Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia 1: É preciso mais do que apenas uma tela sofisticada para desafiar os carros-chefes estabelecidos
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 99 %
iluminação com acumulador: 541 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4" | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -139% | -51% | -25% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 541 | 710 31% | 597 10% | 586 8% | 593 10% |
| Brightness | 543 | 721 33% | 608 12% | 584 8% | 587 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 97 -2% | 89 -10% | 97 -2% | 94 -5% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 3.7 -363% | 2.2 -175% | 1.39 -74% | 0.9 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.7 | 10.3 -506% | 3.6 -112% | 2.7 -59% | 2 -18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.5 -25% | 1.6 -33% | 1.6 -33% | 1.5 -25% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.243 98% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6601 98% | 6611 98% | 6268 104% | 6672 97% | 6548 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 1 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | Huawei P30 Pro | OnePlus 7 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 44% | 153% | 51% | 166% | 125% | 504% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 750 | 811 8% | 849 13% | 1468 96% | 666 -11% | 760 ? 1% | 1863 ? 148% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 206.9 | 249.1 20% | 250.8 21% | 387 87% | 388.3 88% | 297 ? 44% | 1446 ? 599% |
| Random Read 4KB | 147.3 | 135.2 -8% | 174.4 18% | 174.1 18% | 149.4 1% | 152.9 ? 4% | 278 ? 89% |
| Random Write 4KB | 24.16 | 22.7 -6% | 159.2 559% | 24.8 3% | 165.3 584% | 131.6 ? 445% | 309 ? 1179% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 31.34 ? | 73 ? 133% | 82.6 ? 164% | 76 ? 143% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 27.84 ? | 60.7 ? 118% | 68.2 ? 145% | 59.6 ? 114% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia 1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.48 / 1.56 Watt |
| Carga |
3.76 / 8.48 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -20% | -28% | 11% | -8% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.73 27% | 0.68 32% | 0.9 10% | 0.67 33% | 0.939 ? 6% | 0.885 ? 11% |
| Idle Average * | 1.48 | 1.53 -3% | 2.6 -76% | 1.8 -22% | 1.26 15% | 1.506 ? -2% | 1.451 ? 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.56 | 2.07 -33% | 2.77 -78% | 2.9 -86% | 1.29 17% | 1.799 ? -15% | 1.608 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 3.76 | 6.03 -60% | 3.74 1% | 5.5 -46% | 3.71 1% | 4.61 ? -23% | 6.55 ? -74% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.48 | 9.18 -8% | 6.82 20% | 8.2 3% | 9.3 -10% | 9.04 ? -7% | 9.92 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 71% | 37% | 25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1067 | 1560 46% | 1966 84% | 1745 64% | 1650 55% |
| H.264 | 712 | 921 29% | 1193 68% | 802 13% | 1008 42% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 441 | 483 10% | 838 90% | 768 74% | 546 24% |
| Load | 246 | 187 -24% | 344 40% | 236 -4% | 194 -21% |
Pro
Contra
A Sony fez um bom trabalho com o Xperia 1. Tem uma tela atraente, é bem construída e tem um desempenho decente. No entanto, o dispositivo levou quase cinco meses para chegar ao mercado tendo sido revelado na MWC19 em fevereiro, o que torna seu preço sugerido de 950 euros (US$1.071) desagradável quando outros carros-chefe já começaram baixar seus preço. Enquanto você pode encontrar o Xperia 1 online por cerca de 900 Euros (~US$ 1.015), o Galaxy S10+ e o OnePlus 7 Pro caíram ainda mais para cerca de 700 Euros (~US$ 790). Da mesma forma, o P30 Pro despencou para apenas 650 Euros (~US$ 729) por causa da guerra comercial do governo dos EUA com a Huawei.
O Sony Xperia 1 é um companheiro ideal para quem gosta de assistir filmes em movimento. Existem melhores opções lá fora, embora você não se encaixe neste nicho.
Deixando o preço de lado, o Xperia 1 faz muitos compromissos para ser considerado uma séria oposição aos melhores carros-chefes de 2019. Acima de tudo está a tela 21:9. Parece ótimo e é prático para multitarefas, mas dificilmente há conteúdo otimizado para isso, forçando você a assistir a vídeos cortados ou com zoom. Nem são ideais e destacam que 21:9 atualmente tem mais desvantagens do que benefícios.
O Xperia 1 também não possui ótimas câmeras. O sensor frontal de 8 MP é inferior, assim como a fotografia com pouca luz do sensor principal de 12 MP traseiro. A omissão do carregamento sem fio é uma queixa menor, mas é uma que nos lembra que o Xperia 1 não é tão rico em recursos quanto seus rivais. Inexplicavelmente, a Sony incluiu uma bateria de 3.330 mAh, que nunca iria durar muito tempo ao alimentar uma tela 4K de 6,5 polegadas e um SoC Snapdragon 855.
Em suma, o Xperia 1 é um excelente smartphone em isolamento. Ele ganha muito pontos com o seu design, tela e desempenho, mas fica aquém ao compará-lo com outros smartphones carros-chefe mais ricos em recursos e normalmente, mais econômicos, lançados este ano.
Sony Xperia 1
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
More articles related to this device
Sony Xperia 1 (Xperia 1 Serie)Artigos Relacionados
Price comparison
