Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia L3

Name: Sony Xperia L3
Brand: Sony

Um Sony de nível de entrada.

O Xperia L3 possui algumas das características de seus predecessores, ao mesmo tempo em que se destaca com um design mais moderno. Por cerca de 200 euros (~225 dólares), os compradores do smartphone fino no formato 2:1 também recebem um sistema de câmera dupla, bem como a opção de usar um cartão microSD e dois cartões SIM simultaneamente. Avaliamos em nosso teste o que mais o Sony Xperia L3 pode oferecer.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/11/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia L3 (Xperia Serie)

Processador

Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

PowerVR GE8320

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

5.70 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 512 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, bússola, magnetômetro

Funcionamento em rede

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900) 3G UMTS HSPA+ (1/2/5/8), 4G LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 154 x 72

Bateria

3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13+2 MP, 1/3"+1/5", 1.12+1.74 µm, f/2.2+f/2.4, Camera2 API: legacy
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4", 1.12 µm, f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, fones estéreo, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0,6 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.33 W/kg, fanless

peso

156 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g

Preço

199 Euro

Links

Sony página inicial
Sony Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Nokia 3.1 Plus Sony Xperia L3 Honor 10 Lite Motorola Moto G7 Play Archos Diamond Gamma DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 (90^min - 111^max) MBit/s
Nokia 3.1 Plus PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.6 (15^min - 59^max) MBit/s -53%
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	41.3 (29^min - 56^max) MBit/s -60%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38 (19^min - 52^max) MBit/s -63%
Archos Diamond Gamma Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16.7 MBit/s -84%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.6 (2^min - 36^max) MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 (81^min - 129^max) MBit/s
Nokia 3.1 Plus PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 (28^min - 64^max) MBit/s -56%
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	48.4 (42^min - 52^max) MBit/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash	48.1 (23^min - 55^max) MBit/s -62%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34.8 (27^min - 44^max) MBit/s -73%
Archos Diamond Gamma Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.8 MBit/s -88%

Sony Xperia L3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø124.6 (81-129)

Sony Xperia L3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102.1 (90-111)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


563 cd/m²	524 cd/m²	504 cd/m²
565 cd/m²	533 cd/m²	507 cd/m²
555 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	515 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 565 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 532.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.55 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 2132:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11

	Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Nokia 3.1 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 IPS, 1480x720, 6"	Archos Diamond Gamma IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7"
Screen		-49%	-110%	-68%	-24%	-62%
Brightness middle	533	526 -1%	558 5%	310 -42%	467 -12%	479 -10%
Brightness	533	510 -4%	549 3%	313 -41%	446 -16%	481 -10%
Brightness Distribution	89	94 6%	89 0%	89 0%	89 0%	94 6%
Black Level *	0.25	0.17 32%	0.57 -128%	0.23 8%	0.58 -132%	0.37 -48%
Contrast	2132	3094 45%	979 -54%	1348 -37%	805 -62%	1295 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.8	6.64 -137%	7 -150%	6.51 -133%	1.5 46%	4.91 -75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.1	10.02 -96%	13.3 -161%	10.21 -100%	4.5 12%	9.47 -86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.9	6.4 -237%	9.4 -395%	5.6 -195%	2.4 -26%	6.4 -237%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.344 ^94%	2.15 ^102%	2.903 ^76%	2.22 ^99%	2.108 ^104%
CCT	6149 ^106%	7989 ^81%	9626 ^68%	7498 ^87%	6387 ^102%	7292 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	652 Points
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	676 Points
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1523 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1194 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (749 - 824, n=10)	777 Points
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1816 Points
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	2584 Points
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5266 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4179 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3300 - 3660, n=10)	3497 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1413 Points
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	2321 Points
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	3157 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3628 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2166 - 3015, n=8)	2675 Points
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6385 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6238 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	4009 Points -37%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	4779 Points -25%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7160 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7321 Points +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 7465, n=18)	5847 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4912 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4838 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	3214 Points -35%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	3707 Points -25%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5803 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	5930 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5380, n=21)	4696 Points -4%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10340 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10653 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	5969 Points -42%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	9211 Points -11%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	16775 Points +62%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15000 Points +45%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9835 - 13960, n=20)	11460 Points +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10008 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10412 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	5340 Points -47%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	10069 Points +1%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19546 Points +95%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	14603 Points +46%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9536 - 13491, n=20)	11373 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11696 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11590 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	10151 Points -13%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	7095 Points -39%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	11211 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	16576 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9080 - 15891, n=20)	12110 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	684 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	637 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	69 Points -90%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	615 Points -10%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1280 Points +87%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (428 - 830, n=23)	633 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +515%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	624 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	575 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	55 Points -91%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	543 Points -13%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1137 Points +82%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (370 - 750, n=23)	572 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +660%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1026 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1021 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	890 Points -13%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	1149 Points +12%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2282 Points +122%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (854 - 1185, n=23)	1026 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	715 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	740 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	293 Points -59%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	604 Points -16%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1367 Points +91%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (513 - 873, n=23)	770 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +1461%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	663 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	687 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	246 Points -63%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	532 Points -20%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1246 Points +88%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (452 - 823, n=23)	719 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +2889%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	987 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1015 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	887 Points -10%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	1141 Points +16%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2067 Points +109%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (900 - 1195, n=23)	1032 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +407%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	439 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	424 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	316 Points -28%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	810 Points +85%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (269 - 470, n=22)	383 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +601%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	378 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	363 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	263 Points -30%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	683 Points +81%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (222 - 405, n=22)	326 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +760%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	998 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1026 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	1097 Points +10%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2326 Points +133%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (860 - 1175, n=22)	1022 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	451 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	478 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	365 Points -19%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	967 Points +114%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (426 - 536, n=22)	482 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +1603%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	391 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	415 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	305 Points -22%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	839 Points +115%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (368 - 467, n=22)	418 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +2818%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	980 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1025 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	Points -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	1177 Points +20%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2070 Points +111%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (912 - 1188, n=22)	1036 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +368%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	27 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	13 fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	26 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	36 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	37 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (24 - 27, n=9)	26 fps
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	7.6 fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	39 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	24 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (17 - 20, n=9)	19 fps
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	5.5 fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	15 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	20 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (15 - 17, n=9)	16.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	2.8 fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	7.6 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	21 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	10 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9.1 - 10, n=9)	9.67 fps
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	11 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	13 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 11, n=9)	10.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	4.9 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	14 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.9 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.7 - 6.2, n=9)	5.61 fps
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	5.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	5.6 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.8 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7.9 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.8 - 5.1, n=9)	4.37 fps
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	fps
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	2.7 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7.6 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.9 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2.1 - 2.9, n=9)	2.69 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.8 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	6.4 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.8 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=21)	6.9 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.6 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	7 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.8 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=21)	3.81 fps
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	4 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=21)	4.35 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.3 fps
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2.6 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1.3 fps
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=21)	1.39 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	77798 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	76153 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	42138 Points -46%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	56895 Points -27%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	129928 Points +67%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	97294 Points +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (71347 - 88242, n=9)	76135 Points -2%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	57309 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	55264 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	37022 Points -35%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	42643 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	76724 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (52433 - 57309, n=7)	54829 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1166 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1152 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	682 Points -42%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	935 Points -20%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2167 Points +86%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1465 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (323 - 1166, n=8)	896 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +437%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2517 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2423 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	1220 Points -52%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	1758 Points -30%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5026 Points +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3865 Points +54%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2165 - 2619, n=8)	2343 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +303%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1247 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1231 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	647 Points -48%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	758 Points -39%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2969 Points +138%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1068 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (661 - 1247, n=8)	928 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +438%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	760 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	754 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	430 Points -43%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	789 Points +4%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1470 Points +93%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1069 Points +41%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (744 - 799, n=8)	769 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +2105%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	776 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	784 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048	636 Points -18%
Archos Diamond Gamma Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072	726 Points -6%
Honor 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1004 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1045 Points +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 835, n=8)	578 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +101%

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +731%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	9423 Points +113%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	8185 Points +85%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)	4508 Points +2%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	4422 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9)	4166 Points -6%
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69)	3289 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)	3114 Points -30%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69)	13316 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)	12935 ms * -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9)	11753 ms * -5%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	11185 ms *
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)	10888 ms * +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	4806 ms * +57%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	4120 ms * +63%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +86%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +390%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)	62 Points +107%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	30 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=7)	28.6 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)	26 Points -13%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +772%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	13.68 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3)	13.5 Points -1%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +809%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	14.7 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 ()	14.7 runs/min 0%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia L3	Nokia 3.1 Plus	Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018	Archos Diamond Gamma	Honor 10 Lite	Motorola Moto G7 Play	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-7%	10%	0%	80%	90%	10%	1181%
Sequential Read 256KB	290.9	272.5 -6%	292.1 0%	276.5 -5%	288.5 -1%	289 -1%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -17%	1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 532%
Sequential Write 256KB	87.5	35.72 -59%	99.6 14%	117.2 34%	190.6 118%	111 27%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) 15%	1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1534%
Random Read 4KB	28.83	52.4 82%	48.42 68%	27.7 -4%	45.15 57%	74 157%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) 50%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years) 864%
Random Write 4KB	16.36	8.33 -49%	13.33 -19%	11.8 -28%	66.1 304%	73 346%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 37%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 1795%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	75.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	55.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	61.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	64.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -14%

PUBG Compare

Sony Xperia L3; Smooth: Ø24.3 (3-26)

Sony Xperia L3; Balanced: Ø24.1 (11-27)

Arena of Valor

Sony Xperia L3; min: Ø31.2 (26-33)

Sony Xperia L3; high HD: Ø28.4 (24-32)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.6 °C	31.9 °C	31.5 °C
31.7 °C	32 °C	32.3 °C
31.3 °C	31.3 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 32.6 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


29.8 °C	29.8 °C	32.9 °C
29.9 °C	29.9 °C	32.5 °C
29.9 °C	30 °C	31.6 °C

Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia L3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 3.1 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ocioso	0.57 / 1.5 / 1.51 Watt
Carga	3.09 / 4.15 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh	Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh	Archos Diamond Gamma 3000 mAh	Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-56%	-30%	-121%	-61%	-50%	-9%	-60%
Idle Minimum *	0.57	1 -75%	0.68 -19%	1.7 -198%	1 -75%	1 -75%	0.669 ?(0.48 - 1, n=14) -17%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -57%
Idle Average *	1.5	2.4 -60%	1.78 -19%	2.6 -73%	2.19 -46%	1.7 -13%	1.577 ?(1 - 2.4, n=14) -5%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	1.51	2.9 -92%	1.82 -21%	3.8 -152%	2.2 -46%	2.6 -72%	1.851 ?(1.43 - 2.9, n=14) -23%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) -6%
Load Average *	3.09	3.7 -20%	4.44 -44%	6.3 -104%	4.64 -50%	4.1 -33%	2.91 ?(1.94 - 4, n=14) 6%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -107%
Load Maximum *	4.15	5.5 -33%	6.13 -48%	7.4 -78%	7.7 -86%	6.5 -57%	4.41 ?(3.06 - 5.9, n=14) -6%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -132%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		35h 27min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 02min

	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh	Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh	Archos Diamond Gamma 3000 mAh	Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		44%	17%	-19%	-28%	8%
Reader / Idle	2127		1730 -19%		1533 -28%
H.264	750		838 12%		502 -33%
WiFi v1.3	641	920 44%	707 10%	518 -19%	484 -24%	690 8%
Load	242		398 64%		178 -26%

Pro

+ Conexão USB Type-C

+ Bluetooth 5.0

+ DualSIM + microSD

+ Sensor de digitais confiável

Contra

- Apenas 32 GB de armazenamento interno

- Amazon e Netflix sem HD

- Somente LTE Cat. 4

Verdict - Sony retires the brick design

Testing the Sony Xperia L3. Test units provided by Sony Germany and notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Xperia L3, a Sony oferece um smartphone com uma boa relação preço-desempenho. O hardware integrado é adequado para a faixa de preço e o desempenho é suficiente para todas as tarefas comuns do dia a dia. A câmera dupla pode tirar fotos aceitáveis e o alto-falante é adequado para reprodução ocasional de mídia. A duração da bateria também está ao nível da concorrência e, em termos de design, a Sony finalmente deu um grande passo à frente.

No entanto, o teste também revelou alguns pontos fracos que podem ser rastreados até o software. Vários programas de benchmark não conseguiram rodar ou não reconheceram a conexão ativa com a internet. Se estes são problemas que também se tornam geralmente perceptíveis, os usuários só descobrirão durante o uso constante. No entanto, uma atualização de software no futuro pode facilmente aliviar quaisquer problemas que possam surgir.

Embora o Sony Xperia L3 seja um bom smartphone de nível básico, ele está lutando com alguns problemas de software menores.

Sony Xperia L3 - 2019-04-09 04/09/2019 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

85%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

84%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 69%

Peso

92%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

27 / 63 → 43%

Desempenho da aplicação

50 / 70 → 72%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

61%

Médio

73%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia L3

Mike Wobker, 2019-04-11 (Update: 2019-04-11)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Compare

Arena of Valor

Sony Xperia L3 audio analysis

Nokia 3.1 Plus audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Verdict - Sony retires the brick design

More articles related to this device

Price comparison