Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 502 cd/m²
Contraste: 1434:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 PLS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia XA1 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 6% | 5% | -42% | -43% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 502 | 448 -11% | 660 31% | 481 -4% | 522 4% | 295 -41% |
Brightness | 494 | 451 -9% | 625 27% | 469 -5% | 499 1% | 299 -39% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 92 3% | 84 -6% | 92 3% | 96 8% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.29 17% | 0.22 37% | 0.74 -111% | ||
Contrast | 1434 | 2276 59% | 2186 52% | 705 -51% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 2.7 41% | 4.9 -7% | 8.1 -76% | 4.2 9% | 5.8 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8 | 9.8 -23% | 7.6 5% | 15.4 -93% | 11.5 -44% | 8.6 -8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.6 36% | 4.8 -92% | 8.5 -240% | 6.4 -156% | 4.8 -92% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.06 107% | 2.18 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 1.84 120% |
CCT | 6351 102% | 6557 99% | 7357 88% | 9014 72% | 7044 92% | 6252 104% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Nokia 3 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Sony Xperia XA1 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G5 | |
Nokia 3 |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | Lenovo Moto G5 | Nokia 3 | Sony Xperia XA1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -0% | 64% | -17% | 72% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 177.7 | 204.4 15% | 230.6 30% | 181 2% | 248.5 40% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 51 | 52 2% | 45.6 -11% | 34 -33% | 127.8 151% |
Random Read 4KB | 24 | 24.07 0% | 37.6 57% | 17.7 -26% | 66.2 176% |
Random Write 4KB | 9.5 | 9.9 4% | 37.9 299% | 5.5 -42% | 13.2 39% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 70.3 | 72.2 3% | 78.5 12% | 64.3 -9% | 78.4 12% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.6 | 44.21 -26% | 58 -3% | 62.9 6% | 68 14% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 14 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.12 / 0.23 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.82 / 1.94 / 2.06 Watt |
Carga |
3.31 / 3.89 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 38% | -4% | 17% | 38% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.82 | 0.52 37% | 0.73 11% | 0.67 18% | 0.64 22% | 0.96 -17% |
Idle Average * | 1.94 | 1.17 40% | 1.64 15% | 1.35 30% | 0.81 58% | 1.14 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.06 | 1.24 40% | 1.68 18% | 1.39 33% | 0.86 58% | 1.23 40% |
Load Average * | 3.31 | 1.66 50% | 3.46 -5% | 3.1 6% | 2.09 37% | 2.45 26% |
Load Maximum * | 3.89 | 2.94 24% | 6.13 -58% | 4.02 -3% | 3.31 15% | 2.92 25% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 18% | -23% | -17% | -8% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 1425 | 1564 10% | 1243 -13% | 1258 -12% | 1433 1% | 1212 -15% |
H.264 | 819 | 917 12% | 616 -25% | 628 -23% | 751 -8% | 590 -28% |
WiFi v1.3 | 722 | 738 2% | 561 -22% | 552 -24% | 675 -7% | 502 -30% |
Load | 305 | 449 47% | 207 -32% | 283 -7% | 256 -16% | 433 42% |
Pro
Contra
A Samsung conseguiu aprimorar com sucesso o seu campeão de vendas, Galaxy J3. A câmera é excelente e sua resolução foi aumentada em comparação com o antecessor. Embora a tela não seja mais uma AMOLED, é mais brilhante. O desempenho corresponde à categoria, o software é extenso e elegante, o módulo GPS nos acompanha com precisão e, embora o design da carcaça seja um pouco restrito, é elegante e sólido. Além do suporte dual-SIM, também é possível inserir um cartão micro-SD.
A crítica só pode ser aplicada aos detalhes: A bateria agora não é removível, motivo pelo qual muitos usuários não gostarão. Os muitos aplicativos pré-carregados também podem dissuadir alguns compradores, mas eles podem ser desinstalados com um pouco de paciência. Uma rede Wi-Fi de 5 GHz teria sido legal e o microfone poderia fazer gravações mais claras.
O Galaxy J3 da Samsung (2017) é um smartphone bem desenvolvido vindo da gama média inferior. O dispositivo oferece muito por pouco dinheiro.
Em resumo, o Galaxy J3 nos deixa com uma alta impressão geral que envolve restrições típicas para a categoria. Os compradores não podem esperar um dispositivo de gama alta por pouco mais de 200 Euros (~ $ 190). No entanto, a Samsung definitivamente aproveita o orçamento apertado e oferece um smartphone com uma relação preço-desempenho muito boa.
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
-
08/04/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer