Breve Análise do Smartphone Sharp Aquos D10
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| Sharp D10 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| Sharp D10 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 745 cd/m²
Contraste: 1242:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.262
| Sharp D10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | LG Q7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5" | Sharp Aquos C10 IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 24% | -22% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 745 | 597 -20% | 431 -42% | 548 -26% |
| Brightness | 723 | 592 -18% | 419 -42% | 535 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 89 0% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.32 47% | 0.58 3% | 0.49 18% |
| Contrast | 1242 | 1866 50% | 743 -40% | 1118 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.52 | 2.4 47% | 6.2 -37% | 5.21 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.14 | 5.3 42% | 10.1 -11% | 13.47 -47% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 3.4 41% | 6.2 -7% | 6.1 -5% |
| Gamma | 2.262 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.228 99% |
| CCT | 7660 85% | 7172 91% | 8064 81% | 7538 86% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp D10 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp D10 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp D10 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68; AI Boost ON) | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON) | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON) | |
| Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sharp D10 | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | LG Q7 Plus | Sharp Aquos C10 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -14% | 0% | 14% | 852% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 280.7 | 281.1 0% | 235.9 -16% | 283.8 1% | 274 ? -2% | 1887 ? 572% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 211.5 | 146.2 -31% | 186.6 -12% | 213.4 1% | 176.6 ? -17% | 1471 ? 596% |
| Random Read 4KB | 47.2 | 77.4 64% | 35.8 -24% | 48.2 2% | 59.4 ? 26% | 278 ? 489% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.79 | 10.5 -37% | 11.91 -29% | 16.9 1% | 32.2 ? 92% | 311 ? 1752% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.2 ? | 86 ? 3% | 81.4 ? -2% | 83 ? 0% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.6 ? | 67 ? 5% | 62.2 ? -2% | 60.7 ? -5% | 58.3 ? -8% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sharp D10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.7 / 1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Carga |
3.7 / 5.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sharp D10 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh | Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | -29% | -88% | -31% | -51% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.35 50% | 1 -43% | 0.9 -29% | 0.732 ? -5% | 0.882 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1 | 1.81 -81% | 1.57 -57% | 2.2 -120% | 1.835 ? -84% | 1.448 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.4 | 1.83 -31% | 1.64 -17% | 3.8 -171% | 2.16 ? -54% | 1.603 ? -15% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 3.31 11% | 4.1 -11% | 6.2 -68% | 3.81 ? -3% | 6.57 ? -78% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.2 | 4.97 4% | 6.02 -16% | 8 -54% | 5.62 ? -8% | 9.92 ? -91% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sharp D10 2900 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh | Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 644 | 837 30% | 620 -4% | 672 4% |
Pro
Contra
O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido de gama média que fornece uma boa alternativa para dispositivos de fabricantes mais estabelecidos. O D10 tem um impressionante desempenho de sistema, que não é prejudicado por qualquer bloatware. O SoC Snapdragon 630 e 4 GB de RAM tornam o D10 poderoso o suficiente para lidar com aplicativos modernos exigentes. Os 64 GB de armazenamento interno também devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários
O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido que só desaponta com suas câmeras comparativamente decepcionantes.
A Sharp anuncia o D10 como tendo zoom óptico, mas isso não proporcionou nenhum benefício durante nossos testes. As câmeras duplas traseiras são boas o suficiente para fotos rápidas, mas não poderiam substituir uma câmera compacta dedicada. Em geral, o D10 é um dispositivo decente com um design moderno que é prejudicado por algumas pequenas desvantagens.
Sharp D10
- 11/12/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
