Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)

Gama média atualizada. Apenas um ano depois da primeira geração do Galaxy A5, a Samsung introduz o sucessor. As atualizações são encontradas na tela, módulo wireless, bem como o SoC. No entanto, o desempenho ainda demonstra ser uma desvantagem menor.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 (Galaxy Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.8 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: micro-SD (máx. 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: brightness sensor, proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, eCompass, pedometer, position sensor, magnetometer, USB-OTG, WiFi Direct, ANT+, rádio FM, SAR head: 0,29 W/kg, SAR body: 0,47 W/kg
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G (GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 4G (LTE Cat. 6 800/850/900/1800/2100/2300/2600 MHz), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 144.8 x 71
Bateria
2900 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 16 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, 28 mm, OIS, auto foco, flash LED
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, 24 mm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, fones, informação da garantia, manual, Google apps, S-Health, S-Planner, S-Voice, Smart Manager, Galaxy apps, Microsoft Office, My Galaxy, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
155 g, Suprimento de energia: 63 g
Preço
430 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.8 mm 74.9 mm 9.85 mm 178 g147 mm 72.6 mm 8 mm 136 g146 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 143 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g144.9 mm 71.8 mm 6.4 mm 147 g143.4 mm 70.5 mm 6.8 mm 138 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Galaxy A5: total
Galaxy A5: total
Galaxy A5: intersection
Galaxy A5: intersection
Galaxy A5: riverside
Galaxy A5: riverside
Garmin Edge 500: total
Garmin Edge 500: total
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: intersection
Garmin Edge 500: riverside
Garmin Edge 500: riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
396
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 379.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.79 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 378 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
10%
-1%
-55%
-18%
-35%
-25%
Brightness middle
378
503
33%
346
-8%
453
20%
335
-11%
451
19%
334
-12%
Brightness
380
498
31%
349
-8%
439
16%
345
-9%
446
17%
341
-10%
Brightness Distribution
91
97
7%
93
2%
91
0%
89
-2%
90
-1%
91
0%
Black Level *
0.38
0.28
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.95
2.09
-7%
1.55
21%
4.7
-141%
2.51
-29%
3.84
-97%
2.84
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.09
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.86
2.12
-14%
2.05
-10%
5.03
-170%
2.59
-39%
3.97
-113%
2.91
-56%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.27 97%
2.15 102%
2.27 97%
2.43 91%
2.46 89%
2.01 109%
CCT
6376 102%
6621 98%
6267 104%
7439 87%
6424 101%
7283 89%
6432 101%
Contrast
1324
1618
1503
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72.04
58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.14

