Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A80 – Um vencedor com uma câmera rotativa?

Name: Samsung Galaxy A80
Brand: Samsung

Magia da câmera.

650 Euros (~$730) são muito dinheiro. Com o Galaxy A80, a Samsung oferece um smartphone topo de gama com uma câmara rotativa e uma frente sem entalhes para este valor. Vamos ver se o A80 oferece um valor suficiente pelo alto preço.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/20/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A80

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

8 GB

Pantalha

6.70 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 106 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, sensor de brilho, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.3 x 165.2 x 76.5

Bateria

3700 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/2.0, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); f/1.2, ToF (camera 3); rotating

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo de carregamento, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat. 12/6 (600 Mbps download, 50 Mbps upload); SAR values: 0.22 W/kg (head), 1.43 W/kg (body), fanless

peso

220 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g

Preço

650 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 9 PureView Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	523 (421^min - 559^max) MBit/s +85%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	502 (465^min - 517^max) MBit/s +78%
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	330 (232^min - 365^max) MBit/s +17%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (278^min - 319^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	285 (249^min - 304^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	282 (249^min - 327^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 9 PureView Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	638 (561^min - 664^max) MBit/s +49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	584 (557^min - 605^max) MBit/s +36%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	578 (474^min - 617^max) MBit/s +35%
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	428 (360^min - 501^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	388 (361^min - 421^max) MBit/s -9%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	339 (325^min - 351^max) MBit/s -21%

Samsung Galaxy A80; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø427 (360-501)

Samsung Galaxy A80; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (249-327)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


484 cd/m²	482 cd/m²	499 cd/m²
483 cd/m²	478 cd/m²	487 cd/m²
485 cd/m²	481 cd/m²	492 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 499 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 485.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.85 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 478 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.031

	Samsung Galaxy A80 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"	Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 7 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Nokia 9 PureView P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6"	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3"
Screen		6%	7%	8%	25%	23%
Brightness middle	478	539 13%	492 3%	603 26%	648 36%	553 16%
Brightness	486	556 14%	475 -2%	605 24%	641 32%	553 14%
Brightness Distribution	96	88 -8%	94 -2%	94 -2%	92 -4%	96 0%
Black Level *			0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.97	3.78 -27%	2.4 19%	3.5 -18%	2.3 23%	2.2 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.18	6.95 32%	5.2 49%	7.7 24%	5.2 49%	5.1 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	2.2 12%	3.2 -28%	2.7 -8%	2.2 12%	1.7 32%
Gamma	2.031 ^108%	2.274 ^97%	2.06 ^107%	2.266 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	6533 ^99%	6013 ^108%	7125 ^91%	6775 ^96%	6592 ^99%	6434 ^101%
Contrast			1230

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2436 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3406 Points +40%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3314 Points +36%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3510 Points +44%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2421 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1601 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2436 - 2527, n=2)	2482 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +130%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6826 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10274 Points +51%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9868 Points +45%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11388 Points +67%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8909 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5826 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6826 - 6871, n=2)	6849 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +131%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	7881 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7442 Points -6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9028 Points +15%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7372 Points -6%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13272 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5542 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7795 - 7881, n=2)	7838 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +59%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	8626 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11890 Points +38%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12778 Points +48%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	12095 Points +40%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9917 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6338 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8626 - 9075, n=4)	8909 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	7177 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9125 Points +27%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9243 Points +29%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9205 Points +28%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8415 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5789 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7177 - 7913, n=4)	7599 Points +6%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	37475 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65945 Points +76%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	57073 Points +52%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64782 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	25783 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (35557 - 40105, n=4)	38270 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	51091 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97354 Points +91%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67388 Points +32%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	83854 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29065 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (46605 - 52736, n=4)	50758 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	19389 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30972 Points +60%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37164 Points +92%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	36069 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	18523 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (19389 - 21898, n=4)	20581 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3415 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5251 Points +54%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4979 Points +46%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7556 Points +121%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6007 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2054 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2950 - 3547, n=4)	3277 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=25, last 2 years)	4239 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3478 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6122 Points +76%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5252 Points +51%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10008 Points +188%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8053 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1918 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2999 - 3604, n=4)	3316 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=25, last 2 years)	4795 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3211 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3505 Points +9%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4214 Points +31%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4068 Points +27%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3179 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2741 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2792 - 3362, n=4)	3151 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=25, last 2 years)	3303 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3479 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5268 Points +51%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5087 Points +46%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7940 Points +128%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6322 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1898 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3002 - 3644, n=4)	3359 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)	11215 Points +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3635 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6358 Points +75%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5327 Points +47%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10302 Points +183%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8435 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1757 Points -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3101 - 3741, n=4)	3448 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)	19933 Points +448%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3025 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3293 Points +9%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4393 Points +45%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4405 Points +46%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3368 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2645 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2702 - 3339, n=4)	3091 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)	5021 Points +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2405 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5068 Points +111%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4238 Points +76%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5648 Points +135%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4612 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1354 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2192 - 2469, n=4)	2379 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)	3014 Points +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2244 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6040 Points +169%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4256 Points +90%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6336 Points +182%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5123 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1185 Points -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2008 - 2299, n=4)	2212 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)	3179 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3215 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3242 Points +1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4175 Points +30%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4093 Points +27%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3418 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2073 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3210 - 3331, n=4)	3246 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)	3259 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2568 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4604 Points +79%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3847 Points +50%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6249 Points +143%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5057 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1433 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2214 - 2619, n=4)	2437 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8239 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2438 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5184 Points +113%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3718 Points +53%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7089 Points +191%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5828 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1268 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2085 - 2465, n=4)	2291 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12402 Points +409%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3160 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3309 Points +5%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4381 Points +39%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4416 Points +40%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3456 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2774 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2827 - 3349, n=4)	3144 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4754 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2262 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3800 Points +68%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5012 Points +122%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4273 Points +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1851 - 2302, n=4)	2119 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=68, last 2 years)	2791 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2160 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4236 Points +96%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5862 Points +171%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4978 Points +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1731 - 2180, n=4)	1997 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=68, last 2 years)	3021 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	2708 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2794 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3324 Points +23%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2857 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2445 - 2862, n=4)	2700 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=68, last 2 years)	2684 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	59 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps +2%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps +2%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (55 - 59, n=4)	57.8 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	84 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps +1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	118 fps +40%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps +99%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	151 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	46 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (67 - 84, n=4)	78 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=173, last 2 years)	297 fps +254%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	36 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps +42%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps +64%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps +67%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	50 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (31 - 37, n=4)	34.5 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +112%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	42 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	50 fps +19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67 fps +60%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	100 fps +138%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	83 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (34 - 42, n=4)	38.