Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M31 – Médio com alguns destaques

Name: Samsung Galaxy M31
Brand: Samsung

A "M" de médio.

Embora o Samsung Galaxy M31 não esteja disponível em todo o mundo, é uma alternativa interessante de gama média, com sua enorme bateria e sistema de quatro câmeras. No entanto, como você precisa viver com um armazenamento reduzido, o smartphone ainda vale a pena?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/24/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy M31 (Galaxy M Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memória

6 GB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 64GB / 128GB, 49 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, bússola, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159.2 x 75.1

Bateria

6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/2.2, depth sharpness (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.482 W/kg (head), 1.127 W/kg (body); LTE speed: 600 Mbps (download), 150 Mbps (upload), fanless

peso

191 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g

Preço

270 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Samsung Galaxy M31 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
78.8 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2	152 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
79 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	159 g	256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.15"	2312x1080

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Realme 6 Pro Samsung Galaxy M31 Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Samsung Galaxy A41 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s +86%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	349 (339^min - 355^max) MBit/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (258^min - 312^max) MBit/s
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	290 (137^min - 336^max) MBit/s -2%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	224 (197^min - 260^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s +84%
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash	365 (349^min - 370^max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy M31 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	336 (282^min - 350^max) MBit/s
Realme 6 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 (145^min - 352^max) MBit/s -13%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	189 (80^min - 224^max) MBit/s -44%

Samsung Galaxy M31; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (282-350)

Samsung Galaxy M31; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (258-312)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M31

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M31

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M31

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M31: 13.07 ∆E min: 3.76 - max: 24.83 ∆E


620 cd/m²	615 cd/m²	616 cd/m²
620 cd/m²	622 cd/m²	619 cd/m²
607 cd/m²	611 cd/m²	606 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 622 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 615.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 622 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
142% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.019

	Samsung Galaxy M31 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy A41 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition IPS, 2312x1080, 6.2"
Screen		1%	11%	-69%	-48%
Brightness middle	622	554 -11%	610 -2%	442 -29%	507 -18%
Brightness	615	559 -9%	579 -6%	419 -32%	481 -22%
Brightness Distribution	97	92 -5%	92 -5%	90 -7%	88 -9%
Black Level *			0.37	0.37	0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.25	2 11%	1.8 20%	6.1 -171%	4.72 -110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.22	7.7 -24%	3 52%	9.7 -56%	7.84 -26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	1.6 41%	2.5 7%	5.9 -119%	5.5 -104%
Gamma	2.019 ^109%	2.11 ^104%	2.31 ^95%	2.35 ^94%	2.158 ^102%
CCT	6810 ^95%	6589 ^99%	6864 ^95%	7631 ^85%	7596 ^86%
Contrast			1649	1195	1334

