Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ Premium
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 578 cd/m²
Contraste: 932:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.15
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.7" | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 32% | -19% | 15% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 578 | 557 -4% | 464 -20% | 568 -2% | 560 -3% |
| Brightness | 568 | 553 -3% | 468 -18% | 562 -1% | 562 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 97 5% | 85 -8% | 92 0% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.35 44% | 0.43 31% | ||
| Contrast | 932 | 1591 71% | 1321 42% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.4 50% | 3.2 -14% | 2.4 14% | 1.7 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 3.1 39% | 10.5 -106% | 3.8 25% | 3.4 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.3 54% | 1.4 50% | 2.5 11% | 1.6 43% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.37 93% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6728 97% | 6667 97% | 6590 99% | 6779 96% | 6435 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 81.57 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1136 Hz | ≤ 33 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1136 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1136 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Random Read 4KB | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Random Write 4KB | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.22 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.62 / 2.44 / 2.59 Watt |
| Carga |
4.94 / 7.91 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | 0% | -30% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.77 -24% | 0.85 -37% | 1.03 -66% | 0.68 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 2.44 | 2.04 16% | 1.2 51% | 2.61 -7% | 1.13 54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.59 | 2.24 14% | 1.25 52% | 2.83 -9% | 1.16 55% |
| Load Average * | 4.94 | 4.69 5% | 6.97 -41% | 7.03 -42% | 4.69 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.91 | 8.66 -9% | 9.74 -23% | 10.08 -27% | 5.24 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | -23% | -7% | 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1754 | 1835 5% | 1393 -21% | 1655 -6% | 1565 -11% |
| H.264 | 802 | 813 1% | 799 0% | 756 -6% | 742 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 695 | 587 -16% | 463 -33% | 760 9% | 736 6% |
| Load | 236 | 225 -5% | 149 -37% | 174 -26% | 275 17% |
Pro
Contra
Oh, Sony, é muito bom que pela segunda vez que você tenha criado um smartphone de gama alta com recursos tecnológicos inovadores disponíveis. O Xperia XZ Premium impressiona com som de alta resolução, cancelamento de ruído com os fones apropriados e uma função de câmera lenta que funciona muito bem. E tudo isso apenas por alguns dólares a mais em comparação com o Xperia XZ. Então vêm as boas durações da bateria e, claro, a fenomenal tela HDR da qual esperamos que se torne um padrão para aparelhos de gama alta. Se pelo menos a Sony tivesse usado uma tela AMOLED aqui ....
Mas é uma pena, por outro lado, que, em comparação com esses destaques técnicos, o exterior parece bastante desatualizado: a carcaça é pesada e, embora elegante, é fácil de distorcer. Os grandes marcos não ajudam a que a tela pareça moderna. Além disso, o aparelho possui uma capacidade de armazenamento apenas padrão, um módulo GPS lento, uma recepção Wi-Fi medíocre mais longe do roteador e uma qualidade de chamada particularmente nada boa. Os acessórios não possuem carga rápida e o fone de ouvido barato não é digno de um aparelho carro-chefe.
O Xperia XZ Premium é um aparelho com muitas novas tecnologias que comprovou que vídeos em 4K e HDR podem parecer impressionantes mesmo em uma tela de smartphone. Tem uma duração de bateria e uma função de câmera lenta convincentes, mas a Sony poderia ter feito mais esforços em recursos básicos, como na qualidade das chamadas e recepção Wi-Fi.
Se a Sony tivesse sido um pouco mais corajosa, poderia ter feito do Xperia XZ Premium um excelente smartphone, eclipsando sua concorrência. Como é, o aparelho é simplesmente um dos muitos smartphones de gama alta que possui características técnicas convincentes. Não nos entenda mal, em muitos aspectos o Sony Xperia XZ Premium é um bom smartphone com uma fantástica tela HDR. Mas a sensação de que a Sony pode ter esquecido sobre o básico entre todo esse progresso tecnológico, permanece.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
- 07/12/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
