Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 1432:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.17
| Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -54% | 1% | -2% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 630 | 620 -2% | 529 -16% | 629 0% | 600 -5% |
| Brightness | 632 | 610 -3% | 527 -17% | 636 1% | 606 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 93 -3% | 96 0% | 94 -2% | 94 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.79 -80% | |||
| Contrast | 1432 | 785 -45% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 4.2 -180% | 1.4 7% | 1.7 -13% | 1.2 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.3 | 5.8 -35% | 4 7% | 3.6 16% | 3 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 3.9 -86% | 1.6 24% | 2.4 -14% | 1.6 24% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.16 102% | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6513 100% | 7086 92% | 6358 102% | 6337 103% | 6707 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2315 Hz | ≤ 28 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | Sony Xperia XZ1 | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | Apple iPhone X | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 24% | 50% | 217% | 97% | 658% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB | 679 | 679 0% | 815 20% | 732 8% | 696 ? 3% | 1887 ? 178% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 198.7 | 204.4 3% | 206.9 4% | 208.7 5% | 224 ? 13% | 1471 ? 640% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 149.4 | 156.6 5% | 131 -12% | 132.3 -11% | 137.2 ? -8% | 278 ? 86% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 17 | 14.93 -12% | 23.07 36% | 164.4 867% | 84.7 ? 398% | 311 ? 1729% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.25 ? | 65.5 ? 91% | 79.2 ? 131% | 68.6 ? 100% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.12 ? | 47.71 ? 58% | 67.2 ? 123% | 52.2 ? 73% |
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Battle Bay | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| half resolution | 60 fps | ||
| full resolution | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.04 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.72 / 2.21 / 2.22 Watt |
| Carga |
4.6 / 9.34 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | 35% | 19% | -1% | 1% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.72 | 0.51 29% | 0.65 10% | 0.85 -18% | 1.03 -43% | 0.862 ? -20% | 0.882 ? -23% |
| Idle Average * | 2.21 | 2.16 2% | 0.81 63% | 1.15 48% | 2.4 -9% | 1.728 ? 22% | 1.448 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.22 | 2.23 -0% | 0.92 59% | 1.23 45% | 2.6 -17% | 2.07 ? 7% | 1.603 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 4.6 | 7.45 -62% | 4.76 -3% | 4.12 10% | 2.96 36% | 4.87 ? -6% | 6.57 ? -43% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.34 | 9.28 1% | 5.16 45% | 8.42 10% | 6.6 29% | 9.27 ? 1% | 9.92 ? -6% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | -15% | 56% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1402 | 1612 15% | 1182 -16% | 1744 24% | 1292 -8% |
| H.264 | 722 | 580 -20% | 609 -16% | 929 29% | 634 -12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 679 | 601 -11% | 474 -30% | 818 20% | 564 -17% |
| Load | 159 | 172 8% | 164 3% | 398 150% | 180 13% |
Pro
Contra
Oh, Sony ... queremos elogiar seus smartphones só porque eles são ousados e você sabe como apresentá-los bem. Mas lembramos que você ignorou a tendência dos smartphones sem bordas e que agora está lançando um novo telefone que ignora completamente as tradições de design de sua marca. Além disso, você está sempre um pouco atrasado com a memória instalada em seus telefones. O motivo da queda contínua da qualidade das chamadas e da qualidade do som do fone de ouvido desde operia Z3 é desconhecido para todos, menos para você mesma.
Não podemos elogiar o Xperia XZ2 sem reservas, apesar de ainda ser um bom smartphone: As câmeras com suporte HDR para vídeos e a opção de digitalizar objetos em 3D,brilham, e não apenas no papel. Mesmo que a resolução da câmera frontal seja significativamente menor do que a do telefone anterior, ela ainda tira boas fotos. O desempenho do smartphone é excelente, permitindo jogos a 60 fps e as emissões também são aceitáveis. Os tempos de duração da bateria são bons, mas poderiam ser melhorados com menor consumo de energia.
O Sony Xperia XZ2 um smartphone de alta qualidade. Seu desempenho e suas excelentes câmeras são fortes motivos para uma compra.
Apesar de alguns impedimentos, o smartphone da Sony ainda oferece boas razões para uma recomendação de compra. O excelente hardware e desempenho rápido são apenas duas dessas razões.
Sony Xperia XZ2
- 04/23/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
