Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M30s: Uma enorme bateria a um preço acessível

Name: Samsung Galaxy M30s
Brand: Samsung

A normal monster.

A série Galaxy M é caracterizada por consistir em smartphones intermediários de baixo custo com designs modernos e baterias enormes. O Galaxy M30s não é diferente, com o dispositivo com uma bateria de 6.000 mAh, apesar de seu formato relativamente compacto. Continue lendo para descobrir se o dispositivo mais recente da série Galaxy M tem mais a oferecer do que apenas uma bateria enorme.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/02/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy M30s (Galaxy M Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 50.5 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de 512 GB. Slot dedicado para cartões microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 159 x 75.1

Bateria

6000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix , f/2.0, detecção facial autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, vídeos de até 2160p/30 FPS. 8.0 MPix ultra-wide-angle lens, f/2.2,. 5.0 MPix depth of field camera, f/2.2.
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carrregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, Velocidade LTE: 600 Mbps downloads and 150 Mbps uploads. SAR values: Body - 1,130 W/kg, Head - 0.492 W/kg. FM radio, fanless

peso

188 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g

Preço

249 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Device comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Samsung Galaxy M30s Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	188 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
79.2 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 SD 665, Adreno 610	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78.4 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Motorola Moto G8 Plus SD 665, Adreno 610	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2280x1080
78.4 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610	173.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.09"	1560x720
79.5 % v6 ^(old)	03/2019	Samsung Galaxy M20 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2	186 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy M30s Motorola Moto G8 Plus Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Samsung Galaxy M20 Xiaomi Mi A3 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy M30s Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	323 (257^min - 351^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	303 (242^min - 355^max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (2^min - 282^max) MBit/s -47%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	152 (1^min - 254^max) MBit/s -53%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	41 (2^min - 93^max) MBit/s -87%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash	339 (320^min - 349^max) MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy M30s Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	328 (270^min - 341^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	182 (11^min - 259^max) MBit/s -45%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (18^min - 227^max) MBit/s -52%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash	64 (52^min - 69^max) MBit/s -80%

Samsung Galaxy M30s; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (270-341)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø323 (257-351)

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy M30s - Overview

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M30s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M30s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy M30s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M30s: 12.96 ∆E min: 2.88 - max: 27.75 ∆E

A photo of our test chart in controlled lighting conditions


581 cd/m²	601 cd/m²	606 cd/m²
592 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	609 cd/m²
587 cd/m²	597 cd/m²	603 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 609 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 597.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 600 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.013

	Samsung Galaxy M30s Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Motorola Moto G8 Plus IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy M20 PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.3"
Screen		22%	-56%	-70%	-73%
Brightness middle	600	656 9%	597 0%	348 -42%	452 -25%
Brightness	597	643 8%	596 0%	355 -41%	445 -25%
Brightness Distribution	95	95 0%	93 -2%	91 -4%	92 -3%
Black Level *		0.54	0.52		0.41
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.1 56%	5.93 -137%	5.86 -134%	5.3 -112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.17	2.4 67%	9.42 -31%	15.6 -118%	9.5 -32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	2.2 -10%	5.3 -165%	3.6 -80%	6.8 -240%
Gamma	2.013 ^109%	2.2 ^100%	2.232 ^99%	2.232 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6399 ^102%	6263 ^104%	7632 ^85%	7051 ^92%	8355 ^78%
Contrast		1215	1148		1102

