Breve Análise do Smartphone Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 450 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
134.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.162
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS AMOLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8" | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4" | Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 27% | 18% | 49% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle | 450 | 477 6% | 499 11% | 639 42% | 629 40% |
| Brightness | 455 | 453 0% | 506 11% | 637 40% | 636 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 86 -3% | 96 8% | 94 6% | 94 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.39 | 2.1 67% | 4.62 28% | 1 84% | 1.7 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.25 | 8.2 33% | 10.91 11% | 2.2 82% | 3.6 71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.6 57% | 2.2 41% | 2.2 41% | 2.4 35% |
| Gamma | 2.162 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.103 105% | 1.9 116% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 7224 90% | 6425 101% | 6115 106% | 6364 102% | 6337 103% |
| Contrast | 1445 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -34% | -30% | -9% | 15% | 204% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 873 | 749 -14% | 805 -8% | 732 -16% | 829 ? -5% | 1894 ? 117% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 241.7 | 171 -29% | 196 -19% | 208.7 -14% | 376 ? 56% | 1476 ? 511% |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 136 -6% | 134 -7% | 132.3 -8% | 168.8 ? 17% | 278 ? 93% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.3 | 21.75 -86% | 21 -87% | 164.4 3% | 143.6 ? -10% | 312 ? 95% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.18 ? | 77 ? | 66.8 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.23 ? | 66.7 ? | 56.3 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 2.7 / 3.8 Watt |
| Carga |
5.9 / 11.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 17% | 41% | 39% | 20% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.67 33% | 0.9 10% | 0.95 5% | 0.85 15% | 0.978 ? 2% | 0.883 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 2.7 | 2.5 7% | 1.9 30% | 1.34 50% | 1.15 57% | 2.12 ? 21% | 1.467 ? 46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.8 | 2.51 34% | 3.7 3% | 1.48 61% | 1.23 68% | 2.51 ? 34% | 1.621 ? 57% |
| Load Average * | 5.9 | 4.3 27% | 5.3 10% | 4 32% | 4.12 30% | 5.01 ? 15% | 6.58 ? -12% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 6.87 40% | 7.6 34% | 5.13 55% | 8.42 27% | 8.1 ? 30% | 9.91 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | 17% | -10% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1553 | 1347 -13% | 1687 9% | 1442 -7% | 1744 12% |
| H.264 | 754 | 520 -31% | 896 19% | 745 -1% | 929 23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 683 | 547 -20% | 794 16% | 570 -17% | 818 20% |
| Load | 286 | 235 -18% | 354 24% | 245 -14% | 398 39% |
Pro
Contra
O Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS destaca-se como o smartphone de luxo e é ainda mais caro do que o iPhone XS ou XS Max. O sensor de digitais na tela do Mate RS, a memória abundante e as excelentes câmeras tentam justificar o extravagante preço do dispositivo. No entanto, o dispositivo pega emprestado seu sistema de câmera triplo do P20 Pro, e seu sensor de digitais na tela não tem a precisão de seu sensor tradicional.
O Mate RS parece inteligente com sua carcaça resistente e durável. Da mesma forma, o desempenho está no mesmo nível de outros dispositivos com o Kirin 970. Com isso dito, o dispositivo tem muitas fraquezas para seu preço. Nosso dispositivo de teste fica desconfortavelmente quente sob uso intenso e o afogamento térmico é pesado. O consumo de energia também é alto, o que contribui para uma duração de bateria comparativamente fraca. Além disso, a estabilização de imagem não funciona com vídeos 4K e o GPS é muitas vezes impreciso.
O Porsche Design da Huawei Mate RS não pode satisfazer as expectativas elevadas que o seu preço absurdo define.
Há uma abundância de carros-chefes que são de melhor valor pelo dinheiro do que o Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. No entanto, poucos têm o mesmo grau de luxo e prestígio que a marca Porsche Design proporciona.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
- 10/16/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
