Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact

Name: Sony Xperia X Compact
Brand: Sony

Compacto e duradouro, mas não mais gama alta. A Sony mais uma vez oferece uma versão Compact do seu smartphone carro chefe este ano. No entanto, o modelo menor terá que se virar com componentes mais lentos desde agora. Nossa análise mostra por que isto não é necessariamente um problema.

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia X Compact (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 510

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

4.60 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 319 PPI, capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, IPS, Tela TRILUMINOS para Mobile, X-Reality, Dynamic Contrast, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 20 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Impressão digital, acelerômetro, giroscópio, proximidade, barômetro, bússola, espaço de cor, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, App2SD, SAR Head: 1.08 W/kg, SAR Body: 1.25 W/kg

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/ac/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), HSUPA até 5.76 Mbps, HSDPA até 42.2 Mbps, LTE Cat 6 até 300 Mbps downstream, 50 Mbps upstream, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 129 x 65

Bateria

2700 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 44 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 47 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 750 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 710 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 23 MPix (autofoco preditivo, sensor Exmor-R 1/2,3", 22 mm wide angle, Vídeo: 1080p60)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R sensor 1/5", 25 mm wide angle)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo na frente, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 7.5-Watt PSU, cabo USB, fones, guia de início rápido, informação do serviço, Xperia-Apps, Google-Apps, AVG Protection, SwiftKey, PlayStation, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless

peso

135 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g

Preço

449 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Right: Camera button, volume rocker, standby/fingerprint scanner

Left: Combined slot for Nano-SIM and microSD

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	323 MBit/s +51%
Sony Xperia X Compact 802.11a/ac/b/g/n	214 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia X Compact 802.11a/ac/b/g/n	327 MBit/s
OnePlus 3 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	320 MBit/s -2%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia X Compact

Lenovo Moto Z Play

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia X Compact

Lenovo Moto Z Play

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia X Compact

Lenovo Moto Z Play

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


516 cd/m²	575 cd/m²	587 cd/m²
566 cd/m²	579 cd/m²	558 cd/m²
566 cd/m²	570 cd/m²	552 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 587 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 563.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.04 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 579 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24

	Sony Xperia X Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.6"	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.6"	Apple iPhone SE IPS, 1136x640, 4"	Apple iPhone 6S IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Sony Xperia X LCD, 1920x1080, 5"	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		-5%	-16%	6%	11%	-33%	3%
Brightness middle	579	451 -22%	547 -6%	603 4%	552 -5%	404 -30%	419 -28%
Brightness	563	443 -21%	532 -6%	579 3%	549 -2%	392 -30%	431 -23%
Brightness Distribution	88	93 6%	94 7%	93 6%	87 -1%	91 3%	84 -5%
Black Level *	0.4	0.4 -0%	0.54 -35%	0.88 -120%	0.39 2%	0.68 -70%
Contrast	1448	1128 -22%	1013 -30%	685 -53%	1415 -2%	594 -59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.1	5.4 11%	7.37 -21%	1.8 70%	3.4 44%	7.1 -16%	4.1 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.5	9.9 6%		3.5 67%		13.2 -26%	12 -14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7	6.7 4%	8.39 -20%	2.3 67%	4.16 41%	9.7 -39%	3.3 53%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.33 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	8395 ^77%	8262 ^79%	9074 ^72%	6955 ^93%	7288 ^89%	9502 ^68%	6550 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.9865	96.74	95.93		100
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				62.13	62.18		89.38

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	142090 Points +86%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	126969 Points +67%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	94671 Points +24%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	77650 Points +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	76216 Points

