Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A10: Poder em plástico

Name: Samsung Galaxy A10
Brand: Samsung

Jogos em 60 FPS a um preço acessível.

Sem surpresa, a Samsung fez alguns compromissos para o modelo mais barato em sua série Galaxy A. No entanto, o Galaxy A10 não é desleixado e funciona bem para um smartphone de menos de US$ 200. Leia mais para descobrir em quais áreas a Samsung fez bem e onde o Galaxy A10 fica aquém dos seus mais preciosos irmãos da série Galaxy A.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A10 (Galaxy A10 Serie)

Processador

Samsung Exynos 7884B 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Placa gráfica

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Memória

2048 MB

Pantalha

6.20 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 271 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, micro USB

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 155.6 x 75.6

Bateria

3400 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/1.9, 28 mm, Contrast AF, LED flash, videos a 1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na traseira do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.09 W/kg, Head - 0.321 W/kg. LTE: 150 Mbps downloads, 50 Mbps uploads. FM radio, fanless

peso

168 g, Suprimento de energia: 44 g

Preço

150 Euro

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 (52^min - 61^max) MBit/s +9%
Nokia 3.2 Adreno 504, SD 429, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51.1 (46^min - 55^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A10 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	50.6 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (23^min - 50^max) MBit/s -22%
Huawei Y6 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	37.8 (29^min - 46^max) MBit/s -25%
Honor 8A PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash	36.9 (22^min - 52^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Y6 2019 PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash	69 (61^min - 66^max) MBit/s +29%
Honor 8A PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash	66 (58^min - 65^max) MBit/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (47^min - 67^max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy A10 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.6 (39^min - 60^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	51.4 (49^min - 54^max) MBit/s -4%
Nokia 3.2 Adreno 504, SD 429, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.7 (32^min - 51^max) MBit/s -17%

Samsung Galaxy A10; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (39-60)

Samsung Galaxy A10; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø49.7 (27-58)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


407 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	426 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	435 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	445 cd/m²	419 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 451 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 430.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 2050:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.206

	Samsung Galaxy A10 IPS, 1520x720, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8"	Honor 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.1"	Xiaomi Redmi 7 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"	Huawei Y6 2019 IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.1"	Nokia 3.2 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3"
Screen		-16%	-7%	-6%	2%	-22%
Brightness middle	451	475 5%	522 16%	444 -2%	487 8%	415 -8%
Brightness	430	473 10%	542 26%	441 3%	485 13%	391 -9%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	94 4%	90 0%	89 -1%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.22	0.35 -59%	0.47 -114%	0.45 -105%	0.35 -59%	0.55 -150%
Contrast	2050	1357 -34%	1111 -46%	987 -52%	1391 -32%	755 -63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.44	6.8 -25%	4 26%	3.94 28%	4.3 21%	4.8 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.94	13.4 -12%	9.5 20%	6.72 44%	10.1 15%	9.51 20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.8	8.7 -12%	6.6 15%	4.8 38%	4.1 47%	5.7 27%
Gamma	2.206 ^100%	2.33 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.294 ^96%	2.09 ^105%	2.255 ^98%
CCT	9149 ^71%	9385 ^69%	7258 ^90%	7445 ^87%	7312 ^89%	7824 ^83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

77 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 77 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 77 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1168 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1212 Points +4%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	855 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1227 Points +5%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	832 Points -29%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	860 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1168 - 1216, n=3)	1199 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +370%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	3590 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3714 Points +3%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3834 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4301 Points +20%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2354 Points -34%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	2485 Points -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (3590 - 4082, n=3)	3795 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +320%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	2832 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3271 Points +16%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2893 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3850 Points +36%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1607 Points -43%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1904 Points -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (2832 - 3569, n=3)	3224 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +324%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	6823 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points +1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4045 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7117 Points +4%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4229 Points -38%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	6227 Points -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6316 - 6902, n=3)	6680 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	5136 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points +3%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4886 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	5912 Points +15%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	5511 Points +7%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	4631 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5136 - 5309, n=3)	5250 Points +2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	11324 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11565 Points +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7637 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14786 Points +31%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	8431 Points -26%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	7920 Points -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11324 - 13688, n=3)	12192 Points +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	11335 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11427 Points +1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7061 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14536 Points +28%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7567 Points -33%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	6895 Points -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11335 - 13711, n=3)	12158 Points +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	11287 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12075 Points +7%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10689 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	15735 Points +39%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	14037 Points +24%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	16518 Points +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (11287 - 13610, n=3)	12324 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	681 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points +8%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	491 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	936 Points +37%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	411 Points -40%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	470 Points -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (681 - 876, n=3)	765 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +517%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	582 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points +9%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	429 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	807 Points +39%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	357 Points -39%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	399 Points -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (582 - 766, n=3)	662 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +714%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1674 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points -2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	997 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2132 Points +27%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	869 Points -48%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1235 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1646 - 1756, n=3)	1692 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	746 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	741 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	943 Points +26%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	505 Points -32%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	462 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (746 - 937, n=3)	814 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +1389%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	646 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	695 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	813 Points +26%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	450 Points -30%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	393 Points -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (646 - 826, n=3)	710 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +2951%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1629 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	961 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2147 Points +32%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	889 Points -45%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1195 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1624 - 1768, n=3)	1674 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +207%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	531 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points -1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	270 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	516 Points -3%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	298 Points -44%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	189 Points -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (526 - 654, n=3)	570 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +481%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	444 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	223 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	424 Points -5%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	250 Points -44%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	152 Points -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (443 - 555, n=3)	481 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +635%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1682 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points -3%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	998 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2119 Points +26%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	898 Points -47%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1207 Points -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1630 - 1747, n=3)	1686 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	524 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	496 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	567 Points +8%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	238 Points -55%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	257 Points -51%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (524 - 588, n=3)	546 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +1382%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	439 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	432 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	469 Points +7%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	197 Points -55%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	210 Points -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (439 - 498, n=3)	459 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +2528%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1615 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points +1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1021 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	2133 Points +32%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	876 Points -46%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1233 Points -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1554 - 1628, n=3)	1599 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	578 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points +3%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	435 Points -25%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	253 Points -56%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	260 Points -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (576 - 598, n=3)	584 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +392%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	480 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points +4%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	355 Points -26%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	203 Points -58%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	209 Points -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (477 - 498, n=3)	485 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +545%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	2051 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points -2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2079 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1740 Points -15%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1849 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (2018 - 2105, n=3)	2058 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	31 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	26 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	37 fps +19%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	20 fps -35%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	17 fps -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (31 - 41, n=3)	34.3 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +178%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	25 fps +25%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	14 fps -30%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	11 fps -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20 - 25, n=3)	21.7 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +1300%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	16 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	19 fps -5%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	11 fps -45%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	8.9 fps -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20 - 27, n=3)	22.3 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +278%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps +10%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.8 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	11 fps +10%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	6.5 fps -35%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	4.7 fps -53%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (10 - 13, n=3)	11.3 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +1553%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.6 fps -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	14 fps 0%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7.6 fps -46%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	6.7 fps -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (14 - 19, n=3)	15.7 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	6.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	5.8 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7 fps +8%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.2 fps -35%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	3.1 fps -52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)	7.03 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +1703%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	8.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps -1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.8 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7.8 fps -10%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	3.1 fps -64%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	3.6 fps -59%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (8.6 - 12, n=3)	9.77 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +449%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	4.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.6 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3.9 fps -5%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2 fps -51%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1.8 fps -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)	4.2 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +1622%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	7.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps -1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.8 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	7 fps -11%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.3 fps -71%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	2 fps -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (7.8 - 10, n=3)	8.57 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +527%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.8 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	3.9 fps -2%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.2 fps +5%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1.8 fps -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4 - 5, n=3)	4.33 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +1895%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	0 fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4.2 fps -12%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.7 fps -44%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)	5.33 fps +11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +679%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps 0%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	0 fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1.3 fps -7%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	0.8 fps -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)	1.533 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +2186%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	89089 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	95464 Points +7%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	102781 Points +15%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	64157 Points -28%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	63459 Points -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (89089 - 102121, n=3)	95558 Points +7%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1576 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1608 Points +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1223 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1695 Points +8%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	986 Points -37%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	997 Points -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1576 - 1658, n=3)	1614 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +300%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	3164 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3372 Points +7%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2533 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	4090 Points +29%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1755 Points -45%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	2020 Points -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (3164 - 3507, n=3)	3348 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +221%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1991 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2008 Points +1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1366 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1758 Points -12%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	1458 Points -27%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	1285 Points -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (1985 - 2008, n=3)	1995 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +240%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	879 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	893 Points +2%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	792 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1072 Points +22%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	470 Points -47%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	481 Points -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (879 - 1113, n=3)	962 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +1824%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048	1113 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1106 Points -1%
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	816 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072	1071 Points -4%
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	785 Points -29%
Nokia 3.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Adreno 504, 2048	790 Points -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (977 - 1113, n=3)	1065 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +41%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +415%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	26.9 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)	23.4 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)	22.5 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.49 Points -8%
Huawei Y6 2019	15.33 Points -34%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)	14.57 Points -38%
Honor 8A	13.6 Points -42%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +558%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)	27.44 runs/min +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	21.63 runs/min +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)	21.5 runs/min +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chome 76)	20.7 runs/min
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)	15.69 runs/min -24%
Nokia 3.2 (Chome 75)	15.57 runs/min -25%
Honor 8A (Chrome)	14.8 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +230%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	58 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)	47 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)	45 Points
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)	36 Points -20%
Huawei Y6 2019	35 Points -22%
Honor 8A (Chrome)	29 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +437%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	8258 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)	7152 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)	6921 Points
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)	4437 Points -36%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)	4392 Points -37%
Honor 8A (Chrome)	4347 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 8A (Chrome)	11323 ms * -91%
Nokia 3.2 (Chrome 75)	10433 ms * -76%
Huawei Y6 2019	10198 ms * -72%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)	5917 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)	5763 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546 ms * +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)	4856 ms * +18%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +74%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A10	Samsung Galaxy A20e	Honor 8A	Xiaomi Redmi 7	Huawei Y6 2019	Nokia 3.2	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		2%	-2%	-0%	2%	-1%	-3%	1080%
Sequential Read 256KB	296.4	300.4 1%	265 -11%	298 1%	279.3 -6%	282.4 -5%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -18%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 520%
Sequential Write 256KB	101.7	103.6 2%	104 2%	84.7 -17%	107.8 6%	106.3 5%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -1%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 1301%
Random Read 4KB	73.4	79.8 9%	61 -17%	73.6 0%	69 -6%	35 -52%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -41%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 277%
Random Write 4KB	13.3	13.18 -1%	15 13%	14.4 8%	15 13%	17.5 32%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 68%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 2223%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	78.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	81.9 4%	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	87.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	61.8 -5%	63.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -19%

