Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia L3
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 2132:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Nokia 3.1 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 IPS, 1480x720, 6" | Archos Diamond Gamma IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Honor 10 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -49% | -110% | -68% | -24% | -62% | |
Brightness middle | 533 | 526 -1% | 558 5% | 310 -42% | 467 -12% | 479 -10% |
Brightness | 533 | 510 -4% | 549 3% | 313 -41% | 446 -16% | 481 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 89 0% | 89 0% | 89 0% | 94 6% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.17 32% | 0.57 -128% | 0.23 8% | 0.58 -132% | 0.37 -48% |
Contrast | 2132 | 3094 45% | 979 -54% | 1348 -37% | 805 -62% | 1295 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 6.64 -137% | 7 -150% | 6.51 -133% | 1.5 46% | 4.91 -75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 10.02 -96% | 13.3 -161% | 10.21 -100% | 4.5 12% | 9.47 -86% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 6.4 -237% | 9.4 -395% | 5.6 -195% | 2.4 -26% | 6.4 -237% |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.344 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.903 76% | 2.22 99% | 2.108 104% |
CCT | 6149 106% | 7989 81% | 9626 68% | 7498 87% | 6387 102% | 7292 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
Archos Diamond Gamma | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (52433 - 57309, n=7) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9) | |
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69) | |
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69) | |
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 () |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia L3 | Nokia 3.1 Plus | Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | Archos Diamond Gamma | Honor 10 Lite | Motorola Moto G7 Play | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | 10% | 0% | 80% | 90% | 10% | 1178% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 290.9 | 272.5 -6% | 292.1 0% | 276.5 -5% | 288.5 -1% | 289 -1% | 242 ? -17% | 1839 ? 532% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 87.5 | 35.72 -59% | 99.6 14% | 117.2 34% | 190.6 118% | 111 27% | 100.5 ? 15% | 1425 ? 1529% |
Random Read 4KB | 28.83 | 52.4 82% | 48.42 68% | 27.7 -4% | 45.15 57% | 74 157% | 43.2 ? 50% | 277 ? 861% |
Random Write 4KB | 16.36 | 8.33 -49% | 13.33 -19% | 11.8 -28% | 66.1 304% | 73 346% | 22.4 ? 37% | 309 ? 1789% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.9 ? | 81.3 ? 0% | 76.7 ? -5% | 84.3 ? 4% | 75.8 ? -6% | 84.7 ? 5% | 71.8 ? -11% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.7 ? | 55.2 ? -11% | 62.3 ? 1% | 61.4 ? 0% | 67 ? 9% | 64.1 ? 4% | 52.9 ? -14% |
PUBG Compare
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia L3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 3.1 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.57 / 1.5 / 1.51 Watt |
Carga |
3.09 / 4.15 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Archos Diamond Gamma 3000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -56% | -30% | -121% | -61% | -50% | -9% | -61% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 1 -75% | 0.68 -19% | 1.7 -198% | 1 -75% | 1 -75% | 0.669 ? -17% | 0.894 ? -57% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 2.4 -60% | 1.78 -19% | 2.6 -73% | 2.19 -46% | 1.7 -13% | 1.577 ? -5% | 1.456 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.51 | 2.9 -92% | 1.82 -21% | 3.8 -152% | 2.2 -46% | 2.6 -72% | 1.851 ? -23% | 1.616 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 3.09 | 3.7 -20% | 4.44 -44% | 6.3 -104% | 4.64 -50% | 4.1 -33% | 2.91 ? 6% | 6.45 ? -109% |
Load Maximum * | 4.15 | 5.5 -33% | 6.13 -48% | 7.4 -78% | 7.7 -86% | 6.5 -57% | 4.41 ? -6% | 9.8 ? -136% |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Archos Diamond Gamma 3000 mAh | Honor 10 Lite 3400 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 44% | 17% | -19% | -28% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 2127 | 1730 -19% | 1533 -28% | |||
H.264 | 750 | 838 12% | 502 -33% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 641 | 920 44% | 707 10% | 518 -19% | 484 -24% | 690 8% |
Load | 242 | 398 64% | 178 -26% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict - Sony retires the brick design
Com o Xperia L3, a Sony oferece um smartphone com uma boa relação preço-desempenho. O hardware integrado é adequado para a faixa de preço e o desempenho é suficiente para todas as tarefas comuns do dia a dia. A câmera dupla pode tirar fotos aceitáveis e o alto-falante é adequado para reprodução ocasional de mídia. A duração da bateria também está ao nível da concorrência e, em termos de design, a Sony finalmente deu um grande passo à frente.
No entanto, o teste também revelou alguns pontos fracos que podem ser rastreados até o software. Vários programas de benchmark não conseguiram rodar ou não reconheceram a conexão ativa com a internet. Se estes são problemas que também se tornam geralmente perceptíveis, os usuários só descobrirão durante o uso constante. No entanto, uma atualização de software no futuro pode facilmente aliviar quaisquer problemas que possam surgir.
Embora o Sony Xperia L3 seja um bom smartphone de nível básico, ele está lutando com alguns problemas de software menores.
Sony Xperia L3
- 04/09/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker