Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6+ (2018)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 512 cd/m²
Contraste: 1829:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 TFT, 1480x720, 6" | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sharp D10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Motorola One IPS, 1520x720, 5.9" | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 41% | 28% | 1% | -2% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 512 | 570 11% | 454 -11% | 745 46% | 467 -9% | 597 17% |
| Brightness | 508 | 565 11% | 463 -9% | 723 42% | 452 -11% | 592 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 93 -2% | 86 -9% | 89 -6% | 87 -8% | 92 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.6 -114% | 0.38 -36% | 0.32 -14% | ||
| Contrast | 1829 | 1242 -32% | 1229 -33% | 1866 2% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 1.5 73% | 2 64% | 4.52 19% | 5.29 6% | 2.4 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.8 | 3.6 69% | 5.3 55% | 9.14 23% | 7.71 35% | 5.3 55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8 | 1.2 85% | 1.7 79% | 5.8 27% | 5 37% | 3.4 57% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.262 97% | 2.376 93% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7831 83% | 6504 100% | 6394 102% | 7660 85% | 7583 86% | 7172 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Sharp D10 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (24 - 28, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola One (Chrome 69) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Sharp D10 | Motorola One | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 12% | -25% | 22% | 94% | 12% | 2% | 1145% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 292.9 | 295.8 1% | 198.5 -32% | 280.7 -4% | 280.2 -4% | 281.1 -4% | 242 ? -17% | 1839 ? 528% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 95.6 | 104.9 10% | 53 -45% | 211.5 121% | 214.9 125% | 146.2 53% | 100.5 ? 5% | 1425 ? 1391% |
| Random Read 4KB | 64.6 | 84 30% | 25.86 -60% | 47.2 -27% | 61.9 -4% | 77.4 20% | 43.2 ? -33% | 277 ? 329% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.71 | 15.45 22% | 10.54 -17% | 16.79 32% | 69.1 444% | 10.5 -17% | 22.4 ? 76% | 309 ? 2331% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.6 ? | 78.2 ? 2% | 76.1 ? -1% | 83.2 ? 9% | 80.8 ? 5% | 86 ? 12% | 71.8 ? -6% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.5 ? | 64.4 ? 5% | 63.9 ? 4% | 63.6 ? 3% | 60.9 ? -1% | 67 ? 9% | 52.9 ? -14% |
Arena of Valor
Temple Run 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sharp D10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.64 / 1.81 / 1.91 Watt |
| Carga |
4.88 / 6.38 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Sharp D10 2900 mAh | Motorola One 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 47% | 21% | 1% | 21% | -21% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.71 -11% | 0.39 39% | 0.7 -9% | 1 -56% | 0.35 45% | 1.113 ? -74% | 0.894 ? -40% |
| Idle Average * | 1.81 | 1.36 25% | 1.06 41% | 1 45% | 1.6 12% | 1.81 -0% | 2.19 ? -21% | 1.456 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.91 | 1.47 23% | 1.08 43% | 1.4 27% | 2 -5% | 1.83 4% | 2.55 ? -34% | 1.616 ? 15% |
| Load Average * | 4.88 | 5.13 -5% | 1.82 63% | 3.7 24% | 3.3 32% | 3.31 32% | 4.32 ? 11% | 6.45 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.38 | 7.89 -24% | 3.21 50% | 5.2 18% | 5.1 20% | 4.97 22% | 5.5 ? 14% | 9.8 ? -54% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | Sharp D10 2900 mAh | Motorola One 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | 45% | -1% | 0% | 69% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2080 | 1467 -29% | 1950 -6% | 1652 -21% | 4682 125% | |
| H.264 | 706 | 836 18% | 1096 55% | 769 9% | 893 26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 651 | 605 -7% | 904 39% | 644 -1% | 735 13% | 837 29% |
| Load | 272 | 273 0% | 525 93% | 268 -1% | 529 94% |
Pro
Contra
Nosso teste provou que o Samsung Galaxy J6+ é um smartphone sólido e bem feito, com uma tela táctil decente, materiais premium e um design moderno e atraente. Seu baixo preço, uma autonomia de quase 11 horas e câmeras decentes reforçaram ainda mais essa primeira impressão.
No entanto, nem tudo que reluz é ouro e o J6+ sofre com algumas desvantagens que são mais óbvios do que em dispositivos concorrentes. O desempenho geral do sistema é rápido o suficiente para tarefas simples, mas mesmo sites um pouco mais complexos já podem ser muito difíceis de serem solicitados. Aplicações graficamente exigentes não rodam ou requerem de muito mais paciência durante seu carregamento. A memória interna é limitada a apenas 32 GB, o que é particularmente escasso, considerando que os aplicativos não podem ser descarregados para SD neste dispositivo. Os competidores na faixa de preço do J6+ de $ 250 devem superar ele, no entanto, com seu preço atual de cerca de $180, definitivamente vale apenas um não apenas olhar mais de perto, mas também nosso endosso.
O Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus oferece uma qualidade de construção premium e uma configuração de hardware sólida. O preço recomendado pelo fabricante é definitivamente muito alto, mas ao preço atual de rua, o dispositivo vale seu preço.
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
- 02/28/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
