Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 453 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | 9% | -131% | 27% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 453 | 539 19% | 454 0% | 458 1% | 761 68% | 620 37% |
| Brightness | 459 | 542 18% | 463 1% | 473 3% | 723 58% | 612 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 86 -8% | 88 -5% | 90 -3% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.57 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.6 38% | 2 23% | 7.1 -173% | 2.4 8% | 3.46 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.2 | 2.6 72% | 5.3 42% | 14.5 -58% | 5.2 43% | 7.88 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.5 6% | 1.7 -6% | 10.5 -556% | 1.8 -13% | 3.9 -144% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.28 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.073 106% |
| CCT | 6356 102% | 6422 101% | 6394 102% | 8951 73% | 6312 103% | 7230 90% |
| Contrast | 898 | 1103 | 1088 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 62758, n=4) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.8 - 26.4, n=8) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3721 - 4968, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11916, n=8) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 91, n=8) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | -10% | 18% | 130% | 51% | 29% | 1480% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 208.4 | 182 -13% | 198.5 -5% | 270.5 30% | 286.6 38% | 270 30% | 242 ? 16% | 1839 ? 782% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 100.6 | 77.1 -23% | 53 -47% | 139.6 39% | 216.1 115% | 194.5 93% | 100.5 ? 0% | 1425 ? 1317% |
| Random Read 4KB | 24.54 | 22.41 -9% | 25.86 5% | 37.97 55% | 58.4 138% | 79.5 224% | 43.2 ? 76% | 277 ? 1029% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.68 | 12.13 14% | 10.54 -1% | 12.07 13% | 62.8 488% | 7.1 -34% | 22.4 ? 110% | 309 ? 2793% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.4 ? | 73.7 ? -9% | 76.1 ? -7% | 78.7 ? -3% | 83.7 ? 3% | 84.4 4% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.7 ? | 56 ? -15% | 63.9 ? -3% | 49.77 ? -24% | 62.1 ? -5% | 59.5 -9% | 52.9 ? -19% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high HD | 26 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Balanced | 13 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.27 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.81 / 1.26 / 1.3 Watt |
| Carga |
2.87 / 4.82 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 31% | -28% | -13% | -73% | -18% | -56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.81 | 0.64 21% | 0.39 52% | 0.67 17% | 0.5 38% | 0.7 14% | 0.71 ? 12% | 0.894 ? -10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.26 | 1.36 -8% | 1.06 16% | 1.7 -35% | 1.78 -41% | 2.8 -122% | 1.909 ? -52% | 1.456 ? -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.3 | 1.4 -8% | 1.08 17% | 1.78 -37% | 1.81 -39% | 3.4 -162% | 1.995 ? -53% | 1.616 ? -24% |
| Load Average * | 2.87 | 2.53 12% | 1.82 37% | 4.42 -54% | 3.3 -15% | 4.2 -46% | 3.02 ? -5% | 6.45 ? -125% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.82 | 3.63 25% | 3.21 33% | 6.3 -31% | 5.14 -7% | 7.2 -49% | 4.42 ? 8% | 9.8 ? -103% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 39% | 43% | -2% | 6% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1616 | 2418 50% | 1950 21% | 1840 14% | 1846 14% | |
| H.264 | 868 | 984 13% | 1096 26% | 644 -26% | 542 -38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 608 | 843 39% | 904 49% | 730 20% | 702 15% | 497 -18% |
| Load | 301 | 467 55% | 525 74% | 254 -16% | 404 34% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Galaxy A6 (2018), a Samsung oferece um bom smartphone de gama média, que tem de competir com concorrentes capazes. Ele tem várias vantagens, mas também tem muitas desvantagens.
O Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de gama média, que se desempenha pior do que o seu antecessor, o Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), em várias áreas.
O Galaxy A6 (2018) ganha muitos pontos com o seu bom design, tela brilhante e bem calibrada e longa duração de bateria. Ele também possui Android (8.0 Oreo) atualizado, funcionalidade Dual-SIM real e armazenamento expansível (o armazenamento interno pode ser expandido com a ajuda de um cartão MicroSD). O módulo da câmera não funciona muito bem: A câmera principal de 16 PM produz fotos “boas” durante o dia, mas sofre em condições de baixa luminosidade.
O Galaxy A6 (2018) de 309 euros ($362) vem com algumas desvantagens. A porta Micro-USB está muito desatualizada. Outras desvantagens incluem: Wi-Fi lento, a falta de certificação IP e longos tempos de carga. Com o seu SoC Exynos 7870 e unidade gráfica ARM Mali T830 MP2, o Galaxy A6 (2018) oferece muito desempenho para o uso no dia-a-dia. No entanto, não é nem de longe suficientemente poderoso para jogos. Em resumo, o antecessor, o Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), é uma melhor opção, se você não precisa de funcionalidade Dual-SIM. Oferece mais desempenho a um preço menor.
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
- 06/28/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