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

208 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	348 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	357 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points +64%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (345 - 349, n=4)	347 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)	989 Points +184%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1325 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1222 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points +34%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points +33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1207 - 1387, n=4)	1310 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)	3298 Points +149%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1605 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1565 - 1605, n=3)	1592 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (459 - 13578, n=37, last 2 years)	6909 Points +330%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1345 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1208 - 1345, n=3)	1299 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 16883, n=43, last 2 years)	6769 Points +403%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	6202 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7594 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points +47%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points +122%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7593 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7)	6166 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5587 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	6742 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points +40%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6042 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7)	5572 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	23836 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20885 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points +61%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (16738 - 24052, n=6)	21849 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	25160 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	22232 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points +106%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15971 - 25625, n=6)	23092 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20128 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	17231 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points 0%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (13103 - 20393, n=6)	18907 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2056 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1229 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points +72%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points +72%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1004 Points -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1595 - 2110, n=6)	1958 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +104%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2020 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1093 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points +79%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points +82%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	870 Points -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1468 - 2092, n=6)	1944 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2195 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2181 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points +49%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points +40%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2179 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 2286, n=6)	2079 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2055 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1630 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points +77%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points +78%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1382 Points -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1662 - 2074, n=6)	1903 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1993 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1486 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points +90%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points +92%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1261 Points -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1601 - 2021, n=6)	1873 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +894%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2308 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2466 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points +40%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points +35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2084 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1402 - 2336, n=6)	2087 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1601 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1160 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points +56%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points +57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	858 Points -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1342 - 1601, n=7)	1524 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1478 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1016 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points +59%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points +62%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	730 Points -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1203 - 1478, n=7)	1422 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2258 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2296 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points +40%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points +37%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2207 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1415 - 2258, n=7)	2084 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1659 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1179 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points +61%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points +60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	967 Points -42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 1659, n=7)	1588 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +363%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1533 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1028 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points +66%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points +67%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	838 Points -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1267 - 1533, n=7)	1488 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +644%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2332 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2427 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points +39%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points +32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2092 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1463 - 2332, n=7)	2115 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1557 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1148 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points +50%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points +49%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	927 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1442 - 1557, n=7)	1525 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1442 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1005 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points +56%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points +56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	796 Points -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1320 - 1442, n=7)	1414 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2163 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2281 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points +26%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2196 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1972 - 2163, n=7)	2099 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points +25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	37 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +88%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	31 fps -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (25 - 44, n=7)	35.1 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +168%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	39 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps +136%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps +136%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	33 fps -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (28 - 48, n=7)	39.1 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +675%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	20 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps +105%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps +100%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	16 fps -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15 - 24, n=7)	19.9 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +295%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	21 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps +128%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps +128%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	18 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (17 - 26, n=7)	20.4 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +812%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps +107%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	11 fps -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7)	13.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +366%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	13 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps +88%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps +88%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	12 fps -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7)	14.7 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +628%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	9.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.7 fps -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +87%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps +76%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7.3 fps -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)	8.53 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +422%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8.1 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +80%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps +80%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.4 fps -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (6.4 - 10, n=7)	9.43 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +603%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	9.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +81%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps +81%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.4 fps -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)	9.26 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +424%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +80%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps +90%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.9 fps -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7.8 - 10, n=7)	9.66 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +694%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	5.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4.9 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +93%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps +93%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4.2 fps -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)	6.01 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +551%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2.8 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps +92%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps +94%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2.6 fps -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)	3.56 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +778%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	187087 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	157473 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points +45%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	185725 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7)	175473 Points -6%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	649 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1901 Points +193%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points +431%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points +436%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2153 Points +232%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (634 - 2191, n=7)	1418 Points +118%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +864%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4699 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5142 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points +46%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points +47%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4909 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2839 - 4978, n=7)	4361 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +116%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1775 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2148 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points +151%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points +158%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2993 Points +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1291 - 2122, n=7)	1706 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +278%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2168 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1113 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points +73%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points +74%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1466 Points -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2127 - 2168, n=7)	2149 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +673%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M31 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	10 Points
Samsung Galaxy A41 Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1062 Points +10520%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points +12160%
Realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points +12230%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	998 Points +9880%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 1202, n=7)	620 Points +6100%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +15470%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +329%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.9 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	32.64 Points +17%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	31.33 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)	28.2 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	27.81 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.6 Points +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.8 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	56 Points +18%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	50.9 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)	50.5 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	47.5 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +354%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min +54%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	31.4 runs/min +7%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83)	29.4 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)	29 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	27.8 runs/min -5%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +163%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points +27%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	56 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)	53.4 Points -5%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	52 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	52 Points -7%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +252%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points +65%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	10499 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	10434 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)	9667 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	9549 Points -8%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)	4863 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83)	4786 ms *
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)	4318 ms * +10%
Samsung Galaxy A41 (Chrome 83.0.4103.101)	3779 ms * +21%
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033 ms * +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850 ms * +40%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy M31	Samsung Galaxy A41	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Realme 6 Pro	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-18%	-10%	7%	37%	-14%	260%
Sequential Read 256KB	489.5	299.9 -39%	498.1 2%	513 5%	800 63%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) 5%	1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 275%
Sequential Write 256KB	221.7	211.1 -5%	171.1 -23%	203.3 -8%	391.1 76%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) -21%	1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 545%
Random Read 4KB	128.9	84 -35%	122.6 -5%	158.7 23%	198.7 54%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) -9%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years) 116%
Random Write 4KB	152.4	72.5 -52%	112.9 -26%	154 1%	171.6 13%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -47%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 103%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	86.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 16%	76.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	73.4 ?(36.8 - 85.4, n=10) -1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	55.4 ?(33.3 - 65.3, n=10) -9%