Samsung Galaxy A10; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.8 (54-60)

Samsung Galaxy A10; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.4 (53-60)

Samsung Galaxy A10; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø29 (25-31)

Samsung Galaxy A10; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.4 (17-30)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.7 °C	34.6 °C	32.4 °C
37.6 °C	33.8 °C	32.5 °C
36.4 °C	33.8 °C	32.5 °C

Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


30.3 °C	33.4 °C	38.7 °C
30.9 °C	33.6 °C	38.7 °C
30.9 °C	33.6 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 75.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 75.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 75.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga	5.4 / 6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	Honor 8A 3020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh	Huawei Y6 2019 3020 mAh	Nokia 3.2 4000 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 7884B	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		22%	-4%	-2%	17%	-15%	13%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.66 6%	0.73 -4%	1 -43%	0.59 16%	1 -43%	0.67 ?(0.65 - 0.7, n=3) 4%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.63 -2%	2.07 -29%	1.7 -6%	1.94 -21%	1.9 -19%	1.617 ?(1.6 - 1.63, n=3) -1%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.67 16%	2.14 -7%	2.1 -5%	1.96 2%	2.8 -40%	1.777 ?(1.66 - 2, n=3) 11%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	5.4	2.77 49%	4.3 20%	3.3 39%	2.82 48%	4 26%	3.73 ?(2.77 - 5.4, n=3) 31%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	6	3.66 39%	5.96 1%	5.6 7%	3.57 40%	5.8 3%	4.67 ?(3.66 - 6, n=3) 22%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -63%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		24h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 36min

	Samsung Galaxy A10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	Honor 8A 3020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh	Huawei Y6 2019 3020 mAh	Nokia 3.2 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-6%	11%	6%	-4%	27%
Reader / Idle	1489	1432 -4%		1489 0%
H.264	802	753 -6%	917 14%	902 12%	805 0%
WiFi v1.3	753	715 -5%	829 10%	848 13%	732 -3%	958 27%
Load	276	250 -9%	301 9%	268 -3%	249 -10%

Pro

+ Desempenho comparativamente alto

+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado

+ Software atual

+ GPS preciso

+ Tela de alto contraste

+ Temperaturas da superfície baixas mesmo sob uso intenso

+ Alto-falante mono decente

Contra

- Forte oscilação PWM com baixo brilho

- Sem sensor de brilho

- Sem leitor de digitais

- Sem LED de notificações

- Sem bússola

- Qualidade média das chamadas

The Samsung Galaxy A10 smartphone review.

A Samsung tomou decisões estranhas no passado quando se trata de quais recursos exclui de seus smartphones baratos. O Galaxy A10 é um exemplo disso, sem um sensor de brilho, bússola, LED de notificação e leito digitais. Outros smartphones de menos de US$ 200 têm pelo menos alguns desses recursos, o que torna o Galaxy A10 um dispositivo ainda mais complicado de se recomendar às pessoas.

Essas omissões são lamentáveis, pois dificultam o que, de outra forma, seria um smartphone decente. A Samsung colocou muita potência pelo dinheiro, com o Galaxy A10 sendo capaz de rodar alguns jogos modernos a 60 FPS. Nossa unidade de teste também gerencia bem suas temperaturas, enquanto sua única câmera traseira também tira fotos decentes. Da mesma forma, ele possui um módulo GPS razoavelmente preciso e uma tela rica em contraste. Além disso, é raro ver um smartphone econômico com o Android 9.0 Pie.

O Galaxy A10 oferece muita potência pelo dinheiro, mas a Samsung comprometeu-se em muitas áreas para que possamos recomendá-lo.

Em última análise, o Galaxy A10 é um smartphone de orçamento sólido, se você pode ignorar a estranha tomada de decisão da Samsung. No entanto, a falta de recursos básicos, como o brilho automático e um sensor de digitais, pode fazer com que muitas pessoas procurem outra coisa.

Samsung Galaxy A10 - 10/31/2019 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

72%

Teclado

65 / 75 → 87%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

38 / 70 → 54%

Peso

91%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

7 / 64 → 10%

Desempenho da aplicação

48 / 86 → 56%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

48%

Médio

69%

75%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A10: Poder em plástico

Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-21 (Update: 2019-08-23)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy A10 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison