Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S10

Live Review -

A Samsung fixou o preço da versão menor dos modelos S10 de alto nível de forma mais atraente que o S10+. Além de sua tela menor, há uma bateria de menor capacidade, uma única câmera frontal e menos armazenamento interno. Da mesma forma, não há opção para uma traseira de cerâmica como existe com o S10+. Leia mais para descobrir como o Galaxy S10 se compara com o seu homônimo Plus e como ele enfrenta outros carros chefe modernos.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/19/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Samsung Galaxy S10 (Galaxy S Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9820 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Memória

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Pantalha

6.10 polegadas 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 551 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multitouch 10 pontos, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 108.5 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB. Suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Gyro sensor, Sensor Geomagnético, Hall sensor, Sensor de frequência cardíaca, Sensor de proximidade, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100 and AWS. LTE Cat. 20: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600 MHz, AWS and AWS-3., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 149.9 x 70.4

Bateria

12.71 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3.85 V, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Carregamento sem fio, Wireless PowerShare

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 77°, f/1.5 & f/2.4, 1.4 μm, OIS) & 12 MPix (Telephoto, 2 x magnification, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, OIS) & 16 MPix (Ultra-Wide-Angle, Fixed focus, 123°, f/2.2), Ultra HD video; Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 80°, f/1.9); Camera2 API: Full

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, 2 adaptadores OTG, AKG headset, Guia de início rápido, instruções de segurança, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Meses Garantia, Certificação IP68, SAR values: Body – 1.593 W/kg, Head - 0.477 W/kg., fanless

peso

157 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g

Preço

899 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	587 MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (558^min - 592^max) MBit/s
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (492^min - 579^max) MBit/s -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	550 MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	484 (382^min - 499^max) MBit/s -16%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s -18%
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	437 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (655^min - 698^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s +2%
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	650 MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (612^min - 683^max) MBit/s
Huawei P20 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	624 (593^min - 636^max) MBit/s -2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	278 MBit/s -56%

Samsung Galaxy S10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø639 (612-683)

Samsung Galaxy S10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (558-592)


709 cd/m²	698 cd/m²	708 cd/m²
702 cd/m²	701 cd/m²	702 cd/m²
713 cd/m²	707 cd/m²	705 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Curved Dynamic AMOLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 713 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 705 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 701 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8"	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4"	Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6"	Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1"
Screen		10%	12%	-5%	4%	-62%	15%
Brightness middle	701	529 -25%	639 -9%	437 -38%	567 -19%	543 -23%	569 -19%
Brightness	705	527 -25%	637 -10%	442 -37%	559 -21%	542 -23%	578 -18%
Brightness Distribution	98	96 -2%	94 -4%	95 -3%	89 -9%	92 -6%	95 -3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.7	1.4 62%	1 73%	2.21 40%	3.3 11%	6.6 -78%	1.3 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.3	4 61%	2.2 79%	4.27 59%	6.1 41%	11 -7%	2.1 80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.6 -14%	2.2 -57%	2.1 -50%	1.1 21%	4.7 -236%	1.6 -14%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.16 ^102%	1.9 ^116%	2.307 ^95%	2.46 ^89%	1.835 ^120%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	6553 ^99%	6358 ^102%	6364 ^102%	6353 ^102%	6495 ^100%	6817 ^95%	6401 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Ocioso	0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Carga	6.17 / 8.55 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh	Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	-0%	10%	5%	-5%	2%	-11%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.65 -7%	0.95 -56%	0.84 -38%	0.67 -10%	0.87 -43%	0.8 -31%	0.65 ?(0.6 - 0.73, n=4) -7%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Average *	1.27	0.81 36%	1.34 -6%	1.54 -21%	1.26 1%	1.39 -9%	1.2 6%	1.455 ?(1.2 - 1.82, n=4) -15%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Maximum *	1.3	0.92 29%	1.48 -14%	1.57 -21%	1.29 1%	1.41 -8%	1.5 -15%	1.675 ?(1.3 - 2.07, n=4) -29%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -24%
Load Average *	6.17	4.76 23%	4 35%	2.47 60%	3.71 40%	3.96 36%	4.8 22%	5.88 ?(5.2 - 6.17, n=4) 5%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -5%
Load Maximum *	8.55	5.16 40%	5.13 40%	2.49 71%	9.3 -9%	8.6 -1%	6.2 27%	9.44 ?(8.55 - 10.2, n=4) -10%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Initial Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S10 (SM-G973) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Samsung Galaxy S10 apresenta-se como um smartphone topo de gama completo e forte. Além disso, nossa unidade de análise não tem nenhum problema de consumo de energia do qual nosso Galaxy S10+ sofreu, então o S10 deve ter uma duração de bateria melhor do que seu irmão maior, pelo menos por enquanto.

O S10 também tem as mesmas câmeras traseiras do S10+, embora esteja faltando a segunda câmera frontal que do último, por isso as selfies podem ser um pouco piores. O S10 e o S10+ compartilham quase todo o mesmo hardware, por isso será interessante ver se a carcaça menor consegue manter o Exynos 9820 fresco sob uso intenso sustentado.

Se você preferir um smartphone compacto, não precisa de 1 TB de armazenamento interno e está considerando uma das séries S10, então o Galaxy S10 pode ser uma melhor alternativa do que o S10+. After all, you can save €350 with almost no compromises.