Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50

Name: Samsung Galaxy A50
Brand: Samsung

Diversão de foto tripla?

Câmeras traseiras triplas e uma tela AMOLED brilhante em um smartphone de gama média? Isso pode soar como uma mistura inebriante, mas será que o Samsung Galaxy A50 consegue atender às expectativas? Continue lendo esta análise para descobrir.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/22/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A50 (Galaxy A55 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 9610 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memória

4 GB

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 2.5D curved, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 106 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headphone jack, Card Reader: up to 512 GB microSD cards, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Accelerometer, compass, gyroscope, proximity sensor, USB Type-C

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 158.5 x 74.7

Bateria

15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging, 15 W

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 25 MPix , f/1.7, Phase Comparison AF, LED Flash, videos @ 1080p/30 FPS (Camera 1); 8.0 MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Depth of Field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Mono speaker on the underside of the device, Teclado: virtual keyboard, Charger, USB cable, SIM tool, headphones, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: 1.39 W/kg – Body, 0.27 W/kg – Head. LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s downloads, 50 MBit/s uploads. FM radio, fanless

peso

166 g

Preço

350 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (164^min - 362^max) MBit/s +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	232 (217^min - 244^max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +131%
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	334 (311^min - 342^max) MBit/s +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (265^min - 284^max) MBit/s -5%

Samsung Galaxy A50; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (278-302)

Samsung Galaxy A50; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (250-285)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


587 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	646 cd/m²
634 cd/m²	644 cd/m²	639 cd/m²
623 cd/m²	638 cd/m²	644 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 646 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 628.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 644 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
141.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.024

	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Nokia 7.1 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		23%	-62%	-96%	29%
Brightness middle	644	570 -11%	537 -17%	577 -10%	593 -8%
Brightness	628	565 -10%	525 -16%	550 -12%	587 -7%
Brightness Distribution	91	93 2%	85 -7%	91 0%	94 3%
Black Level *			0.58	0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.64	1.5 43%	6.41 -143%	7.4 -180%	0.9 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.23	3.6 61%	10.86 -18%	15 -63%	2 78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	6.7 -168%	10.2 -308%	1.5 40%
Gamma	2.024 ^109%	2.07 ^106%	2.099 ^105%	2.29 ^96%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6649 ^98%	6504 ^100%	8310 ^78%	9657 ^67%	6548 ^99%
Contrast			926	1603

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points -22%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1333 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1721 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +226%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points -11%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4902 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5605 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +181%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points -13%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4560 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	4913 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +156%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points +8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6343 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	7029 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points +8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5663 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5827 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points +22%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	19762 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +288%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	16037 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points +26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	20610 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +542%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	16593 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points +10%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	17274 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	14353 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	960 Points -33%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1462 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +401%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1430 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	845 Points -34%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1323 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +679%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1279 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +271%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1829 Points -25%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2316 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2432 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1071 Points -36%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1534 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +347%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1667 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +566%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	954 Points -39%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1396 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +563%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1553 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1871 Points -17%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2347 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2241 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +123%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points -43%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	945 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +325%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1296 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	634 Points -45%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	811 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +453%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1149 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1821 Points -23%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2251 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2351 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	737 Points -45%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1009 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +345%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1328 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +522%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	629 Points -47%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	869 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +496%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1188 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +945%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1845 Points -19%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2310 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2266 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=69, last 2 years)	2784 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=69, last 2 years)	3009 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=69, last 2 years)	2686 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -3%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	34 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	36 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +141%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	35 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +328%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	39 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +659%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	15 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +186%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	21 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +262%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -30%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	16 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +335%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	23 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +661%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -25%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	9.6 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +346%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +413%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	10 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +393%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	14 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +788%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.9 fps -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +369%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +511%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6.3 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +372%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +740%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps -32%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.5 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +351%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps +518%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -40%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +356%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +843%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps -59%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	3.5 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +390%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	4.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps +694%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2.2 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +416%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	3.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +997%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points -18%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	116496 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +160%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	144194 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2009 Points -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1941 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2193 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +196%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4506 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4457 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5112 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +102%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2445 Points -2%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1917 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2492 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +183%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1356 Points -31%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1590 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +374%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1957 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +820%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1090 Points +18%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1046 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	927 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +70%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +335%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	33.1 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +142%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	62 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points -8%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	54 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +273%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	10322 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points -11%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	8627 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * -23%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	4562 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4123 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	3897 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +52%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +61%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A50	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Nokia 7.1	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-18%	43%	-27%	248%	131%	682%
Sequential Read 256KB	507	295.8 -42%	283.6 -44%	250.9 -51%	666 31%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 50%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 272%
Sequential Write 256KB	192.1	104.9 -45%	208.7 9%	126 -34%	388.3 102%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 55%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 666%
Random Read 4KB	98.9	84 -15%	76.6 -23%	44.9 -55%	149.4 51%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 55%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 181%
Random Write 4KB	18.2	15.45 -15%	73.1 302%	11.93 -34%	165.3 808%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 623%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 1609%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%		76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%		59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -2%

Samsung Galaxy A50; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (55-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.3a: Ø29.5 (28-31)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.3a: Ø28.9 (24-31)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.0: Ø59.2 (52-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.0: Ø59.3 (52-60)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


42.9 °C	37.4 °C	34.1 °C
41.6 °C	37.1 °C	34.6 °C
40 °C	36.9 °C	34.3 °C

Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C


31.7 °C	34.7 °C	40.7 °C
32 °C	35 °C	40.1 °C
32.5 °C	35.9 °C	38.1 °C

Máximo: 40.7 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Carga	5.9 / 8.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9610	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	-11%	-7%	16%	0%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.71 11%	1.1 -38%	1.01 -26%	0.67 16%	0.8 ?() -0%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) -10%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.36 9%	1.7 -13%	2.2 -47%	1.26 16%	1.5 ?() -0%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.47 14%	2.1 -24%	2.25 -32%	1.29 24%	1.7 ?() -0%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 5%
Load Average *	5.9	5.13 13%	5.1 14%	3.76 36%	3.71 37%	5.9 ?() -0%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -11%
Load Maximum *	8.3	7.89 5%	7.9 5%	5.56 33%	9.3 -12%	8.3 ?() -0%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		26h 27min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 35min

	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-11%	-44%	-8%
Reader / Idle	1587	1467 -8%		983 -38%	1650 4%
H.264	869	836 -4%	809 -7%	507 -42%	1008 16%
WiFi v1.3	701	605 -14%	715 2%	346 -51%	546 -22%
Load	275	273 -1%	196 -29%	156 -43%	194 -29%

Pro

+ decent performance

+ great display

+ strong battery life

+ dedicated microSD slot

+ modern design

Contra

- imprecise fingerprint reader

- inaccurate GPS

- fixed focus front-facing camera

- preinstalled advertising apps

Samsung Galaxy A50 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an excellent midrange smartphone. It draws on the successes of its predecessor, like with its triple rear-facing cameras, but it blends these with a more modern design and an improved SoC.

The A50 has few shortcomings, although its fingerprint sensor takes longer to recognise fingers and has a lower detection rate than conventional sensors do. Moreover, its GPS module is oddly inaccurate and its Wi-Fi performance on occasion was worse than its predecessor.

Great screen, long battery life, decent cameras. The Samsung Galaxy A50 delivers in all key areas and is a triumph of a midrange smartphone.

Samsung has also compromised on some areas like limiting LTE performance below what the SoC can achieve, which seems arbitrary. The inclusion of a fixed focus front-facing sensor makes little sense too.

With that said, the A50 makes real strides in other areas compared to the Galaxy A7 (2018). The Exynos 9610 is a big leap from the Exynos 7885, and it even edges out comparable Snapdragon chips. Samsung has included an approximately 20% larger battery too, which helps the A50 deliver better runtimes than its predecessor.

Overall, the Galaxy A50 would be an excellent choice for anyone looking for a smartphone that costs around 350 Euros (~$392). However, last year’s Galaxy A7 (2018) offers almost the same experience in an older design at a fraction of the cost.

Samsung Galaxy A50 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

46 / 70 → 65%

Peso

91%

Bateria