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

118 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 118 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 118 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	349 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	314 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	315 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (345 - 349, n=3)	347 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +166%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1299 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1327 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1379 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1063 - 1326, n=3)	1229 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +132%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1393 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	363 Points -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	370 Points -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1393 - 1522, n=3)	1451 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +200%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	663 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	422 Points -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (663 - 1079, n=3)	932 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +413%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6697 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7446 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8186 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5802 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7)	6166 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5925 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6498 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6534 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5269 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7)	5572 Points -6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16738 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	23534 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23253 Points +39%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13183 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (16738 - 24052, n=6)	21849 Points +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15971 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	24654 Points +54%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24992 Points +56%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13392 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15971 - 25625, n=6)	23092 Points +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20118 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	20354 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18698 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12500 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (13103 - 20393, n=6)	18907 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1595 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1728 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1765 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	752 Points -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1595 - 2110, n=6)	1958 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +164%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1468 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1607 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1634 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	650 Points -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1468 - 2092, n=6)	1944 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +223%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2286 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2378 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2452 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1677 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 2286, n=6)	2079 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1743 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1778 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1790 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	752 Points -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1662 - 2074, n=6)	1903 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +540%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1634 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1668 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1670 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	650 Points -60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1601 - 2021, n=6)	1873 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +1113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2275 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2348 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2393 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1677 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1402 - 2336, n=6)	2087 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +120%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1342 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1114 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1128 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	582 Points -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1342 - 1601, n=7)	1524 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1203 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	967 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	979 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	488 Points -59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1203 - 1478, n=7)	1422 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +170%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2255 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2408 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2424 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1657 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1415 - 2258, n=7)	2084 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1390 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1126 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	579 Points -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 1659, n=7)	1588 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +453%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1267 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	980 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	981 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	488 Points -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1267 - 1533, n=7)	1488 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +801%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2103 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2298 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2341 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1657 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1463 - 2332, n=7)	2115 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1442 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1036 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1040 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1091 Points -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1442 - 1557, n=7)	1525 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1320 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	898 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	901 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	964 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1320 - 1442, n=7)	1414 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2134 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2250 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2268 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2028 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1972 - 2163, n=7)	2099 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points +27%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	37 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33 fps -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	12 fps -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (25 - 44, n=7)	35.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +132%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	41 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	36 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	14 fps -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (28 - 48, n=7)	39.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +580%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	17 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	6.2 fps -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15 - 24, n=7)	19.9 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +341%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	19 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	7 fps -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (17 - 26, n=7)	20.4 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +721%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	12 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3.8 fps -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7)	13.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +366%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	13 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.3 fps -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7)	14.7 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +732%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.1 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.6 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.7 fps -69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)	8.53 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +440%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.9 fps -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.2 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.6 fps -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (6.4 - 10, n=7)	9.43 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +632%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.2 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.3 fps -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)	9.26 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +460%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.1 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.2 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4.7 fps -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7.8 - 10, n=7)	9.66 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +710%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	4.4 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps -46%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2.7 fps -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)	6.01 fps -28%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +347%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2.8 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1.7 fps -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)	3.56 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +778%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	12.34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	7.44 (3.6^min - 21.99^max) fps -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 ()	12.3 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10.82 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	6.65 (3.4^min - 18.65^max) fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	10.74 fps -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 ()	10.8 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	8.24 (5.77^min - 20.65^max) fps -40%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	11.99 fps -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 ()	13.8 fps 0%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1755 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1134 Score -35%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1092 Score -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 ()	1755 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +232%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2191 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2254 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2240 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1862 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (634 - 2191, n=7)	1418 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +186%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4978 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	5006 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5000 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	3957 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2839 - 4978, n=7)	4361 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +104%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	2808 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2835 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2973 Points +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1291 - 2122, n=7)	1706 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +216%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2127 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	1881 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1916 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1038 Points -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2127 - 2168, n=7)	2149 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +688%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1025 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	937 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	926 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy M20 Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	984 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 1202, n=7)	620 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +52%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	174870 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	169695 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	169222 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7)	175473 Points 0%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	63005 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	70889 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	70133 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (43473 - 63005, n=7)	57908 Points -8%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	34020 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	33000 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	33527 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (34020 - 46247, n=7)	38422 Points +13%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	44128 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	38271 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	37857 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29687 - 44128, n=7)	38664 Points -12%
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy M30s Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	33717 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144	27535 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	27705 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (33717 - 44600, n=7)	40479 Points +20%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +315%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	30.69 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.65 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	30.53 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	28.73 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)	28.2 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2)	22.57 Points -21%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	51.9 Points
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	51 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)	50.5 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	50.3 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	49.75 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Browser 9.2)	45.14 Points -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +338%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	30.8 runs/min +1%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	30.5 runs/min
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	30.5 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)	29.5 runs/min -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)	29 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy M20	19.3 runs/min -37%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +194%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)	53.4 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy M20	52 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	52 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	51 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	50 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +279%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	9684 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)	9667 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	9405 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	9107 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M20	9087 Points -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)	4863 ms * -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4584 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)	4562 ms * -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)	4504 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy M30s (Chrome 78)	4332 ms *
Samsung Galaxy M20	3703 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy M30s	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8	Motorola Moto G8 Plus	Xiaomi Mi A3	Samsung Galaxy M20	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-24%	-17%	-8%	-28%	1%	290%
Sequential Read 256KB	483.6	297.6 -38%	302.5 -37%	502 4%	300 -38%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) 44%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 279%
Sequential Write 256KB	190.7	160.5 -16%	217.4 14%	184 -4%	137 -28%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) 17%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 648%
Random Read 4KB	133.8	84.8 -37%	59.9 -55%	126.9 -5%	64 -52%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) 3%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 108%
Random Write 4KB	137.1	91.2 -33%	124.9 -9%	117.4 -14%	44 -68%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) -38%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 126%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	74.2 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)	71.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	72.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	81.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33) -8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.1 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)	52.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	52.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -15%	50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -18%	65.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33) -15%

