Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ

Name: Sony Xperia XZ
Brand: Sony

O visionário. A Sony quer uma revolução: o Xperia XZ tem como alvo mudar a nossa vida diária. No entanto, com a exceção de sua câmera de 23 MP, a maioria de suas especificações é bastante ordinária. Vamos descobrir do que é capaz este modelo carro chefe da Sony.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/26/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia XZ (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 530

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, TRILUMINOS display for mobile, Dynamic Contrast Enhancement, X-Reality, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 32GB (Single Sim) / 64GB (Dual Sim), 22.4 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Digitais, Acelerômetro, Sensor de posição, Sensor de proximidade, Barômetro, Bússola, Sensor de espectro de cores

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1,800/1,900), UMTS (800/850/900/1,700/1,900/2,100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B19/B20/B26/B28/B29/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 146 x 72

Bateria

11 Wh, 2900 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qnovo Adaptive Charging, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 40 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 17 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 610 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 600 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 23 MPix Triple-Sensor-Technology, até ISO 12800, wide-angle 24mm lens, 1/2.3” Exmor RS para sensor móvel
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.06” Exmor RS for mobile image Sensor, 22mm Wide-angle F2.0 lens

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Charging cable, USB-Charger, Headset, Short manual, What's New, News, Weather, Movie Creator, Sketches, Lounge, Playstatation, AVG Protection, Support, Slide View, 24 Meses Garantia, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, MHL; Bandwidth (Download/Upload): 450Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR-value: 0.85 W/kg (head), 1.20 W/kg (body), fanless

peso

161 g, Suprimento de energia: 42 g

Preço

700 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	451 MBit/s +8%
Sony Xperia XZ Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	419 MBit/s
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 MBit/s -32%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	339 MBit/s +151%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 MBit/s +90%
Sony Xperia XZ Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	135 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


510 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	517 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	544 cd/m²	512 cd/m²
516 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	507 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 544 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 521 cd/m² Minimum: 5.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 544 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18

	Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2"	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"
Screen		2%	30%	24%	12%	-25%
Brightness middle	544	419 -23%	556 2%	350 -36%	445 -18%	560 3%
Brightness	521	431 -17%	519 0%	351 -33%	434 -17%	541 4%
Brightness Distribution	93	84 -10%	90 -3%	98 5%	93 0%	85 -9%
Black Level *	0.37		0.34 8%		0.36 3%	0.45 -22%
Contrast	1470		1635 11%		1236 -16%	1244 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.8	4.1 29%	1.3 78%	2.04 65%	2.8 52%	9.19 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.8	12 -22%	2.6 73%	3.25 67%	5.8 41%	15.01 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.2	3.3 54%	1.9 74%	1.63 77%	3.7 49%	10.58 -47%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.1 ^105%	2.26 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.31 ^95%	2.7 ^81%
CCT	8619 ^75%	6550 ^99%	6818 ^95%	6391 ^102%	7164 ^91%	9760 ^67%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		89.38	63.15	86.86		73.19
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100	99.71	99.35

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points
OnePlus 3	142090 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points -1%
HTC 10	131866 Points +2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	78324 Points -39%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points
OnePlus 3	30241 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points +1%
HTC 10	27176 Points -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	26380 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points
OnePlus 3	34023 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points +4%
HTC 10	30061 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	37725 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points
OnePlus 3	21771 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points -4%
HTC 10	20344 Points -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	12852 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points
OnePlus 3	3424 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points -17%
HTC 10	3157 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2009 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points
OnePlus 3	4633 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points -33%
HTC 10	4581 Points +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2336 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points
OnePlus 3	1789 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points +21%
HTC 10	1512 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1348 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps
OnePlus 3	60 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps -40%
HTC 10	43 fps -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	52 fps -41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps
OnePlus 3	89 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps -5%
HTC 10	73 fps -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	56 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps
OnePlus 3	46 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps -31%
HTC 10	24 fps -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	27 fps -31%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps
OnePlus 3	47 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps 0%
HTC 10	39 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	25 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps
OnePlus 3	30 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps -52%
HTC 10	14 fps -55%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19 fps -39%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps
OnePlus 3	31 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps -10%
HTC 10	24 fps -23%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	18 fps -42%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points
OnePlus 3	7101 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -5%
HTC 10	5809 Points +15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5094 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points
OnePlus 3	2496 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -8%
HTC 10	2193 Points +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1649 Points -24%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points
OnePlus 3	3537 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +38%
HTC 10	2806 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2737 Points -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points
OnePlus 3	2052 Points +43%
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points +56%
HTC 10	1772 Points +24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	876 Points -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points
OnePlus 3	4813 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points -63%
HTC 10	5009 Points +6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	3137 Points -33%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points
OnePlus 3	1112 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points -10%
HTC 10	928 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	986 Points -8%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points
OnePlus 3	1754 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points +112%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points
OnePlus 3	4097 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points +51%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	7046 Points
OnePlus 3	7085 Points +1%

Legend

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	281 MB/s
OnePlus 3	408.7 MB/s +45%
Samsung Galaxy S7	483.8 MB/s +72%
HTC 10	275.1 MB/s -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	256.8 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	138 MB/s
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7	145.7 MB/s +6%
HTC 10	115.6 MB/s -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	99.4 MB/s -28%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	71.5 MB/s
OnePlus 3	137.6 MB/s +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7	85.9 MB/s +20%
HTC 10	29.92 MB/s -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19.11 MB/s -73%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	10.5 MB/s
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s +74%
Samsung Galaxy S7	16.01 MB/s +52%
HTC 10	15.89 MB/s +51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	14.53 MB/s +38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	33.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7	72.3 MB/s +116%
HTC 10	83.3 MB/s +149%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	29.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7	53.6 MB/s +80%
HTC 10	65.4 MB/s +119%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms *
OnePlus 3	2921 ms * -6%
Apple iPhone 7	1113 ms * +60%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * +7%
HTC 10	3146 ms * -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	4377 ms * -58%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points
OnePlus 3	9155 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points +174%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points +45%
HTC 10	8905 Points -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	8851 Points -2%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points
OnePlus 3	122 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points +84%
HTC 10	108 Points +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	106 Points +18%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	54.2 Points
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 7	165.9 Points +206%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points +37%
HTC 10	52.1 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	48.2 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.6 °C	36.3 °C	35.4 °C
38.5 °C	37.5 °C	38.2 °C
37.1 °C	37.6 °C	37.6 °C

Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C


36.9 °C	38.5 °C	39.4 °C
37 °C	39 °C	39.7 °C
37.7 °C	37.7 °C	39.4 °C

Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.09 / 0.18 Watt
Ocioso	1.76 / 3.6 / 4.06 Watt
Carga	7 / 9.52 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh
Power Consumption		41%	56%	52%	33%	25%
Idle Minimum *	1.76	0.57 68%	0.54 69%	0.68 61%	0.68 61%	0.83 53%
Idle Average *	3.6	1.24 66%	1.51 58%	1.02 72%	1.49 59%	2.36 34%
Idle Maximum *	4.06	1.36 67%	1.54 62%	1.14 72%	1.91 53%	2.42 40%
Load Average *	7	5.92 15%	3.75 46%	4.73 32%	7.4 -6%	7.27 -4%
Load Maximum *	9.52	10.53 -11%	5.01 47%	7.16 25%	9.71 -2%	9.18 4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		18h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 07min

	Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh
Battery Runtime		56%	22%	43%	11%	-2%
Reader / Idle	1125	1338 19%	1770 57%	1810 61%	1273 13%	1277 14%
H.264	502	847 69%	722 44%	892 78%	648 29%	411 -18%
WiFi v1.3	438	840 92%	517 18%	456 4%	413 -6%	372 -15%
Load	187	268 43%	126 -33%	242 29%	203 9%	210 12%

Pro

+ Design elegante

+ Bom software

+ Diversas configurações para o som e vídeo

+ Sensor de digitais veloz

+ Câmera confiável

+ Câmera frontal de alta resolução

+ Boas fotos:

+ Qualidade de voz nítida

+ MHL, NFC, USB-OTG

+ Controles precisos

+ Iluminação uniforme

+ Tela brilhante

+ Baixas emissões de calor.

+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- Aplicativos com publicidade

- Consumo de energia muito alto

- Velocidade lenta de transferência da memória

- Módulo GPS demora para travar

- Grandes desvios de cores da tela

In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O visionário, o Xperia XZ, tristemente não é suficientemente poderoso para iniciar uma revolução. De muitas maneiras, este modelo de teste é muito conservador e não se arrisca. Nós pudemos classificá-lo como confiável mais do que "revolucionário".

A câmera é um destaque especial da campanha de marketing: ele oferece muitos recursos bons, mas é definitivamente médio quando comparado com a concorrência. Além disso, o aparelho não possui um estabilizador de imagem, o qual ajudaria a melhorar a qualidade das imagens em condições de baixa iluminação. O Xperia XZ pode tirar fotos médias, assim como a maior parte da concorrência.

Em termos de duração da bateria, precisão de cores da tela, as velocidades do módulo WLAN e o consumo de energia, o Xperia XZ deixa a desejar. Esperaríamos mais de um smartphone com um preço de 700 Euros (~$ 763). As baixas velocidades da memória são especialmente agraviantes, dado que elas aumentam notoriamente os tempos de carga dos jogos.

A Sony fez muitas coisa bem: o software tem muitas configurações úteis para novos usuários e as ferramente fornecidas podem inclusive melhorar o som e as cores das tela. O design elegante do telefone definitivamente é um ponto positivo. Os alto falantes e as temperaturas da superfície também sçao muito bons. Nós apreciamos especialmente as ofertas so aplicativo de lealdade do cliente, o Xperia Lounge.

No final, o Xperia XZ é definitivamente médio em muitos departamentos. Como tal, ele não pode ser um smartphone de gama alta destacado. A Sony não inova muito mas criou um bom smartphone.

Sabemos que a Sony é capaz de revolucionalizar o mercado de smartphones: o Xperia Z5 Premium e outros modelos de gama alta compactos são a prova de sua criatividade. No entanto, o Xperia XZ não desafia os padrões estabelecidos pelos smartphones. Apesar de ser uma aparelho confiável de gama alta, seus recursos podem não valer 700 Euros (~$763), dado que há muitos concorrentes, como o OnePlus 3, o Galaxy S7 ou o iPhone 7, que se desempenham muito melhor.

Sony Xperia XZ - 2016-11-02 11/02/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

90%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

54 / 60 → 90%

Peso

91%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 63 → 90%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 70 → 82%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

67 / 91 → 74%

Camera

84%

Médio

78%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ

Florian Wimmer, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-16)