Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Maze Alpha X | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Maze Alpha X |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 659 cd/m²
Contraste: 1177:1 (Preto: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Maze Alpha X IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -2% | 10% | -25% | 4% | -125% | |
Brightness middle | 659 | 472 -28% | 530 -20% | 541 -18% | 425 -36% | 497 -25% |
Brightness | 680 | 430 -37% | 523 -23% | 538 -21% | 423 -38% | 478 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 96 9% | 92 5% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.27 52% | 0.35 37% | 0.6 -7% | ||
Contrast | 1177 | 1748 49% | 1514 29% | 828 -30% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 3.5 -25% | 2.4 14% | 5.8 -107% | 2.1 25% | 11.6 -314% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 5.9 9% | 5.5 15% | 3.4 48% | 22.1 -240% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 4 -33% | 2.2 27% | 2.7 10% | 2.5 17% | 13.5 -350% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.29 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.07 106% | 2.32 95% | 2.93 75% |
CCT | 6938 94% | 7048 92% | 6598 99% | 6570 99% | 6455 101% | 9955 65% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1479 Hz | ≤ 5 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1479 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1479 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | |
Honor View 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
OnePlus 5T | |
Maze Alpha X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10) | |
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53) |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 | Honor View 10 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | OnePlus 5T | Maze Alpha X | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 90% | 301% | 5% | 96% | 4% | 1% | 1199% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 273.7 | 704 157% | 810 196% | 299.9 10% | 699 155% | 247.4 -10% | 242 ? -12% | 1887 ? 589% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 138.8 | 208.6 50% | 194.3 40% | 104.2 -25% | 203.4 47% | 162.2 17% | 100.5 ? -28% | 1471 ? 960% |
Random Read 4KB | 76 | 148.5 95% | 144.3 90% | 82.6 9% | 138.1 82% | 70.3 -7% | 43.2 ? -43% | 278 ? 266% |
Random Write 4KB | 10.1 | 15.75 56% | 160 1484% | 14.69 45% | 20 98% | 11.61 15% | 22.4 ? 122% | 311 ? 2979% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.9 ? | 81 ? -6% | 77.9 ? -9% | 81 ? -6% | 71.8 ? -16% | |||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.3 ? | 65.1 ? 3% | 62.3 ? -2% | 74 ? 17% | 52.9 ? -16% |
Arena of Valor | |
min | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
high HD | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra |
Shadow Fight 3 | |
minimal | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
high | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra |
Battle Bay | |
full resolution | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
half resolution | |
Razer Phone 2017 | |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra |
Arena of Valor | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
min | 31 fps | ||
high HD | 30 fps |
Shadow Fight 3 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 58 fps | ||
minimal | 30 fps |
Battle Bay | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
half resolution | 61 fps | ||
full resolution | 61 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor View 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.02 / 0.42 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.77 / 2.12 / 2.17 Watt |
Carga |
4.3 / 6.73 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -21% | 27% | 17% | 1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.77 | 0.69 10% | 1.05 -36% | 0.67 13% | 0.58 25% | 0.9 -17% |
Idle Average * | 2.12 | 2.03 4% | 2.36 -11% | 1.02 52% | 1.44 32% | 2.14 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.17 | 2.1 3% | 2.41 -11% | 1.1 49% | 1.53 29% | 2.18 -0% |
Load Average * | 4.3 | 3.18 26% | 4.93 -15% | 3.86 10% | 3.17 26% | 3.96 8% |
Load Maximum * | 6.73 | 8.73 -30% | 9.04 -34% | 5.97 11% | 8.54 -27% | 5.81 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | -2% | -6% | -5% | -12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1788 | 1671 -7% | 1546 -14% | 1754 -2% | 1624 -9% | |
H.264 | 876 | 819 -7% | 908 4% | 799 -9% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 849 | 600 -29% | 679 -20% | 646 -24% | 718 -15% | 603 -29% |
Load | 238 | 305 28% | 260 9% | 257 8% | 240 1% |
Pro
Contra
"Sempre foi um pouco mais caro ter um gosto especial". Esse slogan ainda era verdade nos dias em que os smartphones da Sony ainda eram conhecidos como Sony Ericsson Xperia, e ainda é verdade para a unidade de teste de hoje com um preço de mercado de pouco menos de $430. Por apenas $50-$100 a mais, você pode obter um Honor View 10 ou OnePlus 5T com muito mais poder de processamento e melhor relação tela/corpo, para começar. No entanto, a incrível e excepcionalmente brilhante tela 16:9 da Sony é certamente um ponto de venda exclusivo.
As duas câmeras selfie na parte frontal permitem mais liberdade artística ao tirar fotos, permitindo que uma escolha entre uma foto regular e uma grande angular, embora este último vem com distorções nas bordas. A câmera principal ainda é uma prova incrível e viva de que até mesmo uma única lente pode produzir fotos incríveis. No entanto, o baixo desempenho do microfone do dispositivo foi uma grande decepção, especialmente considerando que costumávamos elogiar os smartphones da Sony por sua qualidade de voz superior no passado. O alto-falante, por outro lado, foi bastante decente e o GPS notavelmente preciso foi uma surpresa positiva. A experiência geral é acompanhada pelo software atualizado do dispositivo e pelos recursos de manipulação bastante decentes.
O Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra pode não ser o dispositivo mais moderno e certamente não é o mais acessível, mas seu pacote total resultou bastante impressionante.
Comprado por meio de sua operadora de rede, o Xperia XA2 Ultra pode ser o companheiro ideal para quem gosta de tirar selfies e não precisa de desempenho de ponta. Sua tela grande e bateria de longa duração são louváveis, no entanto, sugerimos que espere um pouco mais para que o preço caia para níveis mais aceitáveis.
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
- 03/31/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer