Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 477 cd/m²
Contraste: 1445:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8" | Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | 11% | 29% | 28% | -5% | -18% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 477 | 578 21% | 565 18% | 600 26% | 569 19% | 430 -10% | 415 -13% | 395 -17% |
| Brightness | 453 | 568 25% | 571 26% | 606 34% | 578 28% | 437 -4% | 420 -7% | 402 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 96 12% | 94 9% | 95 10% | 87 1% | 87 1% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.62 -88% | 0.37 -12% | |||||
| Contrast | 1445 | 932 -36% | 1068 -26% | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.8 -33% | 2.3 -10% | 1.2 43% | 1.3 38% | 2.3 -10% | 2.7 -29% | 1.6 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 5.1 38% | 4.8 41% | 3 63% | 2.1 74% | 4.6 44% | 4.3 48% | 3.4 59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.8 -75% | 1.9 -19% | 1.6 -0% | 1.6 -0% | 2.4 -50% | 3.3 -106% | 1.1 31% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6425 101% | 6728 97% | 6332 103% | 6707 97% | 6401 102% | 6160 106% | 6787 96% | 6536 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2381 Hz | ≤ 31 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 31 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | OnePlus 6 | Google Pixel 2 XL | Huawei P20 Pro | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | 47% | 4% | 6% | 168% | 81% | 587% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 749 | 687 -8% | 819 9% | 726 -3% | 760 1% | 832 11% | 696 ? -7% | 1887 ? 152% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 171 | 194 13% | 204.9 20% | 201.4 18% | 195.3 14% | 196.7 15% | 224 ? 31% | 1471 ? 760% |
| Random Read 4KB | 136 | 74.1 -46% | 129.7 -5% | 137 1% | 170.6 25% | 144.3 6% | 137.2 ? 1% | 278 ? 104% |
| Random Write 4KB | 21.75 | 17.2 -21% | 22.74 5% | 21.8 0% | 17.84 -18% | 160.5 638% | 84.7 ? 289% | 311 ? 1330% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.18 ? | 36.79 ? 8% | 79.2 ? 132% | 68.6 ? 101% | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.23 ? | 33.31 ? 10% | 67.2 ? 122% | 52.2 ? 73% |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| HD | 40 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 2.5 / 2.51 Watt |
| Carga |
4.3 / 6.87 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | 31% | -4% | 16% | -17% | -9% | 27% | -6% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.62 7% | 0.84 -25% | 1.03 -54% | 0.6 10% | 0.77 -15% | 1.28 -91% | 0.68 -1% | 0.862 ? -29% | 0.88 ? -31% |
| Idle Average * | 2.5 | 2.44 2% | 1.54 38% | 2.4 4% | 1 60% | 2.18 13% | 1.87 25% | 0.95 62% | 1.728 ? 31% | 1.444 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.51 | 2.59 -3% | 1.57 37% | 2.6 -4% | 1.6 36% | 2.21 12% | 1.89 25% | 1.09 57% | 2.07 ? 18% | 1.6 ? 36% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 4.94 -15% | 2.47 43% | 2.96 31% | 4.3 -0% | 6.25 -45% | 3.73 13% | 4.58 -7% | 4.87 ? -13% | 6.57 ? -53% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.87 | 7.91 -15% | 2.49 64% | 6.6 4% | 8.6 -25% | 10.16 -48% | 8.08 -18% | 5.16 25% | 9.27 ? -35% | 9.91 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | -1% | 33% | -3% | 23% | 28% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1347 | 1727 28% | 1292 -4% | 1806 34% | 1452 8% | 1706 27% | 1754 30% | 1343 0% |
| H.264 | 520 | 784 51% | 634 22% | 791 52% | 464 -11% | 672 29% | 802 54% | 674 30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 547 | 744 36% | 564 3% | 762 39% | 507 -7% | 581 6% | 695 27% | 521 -5% |
| Load | 235 | 345 47% | 180 -23% | 246 5% | 230 -2% | 302 29% | 236 0% | 237 1% |
Pro
Contra
O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium é um verdadeiro peso-pesado, o que é verdade tanto fisicamente quanto em relação ao seu hardware. Nossa única reclamação de hardware é a decisão da Sony de omitir um conector de fone de ouvido.
A tela UHD deve atrair os viciados em streaming que desejam aproveitar seu conteúdo na resolução mais alta suportada. É estúpido que o prometido suporte para UHD da Netflix e da Amazon não funcione em um dos poucos dispositivos prontos para 4K, mas não temos certeza de quem é o culpado aqui. As vibrações dinâmicas são certamente um recurso interessante, mas a decisão da Sony de restringir seu uso apenas a músicas e vídeos torna o recurso bastante artimanhoso. Além disso, nosso dispositivo de teste tende a vibrar ao longo de superfícies planas ao tocar música com a vibração dinâmica ativada.
O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium segue a atualização de design do XZ2 e consegue entregar uma experiência de carro chefe, embora com algumas desvantagens. A tela UHD deve revelar-se um reviravoltas para os entusiastas.
A grande tela 16: 9 e o poderoso SoC devem agradar a maioria dos jogadores de smartphones, enquanto os entusiastas do áudio apreciarão o áudio de alta resolução e o suporte a codecs populares que complementam os recursos de entretenimento do XZ2 Premium. O dispositivo também possui boas câmeras, embora elas não correspondam aos melhores smartphones atualmente no mercado. Da mesma forma, as gravações de vídeo parecem boas, mas o EIS em UHD deve ser mais eficaz.
Uma grande desvantagem do XZ2 Premium é a duração da bateria. Nosso dispositivo de teste tem pior duração de bateria do que seu antecessor, apesar de ter uma bateria maior. Igualmente, o XZ2 Premium fica aquém dos tempos de duração alcançados pelos nossos dispositivos de comparação. Nós suspeitamos que essas durações fracas poderiam ser corrigidas com atualizações de software. O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium pode ser um excelente companheiro diário, se você puder perdoar o seu grande formato e a duração da bateria abaixo da média.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
- 09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