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2539 Points +67%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2533 Points +67%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2398 Points +58%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1518 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1484 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	5645 Points +45%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	4422 Points +14%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	4386 Points +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3885 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3853 Points -1%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1754 Points +26%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1726 Points +24%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1388 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	5481 Points +64%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4097 Points +23%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3343 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	30241 Points +58%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	29538 Points +54%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	28419 Points +49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	26420 Points +38%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	20235 Points +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	19128 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	17404 Points -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	44059 Points +106%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	42686 Points +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	37319 Points +75%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	34023 Points +59%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	22157 Points +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	21349 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	21087 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	21771 Points +55%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	15531 Points +11%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	14023 Points
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	13717 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	13097 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	13065 Points -7%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	10801 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3424 Points +150%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	3149 Points +130%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1878 Points +37%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1372 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1313 Points -4%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1273 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4633 Points +252%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	4255 Points +223%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	2353 Points +79%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1318 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1280 Points -3%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1112 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2587 Points +62%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1789 Points +12%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1649 Points +3%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1601 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1441 Points -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1100 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3595 Points +151%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1434 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1381 Points -4%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1095 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4804 Points +250%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1373 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1354 Points -1%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1066 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1912 Points +13%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1697 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1486 Points -12%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1211 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2571 Points +194%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2298 Points +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1198 Points +37%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	961 Points +10%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	874 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	855 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2864 Points +271%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2524 Points +227%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1137 Points +47%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	818 Points +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	772 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	761 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2482 Points +53%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1892 Points +17%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1749 Points +8%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1624 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1504 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1472 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2823 Points +191%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	971 Points
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	941 Points -3%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3249 Points +275%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	867 Points
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	816 Points -6%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2034 Points +21%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1935 Points +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1675 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	60 fps +18%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	59.2 fps +16%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	59.1 fps +16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	57 fps +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	51 fps
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	43 fps -16%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	33 fps -35%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	89 fps +187%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	80.3 fps +159%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	79.6 fps +157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	56 fps +81%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	41 fps +32%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	31 fps
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	30 fps -3%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	58.1 fps +94%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	56 fps +87%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	46 fps +53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	45 fps +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	30 fps
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	19 fps -37%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	15 fps -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	47 fps +213%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	40 fps +167%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	39.5 fps +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	25 fps +67%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	19 fps +27%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	15 fps
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	9.2 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	57.9 fps +163%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	38 fps +73%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	30 fps +36%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	22 fps
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	11 fps -50%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	10 fps -55%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	31 fps +230%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	28.1 fps +199%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	18 fps +91%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	10 fps +6%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	9.4 fps
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	4.6 fps -51%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	18 fps +50%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	12 fps
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	6.9 fps -42%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	5.9 fps -51%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	18 fps +233%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	6.3 fps +17%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	5.4 fps
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	5.3 fps -2%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	7101 Points +49%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	6735 Points +41%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	4770 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	4379 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	4084 Points -14%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2496 Points +43%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2287 Points +31%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	2194 Points +26%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2034 Points +16%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1747 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	1569 Points -10%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1450 Points -17%
System
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	5179 Points +67%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	3952 Points +27%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	3537 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	3466 Points +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3107 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	2564 Points -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	2082 Points -33%
Memory
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2556 Points +42%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2052 Points +14%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1796 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1408 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1281 Points -29%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1032 Points -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	963 Points -46%
Graphics
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	4813 Points +194%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	4323 Points +164%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	4175 Points +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	3094 Points +89%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	1703 Points +4%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1638 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1581 Points -3%
Web
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1226 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1207 Points +18%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	1112 Points +9%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	1019 Points
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	994 Points -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	976 Points -4%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	774 Points -24%

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	16550 Points +85%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	16200 Points +81%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	10692 Points +19%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	9155 Points +2%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	8952 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	8388 Points -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	5691 Points -36%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	4210 ms * -23%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3677 ms * -8%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	3417 ms *
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	2979 ms * +13%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	2921 ms * +15%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1715 ms * +50%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	1709 ms * +50%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	187 Points +72%
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	186 Points +71%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	138 Points +27%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	122 Points +12%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	109 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	104 Points -5%
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	92 Points -16%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	118.8 Points +133%
Apple iPhone 6S A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600	118.6 Points +133%
Honor 8 Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4	64 Points +25%
OnePlus 3 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	54.4 Points +7%
Sony Xperia X Compact 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	51 Points
Sony Xperia X 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510	50.9 Points 0%
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430	49 Points -4%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia X Compact Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5		51%	-22%	-17%	135%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	27.57	23.59 -14%		12.82 -54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	32.54	53.7 65%		17.67 -46%
Random Write 4KB	9.3	31.5 239%	7.81 -16%	10.26 10%	18.23 96%
Random Read 4KB	31.52	34.16 8%	14.15 -55%	36.28 15%	137.6 337%
Sequential Write 256KB	139.5	119.3 -14%	88.9 -36%	117.4 -16%	153.3 10%
Sequential Read 256KB	207.9	247.5 19%	248.1 19%	184.3 -11%	408.7 97%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Configurações	Valor
	high	30 fps

... comparado com

Dead Trigger 2
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps

... comparado com

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.6 °C	39.2 °C	40.5 °C
37.8 °C	39.8 °C	41.2 °C
37.3 °C	39 °C	40.8 °C

Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C


37.4 °C	40.9 °C	41.8 °C
39.5 °C	41.5 °C	41.8 °C
37.7 °C	41.5 °C	40.8 °C

Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 32.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia X Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Ocioso	0.33 / 1.48 / 1.6 Watt
Carga	4.83 / 8.66 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia X Compact Wh, 4.6", 1280x720	Honor 8 11.4 Wh, 5.2", 1920x1080	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Wh, 4.6", 1280x720	Apple iPhone SE 6.21 Wh, 4", 1136x640	Apple iPhone 6S 7 Wh, 4.7", 1334x750	Sony Xperia X Wh, 5", 1920x1080	OnePlus 3 Wh, 5.5", 1920x1080
Power Consumption		-32%	-18%	7%	3%	-20%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	0.33	0.78 -136%	0.6 -82%	0.54 -64%	0.5 -52%	0.56 -70%	0.57 -73%
Idle Average *	1.48	1.89 -28%	1.4 5%	1.26 15%	1.6 -8%	1.69 -14%	1.24 16%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	2.02 -26%	1.7 -6%	1.4 12%	1.9 -19%	1.75 -9%	1.36 15%
Load Average *	4.83	5.28 -9%	5.3 -10%	2.45 49%	2.5 48%	6.01 -24%	5.92 -23%
Load Maximum *	8.66	5.44 37%	8.4 3%	6.46 25%	4.8 45%	7.03 19%	10.53 -22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		47h 24min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 06min

	Sony Xperia X Compact 2700 mAh, Wh	Honor 8 3000 mAh, 11.4 Wh	Sony Xperia Z5 Compact mAh, Wh	Apple iPhone SE 1624 mAh, 6.21 Wh	Apple iPhone 6S mAh, 7 Wh	Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh, Wh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh, Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-9%	-3%	-20%	-22%	17%
Reader / Idle	2844	1487 -48%	2249 -21%	1274 -55%	1510 -47%	1240 -56%	1338 -53%
H.264	624	526 -16%	525 -16%	759 22%	699 12%	518 -17%	847 36%
WiFi v1.3	601	499 -17%	440 -27%	673 12%	492 -18%	434 -28%	840 40%
Load	186	255 37%	242 30%	207 11%	137 -26%	213 15%	268 44%

Pro

+ Qualidade de construção muito boa

+ Bom desempenho

+ Longa duração da bateria na prática

+ USB Tipo C

+ Bons alto falantes

+ Boa câmera

+ Tela brilhante

+ Expansão do armazenamento via microSD

Contra

- Superfícies refletivas sensíveis

- Chassi comparativamente grosso

- Apenas USB 2.0

- Mais lento que modelos anteriores em alguns cenários

- Não há mais certificação IP (água, poeira)

- Sem gravação de vídeos em 4K

In review: Sony Xperia X Compact. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Após a análise do novo Xperia X Compact, ficamos um pouco decepcionados que não existem mais telefones Android compactos e de gama alta. Se você deseja ter os componentes mais velozes, agora terá que adquirir um aparelho maior ou dar uma olhada na concorrência da Apple.

No entanto, uma vez que aceite isso, você verá que o novo Sony é um smartphone mainstream muito sólido, e o preço também foi reduzido em comparação com o anterior Xperia Z5 Compact. Sim, o desempenho é inferior em algumas situações, mas dificilmente notará isso na prática e o desempenho dos jogos, em particular, se beneficia da resolução comparativamente baixa. Uma desvantagem é a ausência da certificação IP e as sensíveis superfícies de plástico também não são do gosto de qualquer um. No entanto, gostamos das longas durações da bateria.

Não mais gama alta: O Sony Xperia X Compact agora é um aparelho convencional. No entanto, o smartphone compacto não revela problemas sérios e o desempenho também é mais que suficiente na prática, mas a concorrência é realmente forte nesta faixa de preços.

Com um preço de 449 Euros (~$489; preço de rua sugerido ~410 Euros/~$447), o Xperia X Compact enfrenta fortes rivais como o minicarro chefe Honor 8 e o OnePlus 3. Ambos os aparelhos são mais velozes e possuem telas maiores; de outra maneira, as diferenças ainda são muito pequenas. O predecessor Xperia Z5 Compact também ainda está disponível: Ele suporta gravações 4K e a carcaça é mais durável graças à certificação IP. Se estiver procurando um sistema ainda mais compacto com componentes ainda mais velozes, está limitado ao Apple (iPhone SE) desde agora.

Sony Xperia X Compact - 2016-10-21 10/21/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

82%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 77%

Peso

94%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

45 / 63 → 71%

Desempenho da aplicação

55 / 70 → 78%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

100%

Audio

72 / 91 → 79%

Camera

73%

Médio

76%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia X Compact

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-10-30 (Update: 2016-11- 4)