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.8 (54-60)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø28 (18-30)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø27.8 (22-31)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.4: Ø57.3 (1-60)

Samsung Galaxy M30s; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.4: Ø59.8 (59-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


36 °C	29.9 °C	28.6 °C
35 °C	30.1 °C	29.2 °C
32.5 °C	29.1 °C	28.5 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 31 °C


27.4 °C	29.1 °C	33.3 °C
27.8 °C	29.2 °C	33.9 °C
28.2 °C	29.7 °C	32.3 °C

Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy M30s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy M20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga	5 / 6.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy M30s 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9611	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	-30%	-5%	5%	-20%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.62 38%	1.7 -70%	0.8 20%	0.94 6%	1.173 ?(0.9 - 1.6, n=7) -17%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.77 7%	2.3 -21%	2 -5%	2.37 -25%	2.28 ?(1.7 - 4.24, n=7) -20%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.4	1.8 25%	3.5 -46%	3.3 -38%	2.42 -1%	2.86 ?(1.8 - 4.34, n=7) -19%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 33%
Load Average *	5	3.42 32%	4.7 6%	4.1 18%	3.83 23%	5.97 ?(5 - 6.99, n=7) -19%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -28%
Load Maximum *	6.3	6.14 3%	7.5 -19%	7.7 -22%	5.07 20%	7.83 ?(6.3 - 9.4, n=7) -24%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -53%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		36h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		19h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 36min

	Samsung Galaxy M30s 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M20 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-25%	-14%	-17%	-15%
Reader / Idle	2206	2139 -3%	2002 -9%	1724 -22%	1904 -14%
H.264	1269	859 -32%	996 -22%	1023 -19%	1121 -12%
WiFi v1.3	1154	824 -29%	980 -15%	985 -15%	928 -20%
Load	336	217 -35%	302 -10%	297 -12%	288 -14%

Pro

+ Duração de bateria líder da classe

+ Design elegante

+ Bem construído

+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso

+ Veloz armazenamento interno

+ Tela brilhante

+ Sensor de digitais preciso

+ Módulo GPS preciso

+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Atualizações de segurança desatualizadas

- Aplicativos com anúncios pré instalados

- Alto falante mono ruim

- Afogamento do desempenho sob uso intenso

Veredicto - Finalizado e recomendável

The Samsung Galaxy M30s smartphone review.

O Samsung Galaxy M30s é um aparelho acessível, com poucos compromissos. Nossa unidade de teste possui excelente duração da bateria, armazenamento rápido, muita RAM e é construída de forma robusta, apesar da tampa traseira de plástico.

O dispositivo também possui Wi-Fi comparativamente rápido, enquanto a precisão do seu módulo GPS nos impressionou. Da mesma forma, seu painel AMOLED de 6,4 polegadas deve oferecer brilho suficiente para a maioria das pessoas, e poucos devem ter alguma reclamação sobre a precisão de sua tela táctil ou leitor de digitais.

No entanto, o Galaxy M30s sofre de algumas deficiências. Em primeiro lugar, a Samsung tem falhado em liberar atualizações de patches de segurança nos últimos tempos. No momento da redação deste artigo, nossa análise está presa em patches de três atrás, o que é inaceitável em nossa opinião. Além disso, a Samsung pré-instala aplicativos de publicidade de terceiros, o que é outro problema. Em segundo lugar, nossa unidade de teste se afoga sob uso intenso contínuo, o que é decepcionante. Temos nossas dúvidas com a qualidade de áudio do alto-falante mono, a qualidade das chamadas de nossa unidade de teste e a potência do carregador incluído, mas esses são problemas menores do que os de SoC e de software.

O Samsung Galaxy M30s tem uma duração de bateria fantástica, boas câmeras e uma tela AMOLED brilhante. Embora tenhamos alguns problemas com o dispositivo, ainda o recomendamos se você tiver um orçamento de cerca de 250 Euros (~US$ 275).

No geral, o Galaxy M30s oferece grande valor pelo dinheiro. Nossa unidade de teste nos impressionou em muitas áreas, enquanto nossos problemas com ela devem ter um impacto limitado no uso diário.

Samsung Galaxy M30s - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

77%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 66%

Peso

89%

Bateria

92%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

15 / 64 → 23%

Desempenho da aplicação

59 / 86 → 69%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

69 / 90 → 76%

Camera

62%

Médio

73%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy M30s: Uma enorme bateria a um preço acessível

Florian Schmitt, 2019-12- 2 (Update: 2019-12- 4)

Device comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy M30s audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy M20 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Finalizado e recomendável

More articles related to this device

Price comparison