Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Sharp Aquos C10
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| JVC J20 | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 548 cd/m²
Contraste: 1118:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228
| Sharp Aquos C10 IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | JVC J20 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | LG Q7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5" | Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | -32% | -12% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 548 | 675 23% | 411 -25% | 431 -21% | 530 -3% |
| Brightness | 535 | 650 21% | 426 -20% | 419 -22% | 523 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 92 0% | 82 -11% | 89 -3% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.46 6% | 0.53 -8% | 0.58 -18% | 0.35 29% |
| Contrast | 1118 | 1467 31% | 775 -31% | 743 -34% | 1514 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 5.9 -13% | 8.84 -70% | 6.2 -19% | 2.4 54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.47 | 9.5 29% | 15.08 -12% | 10.1 25% | 5.5 59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 6.6 -8% | 10.7 -75% | 6.2 -2% | 2.2 64% |
| Gamma | 2.228 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.433 90% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7538 86% | 7846 83% | 10717 61% | 8064 81% | 6598 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | |
| JVC J20 | |
| LG Q7 Plus | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| JVC J20 (Chrome 68) | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| JVC J20 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13) | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13) | |
| JVC J20 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10) | |
| LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sharp Aquos C10 | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | JVC J20 | LG Q7 Plus | Honor View 10 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | -8% | -14% | 205% | 14% | 830% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 283.8 | 280.8 -1% | 270.6 -5% | 235.9 -17% | 810 185% | 274 ? -3% | 1839 ? 548% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 213.4 | 204.8 -4% | 199.7 -6% | 186.6 -13% | 194.3 -9% | 176.2 ? -17% | 1425 ? 568% |
| Random Read 4KB | 48.2 | 51.3 6% | 58.3 21% | 35.8 -26% | 144.3 199% | 59.4 ? 23% | 277 ? 475% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.9 | 15.43 -9% | 6.3 -63% | 11.91 -30% | 160 847% | 32 ? 89% | 309 ? 1728% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83 ? | 83.3 ? 0% | 82.8 ? 0% | 81.4 ? -2% | 81 ? -2% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 61.1 ? 1% | 63 ? 4% | 62.2 ? 2% | 65.1 ? 7% | 58.3 ? -4% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 56 fps | ||
| minimal | 55 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sharp Aquos C10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 60.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 60.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 60.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
JVC J20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 60.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 60.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 60.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.9 / 2.2 / 3.8 Watt |
| Carga |
6.2 / 8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | JVC J20 3400 mAh | LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 21% | 27% | 4% | 30% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.63 30% | 1 -11% | 1 -11% | 1.05 -17% | 0.732 ? 19% | 0.894 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 2.2 | 2.16 2% | 1.6 27% | 1.57 29% | 2.36 -7% | 1.835 ? 17% | 1.456 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.8 | 2.18 43% | 2.8 26% | 1.64 57% | 2.41 37% | 2.16 ? 43% | 1.616 ? 57% |
| Load Average * | 6.2 | 4.48 28% | 4 35% | 4.1 34% | 4.93 20% | 3.81 ? 39% | 6.45 ? -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 8 | 7.87 2% | 5.9 26% | 6.02 25% | 9.04 -13% | 5.62 ? 30% | 9.8 ? -23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sharp Aquos C10 2700 mAh | BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | JVC J20 3400 mAh | LG Q7 Plus 3000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | 8% | -23% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1425 | 1374 -4% | 980 -31% | 1671 17% | |
| H.264 | 735 | 658 -10% | 455 -38% | 819 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 672 | 605 -10% | 726 8% | 620 -8% | 679 1% |
| Load | 267 | 145 -46% | 230 -14% | 305 14% |
Pro
Contra
O retorno da Sharp ao mercado ocidental de smartphones é uma tarefa difícil, e, com o Sharp Aquos C10, ela consegue, na primeira tentativa, lançar um sólido dispositivo de gama média no mercado. O smartphone pode convencer com uma tela brilhante, boas câmeras, uma duração de bateria decente e uma WLAN rápida. O desempenho é totalmente suficiente, e o smartphone Sharp parece rápido no geral. No entanto, existem alguns smartphones nessa faixa de preço que trazem significativamente mais potência. Além disso, o Sharp Aquos C10 se afoga visivelmente durante cargas mais longas.
Com o Aquos C10, a Sharp consegue uma boa reentrada no mercado ocidental. Particularmente, as câmeras, a velocidade WLAN e a duração da bateria, são convincentes.
Por outro lado, um comprador em potencial pode ficar incomodado com a falta de uma porta de 3,5 mm, a qualidade de voz medíocre e, é claro, o nível que representa um obstáculo para alguns. Aqueles que podem apreciar o formato incomum do Sharp Aquos C10 e não precisam de tanto poder, terão um bom smartphone que nem todos têm.
Sharp Aquos C10
- 09/27/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