Samsung Galaxy M31; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø55 (40-60)

Samsung Galaxy M31; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø32.4 (19-41)

Samsung Galaxy M31; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29 (15-31)

Samsung Galaxy M31; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø26.6 (10-32)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


43.6 °C	37.9 °C	35 °C
42.9 °C	37.9 °C	35.4 °C
41.2 °C	36.4 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C


33.5 °C	36.8 °C	41.7 °C
34.6 °C	36.5 °C	42.7 °C
35.4 °C	37.3 °C	41.3 °C

Máximo: 42.7 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.6 / 2.3 / 3.7 Watt
Carga	6.7 / 9.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9611	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		46%	35%	30%	28%	16%	28%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.96 40%	0.75 53%	0.92 42%	0.95 41%	1.173 ?(0.9 - 1.6, n=7) 27%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 44%
Idle Average *	2.3	1.57 32%	2.19 5%	1.79 22%	2.1 9%	2.28 ?(1.7 - 4.24, n=7) 1%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 37%
Idle Maximum *	3.7	1.61 56%	2.24 39%	1.88 49%	2.4 35%	2.86 ?(1.8 - 4.34, n=7) 23%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 57%
Load Average *	6.7	2.93 56%	3.88 42%	5.41 19%	4.2 37%	5.97 ?(5 - 6.99, n=7) 11%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) 4%
Load Maximum *	9.4	4.97 47%	5.97 36%	7.59 19%	7.7 18%	7.83 ?(6.3 - 9.4, n=7) 17%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		40h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		22h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		23h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 26min

	Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A41 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh
Battery Runtime		-31%	-12%	-22%	-42%
Reader / Idle	2456	1843 -25%	2336 -5%		1359 -45%
H.264	1432	998 -30%	1096 -23%		802 -44%
WiFi v1.3	1324	650 -51%	1175 -11%	1031 -22%	719 -46%
Load	326	268 -18%	303 -7%		223 -32%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Navegação precisa

+ Duração da bateria muito longa

+ Slot microSD dedicado

+ Software moderno

+ Muitas frequências LTE

+ Boas fotos da câmera

+ Tela brilhante

Contra

- Desempenho relativamente lento

- Muito bloatware

- Afogamentos sob uso estendido

- Engasgos durante gravações de vídeo em UHD

- Alto consumo de energia

Veredicto - Muito agradável em geral

Relativamente rápido, após o seu lançamento, o Samsung Galaxy M31 já está disponível a preços ainda mais acessíveis. Isso também o torna mais atraente, pois o smartphone se mostra bastante médio em termos de equipamento de hardware. Os destaques são a enorme bateria e a tela AMOLED que oferece uma precisão de cores relativamente boa.

Por outro lado, o armazenamento está apenas no nível de sua classe e, em termos de desempenho, o Galaxy M31 ainda permanece significativamente atrás dos concorrentes na faixa de preço do preço de varejo recomendado. Além disso, você precisa conviver com um forte afogamento sob carga, bem como com um aquecimento muito notável. O Galaxy M31 também não consegue avançar em termos de velocidade de WLAN.

Embora tecnicamente, o Galaxy M31 seja mediano em muitas áreas, convence com uma bateria de longa duração e uma boa tela.

Portanto, em muitas áreas, o smartphone Galaxy é mais um telefone comum, do que capaz de se destacar. No entanto, como sua duração de bateria é convincente, a tela é brilhante, as câmeras tiram fotos decentes e a Samsung oferece um software moderno e claramente organizado com o OneUI, que também é atualizado com segurança, o Galaxy M31 ainda é um smartphone atraente no mercado de gama média.

Samsung Galaxy M31 - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 66%

Peso

89%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

17 / 64 → 27%

Desempenho da aplicação

50 / 86 → 59%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

61%

Médio

73%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M31 – Médio com alguns destaques

Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-24 (Update: 2020-07-27)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis

Huawei P30 Lite New Edition audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Muito agradável em geral

More articles related to this device

Price comparison