Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA

Name: Sony Xperia XA
Brand: Sony

Épocas douradas? Com o seu Xperia XA, a Sony lança uma nova obra de designer no ringe dos smartphones de gama média. Estetas, em particular, devem notar a moldura lateral fina da tela, e a construção simples, de imediato. Mas será que os valores interiores são suficientes para manter os rivais à distância?

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/31/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia XA (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva, Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 8.4 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, giroscópio, bússola, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DLNA, nano-SIM, USB-OTG, rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (bandas 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20) Cat 4 (max. 50 Mbit/s upload, 150 Mbit/s download), SAR body: 0.473 W/kg, SAR head: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 143.6 x 66.8

Bateria

8.7 Wh, 2300 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, 1080p video @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (autofoco f/2.0, 1080p video @ 30 fps)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, fones, Playstation, FM radio, Movie Creator, TrackID, Sketch, SwiftKey, AR Effect, Spotify, Facebook, Amazon Shopping, Xperia Lounge, Kobo eBooks, Sky Go, AVG Protection, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

137 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g

Preço

300 EUR

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Huawei P9 Lite ZTE Blade V7 Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Sony Xperia XA Microsoft Lumia 650 Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s +228%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s +169%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	244 MBit/s +164%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.5 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s -46%
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.8 MBit/s -52%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s +247%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	219 MBit/s +162%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s +145%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.6 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s -30%
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.2 MBit/s -41%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


421 cd/m²	471 cd/m²	502 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	518 cd/m²	518 cd/m²
439 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	492 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 475 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 518 cd/m²
Contraste: 849:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.35

	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"	Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Microsoft Lumia 650 OLED, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		10%	34%	10%	-14%	20%
Brightness middle	518	289 -44%	386 -25%	505 -3%	409 -21%	349 -33%
Brightness	475	291 -39%	394 -17%	468 -1%	411 -13%	353 -26%
Brightness Distribution	81	96 19%	88 9%	88 9%	96 19%	92 14%
Black Level *	0.61			0.74 -21%	0.38 38%
Contrast	849			682 -20%	1076 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.8	4.7 31%	1.11 84%	4.1 40%	9.4 -38%	2.6 62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.4	7.3 36%	3.35 71%	5.8 49%	17.6 -54%	8.2 28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7	3 57%	1.34 81%	4.9 30%	11.6 -66%	1.8 74%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.03 ^108%	2.12 ^104%	2.5 ^88%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	8151 ^80%	6291 ^103%	6441 ^101%	7116 ^91%	9597 ^68%	6542 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	35964 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Lite	50366 Points +4%
ZTE Blade V7	37070 Points -23%
Microsoft Lumia 650	31844 Points -34%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	4051 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite	5339 Points +14%
ZTE Blade V7	3947 Points -16%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	756 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Lite	765 Points +7%
ZTE Blade V7	10 Points -99%
Microsoft Lumia 650	546 Points -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	415 Points -38%
Huawei P9 Lite	818 Points +22%
ZTE Blade V7	430 Points -36%
Microsoft Lumia 650	207 Points -69%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	1380 Points -40%
Huawei P9 Lite	2438 Points +7%
ZTE Blade V7	1188 Points -48%
Microsoft Lumia 650	552 Points -76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	662 Points -37%
Huawei P9 Lite	1197 Points +15%
ZTE Blade V7	249 Points -76%
Microsoft Lumia 650	435 Points -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	20 fps -29%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps -32%
ZTE Blade V7	12 fps -57%
Microsoft Lumia 650	5.67 fps -80%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	12 fps -33%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps +6%
ZTE Blade V7	12 fps -33%
Microsoft Lumia 650	3.25 fps -82%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	4.1 fps -43%
Huawei P9 Lite	7.8 fps +8%
ZTE Blade V7	4.5 fps -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	8.4 fps -44%
Huawei P9 Lite	8.4 fps -44%
ZTE Blade V7	4.5 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.5 fps -6%
ZTE Blade V7	2.9 fps -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.9 fps -55%
ZTE Blade V7	2.9 fps -74%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	2.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	2.8 fps +12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	2.9 fps -46%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	7229 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Lite	11769 Points +5%
ZTE Blade V7	6786 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	6522 Points -40%
Huawei P9 Lite	11318 Points +4%
ZTE Blade V7	6170 Points -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11653 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Lite	13676 Points +13%
ZTE Blade V7	10430 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	916 Points -27%
Huawei P9 Lite	1373 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V7	944 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points -92%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	235 Points -55%
Huawei P9 Lite	473 Points -10%
ZTE Blade V7	245 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points -91%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	281 Points -53%
Huawei P9 Lite	554 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V7	293 Points -51%