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years)	175.8 fps +319%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	26 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps +38%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	48 fps +85%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps +119%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (22 - 27, n=4)	24.8 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	67 fps +158%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35 fps +17%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	50 fps +67%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	67 fps +123%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (24 - 30, n=4)	27.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years)	124.9 fps +316%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	15 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	21 fps +40%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28 fps +87%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	37 fps +147%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	19 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.3 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12 - 15, n=4)	13.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=174, last 2 years)	49.7 fps +231%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +29%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps +88%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps +147%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9.1 fps -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (14 - 17, n=4)	16 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=173, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +342%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +38%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps +94%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps +138%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	7.5 fps -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (13 - 16, n=4)	15 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +218%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps +22%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34 fps +89%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps +139%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (15 - 18, n=4)	16.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years)	85.3 fps +374%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	10 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	14 fps +40%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps +100%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps +160%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4.8 fps -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8.3 - 10, n=4)	9.4 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	39.3 fps +293%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6.8 fps
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8.5 fps +25%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps +106%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps +150%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3 fps -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (5.4 - 6.8, n=4)	6.25 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34.4 fps +406%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	202586 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	321145 Points +59%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	306296 Points +51%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	370908 Points +83%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	287123 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140878 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (202586 - 210836, n=2)	206711 Points +2%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3129 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4389 Points +40%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4746 Points +52%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5089 Points +63%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4285 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2364 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2972 - 3539, n=4)	3242 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +108%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	6484 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8718 Points +34%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8594 Points +33%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8986 Points +39%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7940 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5063 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6426 - 6760, n=4)	6569 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +60%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3435 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4324 Points +26%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5616 Points +63%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5610 Points +63%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4072 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2393 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3435 - 4646, n=4)	4007 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +105%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	3855 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8414 Points +118%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7484 Points +94%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9477 Points +146%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7918 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3175 - 3875, n=4)	3616 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +367%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192	1117 Points
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1171 Points +5%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1404 Points +26%
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1407 Points +26%
Nokia 9 PureView Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1317 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1105 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1099 - 1366, n=4)	1171 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +41%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +211%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	63.1 Points +58%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 74)	60.9 Points +52%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	53.8 Points +34%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	44.6 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (36.6 - 50.1, n=4)	43.5 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	40.02 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +270%
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)	67.9 runs/min +75%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 74)	67.5 runs/min +74%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)	64.1 runs/min +65%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	50.5 runs/min +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (32.8 - 46.5, n=4)	39.9 runs/min +3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)	38.9 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +95%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	110 Points +43%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	107 Points +39%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	99 Points +29%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	89 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	77 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (60 - 86, n=4)	73 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	59 Points -23%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +136%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	25051 Points +53%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	23830 Points +46%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	22500 Points +38%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	16484 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	16358 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12771 - 17501, n=4)	15757 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	10145 Points -38%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	3842 (1^min) ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)	3027 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3436, n=4)	2950 ms * +3%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	2375 ms * +22%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	2048 ms * +32%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	2036 ms * +33%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	1958 ms * +35%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A80	LG G8s ThinQ	Honor View 20	OnePlus 7	Nokia 9 PureView	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		27%	172%	95%	14%	-6%	162%	608%
Sequential Read 256KB	502	791 58%	847 69%	1463 191%	728 45%	426.6 -15%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 51%	1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 277%
Sequential Write 256KB	190.4	182.4 -4%	250.1 31%	392 106%	200.3 5%	194.6 2%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 56%	1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 675%
Random Read 4KB	117.5	138 17%	168.9 44%	175.3 49%	132 12%	116.8 -1%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 30%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 137%
Random Write 4KB	21.6	29.6 37%	138.9 543%	28.7 33%	20.18 -7%	19.79 -8%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 509%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 1344%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				73.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)				59.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43)

Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.3 (1-60)

LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (59-61)

OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)

Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.7 (51-60)

LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (53-61)

OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø26.9 (23-29)

LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø28.1 (26-30)

OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)

Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø26.5 (6-29)

LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø27.9 (24-30)

OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.7 (27-31)

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø27.7 (24-30)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.5 °C	41.4 °C	37.9 °C
40.4 °C	41.4 °C	37.8 °C
40.1 °C	40.3 °C	37.9 °C

Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C


33.3 °C	39.6 °C	38 °C
33.9 °C	38.7 °C	38 °C
34.3 °C	37.5 °C	37.5 °C

Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A80 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 72.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 72.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 72.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.6 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Carga	5 / 7.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7 3700 mAh	Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-43%	-59%	-6%	-67%	-31%	1%	-31%
Idle Minimum *	0.6	1.2 -100%	0.97 -62%	0.6 -0%	1.65 -175%	1.06 -77%	0.643 ?(0.54 - 0.8, n=4) -7%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.6 -33%	2.58 -115%	1.1 8%	2.34 -95%	1.94 -62%	1.235 ?(0.95 - 1.49, n=4) -3%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	2 -43%	2.63 -88%	2 -43%	2.43 -74%	1.98 -41%	1.448 ?(1.08 - 1.8, n=4) -3%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	5	5 -0%	5.24 -5%	4 20%	5.02 -0%	3.56 29%	4.28 ?(2.7 - 5, n=4) 14%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) -32%
Load Maximum *	7.1	10 -41%	8.73 -23%	8 -13%	6.51 8%	7.49 -5%	6.65 ?(5.4 - 7.11, n=4) 6%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) -40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 20min

	Samsung Galaxy A80 3700 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7 3700 mAh	Nokia 9 PureView 3320 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh
Battery Runtime		-6%	14%	20%	-20%	3%
Reader / Idle	1796	1689 -6%	1928 7%	1989 11%	1250 -30%	1780 -1%
H.264	902	753 -17%	932 3%	933 3%	732 -19%	1005 11%
WiFi v1.3	713	693 -3%	969 36%	901 26%	486 -32%	689 -3%
Load	200	203 2%	222 11%	278 39%	202 1%	205 3%

Pro

+ Carga muito rápida

+ Quase toda a frente é a tela

+ Ótima qualidade das selfies

+ Duração da bateria sólida

+ Muitas bandas de frequência LTE

+ Carcaça estável

Contra

- Pesado

- Sem reconhecimento facial

- Sensor de digitais um pouco lento

- A câmera não tem um estabilizador ótico de imagem...

- ... e também não conta com um zoom ótico variável

- GPS bastante impreciso

- Câmera ToF é dificilmente usada

- Qualidade de voz medíocre

Veredicto – Ganho a um preço alto

Testing the Samsung Galaxy A80. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O smartphone Galaxy A80 de alta classe da Samsung é um dispositivo bastante grande e também pesado que ganha pontos com várias inovações: A tecnologia de carregamento rápido que usa 25 watts é convincente e até agora não esteve disponível nos modelos Galaxy-S mais caros.

Ao mesmo tempo, a frente vem completamente sem qualquer entalhe e com marcos muito finos. Isso leva a algumas inovações adicionais, como usar a tela como um fone de ouvido que proporciona uma qualidade de som bastante medíocre, ou o sensor de digitais abaixo da tela que também não funciona tão bem quanto um sensor na carcaça.

Mas a inovação mais espetacular é certamente a câmera principal rotativa que garante selfies de alta qualidade. No entanto, na realidade, a câmera é bastante média, e a câmera ToF embutida também é pouco utilizada, nem para reconhecimento de rosto, nem para truques de operação como no LG G8s ThinQ. Apenas o aplicativo de medição começa a usar a câmera inovadora. Não há zoom óptico nem estabilizador óptico de imagem e, quando a câmera é girada, o flash não funciona. Tudo isso limita o entusiasmo por essa solução.

O Samsung Galaxy A80 não é perfeito e um pouco caro para o que oferece, mas há muitas inovações chamativas.

A duração da bateria é sólida, mas também não há revolução, e o mesmo vale para a tela. Além disso, existem smartphones com mais desempenho e um GPS mais preciso pelo mesmo preço.

Aqueles que se apaixonaram pela câmera rotativa têm que conviver com algumas desvantagens, mas também obter um smartphone de alta qualidade e, apesar de tudo, rápido, com recursos incomuns que dificilmente esquenta.

Samsung Galaxy A80 - 07/18/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

86%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

41 / 60 → 69%

Peso

88%

Bateria

95%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

60 / 63 → 96%

Desempenho da aplicação

69 / 70 → 98%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

57 / 91 → 63%

Camera

79%

Médio

78%

87%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A80 – Um vencedor com uma câmera rotativa?

Florian Schmitt, 2019-07-20 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy A80 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Ganho a um preço alto

More articles related to this device

Price comparison