Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Name: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Brand: Samsung

Nova revisão. O Galaxy S5 Neo da Samsung é a nova versão do antigo carro chefe Galaxy S5. É uma opção econômica para o atual Galaxy S6?

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/16/2015 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo (Galaxy S Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

5.10 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.1 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Combo, Card Reader: microSD (até 128 GB), Sensores: Sensor de posição, Acelerômetro, Sensor de luz, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Magnetômetro, Wi-Fi Direct, ANT+, NFC, USB-OTG, GPS, GLOANSS, SAR Body: 0,583 W/kg Head-SAR: 0.457 W/kg, rádio FM

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz)

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 142 x 72.5

Bateria

11 Wh Lítio-Ion, 2800 mAh, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Webcam: 5 MP, Traseira: 16 MP (autofoco, flash LED) vídeos: FHD @30 fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: virtual, modular PSU (7,75 Watts), cabo USB, fones, guia de início rápido, Galaxy Apps, S Health, S Planner, S Voice, Smart Manager, Microsoft OneNote, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

145 g, Suprimento de energia: 53 g

Preço

400 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2


361 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	334 cd/m²	327 cd/m²
356 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 341 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 334 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.91 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-28%	4%	-15%	-1%	-4%
Brightness middle	334	358 7%	335 0%	453 36%	451 35%	641 92%
Brightness	341	364 7%	345 1%	439 29%	446 31%	620 82%
Brightness Distribution	91	82 -10%	89 -2%	91 0%	90 -1%	93 2%
Black Level *				0.28	0.3	0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.84	5.28 -86%	2.51 12%	4.7 -65%	3.84 -35%	5.37 -89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.91	4.65 -60%	2.59 11%	5.03 -73%	3.97 -36%	6.01 -107%
Gamma	2.01 ^109%	2.48 ^89%	2.43 ^91%	2.27 ^97%	2.46 ^89%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	6432 ^101%	7690 ^85%	6424 ^101%	7439 ^87%	7283 ^89%	7806 ^83%
Contrast				1618	1503	1603
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				72.04	58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					90.14

* ... smaller is better

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	37854 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	60804 Points +61%
Huawei P8	45927 Points +21%
OnePlus 2	58535 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Play	29699 Points -22%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3330 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	2885 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S6	5073 Points +52%
Huawei P8	2955 Points -11%
OnePlus 2	4154 Points +25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	721 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	941 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S6	1146 Points +59%
Huawei P8	698 Points -3%
OnePlus 2	1066 Points +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8	3458 Points
OnePlus 2	4804 Points
Motorola Moto X Play	2558 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8	864 Points
OnePlus 2	1140 Points
Motorola Moto X Play	717 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1350 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1777 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1660 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1267 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	2686 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	2151 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	1503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1320 Points -12%
OnePlus 2	1517 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	169 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1152 Points +582%
OnePlus 2	846 Points +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1186 Points +462%
OnePlus 2	938 Points +345%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	1453 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1553 Points +7%
OnePlus 2	1414 Points -3%
Motorola Moto X Play	974 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	272 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1492 Points +449%
OnePlus 2	1854 Points +582%
Motorola Moto X Play	178 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	332 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1505 Points +353%
OnePlus 2	1734 Points +422%
Motorola Moto X Play	218 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10424 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	15198 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S6	18649 Points +79%
Huawei P8	10494 Points +1%
OnePlus 2	10985 Points +5%
Motorola Moto X Play	6839 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	7536 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	19530 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy S6	23193 Points +208%
Huawei P8	8743 Points +16%
OnePlus 2	31858 Points +323%
Motorola Moto X Play	7796 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8030 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	18367 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy S6	22002 Points +174%
Huawei P8	9080 Points +13%
OnePlus 2	22400 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Play	7561 Points -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10270 Points
Huawei P8	9404 Points -8%
Motorola Moto X Play	6841 Points -33%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4449 Points
Huawei P8	6064 Points +36%
Motorola Moto X Play	5082 Points +14%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	5090 Points
Huawei P8	6584 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Play	5390 Points +6%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10466 Points
Huawei P8	9337 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play	6799 Points -35%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8304 Points
Huawei P8	10515 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Play	10194 Points +23%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8704 Points
Huawei P8	10228 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play	9176 Points +5%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5	11.7 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy S6	16 fps +233%
Huawei P8	5.8 fps +21%
OnePlus 2	23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play	6.2 fps +29%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5	11.8 fps +146%
Samsung Galaxy S6	22 fps +358%
Huawei P8	5.5 fps +15%
OnePlus 2	23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play	5.8 fps +21%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.4 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps +459%
Motorola Moto X Play	4.4 fps +29%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.1 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps +513%
Motorola Moto X Play	4.2 fps +35%

PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	1756 Points
Storage score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	3900 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	3293 Points
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4134 Points
Huawei P8	4479 Points +8%
OnePlus 2	4282 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X Play	3589 Points -13%

Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3500 points
Samsung Galaxy S5	4432 points +27%
Huawei P8	4340 points +24%
OnePlus 2	4325 points +24%
Motorola Moto X Play	2523 points -28%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	6719 points
Samsung Galaxy S5	9054 points +35%
Huawei P8	5433 points -19%
OnePlus 2	10472 points +56%
Motorola Moto X Play	3820 points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	733 Points
Huawei P8	694 Points -5%
OnePlus 2	923 Points +26%
Motorola Moto X Play	710 Points -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	488 Points
Huawei P8	882 Points +81%
OnePlus 2	2631 Points +439%
Motorola Moto X Play	785 Points +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	569 Points
Huawei P8	1216 Points +114%
OnePlus 2	1297 Points +128%
Motorola Moto X Play	595 Points +5%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	2095 Points
Huawei P8	1860 Points -11%
OnePlus 2	2536 Points +21%
Motorola Moto X Play	1177 Points -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	808 Points
Huawei P8	1085 Points +34%
OnePlus 2	1681 Points +108%
Motorola Moto X Play	701 Points -13%

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	247.7 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5	678 MFLOPS +174%
Huawei P8	272.5 MFLOPS +10%
OnePlus 2	819 MFLOPS +231%
Motorola Moto X Play	275 MFLOPS +11%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	95.6 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5	355 MFLOPS +271%
Huawei P8	122 MFLOPS +28%
OnePlus 2	630 MFLOPS +559%
Motorola Moto X Play	134 MFLOPS +40%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	735 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	408.7 ms * +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	546 ms * +26%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1164 ms * -58%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	740 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1235 ms * -68%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3627 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3875 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8518 Points +135%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4084 Points +13%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3764 Points +4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11603 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6302 ms * +46%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11808 ms * -2%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * +43%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11694 ms * -1%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3765 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4419 Points +17%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7650 Points +103%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3917 Points +4%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	68 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	70 Points +3%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56 Points -18%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	23.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	49.19 Points +113%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	24.51 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11.07 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1 MB/s -91%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	19.9 MB/s +80%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10.04 MB/s -9%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13.94 MB/s +26%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16 MB/s +45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.57 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 MB/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	80 MB/s +254%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.46 MB/s 0%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21.87 MB/s -3%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16 MB/s -29%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	57.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	19.05 MB/s -67%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	138.9 MB/s +140%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.58 MB/s -32%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125.5 MB/s +117%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	75 MB/s +30%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	215.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.5 MB/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319 MB/s +48%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139.9 MB/s -35%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	234.2 MB/s +8%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139 MB/s -36%

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33 °C	33 °C	31.4 °C
33.5 °C	32.7 °C	31.3 °C
32.4 °C	31.2 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 33.5 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C


31.3 °C	34 °C	32.5 °C
30.8 °C	31 °C	30.5 °C
29.7 °C	30.2 °C	30.1 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 28.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.08 Watt
Ocioso	1.68 / 2.2 / 2.33 Watt
Carga	4.09 / 5.92 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		46%	32%	6%	14%	11%
Idle Minimum *	1.68	0.3 82%	0.4 76%	0.7 58%	0.6 64%	0.9 46%
Idle Average *	2.2	0.5 77%	0.6 73%	2 9%	1.7 23%	1.6 27%
Idle Maximum *	2.33	1.1 53%	1.2 48%	2.1 10%	1.8 23%	1.8 23%
Load Average *	4.09	3.1 24%	5 -22%	4.9 -20%	5.7 -39%	4.9 -20%
Load Maximum *	5.92	6.2 -5%	6.8 -15%	7.4 -25%	6 -1%	7.2 -22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		26h 55min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 38)		9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)		6h 42min

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-20%	-21%	-36%	-29%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1615	1695 5%	1300 -20%	826 -49%	1393 -14%	1145 -29%
H.264	773	556 -28%		581 -25%	580 -25%	742 -4%
WiFi v1.3	546		475 -13%	434 -21%	356 -35%	674 23%
Load	402	253 -37%	278 -31%	215 -47%	229 -43%	174 -57%
WiFi		613	575

Pro

+ Chassi resistente

+ Resistente à poeira e agua

+ Ótima tela

+ Boa câmera

+ Bateria substituível

+ Slot microSD

+ Boas durações da bateria

+ Baixas temperaturas

Contra

- Pior desempenho em comparação com o predecessor

- Afogamento do SoC sob carga contínua

- Opções limitadas dos vídeos

- O leitor de digitais foi dispensado

In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

O Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo está "reciclando" em um nível muito alto. O anterior telefone carro chefe foi melhorado em alguns aspectos, mas o desempenho do SoC é reduzido e alguns recursos foram removidos

Os aspectos positivos do Galaxy S5 Neo ainda são o sólido chassi, a ótima tela, o amplo equipamento de software e as longas durações da bateria. O smartphone ainda é resistente à água, mas não precisa mais das irritantes tampas. A Samsung também melhorou as câmeras – os resultados são, de fato, muito bons. Apenas as opções de vídeo são limitadas. À diferença de smartphones carros chefe da série S6, você pode substituir a bateria e expandir o armazenamento via cartões microSD.

O Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo é um smartphone sofisticado com bons recursos. Se você estiver satisfeito com a carcaça de plástico e não precisa do smartphone mais veloz, estão não está enganado com o S5 Neo.

Não conseguimos encontrar problemas sérios. É uma pena que o desempenho 3D, em particular, fique evidentemente atrás do predecessor e que alguns recursos tenham sido dispensados. Gostaríamos de ter visto, pelo menos, o leitor de digitais. Ele ainda é um pacote conveniente no geral, por um preço de rua de cerca de 330 Euros (~$363). Você pode obter o antigo Galaxy S5 por cerca de 350 a 380 Euros (~$385 a ~$418) em algumas lojas, mas estará melhor com o atual Galaxy S5 Neo se você não precisar dos recursos adicionais e não joga jogos muito exigentes.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo - 2015-12-04 12/04/2015 v4 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

69 / 75 → 92%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 77%

Peso

93%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 63 → 90%

Desempenho da aplicação

38 / 70 → 54%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

63 / 91 → 69%

Camera

79%

Médio

77%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Andreas Osthoff, 2015-12-16 (Update: 2015-12-31)