Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus (2018)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 558 cd/m²
Contraste: 979:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 IPS, 1480x720, 6" | BQ Aquaris C IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Motorola Moto E5 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Xiaomi Redmi 6 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | 12% | -21% | 10% | 1% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 558 | 623 12% | 483 -13% | 394 -29% | 338 -39% | 518 -7% | 373 -33% |
| Brightness | 549 | 608 11% | 460 -16% | 385 -30% | 327 -40% | 481 -12% | 361 -34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 88 -1% | 93 4% | 82 -8% | 87 -2% | 94 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.61 -7% | 0.4 30% | 0.66 -16% | 0.27 53% | 0.85 -49% | 0.53 7% |
| Contrast | 979 | 1021 4% | 1208 23% | 597 -39% | 1252 28% | 609 -38% | 704 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7 | 4.5 36% | 5.8 17% | 8.2 -17% | 5.36 23% | 4.47 36% | 4.22 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.3 | 7.33 45% | 12.6 5% | 21.5 -62% | 9.77 27% | 8.04 40% | 10.14 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.4 | 4.8 49% | 5 47% | 7.5 20% | 6.2 34% | 5.4 43% | 3.3 65% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.596 85% | 2.6 85% | 2.6 85% | 2.345 94% | 2.318 95% | 2.321 95% |
| CCT | 9626 68% | 7557 86% | 7709 84% | 7581 86% | 8460 77% | 7134 91% | 6862 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 2.1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris C | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| LG K11 | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=10) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
| BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| LG K11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70) | |
| BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (24 - 28, n=5) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 | BQ Aquaris C | Huawei Y6 2018 | LG K11 | Nokia 2.1 | Motorola Moto E5 Plus | Xiaomi Redmi 6 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -17% | -14% | -11% | -7% | 63% | 35% | 3% | 1140% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 292.1 | 275.9 -6% | 254.3 -13% | 253 -13% | 288.3 -1% | 248.5 -15% | 287 -2% | 242 ? -17% | 1834 ? 528% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 99.6 | 45.7 -54% | 65.6 -34% | 48.32 -51% | 51.2 -49% | 137.9 38% | 118.4 19% | 100.5 ? 1% | 1426 ? 1332% |
| Random Read 4KB | 48.42 | 39.1 -19% | 38.8 -20% | 45.8 -5% | 50.5 4% | 62.7 29% | 52.5 8% | 43.2 ? -11% | 278 ? 474% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.33 | 9.8 -26% | 9 -32% | 13.16 -1% | 13.45 1% | 56.1 321% | 36.3 172% | 22.4 ? 68% | 310 ? 2226% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.7 ? | 83 ? 8% | 84.9 ? 11% | 82.8 ? 8% | 79.4 ? 4% | 83.9 ? 9% | 82.9 ? 8% | 71.8 ? -6% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.3 ? | 59.2 ? -5% | 64 ? 3% | 61.1 ? -2% | 61.9 ? -1% | 60.7 ? -3% | 64.4 ? 3% | 52.9 ? -15% |
Dead Trigger 2
Shadow Fight 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
BQ Aquaris C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 81% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 81% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 81% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.68 / 1.78 / 1.82 Watt |
| Carga |
4.44 / 6.13 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | BQ Aquaris C 3000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | -59% | 9% | 15% | 4% | 17% | -23% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.68 | 0.7 -3% | 1.7 -150% | 0.57 16% | 0.7 -3% | 0.9 -32% | 0.6 12% | 1.113 ? -64% | 0.895 ? -32% |
| Idle Average * | 1.78 | 1.9 -7% | 2.5 -40% | 1.48 17% | 1.2 33% | 1.5 16% | 1.3 27% | 2.19 ? -23% | 1.447 ? 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.82 | 2.5 -37% | 3.2 -76% | 1.54 15% | 1.9 -4% | 2 -10% | 2.1 -15% | 2.55 ? -40% | 1.608 ? 12% |
| Load Average * | 4.44 | 4.1 8% | 5.2 -17% | 4.56 -3% | 3.2 28% | 3.2 28% | 3 32% | 4.32 ? 3% | 6.41 ? -44% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.13 | 5.2 15% | 6.8 -11% | 6.16 -0% | 4.8 22% | 4.9 20% | 4.4 28% | 5.5 ? 10% | 9.61 ? -57% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 3300 mAh | BQ Aquaris C 3000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | LG K11 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | -20% | 5% | 14% | 52% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1730 | 1329 -23% | 1425 -18% | ||||
| H.264 | 838 | 702 -16% | 752 -10% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 707 | 583 -18% | 643 -9% | 741 5% | 809 14% | 1078 52% | 695 -2% |
| Load | 398 | 279 -30% | 238 -40% |
Pro
Contra
O Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus (2018) é um impressionante smartphone econômico. Sua tela de 6 polegadas e design elegante fazem o dispositivo parecer mais caro do que é, enquanto sua funcionalidade dual-SIM, tela IPS brilhante, bateria de longa duração e SO Android 8.1 Oreo são impressionantes para um dispositivo tão barato.
O Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus (2018) é um excelente smartphone de nível de entrada com um excelente valor pelo dinheiro.
O antigo SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 ainda se sai surpreendentemente bem em 2018, mas não pode rodar jogos complexos como o Asphalt 9: Legends. A lista de outras desvantagens é agradavelmente curta. Gostaríamos de ver um sensor de digitais e uma porta USB Type-C, mas, infelizmente, a Samsung os reserva para seus dispositivos mais caros. A falta de uma porta USB Type-C também significa que não há funcionalidade de carregamento rápido, e o dispositivo só pode se conectar a redes Wi-Fi de 2,4 GHz; nosso dispositivo de teste se desempenhou abaixo do esperado em nossos testes de Wi-Fi também.
No geral, o Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus (2018) é uma boa opção para quem está à procura de um smartphone com uma grande tela. O dispositivo também não pareceria fora do lugar ao lado de seus irmãos mais caros Galaxy A e S, o que é uma prova de quão bem projetado é o Galaxy J4 Plus (2018).
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
-
12/20/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