Legend

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -36%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11796 ms * -23%
Huawei P9 Lite	9397 ms * +2%
ZTE Blade V7	13761 ms * -43%
Microsoft Lumia 650	18237 ms * -90%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	3566 Points -12%
Huawei P9 Lite	4756 Points +18%
ZTE Blade V7	2689 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 650	2574 Points -36%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	72 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	64 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Lite	67 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 650	52 Points -28%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	22.1 Points -20%
Huawei P9 Lite	29.03 Points +6%
ZTE Blade V7	18.19 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	22.05 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	21.92 MB/s -1%
Huawei P9 Lite	38.22 MB/s +73%
ZTE Blade V7	28.07 MB/s +27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	10.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	10.27 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9 Lite	15.35 MB/s +45%
ZTE Blade V7	7.58 MB/s -28%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	68.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	27.27 MB/s -60%
Huawei P9 Lite	46.24 MB/s -33%
ZTE Blade V7	39.45 MB/s -42%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	240.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	168.8 MB/s -30%
Huawei P9 Lite	283.5 MB/s +18%
ZTE Blade V7	196.8 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	50.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s -8%
Huawei P9 Lite	25.1 MB/s -50%
ZTE Blade V7	20.89 MB/s -59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	72.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s +9%
Huawei P9 Lite	60.8 MB/s -17%
ZTE Blade V7	43.67 MB/s -40%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	443 Points -59%
Huawei P9 Lite	1346 Points +25%
ZTE Blade V7	790 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650	575 Points -47%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	27 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	59 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


41.7 °C	41.6 °C	37.1 °C
42 °C	41.6 °C	36.6 °C
40.4 °C	40.2 °C	36.3 °C

Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C


33.9 °C	38.2 °C	41.4 °C
35.4 °C	37.4 °C	41.7 °C
32.3 °C	38.4 °C	41.5 °C

Máximo: 41.7 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 30.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.04 / 0.22 Watt
Ocioso	0.72 / 1.5 / 1.57 Watt
Carga	3.48 / 6.04 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Power Consumption		20%	10%	-15%	10%	14%
Idle Minimum *	0.72	0.61 15%	0.96 -33%	0.73 -1%	0.73 -1%	0.7 3%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.41 6%	1.39 7%	2.09 -39%	0.92 39%	1.1 27%
Idle Maximum *	1.57	1.51 4%	1.45 8%	2.11 -34%	0.93 41%	1.18 25%
Load Average *	3.48	2.56 26%	2.65 24%	4.15 -19%	4.47 -28%	4.04 -16%
Load Maximum *	6.04	3.1 49%	3.51 42%	5.05 16%	5.96 1%	4.07 33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 50min

	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		92%	111%	59%	47%	13%
Reader / Idle	775	1599 106%	1978 155%	1404 81%		910 17%
H.264	460	658 43%	863 88%	568 23%		510 11%
WiFi v1.3	353	643 82%	628 78%	604 71%	519 47%	345 -2%
Load	170	402 136%	376 121%	272 60%		213 25%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina

+ Botão dedicado da câmera

+ Slot micro-SD com App2SD

+ Micacast , USB OTG e suporte para DLNA

+ WiFi de 5 GHz

+ Boa câmera frontal com autofoco

+ Tela brilhante

+ Bom desempenho total

+ Android 6.0 Marshmallow

+ Boa qualidade das chamadas mediante o fone

+ Suporte para carga rápida

Contra

- Curta duração da bateria

- Sem leitor de digitais

- Problemas com a tela táctil no modelo de teste

- Desempenho pobre da viva voz

- Problemas com o foco da câmera principal em vídeos

- Bateria não removível

- Sem carregador Pump Express+ 2.0 incluído

In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O novo smartphone de gama média Sony Xperia XA colhe alguns pontos adicionais com sua boa configuração: O armazenamento interno de 16 GB é facilmente expansível com um cartão micro-SD, a porta micro-USB é compatível com OTG, e NFC também está abordo. No entanto, um leitor de digitais para desbloquear o smartphone de forma confortável está ausente. Os entusiastas das fotos provavelmente ficarão satisfeitos com o botão de liberação dedicado, e a resolução relativamente alta da câmera principal e autofoco. Como é comum nesta categoria, compromissos terão que ser feitos em termos de qualidade de imagem. Também gostamos do bom desempenho do SoC MediaTek e tela brilhante. Os recorrentes problemas da tela táctil, no entanto, foram perturbantes durante o teste. Algo totalmente inaceitável para muitos compradores potenciais provavelmente será a duração da bateria abaixo da média.

O Xperia XA chamara a atenção principalmente com sua linha fina, mas os valores interiores na forma de um veloz SoC, tela brilhante, e armazenamento expansível também são muito convincentes. Finalmente é a curta duração da bateria que estraga o modelo de teste, que de outra maneira teria um bom resultado.

Com um preço de aproximadamente 270 Euros (~$302), o Xperia XA se situa entre a escala de preços superior para smartphones de gama média. O Huawei P9 Lite em particular, demonstrou ser um oponente digno em muitos aspectos no teste. Ele oferece algumas vantagens com uma tela maior, duração mais longa da bateria e leitor de digitais integrado, e também está disponível a partir de aproximadamente 270 Euros (~$302).

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês.

Sony Xperia XA - 2016-08-10 08/10/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

77%

Conectividade

45 / 60 → 74%

Peso

93%

Bateria

88%

Pantalha

81%

Desempenho do jogos

25 / 63 → 40%

Desempenho da aplicação

44 / 70 → 63%

Temperatura

87%

Ruído

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

70%

Médio

71%

81%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA

Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-31 (Update: 2016-09- 9)