Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA1
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Honor 6X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 705:1 (Preto: 0.74 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18
| Sony Xperia XA1 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto G5 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | 19% | 20% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 522 | 518 -1% | 503 -4% | 507 -3% | 547 5% |
| Brightness | 499 | 475 -5% | 495 -1% | 509 2% | 540 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 81 -12% | 96 4% | 95 3% | 94 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.74 | 0.61 18% | 0.31 58% | 0.36 51% | 0.57 23% |
| Contrast | 705 | 849 20% | 1623 130% | 1408 100% | 960 36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 6.8 -62% | 6.2 -48% | 5.1 -21% | 5.1 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.5 | 11.4 1% | 9.8 15% | 9 22% | 9.1 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 7 -9% | 6.8 -6% | 6.1 5% | 6.2 3% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.35 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.09 105% |
| CCT | 7044 92% | 8151 80% | 8113 80% | 8143 80% | 6546 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 57 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XA1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.17 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.64 / 0.81 / 0.86 Watt |
| Carga |
2.09 / 3.31 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 Plus 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -66% | -77% | -69% | -84% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.72 -13% | 0.91 -42% | 0.38 41% | 0.82 -28% |
| Idle Average * | 0.81 | 1.5 -85% | 1.83 -126% | 1.87 -131% | 2 -147% |
| Idle Maximum * | 0.86 | 1.57 -83% | 1.87 -117% | 1.92 -123% | 2.03 -136% |
| Load Average * | 2.09 | 3.48 -67% | 3.17 -52% | 3.82 -83% | 3.34 -60% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.31 | 6.04 -82% | 4.87 -47% | 4.9 -48% | 4.92 -49% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 Plus 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -42% | 7% | -3% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1433 | 775 -46% | 1206 -16% | 1410 -2% | 2250 57% |
| H.264 | 751 | 460 -39% | 799 6% | 586 -22% | 885 18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 353 -48% | 746 11% | 665 -1% | 957 42% |
| Load | 256 | 170 -34% | 325 27% | 286 12% | 375 46% |
Pro
Contra
O Xperia XA1 da Sony é uma evolução bem sucedida do anterior Xperia XA. O smartphone foi melhorado em muitos aspectos, como a duração da bateria, consumo de energia, desempenho e câmera. Antigas virtudes da Sony, como o botão físico da câmera, diversas configurações de áudio e vídeo, e o software intrincado autodesenvolvido, naturalmente, ainda estão presentes.
Em comparação com outros smartphones desta categoria, o Sony Xperia XA1 possui algumas deficiências: A Sony ainda instala uma tela de 720p, enquanto a resolução Full HD atualmente é padrão. Somente o tamanho de tela um pouco menor o torna aceitável. Além disso, o XA1 da Sony pode esquentar bastante, o que pode ser desagradável, especialmente no verão, quando o smartphone é transportado em um bolso. O alto-falante é medíocre, assim como a qualidade das chamadas. A Sony já fez um trabalho melhor com isso no passado. No entanto, o Xperia XA1 pode manter-se bem nestes dois aspectos dentro dessa faixa de preços. É uma pena que a Sony não inclua um carregador rápido. Além disso, a falta de um leitor de digitais é inadequado para esta classe.
A Sony reformulou o seu smartphone Xperia XA1 de gama média e consegue superar a concorrência em termos de câmera, consumo de energia e desempenho de jogos. O design é exclusivo e é muito bem sucedido e elegante. Somente a tela de baixa resolução pode dissuadir alguns compradores.
O Sony Xperia XA1 pode ser recomendado, apesar de alguns pontos de crítica menores: A câmera está claramente posicionada acima da faixa de preços e inclusive consegue competir com aparelhos de gama alta como o LG G6, e a duração da bateria é muito boa, apesar da muito pequena bateria. A Sony está pelo menos a par com os rivais ou mesmo os supera evidentemente em muitos aspectos. Não há muitas fraquezas importantes, e a forma única do Xperia XA1 e um design elegante e sem marcos, atrai até mesmo o coração.
Sony Xperia XA1
- 06/29/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
