Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Versão mais barata do phablet de caneta

Esboços mais baratos.

Para conquistar mais clientes para a série Galaxy Note com caneta, a Samsung lançou pela primeira vez a versão mais barata, o Galaxy Note 10 Lite. Leia nossa análise para descobrir por que achamos que essa foi uma boa ideia.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9810 8 x - 2.9 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
6.70 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE (1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,14,18,19,20,28,29,30), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.7 x 163.7 x 76.1
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.7, phase detection AF (dual-pixel), OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/​60FPS (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.4, phase detection AF, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE-A pro Cat 18 (1200/150 Mbit/s); SAR value: 0.291W/​kg (head), 1.077W/​kg (body); stylus, fanless
peso
199 g, Suprimento de energia: 71 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.8 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86.3 %
v7 (old)
08/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
168 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.30"2280x1080
89 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
86.5 %
v7 (old)
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
83.3 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite

Size Comparison

163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g151 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 168 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s +133%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s +53%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
440 (245min - 489max) MBit/s +6%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (238min - 447max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s +173%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s +44%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s +52%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (374min - 485max) MBit/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
390 (294min - 447max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s -11%
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (315-388)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (295-452)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 7.97 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 16.26 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.3 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 29.86 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 43.43 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
542
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 560 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 536.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 510 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.242
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3"
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen
35%
29%
49%
15%
29%
Brightness middle
510
764
50%
592
16%
679
33%
625
23%
693
36%
Brightness
536
757
41%
605
13%
671
25%
607
13%
703
31%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
96
5%
93
2%
89
-2%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.6
2.66
60%
2.5
62%
0.8
88%
4.38
34%
3.42
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.56
5.65
68%
5.5
69%
2.4
86%
6.83
61%
6.12
65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
3.2
-10%
2.6
10%
1.1
62%
4.1
-41%
3.3
-14%
Gamma
2.242 98%
2.073 106%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.251 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
6989 93%
6326 103%
6173 105%
6610 98%
7251 90%
6799 96%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 229.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 229.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 229.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
679 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
822 Points +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
783 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points +98%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points -20%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
679 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)
928 Points +37%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2033 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2191 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3059 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points +70%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1723 Points -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
2033 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)
3014 Points +48%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4140 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4593 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4442 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1128 Points -73%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
4140 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)
4173 Points +1%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3794 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2457 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3222 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
891 Points -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
3794 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)
3404 Points -10%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
11011 Points +68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points +38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5736 - 6571, n=4)
6022 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8801 Points +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points +76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points +29%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5184 - 5851, n=4)
5411 Points -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5096 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points +44%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3895 - 4734, n=4)
4137 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5732 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points +37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (4569 - 5586, n=4)
4905 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3670 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2496 - 3087, n=4)
2675 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5048 Points +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points +146%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points +128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3744 - 4124, n=4)
3994 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5605 Points +42%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points +101%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points +351%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points +189%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3958 - 4904, n=4)
4626 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +398%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3746 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2561 - 3148, n=4)
2752 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5003 Points +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3244 - 4022, n=4)
3469 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5659 Points +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points +46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3553 - 4422, n=4)
3808 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3559 Points +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points +61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2469 - 3056, n=4)
2645 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5300 Points +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points +49%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3376 - 4291, n=4)
3634 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6087 Points +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points -50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3697 - 4806, n=4)
4023 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3649 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points +79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points +2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2546 - 3120, n=4)
2717 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4921 Points +36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points +54%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
3613 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6342 Points +51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
4201 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2758 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
3120 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points -13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
50 fps -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps +303%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps +131%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (80 - 147, n=4)
129.3 fps +62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +250%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
57 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps -33%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (45 - 57, n=4)
48.5 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +32%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
69 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps -44%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (73 - 76, n=4)
74 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +126%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
45 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 46, n=4)
29.8 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
47 fps +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps +133%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps +388%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps +25%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps +229%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 47, n=4)
40.5 fps +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +388%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps +36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (14 - 25, n=4)
17 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +91%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps +41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps +152%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (28 - 29, n=4)
28.3 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +143%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps +43%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps -43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
28 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38 fps +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps +58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps +181%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -42%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
31 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +157%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
29 fps +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps +53%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps +253%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +120%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
18 fps +64%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps +73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps +200%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps -9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +191%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4889 Points +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3110 - 3393, n=4)
3273 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +86%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8014 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points +13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5707 - 6413, n=4)
6123 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4598 Points +66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points +121%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points +54%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points +76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2068 - 2771, n=4)
2533 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +144%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9465 Points +47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points +57%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (6370 - 6506, n=4)
6423 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +162%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1638 Points +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (1099 - 1300, n=4)
1160 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +20%
AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
329860 Points 0%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
102716 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151146 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
94730 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
102716 Points 0%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
117851 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
160733 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
70647 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
117851 Points 0%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
51005 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100390 Points +97%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51664 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
51005 Points 0%
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58288 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70955 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
49376 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  ()
58288 Points 0%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.9 Points +312%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +273%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.9 Points +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.3 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
47.97 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.04 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()
32.3 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.26 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.4 Points +366%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.8 Points +92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.5 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
86.9 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.2 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (62.9 - 69.6, n=4)
65.8 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.9 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min +303%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +249%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min +90%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chome 76)
59.7 runs/min +53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()
39 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points +156%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +107%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points +65%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
97 Points +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (63 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points +277%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +187%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
18908 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (12933 - 15233, n=4)
14397 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3189 ms *
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2770 ms * +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2060 - 3189, n=4)
2509 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
2478 ms * +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021 ms * +37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1963 ms * +38%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +51%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
573 ms * +82%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 7TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
95%
71%
-12%
11%
11%
253%
Sequential Read 256KB
777
1478
90%
1781
129%
480.5
-38%
1406
81%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.8
590
209%
401.8
111%
243.6
28%
218.4
14%
Random Read 4KB
132
194.2
47%
226.4
72%
106.2
-20%
170.1
29%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
16%
Random Write 4KB
142
191.9
35%
259.2
83%
118.9
-16%
29.9
-79%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card)
12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card)
16%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (25-31)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (26-31)
Carga Máxima
 38.5 °C35.6 °C33.2 °C 
 39.4 °C35.8 °C33.2 °C 
 38.9 °C35.9 °C32.4 °C 
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
31.2 °C34.6 °C35 °C
31.4 °C34.4 °C37.5 °C
30.8 °C34.6 °C39.1 °C
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260/Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.642.32545.343.23137.137.24037.4385040.238.7633734.48028.628.210027.528.512526.927.116024.931.520022.942.125022.549.131521.455.24002361.150021.165.763022.265.78002068.1100019.871.5125018.373.8160017.876.7200017.673.8250016.868.431501770.4400016.770500017.867.5630016.871.4800017.173.71000017.2681250017.453.51600017.448SPL68.530.983.6N22.91.556.7median 19.8median 65.7median 70.2Delta4.213.413.539.943.643.849.536.538.836.142.745.144.635.736.426.732.328.529.326.532.824.841.824.646.82452.122.555.62058.320.466.519.866.719.365.223.869.117.871.31871.517.37016.668.615.760.915.765.715.770.915.672.115.769.415.76415.757.715.755.763.268.730.780.917.322.21.549.5median 18median 65.2median 16.1median 65.23.89.714.615.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (130.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Carga midlight 8.4 / 10.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
18%
-2%
12%
4%
19%
11%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.9
-0%
0.87
3%
0.56
38%
0.7
22%
0.9
-0%
0.783 ?(0.65 - 0.9, n=4)
13%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.75
-9%
2.99
-87%
1.8
-13%
1.4
12%
1.315 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=4)
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2
-5%
1.83
4%
3.02
-59%
2.2
-16%
2.9
-53%
1.903 ?(0.92 - 3.7, n=4)
-0%
Load Average *
8.4
7.7
8%
3.85
54%
4.17
50%
5.2
38%
4.7
44%
5.76 ?(4.58 - 8.4, n=4)
31%
Load Maximum *
10.3
10.5
-2%
6.64
36%
5.44
47%
7.5
27%
8.3
19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 34min
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-27%
-7%
6%
24%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2205
1392
-37%
2174
-1%
2765
25%
2134
-3%
2003
-9%
H.264
1071
803
-25%
1098
3%
1147
7%
1423
33%
967
-10%
WiFi v1.3
904
583
-36%
823
-9%
866
-4%
1127
25%
896
-1%
Load
274
246
-10%
219
-20%
267
-3%
387
41%
283
3%

Pro

+ Caneta incrível
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bom equipamento de câmera
+ GPS preciso
+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Afogamento sob carga prolongada
- Plástico de qualidade moderada
- Sem certificação IP

Veredicto - Opção barata com modificações

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite

O Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite é uma versão mais barata dos smartphones carros-chefes da Samsung. Isso se torna imediatamente aparente a partir da carcaça de plástico bastante simplista, SoC de gama média, alto-falante mono básico, a luminosidade da tela ligeiramente mais baixa e a quantidade reduzida de frequências LTE suportadas.

No entanto, o Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite não precisa ser visto como uma versão reduzida. Dependendo das preferências do usuário, o Note10 Lite pode até ter algumas vantagens, com a maior duração da bateria provavelmente sendo a mais relevante. Quem prefere áudio analógico tem acesso a um conector de áudio de 3,5 mm e os fanáticos de expansão de armazenamento podem usar um cartão microSD para aumentar o espaço de armazenamento. O Galaxy Note10 não possui nenhuma dessas opções.

O Samsung Galaxy Note10 é um ponto de entrada relativamente barato na família de dispositivos Galaxy Note e recebe uma recomendação nossa.

Além disso, a qualidade da imagem das câmeras é boa, o GPS é preciso, o software é moderno e a excelente caneta é quase única, pois abre toda uma gama de novas possibilidades com apenas alguns recursos ausentes em comparação com os outros smartphones Note10.

Recomendamos o Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite para quem sempre quis um smartphone Galaxy Note mais barato. Embora possa valer a pena dar uma olhada no Galaxy Note 9, que, embora tenha alguns meses mais velho, pode ser comprado a um preço semelhante ao Note10 Lite.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 72%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 64 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
63 / 86 → 74%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
73%
Médio
76%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Versão mais barata do phablet de caneta
Florian Schmitt, 2020-02-19 (Update: 2020-03- 3)