Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 513 cd/m²
Contraste: 1221:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.2
| Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto X4 LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | -22% | 21% | 9% | 1% | 40% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 513 | 656 28% | 458 -11% | 550 7% | 545 6% | 469 -9% | 539 5% | 659 28% |
| Brightness | 506 | 634 25% | 473 -7% | 535 6% | 526 4% | 479 -5% | 542 7% | 680 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 88 -5% | 92 -1% | 87 -6% | 86 -8% | 93 0% | 88 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.4 5% | 0.51 -21% | 0.42 -0% | 0.42 -0% | 0.37 12% | 0.56 -33% | |
| Contrast | 1221 | 1640 34% | 898 -26% | 1310 7% | 1298 6% | 1268 4% | 1177 -4% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 5.3 -6% | 7.1 -42% | 3.3 34% | 4.9 2% | 5.5 -10% | 1.6 68% | 2.8 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.4 | 7.8 32% | 14.5 -27% | 4.5 61% | 8.5 25% | 10.7 6% | 2.6 77% | 6.5 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 5.2 33% | 10.5 -35% | 3.6 54% | 5.4 31% | 6.7 14% | 1.5 81% | 3 62% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 7964 82% | 7905 82% | 8951 73% | 7226 90% | 7610 85% | 8064 81% | 6422 101% | 6938 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1157 Hz | ≤ 7 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1157 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 7 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1157 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XA2 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Honor 9 | HTC U11 Life | Motorola Moto X4 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 14% | -8% | 28% | 39% | 49% | -27% | 10% | -1% | 1086% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 271.5 | 287.4 6% | 270.5 0% | 293 8% | 268 -1% | 281.6 4% | 182 -33% | 273.7 1% | 242 ? -11% | 1887 ? 595% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 127.4 | 205.3 61% | 139.6 10% | 204 60% | 120 -6% | 120.5 -5% | 77.1 -39% | 138.8 9% | 100.5 ? -21% | 1471 ? 1055% |
| Random Read 4KB | 43.07 | 68.6 59% | 37.97 -12% | 55.7 29% | 39.3 -9% | 45.4 5% | 22.41 -48% | 76 76% | 43.2 ? 0% | 278 ? 545% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.82 | 7.59 -45% | 12.07 -13% | 32.7 137% | 50.2 263% | 55.3 300% | 12.13 -12% | 10.1 -27% | 22.4 ? 62% | 311 ? 2150% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86 ? | 86.9 ? 1% | 78.7 ? -8% | 68 ? -21% | 82.8 ? -4% | 83.9 ? -2% | 73.7 ? -14% | 85.9 ? 0% | 71.8 ? -17% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.8 ? | 66.5 ? 3% | 49.77 ? -23% | 34.64 ? -47% | 59.8 ? -8% | 60 ? -7% | 56 ? -14% | 63.3 ? -2% | 52.9 ? -18% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.39 / 1.61 / 1.62 Watt |
| Carga |
3.12 / 4.92 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -57% | -32% | -78% | -26% | -19% | 2% | -48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.39 | 0.84 -115% | 0.67 -72% | 1.13 -190% | 0.63 -62% | 0.65 -67% | 0.64 -64% | 0.77 -97% |
| Idle Average * | 1.61 | 2.31 -43% | 1.7 -6% | 2.25 -40% | 2.1 -30% | 1.51 6% | 1.36 16% | 2.12 -32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.62 | 2.33 -44% | 1.78 -10% | 2.3 -42% | 2.15 -33% | 1.57 3% | 1.4 14% | 2.17 -34% |
| Load Average * | 3.12 | 4.76 -53% | 4.42 -42% | 4.89 -57% | 3.34 -7% | 3.88 -24% | 2.53 19% | 4.3 -38% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.92 | 6.39 -30% | 6.3 -28% | 7.99 -62% | 4.83 2% | 5.47 -11% | 3.63 26% | 6.73 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -19% | -30% | -10% | -18% | 19% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2503 | 1665 -33% | 1840 -26% | 1399 -44% | 1820 -27% | 1652 -34% | 2418 -3% | 1788 -29% |
| H.264 | 766 | 698 -9% | 644 -16% | 564 -26% | 798 4% | 688 -10% | 984 28% | 876 14% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 886 | 562 -37% | 730 -18% | 516 -42% | 725 -18% | 659 -26% | 843 -5% | 849 -4% |
| Load | 298 | 286 -4% | 254 -15% | 278 -7% | 303 2% | 289 -3% | 467 57% | 238 -20% |
Pro
Contra
O Sony Xperia XA2 é um smartphone de gama média muito sólido. No entanto, não traz um "recurso matador" real para diferenciá-lo da concorrência.
Com o Xperia XA2, a Sony possui um bom dispositivo de gama média em sua linha, o que facilita a vida cotidiana com o smartphone. O moderno dispositivo de 5,2 polegadas encaixa bem nas mãos, possui uma tela Full HD brilhante com ângulos de visão estáveis e, graças a reservas de desempenho decentes, também roda jogos graficamente exigentes, sem problemas. Pontos positivos adicionais são a câmera de 23 MP que tira boas fotos à luz do dia, a longa duração da bateria e os tempos de carregamento agradavelmente curtos graças ao Quick Charge 3.0. Com o Android 8.0 no momento de nossos testes, o Xperia XA2 também roda uma versão muito atual do sistema operacional da Google.
Embora o Xperia XA2 não comete verdadeiros erros, poderia ter sido melhor em algumas partes: A câmera de selfies produz apenas uma qualidade de imagem medíocre e os 32 GB de armazenamento nominal são reduzidos a 20 GB pelos muitos aplicativos pré-instalados que não podem ser desinstalados. Embora uma carcaça à prova d'água não seja mais uma raridade na gama média, a Sony a omitiu no Xperia XA2.
No momento do teste, o Xperia XA2 custa 300 euros (~$370, cerca de $ 350 nos EUA), o que é praticamente tanto quanto os smartphones similares e rápidos como o BQ Aquaris X Pro, o HTC U11 Life, ou o Motorola Moto X4.
Sony Xperia XA2
- 03/29/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
