Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) Duos
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Lenovo P2 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Lenovo P2 (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo P2 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | -1% | -61% | -13% | -54% | |
| Brightness middle | 454 | 287 -37% | 509 12% | 658 45% | 479 6% | 485 7% |
| Brightness | 463 | 289 -38% | 511 10% | 633 37% | 477 3% | 481 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 93 8% | 93 8% | 91 6% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.5 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.9 -45% | 2.2 -10% | 4.9 -145% | 2.4 -20% | 4.2 -110% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 10.1 -91% | 5.8 -9% | 9.1 -72% | 5.6 -6% | 7.9 -49% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.1 -24% | 2 -18% | 5.8 -241% | 2.8 -65% | 4.8 -182% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.05 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6394 102% | 6228 104% | 6768 96% | 7840 83% | 6702 97% | 7568 86% |
| Contrast | 997 | 970 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 257.7 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 257.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 257.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1) | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | Lenovo P2 | Huawei Nova Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -8% | 71% | 73% | 75% | 35% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 198.5 | 189.4 -5% | 204.4 3% | 254.8 28% | 282 42% | 270.1 36% | 241.6 22% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 53 | 46.24 -13% | 52 -2% | 73.1 38% | 188 255% | 76.7 45% | 82.1 55% |
| Random Read 4KB | 25.86 | 22.33 -14% | 24.07 -7% | 38.78 50% | 74 186% | 38.2 48% | 35.64 38% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.54 | 10.11 -4% | 9.9 -6% | 45.58 332% | 7.4 -30% | 44.4 321% | 30.12 186% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.1 ? | 75.5 ? -1% | 72.2 ? -5% | 74.6 ? -2% | 79.2 ? 4% | 79.3 ? 4% | 41.64 ? -45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.9 ? | 58.2 ? -9% | 44.21 ? -31% | 50.6 ? -21% | 50.1 ? -22% | 59.4 ? -7% | 33.32 ? -48% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 18 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Temple Run 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| default | 59 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.06 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.39 / 1.06 / 1.08 Watt |
| Carga |
1.82 / 3.21 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -47% | -3% | -93% | -10% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.39 | 0.67 -72% | 0.51 -31% | 0.83 -113% | 0.54 -38% | 0.49 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1.06 | 1.71 -61% | 0.87 18% | 2.11 -99% | 1.01 5% | 1.63 -54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.08 | 1.83 -69% | 0.9 17% | 2.12 -96% | 1.03 5% | 1.76 -63% |
| Load Average * | 1.82 | 2.37 -30% | 1.69 7% | 3.41 -87% | 1.78 2% | 2.98 -64% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.21 | 3.31 -3% | 4 -25% | 5.46 -70% | 3.98 -24% | 4.99 -55% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Lenovo P2 5100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 14% | -21% | 16% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1950 | 2030 4% | 2540 30% | 1502 -23% | 2841 46% | 2048 5% |
| H.264 | 1096 | 1220 11% | 1190 9% | 905 -17% | 1199 9% | 732 -33% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 904 | 1025 13% | 824 -9% | 797 -12% | 978 8% | 820 -9% |
| Load | 525 | 681 30% | 652 24% | 352 -33% | 528 1% | 366 -30% |
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U11 | |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) é um smartphone bem feito. No entanto, não consegue dominar seus concorrentes tanto quanto o Galaxy J5. Isso se torna muito aparente em termos de duração da bateria. No entanto, isto é reclamar em um nível muito alto, dado que ainda é muito bom. Apesar da bateria maior, infelizmente é pior do que o J7 do ano passado. A Samsung pode melhorar isso com uma atualização.
O Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) não melhorou em todos os aspectos. No entanto, é um ótimo smartphone.
O Galaxy J7 (2017) pode brilhar com a sua ótima tela Super-AMOLED, que é finalmente controlada por um sensor de luz ambiente - o que estava atrasado há muito tempo. Além disso, agora oferece resolução Full HD. Infelizmente, a Samsung não equipa o telefone com um SoC ligeiramente mais poderoso para lidar com a maior densidade de pixels. Isso é notório no desempenho fraco dos jogos, mas também pode ser um motivo para durações da bateria mais curtas. As câmeras não são modelos de referência, mas produzem bons resultados se o ambiente for suficientemente iluminado. O módulo Wi-Fi não suporta apenas todos os padrões atuais, mas também oferece boas taxas de transferência. O armazenamento interno de 16 GB também é bastante padrão. No entanto, a capacidade de armazenamento pode ser expandida com um microSD sem renunciar ao recurso dual SIM.
O que resta é um smartphone visualmente melhorado. No entanto, sua bateria agora é removível. Em troca, ele vem com um sensor de digitai e 3 GB de RAM. Para alguns, pode valer a penas adquirir o modelo do ano passado.
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- 07/28/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt