Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 660 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -21% | -102% | -137% | -206% | -34% | -150% | |
| Brightness middle | 539 | 378 -30% | 485 -10% | 328 -39% | 421 -22% | 509 -6% | 451 -16% |
| Brightness | 542 | 380 -30% | 481 -11% | 334 -38% | 430 -21% | 511 -6% | 443 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 90 -3% | 88 -5% | 84 -10% | 93 0% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.95 -22% | 4.2 -163% | 4.6 -188% | 7.1 -344% | 2.2 -38% | 5.4 -238% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 3.09 -19% | 7.9 -204% | 14.7 -465% | 15.3 -488% | 5.8 -123% | 9.9 -281% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.86 -24% | 4.8 -220% | 2.8 -87% | 6.8 -353% | 2 -33% | 6.7 -347% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.36 93% | 2.29 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6422 101% | 6376 102% | 7568 86% | 6612 98% | 7866 83% | 6768 96% | 8262 79% |
| Contrast | 970 | 1128 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Huawei Nova Plus | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Honor 8 | ZTE Axon 7 | OnePlus 3T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 27% | 63% | 36% | 115% | 305% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 182 | 209.4 15% | 241.6 33% | 254.8 40% | 247.5 36% | 406.5 123% | 436.4 140% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.1 | 60.4 -22% | 82.1 6% | 73.1 -5% | 119.3 55% | 150.9 96% | 165.3 114% |
| Random Read 4KB | 22.41 | 22.9 2% | 35.64 59% | 38.78 73% | 34.16 52% | 121.1 440% | 123.6 452% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.13 | 11.2 -8% | 30.12 148% | 45.58 276% | 31.5 160% | 16.22 34% | 74.4 513% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.7 | 41.64 -44% | 74.6 1% | 53.7 -27% | 78.4 6% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 56 | 33.32 -40% | 50.6 -10% | 23.59 -58% | 51.3 -8% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.64 / 1.36 / 1.4 Watt |
| Carga |
2.53 / 3.63 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -16% | 23% | -53% | -50% | -84% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.96 -50% | 0.49 23% | 0.51 20% | 0.78 -22% | 0.64 -0% | 0.61 5% |
| Idle Average * | 1.36 | 1.64 -21% | 1.63 -20% | 0.87 36% | 1.89 -39% | 0.84 38% | 1.77 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.4 | 1.71 -22% | 1.76 -26% | 0.9 36% | 2.02 -44% | 0.87 38% | 1.81 -29% |
| Load Average * | 2.53 | 2.98 -18% | 2.98 -18% | 1.69 33% | 5.28 -109% | 6.02 -138% | 6.67 -164% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.63 | 5.08 -40% | 4.99 -37% | 4 -10% | 5.44 -50% | 10.45 -188% | 10.98 -202% |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -17% | 16% | -43% | -39% | -35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2418 | 2323 -4% | 2048 -15% | 2540 5% | 1487 -39% | 1735 -28% | 1423 -41% |
| H.264 | 984 | 672 -32% | 732 -26% | 1190 21% | 526 -47% | 704 -28% | 810 -18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 843 | 626 -26% | 820 -3% | 824 -2% | 499 -41% | 411 -51% | 494 -41% |
| Load | 467 | 483 3% | 366 -22% | 652 40% | 255 -45% | 245 -48% | 282 -40% |
Pro
Contra
A nova versão 2017 do Samsung Galaxy A5 (SM-A520F) é de forma alguma inferior a seus concorrentes - o fabricante coreano entre um smartphone realmente muito bom. Seu design bem-sucedido e, sobre tudo, sua excelente duração da bateria são convincentes. Embora o desempenho não estabeleça padrões, é muito adequado para a faixa de preços. Somente a IU Grace não roda com muita fluidez, mas é uma melhoria sobre os seu predecessor TouchWiz. As câmeras tiram boas fotos, embora nós teríamos desejado uma melhor configuração para a função de vídeo. A resistência á água e poeira, que também encontramos nos modelos premium da Samsung, é única nesta faixa de preços. A tela simplesmente é excelente. No entanto, os usuários que reagem de forma sensíveis ao flickering PWM, como é caso aqui, deveriam considerar isto quando estiverem escolhendo um smartphone.
A Samsung melhorou os pontos mais importantes em seu novo Galaxy A5 e convence principalmente com a sua excelente duração de bateria.
O Galaxy A5 (2017) não apresenta grandes desvantagens, mas apenas pequenos detalhes, como o armazenamento lento, a falta de OTG e dual-SIM, certamente poderiam ser fatores decisivos para alguns compradores.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
- 02/07/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
