	338 -24%	442 -1%
Brightness	442	481 9%	462 5%	327 -26%	446 1%
Brightness Distribution	86	94 9%	84 -2%	82 -5%	86 0%
Black Level *	0.6	0.37 38%	0.32 47%	0.27 55%	0.35 42%
Contrast	745	1295 74%	1453 95%	1252 68%	1263 70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.63	4.91 -35%	4.76 -31%	5.36 -48%	8.03 -121%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.49	9.47 -0%	7.71 19%	9.77 -3%	15.81 -67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	6.4 -83%	4.6 -31%	6.2 -77%	10.4 -197%
Gamma	2.229 ^99%	2.108 ^104%	2.674 ^82%	2.345 ^94%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6753 ^96%	7292 ^89%	6806 ^96%	8460 ^77%	10070 ^65%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

100 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	657 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1194 Points +82%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	674 Points +3%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	636 Points -3%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	579 Points -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14)	632 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)	5460 Points +731%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1769 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4179 Points +136%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2542 Points +44%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1602 Points -9%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1418 Points -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14)	1733 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)	15023 Points +749%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1419 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3628 Points +156%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2461 Points +73%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1405 Points -1%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1460, n=12)	1328 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	12011 Points +746%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7321 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	4323 Points
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11)	4323 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3227 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	5930 Points +84%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	3596 Points +11%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3146 Points -3%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	2630 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16)	3206 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4173 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15000 Points +259%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9517 Points +128%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6133 Points +47%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	3395 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3392 - 4339, n=17)	3912 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3585 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	14603 Points +307%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9686 Points +170%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5487 Points +53%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	2878 Points -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=17)	3398 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	9801 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	16576 Points +69%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	8971 Points -8%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10427 Points +6%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	9159 Points -7%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10981, n=17)	9367 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	152 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	594 Points +291%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	58 Points -62%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	127 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 211, n=17)	157.5 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +2666%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	125 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	523 Points +318%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	46 Points -63%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	104 Points -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 185, n=17)	131.6 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +3692%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	594 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1136 Points +91%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	892 Points +50%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	532 Points -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 690, n=17)	567 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +456%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	196 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	603 Points +208%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	297 Points +52%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	159 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (159 - 225, n=16)	192.4 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +5594%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	164 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	529 Points +223%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	250 Points +52%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	131 Points -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (131 - 189, n=16)	161.4 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +11982%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	630 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1184 Points +88%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	885 Points +40%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	611 Points -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (530 - 698, n=16)	615 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +695%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	105 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	310 Points +195%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	86 Points -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (80 - 221, n=17)	104.9 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +2830%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	85 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	Points -100%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	257 Points +202%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	69 Points -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (65 - 185, n=17)	85.4 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +3726%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	606 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1103 Points +82%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	549 Points -9%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (486 - 690, n=17)	567 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	124 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	365 Points +194%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	93 Points -25%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (93 - 225, n=14)	120.2 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=161, last 2 years)	7744 Points +6145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	101 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	305 Points +202%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	75 Points -26%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (75 - 189, n=14)	98.1 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=161, last 2 years)	11504 Points +11290%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	634 Points
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1167 Points +84%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	611 Points -4%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (573 - 677, n=14)	614 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=161, last 2 years)	4605 Points +626%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	9.8 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	37 fps +278%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	25 fps +155%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	14 fps +43%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	8.2 fps -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17)	10.1 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)	85.9 fps +777%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	6 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	24 fps +300%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	16 fps +167%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps +27%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	5 fps -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17)	5.64 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=171, last 2 years)	280 fps +4567%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	5.4 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	20 fps +270%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps +141%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6.1 fps +13%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	4.4 fps -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16)	5.61 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +1293%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2.7 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	10 fps +270%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	7.1 fps +163%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)	2.56 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=171, last 2 years)	164.7 fps +6000%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3.5 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15 fps +329%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	9.7 fps +177%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	2.8 fps -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)	3.51 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=171, last 2 years)	65.5 fps +1771%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.6 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.9 fps +331%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2.5 fps +56%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1.3 fps -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)	1.494 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=171, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +7219%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.6 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7.9 fps +394%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	5 fps +213%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)	1.553 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=172, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +2888%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.89 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.9 fps +338%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2.6 fps +192%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)	0.826 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=171, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +7833%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.8 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.8 fps +278%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	4.7 fps +161%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.4 - 2.5, n=6)	1.983 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=203, last 2 years)	49.7 fps +2661%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.95 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.8 fps +300%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2.6 fps +174%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.6 - 0.95, n=6)	0.828 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=203, last 2 years)	79.7 fps +8289%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.86 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4.3 fps +400%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	2.8 fps +226%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.61 - 2, n=5)	1.062 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=203, last 2 years)	37.5 fps +4260%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.35 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1.3 fps +271%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	0.88 fps +151%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.21 - 0.4, n=4)	0.3275 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=203, last 2 years)	31.9 fps +9014%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	223 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1465 Points +557%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	945 Points +324%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	643 Points +188%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	162 Points -27%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=15)	291 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=153, last 2 years)	6274 Points +2713%
System (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1367 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3865 Points +183%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	1808 Points +32%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1228 Points -10%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	1115 Points -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1103 - 1526, n=15)	1294 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=153, last 2 years)	10160 Points +643%
Memory (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1010 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1068 Points +6%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	884 Points -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	502 Points -50%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	431 Points -57%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (420 - 1039, n=15)	768 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=153, last 2 years)	6729 Points +566%
Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	186 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1069 Points +475%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	741 Points +298%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	428 Points +130%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	149 Points -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 190, n=15)	160.5 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)	16804 Points +8934%
Web (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1045 Points +10350%
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072	673 Points +6630%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	649 Points +6390%
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024	10 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 624, n=15)	165.4 Points +1554%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=153, last 2 years)	1560 Points +15500%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G7 Play	42.63 Points +142%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)	17.76 Points +1%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)	17.6 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14)	16.7 Points -5%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	15.85 Points -10%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	13.38 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	36870 Points +989%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	8185 Points +142%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)	3386 Points
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)	3089 Points -9%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)	2945 Points -13%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	2503 Points -26%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	2093 Points -38%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)	16427 ms * -21%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)	15962 ms * -17%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms * -2%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)	13599 ms *
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)	13373 ms * +2%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	4806 ms * +65%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years)	1577 ms * +88%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +445%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)	27 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (23 - 27, n=2)	25 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

	TP-Link Neffos C9	Motorola Moto G7 Play	Nokia 2.1	Gigaset GS100	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		270%	154%	109%	68%	1549%
Sequential Read 256KB	266.1	289 9%	288.3 8%	97.2 -63%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -38%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 589%
Sequential Write 256KB	50.8	111 119%	51.2 1%	24 -53%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -15%	1422 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 2699%
Random Read 4KB	41.7	74 77%	50.5 21%	17.6 -58%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -48%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=194, last 2 years) 567%
Random Write 4KB	12.7	73 475%	13.45 6%	6.2 -51%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -36%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 2341%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	18.3 ?(Kingston 32GB)	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 363%	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 334%	79.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 334%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) 223%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	9.5 ?(Kingston 32GB)	64.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 575%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 552%	61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 542%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) 319%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.5 °C	32.8 °C	33.3 °C
34.8 °C	32.7 °C	33.6 °C
34.2 °C	32.8 °C	32.7 °C

Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C


32.8 °C	33.9 °C	36.6 °C
32.7 °C	34 °C	35.9 °C
32.8 °C	34 °C	34.8 °C

Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

TP-Link Neffos C9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G7 Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Carga	4 / 5.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	TP-Link Neffos C9 3840 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6739	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	17%	32%	1%	-6%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	1 33%	0.8 47%	0.7 53%	1.3 13%	1.522 ?(0.87 - 2.8, n=16) -1%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Average *	2.2	1.7 23%	2 9%	1.2 45%	2.1 5%	2.17 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=16) 1%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	2.6 10%	2.3 21%	1.9 34%	2.9 -0%	2.86 ?(1.68 - 6.3, n=16) 1%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 45%
Load Average *	4	4.1 -3%	3.6 10%	3.2 20%	4.4 -10%	4.73 ?(2.8 - 7, n=16) -18%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -60%
Load Maximum *	5.2	6.5 -25%	5.4 -4%	4.8 8%	5.3 -2%	5.99 ?(3.5 - 11.9, n=16) -15%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -85%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		9h 28min

	TP-Link Neffos C9 3840 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Gigaset GS100 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	568	690 21%	734 29%	809 42%	532 -6%

Pro

+ Grande tela

+ Dual SIM

+ Expansão microSD

+ Slots para cartões dedicados

+ Acessível

Contra

- Desempenho lento

- Duração da bateria abaixo do esperado

The TP-Link Neffos C9 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.

O TP-Link Neffos C9 é um smartphone de baixo custo. Sua tela grande e o hardware desatualizado ainda o tornam bom o suficiente para aplicações e tarefas cotidianas, como o uso de mídias sociais e a navegação na Internet. No entanto, nossa unidade de teste se sente mais lenta do que seus contemporâneos, e não se ajuda com sua duração de bateria relativamente curta.

O TP-Link Neffos C9 vai atrair aqueles que estão atrás de um smartphone econômico com uma grande tela. Você deve suportar o desempenho lânguido e a duração da bateria nada inspiradora.

A capacidade de ter dois cartões SIM e um cartão microSD instalados simultaneamente é algo que nem todos os dispositivos oferecem, mas esse é um pequeno ponto positivo. Em suma, o Neffos C9 não se distingue de outros smartphones econômicos. Ele não se sai muito bem e frustra em muitas áreas.

TP-Link Neffos C9 - 2019-05-20 05/20/2019 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann

Acabamento

82%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

38 / 60 → 63%

Peso

91%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

7 / 63 → 11%

Desempenho da aplicação

34 / 70 → 48%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

100%

Audio

57 / 91 → 63%

Camera

60%

Médio

69%

79%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11135 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone TP-Link Neffos C9

Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann, 2019-05-24 (Update: 2019-05-25)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

TP-Link Neffos C9 audio analysis

Motorola Moto G7 Play audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison