Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20+: Um telefone com recursos de vídeo de 8K
Device comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3200x1440 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 198 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.53" | 2400x1176 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640 | 206 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 3120x1440 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Sony Xperia 1 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 178 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 3840x1644 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 740 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5" | OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | -21% | -21% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 740 | 790 7% | 592 -20% | 606 -18% | 541 -27% |
| Brightness | 747 | 790 6% | 605 -19% | 611 -18% | 543 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 97 3% | 96 2% | 95 1% | 99 5% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.4 46% | 2.5 4% | 3.46 -33% | 0.8 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.57 | 3.4 26% | 5.5 -20% | 5.64 -23% | 1.7 63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.9 -27% | 2.6 -73% | 2 -33% | 1.2 20% |
| Gamma | 2.269 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.258 97% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6284 103% | 6466 101% | 6173 105% | 6779 96% | 6601 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 214 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 214 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 214 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (13627 - 14760, n=5) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10008 - 11784, n=5) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (296746 - 527820, n=5) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (71.4 - 71.6, n=2) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (42.3 - 63, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (84.1 - 85.6, n=2) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4607 - 4957, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5) | |
| OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75) | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ | Huawei Mate 30 Pro | OnePlus 7T Pro | Sony Xperia 1 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | -38% | -57% | -7% | 51% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1603 | 1781 11% | 1489 -7% | 750 -53% | 1520 ? -5% | 1887 ? 18% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 694 | 401.8 -42% | 405 -42% | 206.9 -70% | 546 ? -21% | 1471 ? 112% |
| Random Read 4KB | 199.6 | 226.4 13% | 169 -15% | 147.3 -26% | 206 ? 3% | 278 ? 39% |
| Random Write 4KB | 229.8 | 259.2 13% | 26 -89% | 24.16 -89% | 193.9 ? -16% | 311 ? 35% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 66.8 ? | 82.5 ? 24% | 31.34 ? -53% | 67.3 ? 1% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.6 ? | 69.2 ? 20% | 27.84 ? -52% | 55.7 ? -3% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.7 / 2.3 Watt |
| Carga |
5.8 / 11.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 990 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | 22% | -40% | 22% | 13% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.92 8% | 0.87 13% | 2.1 -110% | 1 -0% | 0.846 ? 15% | 0.883 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 2.9 -71% | 1.75 -3% | 3 -76% | 1.48 13% | 1.534 ? 10% | 1.467 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 2.94 -28% | 1.83 20% | 3.5 -52% | 1.56 32% | 1.858 ? 19% | 1.621 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 5.8 | 3.65 37% | 3.85 34% | 5.3 9% | 3.76 35% | 5.14 ? 11% | 6.55 ? -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.8 | 6.18 48% | 6.64 44% | 8.3 30% | 8.48 28% | 10.7 ? 9% | 9.9 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 42% | 6% | 11% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2041 | 2618 28% | 2174 7% | 2015 -1% | 1067 -48% |
| H.264 | 978 | 1346 38% | 1098 12% | 957 -2% | 712 -27% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 794 | 909 14% | 823 4% | 912 15% | 441 -44% |
| Load | 218 | 408 87% | 219 0% | 283 30% | 246 13% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Fraqueza da câmera
O preço do Galaxy S20+ já caiu significativamente, logo após o lançamento da Samsung a 999 Euros (~US$ 1.093). Sem dúvida, essa é uma boa notícia para os consumidores, pois eles podem obter o mesmo smartphone gastando menos dinheiro. No entanto, os clientes europeus receberão um Galaxy S20+ que não corresponde ao seu potencial. Isso ocorre principalmente porque a Samsung equipa o dispositivo com o Exynos 990, seu chipset interno que fica aquém do Snapdragon 865 em muitas áreas. Em resumo, o Galaxy S20+ europeu tem conectividade 5G pior, maior afogamento sob carga e pior desempenho da CPU do que seu irmão Snapdragon 865. No geral, a versão do Galaxy S20+ com Snapdragon 865 seria o melhor dos dois dispositivos a comprar.
Pelo menos a duração da bateria do SoC Exynos está agora se aproximando lentamente do nível da concorrência. No entanto, o Exynos 990 é relativamente sedento de energia sob uso intenso sustentado. Você não deve esperar a melhor tecnologia de carregamento da Samsung com o Galaxy S20+, pois a empresa reserva isso para o Galaxy S20 Ultra. Em geral, tanto o Galaxy S20 quanto o Galaxy S20 Plus se sentem como uma redução significativa em comparação com o S20 Ultra.
Isto é principalmente devido às câmeras que a Samsung inclui. Sem um zoom óptico real, parece que a Samsung priorizou os recursos de vídeo de 8K em vez de uma lente telefoto adequada. No entanto, a empresa aplica muitas restrições à gravação de vídeo em 8K, como a incapacidade de aplicar zoom ou usar o foco automático. Da mesma forma, a Samsung restringe as opções que podem ser usadas ao gravar vídeos de 60 FPS em 1080p e superior.
As omissões da câmera são uma pena, pois o Galaxy S20+ tira fotos decentes. Da mesma forma, o One UI 2.1 se sente moderno e inclui as mais recentes correções de segurança, enquanto o dispositivo possui uma tela AMOLED brilhante e responsiva.
O Samsung Galaxy S20+ usa truques para esconder os pontos fracos de sua câmera. Sua ótima tela ainda faz valer a pena dar uma olhada.
Em resumo, você deve procurar outras opções se quiser a melhor câmera de smartphone. Manter-se fiel à Samsung o recompensará com um carro-chefe de alta qualidade que pode convencer com seu Wi-Fi, boa qualidade de chamada, precisão decente de GPS, qualidade de construção impressionante e duração da bateria.
Samsung Galaxy S20+
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
