Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Plus

Name: Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Brand: Sony

Smaller bezels, larger display.

Depois do XA2 regular e sua versão Ultra, mais poderosa, os compradores interessados agora podem escolher entre três modelos XA2. O design foi atualizado ligeiramente, agora oferecendo marcos menores, bem como uma tela de 6 polegadas no formato 18:9. Nós esclarecemos em nossa análise, o que mais o Sony XA2 Plus pode fazer.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Sony Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.00 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 20 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, até 400 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (1/2/5/8), LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.6 x 157 x 75

Bateria

3580 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 23 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.4

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, fones estéreo, Movie Creator, Xperia Lounge, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 1.9 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.44 W/kg, fanless

peso

204 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g

Preço

399 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s +86%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	347 MBit/s
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	307 MBit/s -12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	305 MBit/s -12%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	236 MBit/s -32%
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s +118%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	334 MBit/s +8%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	309 MBit/s
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s -20%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	210 MBit/s -32%
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42.7 MBit/s -86%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


577 cd/m²	601 cd/m²	620 cd/m²
587 cd/m²	597 cd/m²	605 cd/m²
576 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	596 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 620 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 592.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 597 cd/m²
Contraste: 1866:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	LG Q7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5"	Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
Screen		-11%	-23%	-67%	-18%	-15%
Brightness middle	597	555 -7%	489 -18%	431 -28%	458 -23%	659 10%
Brightness	592	537 -9%	486 -18%	419 -29%	463 -22%	680 15%
Brightness Distribution	92	94 2%	93 1%	89 -3%	92 0%	88 -4%
Black Level *	0.32	0.39 -22%	0.34 -6%	0.58 -81%	0.22 31%	0.56 -75%
Contrast	1866	1423 -24%	1438 -23%	743 -60%	2082 12%	1177 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	2.3 4%	3.8 -58%	6.2 -158%	4 -67%	2.8 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.3	6 -13%	7.1 -34%	10.1 -91%	7.4 -40%	6.5 -23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	3.9 -15%	4.4 -29%	6.2 -82%	4.7 -38%	3 12%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.19 ^100%	2.18 ^101%
CCT	7172 ^91%	6212 ^105%	7213 ^90%	8064 ^81%	7425 ^88%	6938 ^94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 4 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.8 ms rise
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	70346 Points
Honor 10	174272 Points +148%
Xiaomi Poco F1	227026 Points +223%
LG Q7 Plus	44064 Points -37%
Nokia 7 Plus	117165 Points +67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	70141 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points -2%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	89006 Points
Honor 10	205297 Points +131%
Xiaomi Poco F1	263165 Points +196%
LG Q7 Plus	52855 Points -41%
Nokia 7 Plus	141701 Points +59%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	89349 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5659 Points
Honor 10	8530 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F1	9664 Points +71%
LG Q7 Plus	3969 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus	6825 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5083 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	4953 Points
Honor 10	7046 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco F1	8101 Points +64%
LG Q7 Plus	3080 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus	6077 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5051 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1570 Points
Honor 10	3374 Points +115%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3838 Points +144%
LG Q7 Plus	855 Points -46%
Nokia 7 Plus	2369 Points +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1560 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +303%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3284 Points
Honor 10	5882 Points +79%
Xiaomi Poco F1	6506 Points +98%
LG Q7 Plus	1407 Points -57%
Nokia 7 Plus	4976 Points +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	3287 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +210%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points
Honor 10	3808 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3239 Points +143%
LG Q7 Plus	800 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus	2503 Points +88%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1325 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +409%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1480 Points
Honor 10	4397 Points +197%
Xiaomi Poco F1	7945 Points +437%
LG Q7 Plus	631 Points -57%
Nokia 7 Plus	2298 Points +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1492 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +1060%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	936 Points
Honor 10	1316 Points +41%
Xiaomi Poco F1	1296 Points +38%
LG Q7 Plus	751 Points -20%
