Breve Análise do Smartphone Sharp Aquos D10

Name: Sharp D10
Brand: Sharp

Sharp photos.

O Sharp Aquos D10 está tentando conquistar os corações dos compradores com sua câmera que tem zoom óptico e seu design quase sem marcos. O D10 possui um SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, e câmeras duplas de 12 e 13 MP PDAF. Leia para descobrir se o D10 pode funcionar tão bem quanto parece.

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/15/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sharp D10

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

5.90 polegadas 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 55 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G/UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100. 4G LTE Cat.4/FDD: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 148.2 x 74.2

Bateria

2900 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 20 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 555 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um só alto-falantes, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, Cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, Carcaça, adaptador de USB Type-C para conector de 3,5mm, Sharp UI, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 0.944 W/kg, Head - 0.308 W/kg, fanless

peso

165 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g

Preço

390 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	655 (619^min - 692^max) MBit/s +302%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	347 MBit/s +113%
Sharp Aquos C10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	313 MBit/s +92%
Sharp D10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	163 (79^min - 172^max) MBit/s
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s -67%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	612 (580^min - 635^max) MBit/s +82%
Sharp D10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	336 (287^min - 344^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	309 MBit/s -8%
Sharp Aquos C10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	308 MBit/s -8%
LG Q7 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash	42.7 MBit/s -87%

Sharp D10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (287-344)

Sharp D10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø160.5 (79-172)

GPS test: Sharp D10 – Cycling through a grove

GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


684 cd/m²	723 cd/m²	750 cd/m²
676 cd/m²	745 cd/m²	757 cd/m²
708 cd/m²	722 cd/m²	738 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 757 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 722.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.27 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 745 cd/m²
Contraste: 1242:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.262

