Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 296 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6" | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Honor 7X IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -46% | 61% | 20% | -44% | 14% | -55% | |
| Brightness middle | 296 | 456 54% | 761 157% | 448 51% | 513 73% | 533.2 80% | 417 41% |
| Brightness | 294 | 455 55% | 723 146% | 451 53% | 506 72% | 511 74% | 421 43% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 90 -3% | 91 -2% | 93 0% | 88 -5% | 88 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.61 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.6 -100% | 2.4 14% | 2.7 4% | 5 -79% | 2.83 -1% | 6.1 -118% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.8 | 11.1 -13% | 5.2 47% | 9.8 -0% | 11.4 -16% | 6.72 31% | 11.2 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 6.9 -263% | 1.8 5% | 1.6 16% | 7.8 -311% | 3.7 -95% | 7.1 -274% |
| Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.06 107% | 2.2 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6398 102% | 7883 82% | 6312 103% | 6557 99% | 7964 82% | 6918 94% | 8362 78% |
| Contrast | 1103 | 1221 | 1523 | 684 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 245.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.8 - 26.4, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3721 - 4968, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11916, n=8) | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 91, n=8) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | Sony Xperia XA2 | Huawei Honor 7X | Nokia 6 2018 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | 112% | -21% | 22% | 38% | 19% | 21% | 1380% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 206.5 | 269.3 30% | 286.6 39% | 204.4 -1% | 271.5 31% | 265.3 28% | 272.6 32% | 242 ? 17% | 1887 ? 814% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 100.5 | 139.5 39% | 216.1 115% | 52 -48% | 127.4 27% | 127.9 27% | 118.3 18% | 100.5 ? 0% | 1471 ? 1364% |
| Random Read 4KB | 27.05 | 36.8 36% | 58.4 116% | 24.07 -11% | 43.07 59% | 81.4 201% | 38.78 43% | 43.2 ? 60% | 278 ? 928% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.37 | 12 -3% | 62.8 408% | 9.9 -20% | 13.82 12% | 20.24 64% | 15.3 24% | 22.4 ? 81% | 311 ? 2414% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.8 ? | 83.9 ? 3% | 83.7 ? 2% | 72.2 ? -12% | 86 ? 5% | 52.7 -36% | 83.4 ? 2% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.8 ? | 72.1 ? 10% | 62.1 ? -6% | 44.21 ? -33% | 64.8 ? -2% | 30.55 -54% | 61.3 ? -7% | 52.9 ? -20% |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Balanced | 10 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.85 / 1.51 / 1.57 Watt |
| Carga |
4.21 / 5.88 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 3000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 30% | 9% | 39% | 17% | -28% | 9% | 3% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.58 32% | 0.5 41% | 0.52 39% | 0.39 54% | 1.02 -20% | 0.67 21% | 0.71 ? 16% | 0.88 ? -4% |
| Idle Average * | 1.51 | 1.31 13% | 1.78 -18% | 1.17 23% | 1.61 -7% | 2.46 -63% | 1.76 -17% | 1.909 ? -26% | 1.444 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 1.33 15% | 1.81 -15% | 1.24 21% | 1.62 -3% | 2.51 -60% | 1.78 -13% | 1.995 ? -27% | 1.6 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 4.21 | 1.88 55% | 3.3 22% | 1.66 61% | 3.12 26% | 4.16 1% | 2.82 33% | 3.02 ? 28% | 6.57 ? -56% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.88 | 3.8 35% | 5.14 13% | 2.94 50% | 4.92 16% | 5.87 -0% | 4.56 22% | 4.42 ? 25% | 9.91 ? -69% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 3000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | 5% | 17% | 20% | -22% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1495 | 1846 23% | 1564 5% | 2503 67% | 1111 -26% | 1833 23% | |
| H.264 | 869 | 542 -38% | 917 6% | 766 -12% | 675 -22% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 708 | 654 -8% | 702 -1% | 738 4% | 886 25% | 664 -6% | 942 33% |
| Load | 297 | 404 36% | 449 51% | 298 0% | 199 -33% | 362 22% |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de nível básico que tem deficiências em algumas áreas cruciais. A Samsung depende muito do peso de sua série Galaxy J, na medida em que recomendamos o Galaxy J5 (2017) do ano passado, sobre o J6 (2018).
O Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de nível básico, mas não se apresse em comprá-lo; o Galaxy J5 (2017) do ano passado oferece mais recursos pela metade do custo.
Existem muitas áreas nas quais o J6 (2018) é mais deficiente do que seu predecessor. Embora a carcaça seja bem trabalhada, é feita de plástico ao invés do alumínio que a Samsung usou no J5 (2017). Além disso, a Samsung removeu a conectividade Wi-Fi de 5 GHz entre gerações, descartou o brilho automático e usou sensores de câmera do J5 (2016). Todos esses erros dificultam o J6 (2018) no uso diário em comparação com seu antecessor.
Esses problemas tomam outras decisões, como a escolha do SoC, a falta de USB Type-C, a ausência do carregamento rápido e uma tela 720p, mais frustrante, ao considerar o que a concorrência oferece agora.
No entanto, o J6 (2018) faz algumas coisas bem. O dispositivo tem slots de cartão microSD e dual nano-SIM dedicados e ampla cobertura LTE; significativamente mais do que o J5 (2017). Da mesma forma, o J6 (2018) vem com o Android Oreo 8.0 e possui um módulo GPS preciso. Por fim, o dispositivo tem boa duração de bateria e sua tela Super AMOLED é brilhante e reproduz cores precisas.
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
- 07/20/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
