Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ3
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 361 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.835
| Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.7" | LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 28% | 15% | 26% | 41% | |
| Brightness middle | 543 | 395 -27% | 464 -15% | 974 79% | 600 10% |
| Brightness | 542 | 402 -26% | 468 -14% | 975 80% | 606 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 85 -8% | 96 4% | 94 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.49 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 1.6 76% | 3.2 52% | 5.4 18% | 1.2 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 3.4 69% | 10.5 5% | 13.1 -19% | 3 73% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 1.1 77% | 1.4 70% | 5 -6% | 1.6 66% |
| Gamma | 1.835 120% | 2.14 103% | 2.27 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6817 95% | 6536 99% | 6590 99% | 7480 87% | 6707 97% |
| Contrast | 1068 | 1988 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | |
| HTC U12 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Chrome 55) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Chrome 55) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Chrome 55) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Chrome 55) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ3 | HTC U12 Plus | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | LG G7 ThinQ | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 103% | 17% | 39% | 79% | 548% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 681 | 709 4% | 409 -40% | 695 2% | 696 ? 2% | 1847 ? 171% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.1 | 195.8 0% | 163.1 -17% | 176.4 -10% | 224 ? 14% | 1436 ? 632% |
| Random Read 4KB | 135.7 | 118.1 -13% | 100.9 -26% | 110.5 -19% | 137.2 ? 1% | 277 ? 104% |
| Random Write 4KB | 22.22 | 104.2 369% | 14.55 -35% | 23.26 5% | 84.7 ? 281% | 308 ? 1286% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.2 ? | 84.3 ? 146% | 77.8 ? 127% | 84.7 ? 148% | 68.6 ? 101% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.4 ? | 63.6 ? 109% | 59 ? 94% | 62.7 ? 106% | 52.2 ? 72% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.8 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt |
| Carga |
4.8 / 6.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | -18% | -35% | -34% | -28% | -27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.77 4% | 0.85 -6% | 1.16 -45% | 1.03 -29% | 0.862 ? -8% | 0.895 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.2 | 2.18 -82% | 1.2 -0% | 1.98 -65% | 2.4 -100% | 1.728 ? -44% | 1.453 ? -21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 2.21 -47% | 1.25 17% | 2.07 -38% | 2.6 -73% | 2.07 ? -38% | 1.613 ? -8% |
| Load Average * | 4.8 | 6.25 -30% | 6.97 -45% | 4.51 6% | 2.96 38% | 4.87 ? -1% | 6.5 ? -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.2 | 10.16 -64% | 9.74 -57% | 8.3 -34% | 6.6 -6% | 9.27 ? -50% | 9.86 ? -59% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | LG G7 ThinQ 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 21% | 54% | 19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1270 | 1452 14% | 1393 10% | 1662 31% | 1292 2% |
| H.264 | 420 | 464 10% | 799 90% | 908 116% | 634 51% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 507 21% | 463 11% | 591 41% | 564 35% |
| Load | 202 | 230 14% | 149 -26% | 260 29% | 180 -11% |
Pro
Contra
O Sony Xperia XZ3 é adequado para quase qualquer tarefa. O dispositivo tira boas fotos e tem um desempenho sólido do sistema. Nosso dispositivo de teste também lida bem com aplicativos e jogos complexos. O modo de uma mão é imprevisível, especialmente porque nós o ativamos com frequência enquanto pegamos o dispositivo.
O Sony Xperia XZ3 é um dispositivo carro-chefe que se sai bem contra os seus concorrentes, sem ter que saltar sobre as tendências do mercado.
No entanto, o nosso dispositivo de teste tem uma duração de bateria decepcionante, enquanto levará algum tempo para se acostumar ao posicionamento do sensor de digitais. Além disso, aconselhamos segurar o dispositivo com cuidado, pois é susceptível de escapar de suas mãos. No geral, o Xperia XZ3 é um ótimo smartphone que tem um visual e sensação diferente ao de muitos dos seus concorrentes.
Sony Xperia XZ3
- 11/18/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