Nokia 7 Plus	1101 Points +18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	912 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +67%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	858 Points
Honor 10	1890 Points +120%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2468 Points +188%
LG Q7 Plus	639 Points -26%
Nokia 7 Plus	1646 Points +92%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	865 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +539%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	4152 Points
Honor 10	6610 Points +59%
Xiaomi Poco F1	9182 Points +121%
LG Q7 Plus	2135 Points -49%
Nokia 7 Plus	5867 Points +41%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	4234 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +263%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3621 Points
Honor 10	8634 Points +138%
Xiaomi Poco F1	14369 Points +297%
LG Q7 Plus	2084 Points -42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	3738 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +231%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	16972 Points
Honor 10	29111 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco F1	63159 Points +272%
LG Q7 Plus	9710 Points -43%
Nokia 7 Plus	26610 Points +57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	16949 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	18472 Points
Honor 10	32674 Points +77%
Xiaomi Poco F1	82125 Points +345%
LG Q7 Plus	9656 Points -48%
Nokia 7 Plus	29333 Points +59%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	18528 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13217 Points
Honor 10	21070 Points +59%
Xiaomi Poco F1	34928 Points +164%
LG Q7 Plus	9903 Points -25%
Nokia 7 Plus	20085 Points +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	13054 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points
Honor 10	3358 Points +152%
Xiaomi Poco F1	5687 Points +326%
LG Q7 Plus	120 Points -91%
Nokia 7 Plus	2035 Points +53%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1333 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1248 Points
Honor 10	3573 Points +186%
Xiaomi Poco F1	8261 Points +562%
LG Q7 Plus	96 Points -92%
Nokia 7 Plus	1895 Points +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1256 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +280%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1757 Points
Honor 10	2773 Points +58%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2720 Points +55%
LG Q7 Plus	1029 Points -41%
Nokia 7 Plus	2734 Points +56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1698 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	824 Points
Honor 10	2891 Points +251%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3972 Points +382%
LG Q7 Plus	101 Points -88%
Nokia 7 Plus	1332 Points +62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	833 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +274%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	718 Points
Honor 10	2993 Points +317%
Xiaomi Poco F1	4746 Points +561%
LG Q7 Plus	80 Points -89%
Nokia 7 Plus	1161 Points +62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	727 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +354%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1712 Points
Honor 10	2582 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2528 Points +48%
LG Q7 Plus	1031 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus	2749 Points +61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1706 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +92%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	28 fps
Honor 10	59 fps +111%
Xiaomi Poco F1	60 fps +114%
LG Q7 Plus	16 fps -43%
Nokia 7 Plus	48 fps +71%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	31 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +208%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	30 fps
Honor 10	124 fps +313%
Xiaomi Poco F1	150 fps +400%
LG Q7 Plus	17 fps -43%
Nokia 7 Plus	50 fps +67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	29 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +843%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13 fps
Honor 10	50 fps +285%
Xiaomi Poco F1	58 fps +346%
LG Q7 Plus	6.8 fps -48%
Nokia 7 Plus	22 fps +69%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	15 fps +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +481%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	14 fps
Honor 10	59 fps +321%
Xiaomi Poco F1	71 fps +407%
LG Q7 Plus	7.1 fps -49%
Nokia 7 Plus	23 fps +64%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +1094%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.3 fps
Honor 10	34 fps +266%
Xiaomi Poco F1	54 fps +481%
LG Q7 Plus	4.5 fps -52%
Nokia 7 Plus	15 fps +61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	11 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +605%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.8 fps
Honor 10	39 fps +298%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps +257%
LG Q7 Plus	4.7 fps -52%
Nokia 7 Plus	14 fps +43%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5.2 fps -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +1109%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.3 fps
Honor 10	20 fps +277%
Xiaomi Poco F1	33 fps +523%
LG Q7 Plus	2.4 fps -55%
Nokia 7 Plus	9.1 fps +72%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	6 fps +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +804%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.6 fps
Honor 10	23 fps +311%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps +525%
LG Q7 Plus	2.5 fps -55%
Nokia 7 Plus	8.3 fps +48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5.5 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +1171%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus	15.07 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	9.81 fps

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus	349 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 ()	190 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points

Legend

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	76 Points +175%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	56.5 Points +105%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	53.9 Points +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	28.11 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	27.61 Points
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	18.69 Points -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +643%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points +189%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	10965 Points +119%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	10945 Points +118%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	5052 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	5017 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	3422 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	13671 ms * -36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	10086 ms *
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	9823 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * +4%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	3937 ms * +61%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	3899 ms * +61%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2714 ms * +73%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +85%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	223 Points +110%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	182 Points +72%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	168 Points +58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	110 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	106 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	105.9 Points 0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	70 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	Honor 10	Xiaomi Poco F1	LG Q7 Plus	Nokia 7 Plus	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		442%	42%	-7%	16%	-3%	-2%	1133%
Sequential Read 256KB	281.1	828 195%	705 151%	235.9 -16%	283.1 1%	273.7 -3%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -14%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 557%
Sequential Write 256KB	146.2	192.1 31%	155.6 6%	186.6 28%	211.6 45%	138.8 -5%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -31%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 882%
Random Read 4KB	77.4	145.9 89%	101 30%	35.8 -54%	54.7 -29%	76 -2%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -44%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 258%
Random Write 4KB	10.5	163 1452%	17.81 70%	11.91 13%	19.62 87%	10.1 -4%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 113%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 2833%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	82.2 -4%	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	62.3 -7%	63.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -21%

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	31 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Configurações	Valor
	High Quality	28 fps
	Standard / low	30 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.6 °C	33.9 °C	33.5 °C
33.9 °C	33.2 °C	33.5 °C
33.3 °C	33.4 °C	33.1 °C

Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C


30.4 °C	30.5 °C	31.1 °C
30.5 °C	30.7 °C	32.8 °C
29.8 °C	30.9 °C	32.3 °C

Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 31 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ocioso	0.35 / 1.81 / 1.83 Watt
Carga	3.31 / 4.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh	Honor 10 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-77%	-43%	-42%	-40%	-44%	-31%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	0.35	1.12 -220%	0.65 -86%	1 -186%	0.65 -86%	0.77 -120%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) -109%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -156%
Idle Average *	1.81	2.26 -25%	1.97 -9%	1.57 13%	1.76 3%	2.12 -17%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) -1%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	1.83	2.3 -26%	2.01 -10%	1.64 10%	1.78 3%	2.17 -19%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) -18%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	3.31	5.14 -55%	4.29 -30%	4.1 -24%	4.47 -35%	4.3 -30%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -15%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -96%
Load Maximum *	4.97	7.89 -59%	9.05 -82%	6.02 -21%	9.13 -84%	6.73 -35%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -13%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -98%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		78h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)		8h 49min

	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh	Honor 10 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh
Battery Runtime		-45%	-28%	-53%	-44%	-30%
Reader / Idle	4682	1162 -75%	2088 -55%	980 -79%	1703 -64%	1788 -62%
H.264	893	662 -26%	936 5%	455 -49%	706 -21%	876 -2%
WiFi v1.3	837	663 -21%	808 -3%	620 -26%	672 -20%	849 1%
Load	529	216 -59%	220 -58%	230 -57%	158 -70%	238 -55%

Pro

+ Bom alto falante

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Slot dual SIM / microSD pode ser aberto em uma ferramenta

+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Armazenamento interno

- As vozes soam abafadas durante as conversas

- Desempenho medíocre do sistema

Testing the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus. Test unit provided by Sony Germany

Em nosso teste, o Xperia XA2 Plus apresenta bom desempenho, embora o desempenho do sistema permaneça abaixo do dos dispositivos em um nível de preço similar. Embora o desempenho de armazenamento também seja um pouco baixo, é possível manter o nível de smartphones comparáveis. Além disso, há uma porta USB-2.0 lenta e o desempenho da câmera principal de 23 MP está abaixo da média, principalmente em condições de iluminação irregulares.

O Xperia XA2 Plus se recomenda para os compradores interessados em smartphones da Sony que preferem o pequeno design do formato 18: 9 e que não se importam muito com um sistema de câmera dupla.

No lado positivo, há uma excelente duração de bateria e uma tela agradável, rica em contraste. Os resultados nos benchmarks dificilmente representam algo significativo no uso diário, onde o smartphone da Sony apresenta uma interface de usuário fluida e os aplicativos rodam sem problemas. Jogos exigentes podem ser bem jogados com configurações médias, e o Bluetooth 5.0 está presente. Para muitos outros fabricantes, isso ainda não é o padrão. O Xperia XA2 Plus é, portanto, recomendado para todos aqueles que não precisam das câmeras duplas do XA2 Ultra e preferem o formato 18: 9 mais fino.

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus - 09/30/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

49 / 60 → 81%

Peso

88%

Bateria