Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ

O visionário. A Sony quer uma revolução: o Xperia XZ tem como alvo mudar a nossa vida diária. No entanto, com a exceção de sua câmera de 23 MP, a maioria de suas especificações é bastante ordinária. Vamos descobrir do que é capaz este modelo carro chefe da Sony.
Sony Xperia XZ (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Memória
3 GB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, TRILUMINOS display for mobile, Dynamic Contrast Enhancement, X-Reality, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 32GB (Single Sim) / 64GB (Dual Sim), 22.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Digitais, Acelerômetro, Sensor de posição, Sensor de proximidade, Barômetro, Bússola, Sensor de espectro de cores
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), UMTS (800/​850/​900/​1,700/​1,900/​2,100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 146 x 72
Bateria
11 Wh, 2900 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qnovo Adaptive Charging, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 40 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 610 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 600 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix Triple-Sensor-Technology, até ISO 12800, wide-angle 24mm lens, 1/2.3” Exmor RS para sensor móvel
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.06” Exmor RS for mobile image Sensor, 22mm Wide-angle F2.0 lens
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Charging cable, USB-Charger, Headset, Short manual, What's New, News, Weather, Movie Creator, Sketches, Lounge, Playstatation, AVG Protection, Support, Slide View, 24 Meses Garantia, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, MHL; Bandwidth (Download/​Upload): 450Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR-value: 0.85 W/kg (head), 1.20 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
161 g, Suprimento de energia: 42 g
Preço
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

154.4 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 181 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g145.9 mm 71.9 mm 9 mm 161 g146 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 161 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
451 MBit/s +8%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
419 MBit/s
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 MBit/s -32%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
339 MBit/s +151%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 MBit/s +90%
Sony Xperia XZ
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
135 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: forest
GPS Garmin Edge 500: forest
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: bridge
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: bridge
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: forest
GPS Sony Xperia XZ: forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
510
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 544 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 521 cd/m² Minimum: 5.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 544 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"
Screen
2%
30%
24%
12%
-25%
Brightness middle
544
419
-23%
556
2%
350
-36%
445
-18%
560
3%
Brightness
521
431
-17%
519
0%
351
-33%
434
-17%
541
4%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
90
-3%
98
5%
93
0%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.37
0.34
8%
0.36
3%
0.45
-22%
Contrast
1470
1635
11%
1236
-16%
1244
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.8
4.1
29%
1.3
78%
2.04
65%
2.8
52%
9.19
-58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.8
12
-22%
2.6
73%
3.25
67%
5.8
41%
15.01
-53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.2
3.3
54%
1.9
74%
1.63
77%
3.7
49%
10.58
-47%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.31 95%
2.7 81%
CCT
8619 75%
6550 99%
6818 95%
6391 102%
7164 91%
9760 67%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
63.15
86.86
73.19
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.71
99.35

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points -1%
HTC 10
131866 Points +2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points -39%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points +1%
HTC 10
27176 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
26380 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points +4%
HTC 10
30061 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
37725 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points
OnePlus 3
21771 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points -4%
HTC 10
20344 Points -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
12852 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points -17%
HTC 10
3157 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points
OnePlus 3
4633 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points -33%
HTC 10
4581 Points +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points
OnePlus 3
1789 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points +21%
HTC 10
1512 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps
OnePlus 3
60 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps -40%
HTC 10
43 fps -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
52 fps -41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps
OnePlus 3
89 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps -5%
HTC 10
73 fps -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
56 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps
OnePlus 3
46 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps -31%
HTC 10
24 fps -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
27 fps -31%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps
OnePlus 3
47 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps 0%
HTC 10
39 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
25 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps
OnePlus 3
30 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps -52%
HTC 10
14 fps -55%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps -39%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps
OnePlus 3
31 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps -10%
HTC 10
24 fps -23%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps -42%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points -5%
HTC 10
5809 Points +15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points -8%
HTC 10
2193 Points +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points -24%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points
OnePlus 3
3537 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points +38%
HTC 10
2806 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points
OnePlus 3
2052 Points +43%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points +56%
HTC 10
1772 Points +24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points -63%
HTC 10
5009 Points +6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points -33%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points -10%
HTC 10
928 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
986 Points -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points
OnePlus 3
1754 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points +112%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points
OnePlus 3
4097 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points +51%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
7046 Points
OnePlus 3
7085 Points +1%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
281 MB/s
OnePlus 3
408.7 MB/s +45%
Samsung Galaxy S7
483.8 MB/s +72%
HTC 10
275.1 MB/s -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
256.8 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
138 MB/s
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
145.7 MB/s +6%
HTC 10
115.6 MB/s -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
99.4 MB/s -28%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
71.5 MB/s
OnePlus 3
137.6 MB/s +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7
85.9 MB/s +20%
HTC 10
29.92 MB/s -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19.11 MB/s -73%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
10.5 MB/s
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s +74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
16.01 MB/s +52%
HTC 10
15.89 MB/s +51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.53 MB/s +38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
33.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
72.3 MB/s +116%
HTC 10
83.3 MB/s +149%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
29.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
53.6 MB/s +80%
HTC 10
65.4 MB/s +119%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms *
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * -6%
Apple iPhone 7
1113 ms * +60%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2562 ms * +7%
HTC 10
3146 ms * -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4377 ms * -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points
OnePlus 3
9155 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points +174%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points +45%
HTC 10
8905 Points -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
8851 Points -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points
OnePlus 3
122 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points +84%
HTC 10
108 Points +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
106 Points +18%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ
54.2 Points
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 7
165.9 Points +206%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points +37%
HTC 10
52.1 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
48.2 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C36.3 °C35.4 °C 
 38.5 °C37.5 °C38.2 °C 
 37.1 °C37.6 °C37.6 °C 
Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
36.9 °C38.5 °C39.4 °C
37 °C39 °C39.7 °C
37.7 °C37.7 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.626.130.12526.226.725.93126.526.5244028.732.329.35029.728.827.46324.72825.88026.123.927.310029.8263012538.934.737.816024.520.221.720033.125.52425040.822.629.531548.62136.940053.521.441.65005620.444.16306117.548.180064.91851.6100066.818.153.1125064.416.950.7160064.815.250.4200068.615.751.7250068.71551.9315067.314.551400065.71449.150006113.645.7630057.313.542.7800051.613.438.2100005913.635.41250056.213.731.71600051.213.528.3SPL7728.961.5N36.41.214.3median 57.3median 16.9median 42.7Delta9.949.729.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9median 16.7median 65.910.53.610.535.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 69.7median 51median 17.9median 69.710.211.11.510.240.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 71.8median 53.8median 17.7median 71.810.910.71.710.939.632.44132.431.335.531.531.731.234.22630.446.839.441.833.936.234.629.328.630.233.825.430.629.421.334.434.523.340.541.922.544.845.622.450.153.321.355.85518.458.155.817.56056.817.56152.517.256.660.216.861.769.717.362.774.417.466.87416.672.175.317.371.973.717.665.469.717.663.266.317.756.170.617.459.27017.761.167.317.961.259.118.159.463.318.155.583.129.878.149.11.337.6median 60.2median 17.7median 59.410.71.75.733.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1median 48.9median 17.7median 71.18.871.78.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia XZApple iPhone 7Samsung Galaxy S7OnePlus 3HTC 10LG G5
Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.76 / 3.6 / 4.06 Watt
Carga midlight 7 / 9.52 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3430 mAh
Power Consumption
41%
56%
52%
33%
25%
Idle Minimum *
1.76
0.57
68%
0.54
69%
0.68
61%
0.68
61%
0.83
53%
Idle Average *
3.6
1.24
66%
1.51
58%
1.02
72%
1.49
59%
2.36
34%
Idle Maximum *
4.06
1.36
67%
1.54
62%
1.14
72%
1.91
53%
2.42
40%
Load Average *
7
5.92
15%
3.75
46%
4.73
32%
7.4
-6%
7.27
-4%
Load Maximum *
9.52
10.53
-11%
5.01
47%
7.16
25%
9.71
-2%
9.18
4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 07min
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3430 mAh
Battery Runtime
56%
22%
43%
11%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1125
1338
19%
1770
57%
1810
61%
1273
13%
1277
14%
H.264
502
847
69%
722
44%
892
78%
648
29%
411
-18%
WiFi v1.3
438
840
92%
517
18%
456
4%
413
-6%
372
-15%
Load
187
268
43%
126
-33%
242
29%
203
9%
210
12%

Pro

+ Design elegante
+ Bom software
+ Diversas configurações para o som e vídeo
+ Sensor de digitais veloz
+ Câmera confiável
+ Câmera frontal de alta resolução
+ Boas fotos:
+ Qualidade de voz nítida
+ MHL, NFC, USB-OTG
+ Controles precisos
+ Iluminação uniforme
+ Tela brilhante
+ Baixas emissões de calor.
+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- Aplicativos com publicidade
- Consumo de energia muito alto
- Velocidade lenta de transferência da memória
- Módulo GPS demora para travar
- Grandes desvios de cores da tela
In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O visionário, o Xperia XZ, tristemente não é suficientemente poderoso para iniciar uma revolução. De muitas maneiras, este modelo de teste é muito conservador e não se arrisca. Nós pudemos classificá-lo como confiável mais do que "revolucionário".

A câmera é um destaque especial da campanha de marketing: ele oferece muitos recursos bons, mas é definitivamente médio quando comparado com a concorrência. Além disso, o aparelho não possui um estabilizador de imagem, o qual ajudaria a melhorar a qualidade das imagens em condições de baixa iluminação. O Xperia XZ pode tirar fotos médias, assim como a maior parte da concorrência.

Em termos de duração da bateria, precisão de cores da tela, as velocidades do módulo WLAN e o consumo de energia, o Xperia XZ deixa a desejar. Esperaríamos mais de um smartphone com um preço de 700 Euros (~$ 763). As baixas velocidades da memória são especialmente agraviantes, dado que elas aumentam notoriamente os tempos de carga dos jogos.

A Sony fez muitas coisa bem: o software tem muitas configurações úteis para novos usuários e as ferramente fornecidas podem inclusive melhorar o som e as cores das tela. O design elegante do telefone definitivamente é um ponto positivo. Os alto falantes e as temperaturas da superfície também sçao muito bons. Nós apreciamos especialmente as ofertas so aplicativo de lealdade do cliente, o Xperia Lounge.

No final, o Xperia XZ é definitivamente médio em muitos departamentos. Como tal, ele não pode ser um smartphone de gama alta destacado. A Sony não inova muito mas criou um bom smartphone.

Sabemos que a Sony é capaz de revolucionalizar o mercado de smartphones: o Xperia Z5 Premium e outros modelos de gama alta compactos são a prova de sua criatividade. No entanto, o Xperia XZ não desafia os padrões estabelecidos pelos smartphones. Apesar de ser uma aparelho confiável de gama alta, seus recursos podem não valer 700 Euros (~$763), dado que há muitos concorrentes, como o OnePlus 3, o Galaxy S7 ou o iPhone 7, que se desempenham muito melhor.

Sony Xperia XZ - 11/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
54 / 60 → 90%
Peso
91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 63 → 90%
Desempenho da aplicação
57 / 70 → 82%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
84%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ
Florian Wimmer, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-16)