Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A51 – Dedicado ao sucesso

Name: Samsung Galaxy A51
Brand: Samsung

An exemplary mid-range phone.

O Samsung Galaxy A51 é o sucessor de um dos smartphones mais bem sucedidos de 2019. Naturalmente, portanto, nossas expectativas são altas - mas a concorrência nunca dorme. Descubra se o smartphone Galaxy, com seu total de cinco câmeras, pode permanecer firme em nossa análise.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A51 (Galaxy A55 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.50 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 105 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 158.5 x 73.6

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/2.0, phase detection Auto Focus, LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.2, depth of field (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA de carga rápida, cabo USB, headset, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.369W/kg (head), 1.59W/kg (body); LTE speed: 600 Mbit/s (download) and 150 Mbit/s (upload); FM radio, fanless

peso

172 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g

Preço

369 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy A50 Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
81.6 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	Xiaomi Mi 9T SD 730, Adreno 618	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.39"	2340x1080
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Google Pixel 3a SD 670, Adreno 616	147 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.60"	2220x1080
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Huawei Nova 5T Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10	174 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.26"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	541 (422^min - 570^max) MBit/s +82%
Huawei Nova 5T Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	315 (226^min - 345^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (189^min - 335^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	293 (161^min - 346^max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 3a Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	637 (275^min - 679^max) MBit/s +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	333 (297^min - 343^max) MBit/s +12%
Huawei Nova 5T Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	317 (30^min - 340^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	298 (185^min - 350^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s -1%

Samsung Galaxy A51; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø298 (185-350)

Samsung Galaxy A51; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (189-335)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A51

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A51

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A51

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A51: 5.94 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 17.17 ∆E

Photo standard lens – automatic brightness


576 cd/m²	590 cd/m²	601 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	589 cd/m²	602 cd/m²
576 cd/m²	586 cd/m²	609 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 609 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 589.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 589 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111

	Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Google Pixel 3a P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6"	Huawei Nova 5T LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"
Screen		-2%	11%	-33%	-88%
Brightness middle	589	644 9%	589 0%	403 -32%	524 -11%
Brightness	589	628 7%	589 0%	411 -30%	510 -13%
Brightness Distribution	94	91 -3%	96 2%	96 2%	86 -9%
Black Level *					0.39
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.22	2.64 -19%	2.5 -13%	5.1 -130%	6.6 -197%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.24	9.23 -12%	4.9 41%	11 -33%	12.2 -48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	2.5 4%	1.6 38%	2 23%	9.1 -250%
Gamma	2.111 ^104%	2.024 ^109%	2.24 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.34 ^94%
CCT	6508 ^100%	6649 ^98%	6544 ^99%	6589 ^99%	8987 ^72%
Contrast					1344

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	347 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	707 Points +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (345 - 349, n=3)	347 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +167%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1326 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2549 Points +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1063 - 1326, n=3)	1229 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +127%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1522 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3360 Points +121%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1393 - 1522, n=3)	1451 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +174%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1079 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2203 Points +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (663 - 1079, n=3)	932 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +215%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6416 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points +41%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9458 Points +47%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	10209 Points +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7)	6166 Points -4%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5649 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points +33%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7387 Points +31%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8279 Points +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7)	5572 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23866 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points +49%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29229 Points +22%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	40895 Points +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (16738 - 24052, n=6)	21849 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25086 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points +86%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35401 Points +41%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	51362 Points +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15971 - 25625, n=6)	23092 Points -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20393 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points -5%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	18523 Points -9%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	23870 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (13103 - 20393, n=6)	18907 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2068 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points +55%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2477 Points +20%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5638 Points +173%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1595 - 2110, n=6)	1958 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2027 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points +57%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2419 Points +19%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6111 Points +201%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1468 - 2092, n=6)	1944 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2225 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points +46%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2708 Points +22%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4436 Points +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 2286, n=6)	2079 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2060 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points +61%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2582 Points +25%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5990 Points +191%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1662 - 2074, n=6)	1903 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +439%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1993 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points +66%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2533 Points +27%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6350 Points +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1601 - 2021, n=6)	1873 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +889%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2336 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points +41%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2771 Points +19%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4997 Points +114%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1402 - 2336, n=6)	2087 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1592 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points +38%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1651 Points +4%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4835 Points +204%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1342 - 1601, n=7)	1524 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1473 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points +36%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1482 Points +1%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4937 Points +235%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1203 - 1478, n=7)	1422 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +122%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2217 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points +46%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2728 Points +23%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4509 Points +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1415 - 2258, n=7)	2084 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1654 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points +42%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1772 Points +7%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5102 Points +208%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 1659, n=7)	1588 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +370%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1530 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points +42%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1611 Points +5%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5157 Points +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1267 - 1533, n=7)	1488 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +654%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2311 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points +40%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +20%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4917 Points +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1463 - 2332, n=7)	2115 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1554 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points +33%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4434 Points +185%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1442 - 1557, n=7)	1525 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1438 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points +33%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4853 Points +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1320 - 1442, n=7)	1414 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +115%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2161 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points +29%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3406 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1972 - 2163, n=7)	2099 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps +45%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	52 fps +30%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	60 fps +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (25 - 44, n=7)	35.1 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +116%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	46 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps +67%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps +26%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	137 fps +198%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (28 - 48, n=7)	39.1 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +509%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps +48%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	27 fps +17%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	59 fps +157%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15 - 24, n=7)	19.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +228%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	24 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps +58%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps +21%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	88 fps +267%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (17 - 26, n=7)	20.4 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +589%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps +71%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps +36%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	48 fps +243%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7)	13.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps +80%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps +33%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	56 fps +273%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7)	14.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +681%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps +51%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	10 fps +16%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps +226%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)	8.53 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +456%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +60%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps +10%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	32 fps +220%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (6.4 - 10, n=7)	9.43 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +606%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps +65%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps +21%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	33 fps +263%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)	9.26 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +444%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps +60%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +20%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	37 fps +270%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7.8 - 10, n=7)	9.66 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +698%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps +69%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7 fps +27%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	21 fps +282%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)	6.01 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +580%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps +74%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.4 fps +26%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	14 fps +300%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)	3.56 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +814%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	634 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points +246%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points +425%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2811 Points +343%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4689 Points +640%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (634 - 2191, n=7)	1418 Points +124%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +893%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4738 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points +43%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5480 Points +16%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8456 Points +78%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2839 - 4978, n=7)	4361 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +114%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points +55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points +189%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3288 Points +105%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5116 Points +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1291 - 2122, n=7)	1706 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +322%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2168 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points +64%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2818 Points +30%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7640 Points +252%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2127 - 2168, n=7)	2149 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +680%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 Points
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points +9170%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points +10890%
Google Pixel 3a Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1229 Points +12190%
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1462 Points +14520%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 1202, n=7)	620 Points +6100%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +15540%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	181295 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	410820 Points +127%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7)	175473 Points -3%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	62594 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	136978 Points +119%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (43473 - 63005, n=7)	57908 Points -7%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36821 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	135337 Points +268%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (34020 - 46247, n=7)	38422 Points +4%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	43405 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	71845 Points +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29687 - 44128, n=7)	38664 Points -11%
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	38475 Points
Huawei Nova 5T HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	66660 Points +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (33717 - 44600, n=7)	40479 Points +5%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +335%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	47.13 Points +70%
Google Pixel 3a	33.56 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)	28.2 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	27.68 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)	109.9 Points +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	87.5 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	51.3 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)	50.5 Points -2%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +368%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	46.46 runs/min +60%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min +14%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	29.1 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)	29 runs/min 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +161%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)	124 Points +118%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	86 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	57 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)	53.4 Points -6%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +265%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)	22379 Points +120%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	17501 Points +72%
Google Pixel 3a	10844 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	10194 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)	9667 Points -5%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)	4863 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	4375 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms * +11%
Google Pixel 3a	3589 ms * +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	2564 ms * +41%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)	2059 ms * +53%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A51	Samsung Galaxy A50	Xiaomi Mi 9T	Google Pixel 3a	Huawei Nova 5T	Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	4%	-12%	63%	3%	322%
Sequential Read 256KB	496.1	507 2%	492.7 -1%	302 -39%	904 82%	530 ?(286 - 948, n=37) 7%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 271%
Sequential Write 256KB	184.9	192.1 4%	179.2 -3%	253.9 37%	186.4 1%	212 ?(103.4 - 466, n=37) 15%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 671%
Random Read 4KB	110.8	98.9 -11%	128.6 16%	63.6 -43%	146.2 32%	130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37) 18%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 150%
Random Write 4KB	104.4	18.2 -83%	107.8 3%	99.9 -4%	247.1 137%	101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37) -3%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 196%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%				68.3 ?(30.2 - 86, n=20) -6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%				53.2 ?(28.6 - 70.2, n=20) -11%

Samsung Galaxy A51; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.8 (53-61)

Samsung Galaxy A51; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60 (60-61)

Samsung Galaxy A51; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø28.8 (18-31)

Samsung Galaxy A51; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø27.8 (20-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.8 °C	35.9 °C	33.3 °C
39.9 °C	35.5 °C	33.3 °C
39 °C	35.4 °C	32.7 °C

Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 36 °C


32.3 °C	34.7 °C	36.3 °C
31.5 °C	34.2 °C	39.3 °C
31.4 °C	34.4 °C	38.6 °C

Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 65.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	0.9 / 1.7 / 1.8 Watt
Carga	5.2 / 6.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh	Huawei Nova 5T 3750 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9611	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-2%	38%	27%	-12%	-31%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.8 11%	0.54 40%	0.61 32%	0.87 3%	1.173 ?(0.9 - 1.6, n=7) -30%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.7	1.5 12%	0.95 44%	1.56 8%	2.34 -38%	2.28 ?(1.7 - 4.24, n=7) -34%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	1.7 6%	1.08 40%	1.6 11%	2.4 -33%	2.86 ?(1.8 - 4.34, n=7) -59%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 10%
Load Average *	5.2	5.9 -13%	2.7 48%	2.67 49%	4.56 12%	5.97 ?(5 - 6.99, n=7) -15%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -24%
Load Maximum *	6.6	8.3 -26%	5.4 18%	4.33 34%	6.97 -6%	7.83 ?(6.3 - 9.4, n=7) -19%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 06min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 49min

	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh	Huawei Nova 5T 3750 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	25%	-12%	11%
Reader / Idle	1689	1587 -6%	2138 27%
H.264	846	869 3%	1208 43%
WiFi v1.3	698	701 0%	991 42%	612 -12%	776 11%
Load	289	275 -5%	258 -11%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e elegante

+ Câmera flexível de boa quality

+ Muitas bandas LTE

+ Slot microSD dedicado

+ 60-fps em alguns jogos

+ Tela com cores precisas e brilhante

+ Quase sem desenvolvimento de calor

Contra

- Desempenho médio para essa faixa de preço

- A duração da bateria poderia ser mais longa

- Sem zoom continuo

- A navegação é lenta

Veredicto – boa gama média

O Galaxy A51 da Samsung é outro dispositivo intermediário que praticamente não apresenta fraquezas reais. Suas câmeras são um dos destaques - embora ainda seja perceptível a lacuna em relação aos gama alta, por exemplo, quando se trata de desempenho com pouca luz ou zoom. No entanto, o Galaxy A51 pode tirar algumas fotos muito legais. A tela AMOLED brilhante é outro prazer - ficamos particularmente impressionados com a boa tela colorida.

O telefone suporta uma quantidade significativamente maior de frequências LTE do que seu antecessor, mas o Wi-Fi continua lento.

A Samsung poderia ter trabalhado um pouco mais em termos de desempenho e a duração da bateria não consegue acompanhar a de outros dispositivos. Esses são aspectos particularmente perceptíveis em uma comparação direta. Ainda assim, o Galaxy A51 é um telefone confiável de gama média.

O Galaxy A51 é um smartphone de gama média que faz um bom trabalho em todas as áreas e tira boas fotos.

Como a Samsung realmente não cometeu nenhum erro, podemos definitivamente recomendar o smartphone Galaxy A51.

Samsung Galaxy A51 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 65%

Peso

90%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

17 / 64 → 27%

Desempenho da aplicação

50 / 86 → 58%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

71 / 90 → 79%

Camera

63%

Médio

73%

80%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A51 – Dedicado ao sucesso

Florian Schmitt, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – boa gama média

More articles related to this device

Price comparison