	Sharp D10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9"	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	LG Q7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5"	Sharp Aquos C10 IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5"
Screen		24%	-22%	-14%
Brightness middle	745	597 -20%	431 -42%	548 -26%
Brightness	723	592 -18%	419 -42%	535 -26%
Brightness Distribution	89	92 3%	89 0%	92 3%
Black Level *	0.6	0.32 47%	0.58 3%	0.49 18%
Contrast	1242	1866 50%	743 -40%	1118 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.52	2.4 47%	6.2 -37%	5.21 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.14	5.3 42%	10.1 -11%	13.47 -47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	3.4 41%	6.2 -7%	6.1 -5%
Gamma	2.262 ^97%	2.2 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.228 ^99%
CCT	7660 ^85%	7172 ^91%	8064 ^81%	7538 ^86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	875 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	858 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	2457 Points +181%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	2425 Points +177%
LG Q7 Plus	639 Points -27%
Sharp Aquos C10	710 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +527%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	4203 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	4152 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	9014 Points +114%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8849 Points +111%
LG Q7 Plus	2135 Points -49%
Sharp Aquos C10	2246 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +258%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	3728 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3621 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	14160 Points +280%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	13496 Points +262%
LG Q7 Plus	2084 Points -44%
Sharp Aquos C10	2910 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +222%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	5796 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5659 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	10571 Points +82%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	9971 Points +72%
LG Q7 Plus	3969 Points -32%
Sharp Aquos C10	5377 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	17032 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	16972 Points 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	64592 Points +279%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	62063 Points +264%
LG Q7 Plus	9710 Points -43%
Sharp Aquos C10	15466 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	18635 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	18472 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	84681 Points +354%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	80166 Points +330%
LG Q7 Plus	9656 Points -48%
Sharp Aquos C10	16508 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	13090 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13217 Points +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	35290 Points +170%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	34665 Points +165%
LG Q7 Plus	9903 Points -24%
Sharp Aquos C10	12667 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1351 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	6293 Points +366%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	6252 Points +363%
LG Q7 Plus	120 Points -91%
Sharp Aquos C10	1363 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +211%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1269 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1248 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8236 Points +549%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8179 Points +545%
LG Q7 Plus	96 Points -92%
Sharp Aquos C10	1286 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +274%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1743 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1757 Points +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3482 Points +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3392 Points +95%
LG Q7 Plus	1029 Points -41%
Sharp Aquos C10	1725 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1395 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1381 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	6375 Points +357%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	6083 Points +336%
LG Q7 Plus	554 Points -60%
Sharp Aquos C10	1325 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1299 - 1415, n=13)	1379 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +696%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1325 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1303 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8352 Points +530%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8291 Points +526%
LG Q7 Plus	493 Points -63%
Sharp Aquos C10	1244 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1204 - 1332, n=13)	1302 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1387%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1711 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1744 Points +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3486 Points +104%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3148 Points +84%
LG Q7 Plus	976 Points -43%
Sharp Aquos C10	1714 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1657 - 1819, n=13)	1731 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sharp D10	832 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	824 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	4656 Points +460%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	4617 Points +455%
LG Q7 Plus	101 Points -88%
Sharp Aquos C10	819 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +271%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	723 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	718 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	5158 Points +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	5144 Points +611%
LG Q7 Plus	80 Points -89%
Sharp Aquos C10	712 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +351%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1755 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1712 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3473 Points +98%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3399 Points +94%
LG Q7 Plus	1031 Points -41%
Sharp Aquos C10	1719 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sharp D10	912 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	903 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	5036 Points +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	4971 Points +445%
LG Q7 Plus	373 Points -59%
Sharp Aquos C10	872 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (872 - 919, n=13)	904 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +752%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	806 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	793 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	5747 Points +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	5641 Points +600%
LG Q7 Plus	316 Points -61%
Sharp Aquos C10	767 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (767 - 809, n=13)	797 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1331%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1697 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1756 Points +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3515 Points +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3512 Points +107%
LG Q7 Plus	999 Points -41%
Sharp Aquos C10	1674 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1664 - 1778, n=13)	1710 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +172%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	29 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	28 fps -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	60 fps +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	60 fps +107%
LG Q7 Plus	16 fps -45%
Sharp Aquos C10	30 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +197%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	30 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	30 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	150 fps +400%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	149 fps +397%
LG Q7 Plus	17 fps -43%
Sharp Aquos C10	30 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +843%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sharp D10	14 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13 fps -7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	59 fps +321%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	55 fps +293%
LG Q7 Plus	6.8 fps -51%
Sharp Aquos C10	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +439%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	13 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	14 fps +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	82 fps +531%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	80 fps +515%
LG Q7 Plus	7.1 fps -45%
Sharp Aquos C10	14 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +1185%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	9.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.3 fps -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	53 fps +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	51 fps +431%
LG Q7 Plus	4.5 fps -53%
Sharp Aquos C10	9.8 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +583%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	9.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.8 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	60 fps +512%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	59 fps +502%
LG Q7 Plus	4.7 fps -52%
Sharp Aquos C10	10 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +1109%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	5.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.3 fps -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	31 fps +474%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	31 fps +474%
LG Q7 Plus	2.4 fps -56%
Sharp Aquos C10	6 fps +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +787%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	5.5 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.6 fps +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	35 fps +536%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	35 fps +536%
LG Q7 Plus	2.5 fps -55%
Sharp Aquos C10	5.6 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +1195%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	5.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.4 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	36 fps +567%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.4 - 5.4, n=4)	5.05 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +835%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	5.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.6 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	37 fps +561%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.9 - 5.6, n=4)	5.28 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	80.3 fps +1334%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	3.2 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3.1 fps -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	23 fps +619%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2.7 - 3.2, n=4)	3.03 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.6 fps +1075%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1.9 fps
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1.9 fps 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	14 fps +637%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1.7 - 1.9, n=4)	1.825 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	32.3 fps +1600%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	90099 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	89006 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	272546 Points +202%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	266374 Points +196%
LG Q7 Plus	52855 Points -41%
Sharp Aquos C10	89351 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points -1%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10	72035 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	70346 Points -2%
LG Q7 Plus	44064 Points -39%
Sharp Aquos C10	71531 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1539 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1570 Points +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	4478 Points +191%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	4406 Points +186%
LG Q7 Plus	855 Points -44%
Sharp Aquos C10	1152 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +311%
System (sort by value)
Sharp D10	3298 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3284 Points 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8081 Points +145%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	8023 Points +143%
LG Q7 Plus	1407 Points -57%
Sharp Aquos C10	1763 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +209%
Memory (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1235 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3924 Points +218%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	3762 Points +205%
LG Q7 Plus	800 Points -35%
Sharp Aquos C10	998 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +449%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10	1495 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1480 Points -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	7860 Points +426%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	7777 Points +420%
LG Q7 Plus	631 Points -58%
Sharp Aquos C10	1502 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +1048%
Web (sort by value)
Sharp D10	921 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	936 Points +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	1613 Points +75%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	1606 Points +74%
LG Q7 Plus	751 Points -18%
Sharp Aquos C10	666 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +70%

Legend

Sharp D10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sharp Aquos C10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68; AI Boost ON)	89.3 Points +221%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)	88.6 Points +218%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points +2%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	28.27 Points +2%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)	27.85 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	27.61 Points -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	18.69 Points -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +645%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)	16728 Points +234%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)	16635 Points +232%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	5202 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	5017 Points 0%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)	5004 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	3422 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)	13671 ms * -39%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	10086 ms * -3%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)	9807 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * +1%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)	9533 ms * +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)	2277 ms * +77%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)	2264 ms * +77%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +84%

* ... smaller is better

	Sharp D10	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	LG Q7 Plus	Sharp Aquos C10	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		1%	-14%	0%	14%	840%
Sequential Read 256KB	280.7	281.1 0%	235.9 -16%	283.8 1%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -2%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 558%
Sequential Write 256KB	211.5	146.2 -31%	186.6 -12%	213.4 1%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -17%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 579%
Random Read 4KB	47.2	77.4 64%	35.8 -24%	48.2 2%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) 26%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 487%
Random Write 4KB	16.79	10.5 -37%	11.91 -29%	16.9 1%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 91%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 1734%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -8%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.4 °C	32.5 °C	33.4 °C
33.7 °C	32.3 °C	32.9 °C
33.5 °C	32.3 °C	32.9 °C

Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 33 °C


30.2 °C	31.8 °C	33.4 °C
31.2 °C	31.7 °C	35 °C
31.2 °C	31.9 °C	34.6 °C

Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sharp D10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1 / 1.4 Watt
Carga	3.7 / 5.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sharp D10 2900 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-9%	-29%	-88%	-31%	-51%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.35 50%	1 -43%	0.9 -29%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) -5%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1	1.81 -81%	1.57 -57%	2.2 -120%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) -84%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	1.83 -31%	1.64 -17%	3.8 -171%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) -54%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) -15%
Load Average *	3.7	3.31 11%	4.1 -11%	6.2 -68%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -3%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -76%
Load Maximum *	5.2	4.97 4%	6.02 -16%	8 -54%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -8%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -90%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing

10h 44min

	Sharp D10 2900 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh	LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh	Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	644	837 30%	620 -4%	672 4%

Pro

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Desempenho sólido do sistema

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Design sem marcos

Contra

- Bluetooth 4.0

- Transições de cores desbotadas com a câmera principal

The Sharp D10 Smartphone Review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido de gama média que fornece uma boa alternativa para dispositivos de fabricantes mais estabelecidos. O D10 tem um impressionante desempenho de sistema, que não é prejudicado por qualquer bloatware. O SoC Snapdragon 630 e 4 GB de RAM tornam o D10 poderoso o suficiente para lidar com aplicativos modernos exigentes. Os 64 GB de armazenamento interno também devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários

O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido que só desaponta com suas câmeras comparativamente decepcionantes.

A Sharp anuncia o D10 como tendo zoom óptico, mas isso não proporcionou nenhum benefício durante nossos testes. As câmeras duplas traseiras são boas o suficiente para fotos rápidas, mas não poderiam substituir uma câmera compacta dedicada. Em geral, o D10 é um dispositivo decente com um design moderno que é prejudicado por algumas pequenas desvantagens.

Sharp D10 - 11/12/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

91%

Bateria