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3607 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2955 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5073 Points +41%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4154 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3330 Points -8%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
692 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
698 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1146 Points +66%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1066 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
721 Points +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3530 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3032 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3458 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4804 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1246 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
747 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
864 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1140 Points
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
38291 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52923 Points +38%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
40780 Points +7%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45927 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
60804 Points +59%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58535 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37854 Points -1%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41676 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65936 Points +58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1350 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1777 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1660 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1267 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2686 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2151 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1002 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1060 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1320 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1517 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1503 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1152 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
846 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
169 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1096 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
385 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1186 Points
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
938 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
211 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1479 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
831 Points -44%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1051 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1553 Points +5%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1414 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1453 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
275 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1942 Points +606%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
618 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1492 Points +443%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1854 Points +574%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
272 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
336 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1497 Points +346%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
680 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1505 Points +348%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1734 Points +416%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
332 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9495 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12451 Points +31%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9423 Points -1%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10494 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
18649 Points +96%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10985 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10424 Points +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7542 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22180 Points +194%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9015 Points +20%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8743 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
23193 Points +208%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31858 Points +322%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7536 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7903 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18898 Points +139%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9163 Points +16%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9080 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22002 Points +178%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22400 Points +183%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8030 Points +2%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9808 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8761 Points -11%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9404 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10270 Points +5%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4451 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4969 Points +12%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6064 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4449 Points 0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5066 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5498 Points +9%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6584 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5090 Points 0%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9265 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8656 Points -7%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9337 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10466 Points +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8329 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9962 Points +20%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10515 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8304 Points 0%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8520 Points
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9639 Points +13%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10228 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8704 Points +2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +171%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +14%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
30 fps +114%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47 fps +236%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps +164%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +14%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
46 fps +229%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps +243%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.8 fps
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +347%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6.7 fps +76%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.8 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16 fps +321%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +505%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps +26%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.8 fps
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +321%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6.4 fps +68%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
22 fps +479%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +505%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps +26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
769 Points +4%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
786 Points +6%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -6%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
923 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
733 Points -1%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
488 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2038 Points +318%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
726 Points +49%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
882 Points +81%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2631 Points +439%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
488 Points 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
554 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1115 Points +101%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1018 Points +84%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1216 Points +119%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1297 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
569 Points +3%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2153 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1730 Points -20%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1595 Points -26%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1860 Points -14%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2536 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2095 Points -3%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
810 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1318 Points +63%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points +21%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points +34%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1681 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
808 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3611 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8202 Points +127%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3911 Points +8%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4084 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8518 Points +136%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3627 Points 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11887 ms *
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4734 ms * +60%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11054 ms * +7%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11808 ms * +1%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585 ms * +45%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11603 ms * +2%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points +105%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
24.79 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.19 Points +124%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.29 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.1 Points +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
107 Points +67%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
69 Points +8%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
70 Points +9%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
68 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
209.4 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
245.2 MB/s +17%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
187.6 MB/s -10%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.9 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 MB/s +52%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.2 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
215.9 MB/s +3%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60.4 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.6 MB/s +63%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.61 MB/s -34%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.58 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
138.9 MB/s +130%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.5 MB/s +108%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MB/s -4%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.9 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.8 MB/s +8%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10 MB/s -56%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.46 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
80 MB/s +249%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.57 MB/s -1%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11.2 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.21 MB/s +9%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.61 MB/s -68%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.04 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19.9 MB/s +78%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11.07 MB/s -1%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
554 Points
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1115 Points +101%
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1018 Points +84%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1216 Points +119%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1297 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
569 Points +3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high34 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.9 °C34.5 °C31.6 °C 
 35.5 °C33.1 °C31.3 °C 
 34.2 °C32.3 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
31.6 °C32.9 °C33.8 °C
31.5 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C
30.8 °C31.2 °C31.7 °C
Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Heat
6%
-3%
5%
4%
-23%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
35.9
34.4
4%
41.3
-15%
35.7
1%
35.6
1%
45.8
-28%
33.5
7%
Maximum Bottom *
33.8
37.4
-11%
39.8
-18%
31.3
7%
35.9
-6%
43.5
-29%
34
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
32.8
28.2
14%
28.7
12%
33.2
-1%
29.4
10%
38.9
-19%
27.8
15%
Idle Bottom *
31.5
25.8
18%
28.4
10%
27.6
12%
28.6
9%
36.9
-17%
27.4
13%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.64 / 1.71 Watt
Carga midlight 2.98 / 5.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-12%
1%
-26%
10%
-16%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
0.55
43%
0.9
6%
0.7
27%
0.4
58%
0.6
37%
1.68
-75%
Idle Average *
1.64
1.44
12%
1.2
27%
2
-22%
0.6
63%
1.7
-4%
2.2
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.71
1.9
-11%
1.4
18%
2.1
-23%
1.2
30%
1.8
-5%
2.33
-36%
Load Average *
2.98
3.36
-13%
3.8
-28%
4.9
-64%
5
-68%
5.7
-91%
4.09
-37%
Load Maximum *
5.08
9.76
-92%
5.9
-16%
7.4
-46%
6.8
-34%
6
-18%
5.92
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
38h 43min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 38)
10h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
8h 03min
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-31%
-47%
-41%
-37%
-38%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2323
1775
-24%
1154
-50%
826
-64%
1300
-44%
1393
-40%
1615
-30%
H.264
672
555
-17%
465
-31%
581
-14%
580
-14%
773
15%
WiFi v1.3
626
412
-34%
368
-41%
434
-31%
475
-24%
356
-43%
546
-13%
Load
483
245
-49%
176
-64%
215
-55%
278
-42%
229
-53%
402
-17%
WiFi
575

Pro

+ Excelente tela
+ Construção muito boa
+ Duração da bateria muito longa
+ Baixas emissões
+ Armazenamento expansível mediante micro-SD
+ Leitor de digitais

Contra

- Desempenho médio
- Bateria não removível
- Lado traseiro liso
- PWM flickering
In review: Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.

O Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) demonstra ser um avanço bem-sucedido do predecessor em quase todas as áreas. O smartphone de gama média é mais uma vez, muito elegante e, fora o flickering, ele possui um dos melhores painéis deste segmento. As câmeras também foram um pouco melhoradas. Outros pontos extras são as baixas emissões e a longa duração da bateria.

Grandes desvantagens não são encontradas. Teríamos desejado Wi-Fi ac, e a carcaça é bastante escorregadia devido à sua traseira de vidro, o qual diminui a boa impressão geral até certo ponto. No entanto, o maior problema é - como no predecessor - o desempenho. Com um preço recomendado de rua de 429 Euros (~$466), teríamos esperado um pouco mais de poder. O Galaxy A5 não apenas fica atrás se seus oponentes nos benchmarks, mas também são notados pequenos lags e falhas de vez em quando durante o uso diário. Se os modelos da gama média da linha A serão atualizados para Android 6.0 ainda não é certo.

A Samsung mais uma vez fornece um smartphone de muita alta qualidade e também caro com o seu novo Galaxy A5. A tela pertence a melhor do seu tipo, mas fica atrás de seus rivais em termos de desempenho.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 - 02/26/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
93%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
46 / 60 → 76%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
15 / 63 → 24%
Desempenho da aplicação
35 / 70 → 50%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
68%
Médio
72%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-03- 6 (Update: 2016-03-15)